Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

• 2015_10_29_325-seq60 translatedText "13 - The Legal Office proposal has been supported and incorporated into the Commission in 15 proposals".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq58 translatedText "12 - Member of Ingmar's Anderson proposal not sponsored by the Commission".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq56 translatedText "11 - The Department of Economic Affairs's proposal for a putras-free proposal has been supported".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq54 translatedText "10 - The half-time proposal of the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, partly supported and incorporated into 7 of the proposals, as well as 9 of the proposal".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq50 translatedText "8 - The Department of Economic Affairs's draft putras proposal has garnered support".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq46 translatedText "6 - Provide of parliamentary secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs in the Commission".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq44 translatedText "5 - The proposal from the Legal Office has gained the support of the Commission".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq42 translatedText "It, looking for 4 proposal 4 - Secretary of State at the Department of Economic Affairs of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, sponsored by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq38 translatedText "2 - proposal by the Legal Office on the composition of the Competition Council and its operation in the Commission".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq36 translatedText "Good afternoon, colleagues, we are working on the bill in the Competition Law Commission as a whole, 23 proposals 1 proposal is proposed by the Legal Office, which has given its support to the Committee.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq35 translatedText "Thank you to Members of the Conference of Members for the Bill to the College to speak to the Commission? Members oppose the fact that this bill is being passed on to the Commission? The Law Committee on Legal Affairs referred to the criminal law, stating that it is the responsible Commission, asking for the result, the 23, against - 39 abstentions, the 13-member committee of the Commission has not referred to the appointment of MEP Elin, Ageshina, Potapkina, Female and Orloon. The amendments tabled by the Committee on Legal Affairs will be put to the vote on Tuesday, vote on a resolution on the subject. In the Code of Administrative Offences referred to as the " responsible Commission, " the committee asked for the result, 23, against: 20, the 30-30 Legal Draft committee has not referred to the outgoing MP, Ageshina, Potapkina, Female, andOrlova's submission of the bill " Amendment to the Law on the Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Public Figures " to be sent to the Public Administration and Local Government Commission to determine that it is responsible for MPs is objections to a call! Potapkina, Orloid and Orlova draft law on " Prevention of conflict of interest in the conduct of public office " Public Administration and Local Government Commission stating that it is responsible to the commission, please voting the result!: 21, against - 49, abstentions- 1 draft law Commission has not referred to the Bureau of Saeima's proposal for a bill to " bring about the expropriation of immovable property required by the Committee on Legal Affairs " to refer to the Committee on Legal Affairs as opposed to the draft legislative proposal? The Commission has been referred to the Commission for the next part-session on the award of the leave of leave for the unpaid leave to Martin Kuchinskim from 27 October to 29 October 2010, Member Maris Kucinskis has asked for an unpaid leave of between 27 and 29. In October, the Saeima Bureau has given this to the Vote Leave, and you, dear colleagues, are aware of this today at the next item on the next item on the next item: the allocated unpaid leave to Armandam Krauzem on 28 and 29 October this year, the Member of the Member State of the Member, Armand Krauzem, told MEPs. Asked to give him an unpaid leave on 28 and 29 October of this year, the Bureau of MPs on this leave has been granted, and it is my job to inform you of this decision on the next item on the next item: the assigned unpaid leave to Mr Alexankafrom 27 October to 29 October this year, the Members of the European Parliament have been asked to grant him an unpaid leave of between 27 and 29 October, and you are aware of this decision and that you are aware of this decision. On 29 October this year, Mr Platgers had asked to give him an unpaid leave on 29 October this year, and you have informed members of Parliament about this today, and you are aware of this today. Before we get to the next chapter on the agenda, we need to decide, on the agenda of today's sitting, that the Commission, the agenda of today's sitting of the House, put the draft law on the Committee on Social Services on the agenda of today's sitting. The Social Aid Law at first reading without a hearing committee does not raise the number of objections to the agenda, as Members of Parliament have modified Savunod debtors, Silba, Dombrava, Cools, Kyelis, Gaidis, Gaidis, and Cilevic are asked to amend todayMembers of the sitting on the Declaration on the protection of young children's rights in the field of the rights of children from Member States were rejected by MEPs on Tuesday. Please vote in favour of the amendments on the agenda for today's sitting, including the draft' Declaration on the protection of minors' rights abroad in the area of the rights of children in the child's rights '. The agenda has been amended by Savi Ribakov, Ageshin, Jakimov, Steunenko, Cilevic, Cilevic, Tutin, Pimenov, Tretjaka and Orlov, who asked for the draft agenda of today's sitting to be included on the draft agenda of today's meeting of MEP Alexander Jakimov@@. Members of the European Parliament oppose the adoption by Ribakov, Mr. Ahbyn, Steunenko, Cilevic, Cilevic, Tutzić, Tretjaka and Orlov, to ask that the agenda of today's sitting on the election of MEP Alexander Jakimovie be included in the agenda of today's sitting :MEPs have reservations? MEPs are not opposed to the agenda unchanged (DEP A Caims: " vote! ") No, dear colleagues, too late in this proposal (DEP A Carover: late?' )I am sorry, from any discussion with the President of the House of Deputies, the Commissioner for the Order of the Order of the Order of the Order of the House of Ministers, on behalf of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, the second reading of the Economic and Economic and Regional Policy Commission:".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq34 translatedText "Dear colleagues, the specific bill and the next draft bill, the bill " Amendment of the Latvian Administrative Code " - debt criteria to which it will be possible to open the public with cases to the authorities concerned by the administrative irregularities or the criminal proceedingsgangland We are proposing that the law incorporate a rule for waiving immunity, including the administrative immunity which is now the subject of a debate in the Committee on Legal Affairs that we have already discussed in part on the issue. Public officials must be made aware of the criminal offence We are proposing a version that states that the state and local authorities are obliged to inform the public of the public disclosure of public health officials in accordance with their competence ;the right to know when a public official has committed an offence to disseminate information to the relevant institution's website, the State Office of Public Figures, is available to us so that information about public health officials' crimes is also available. On state officials, we are accepted to regard all the officials listed in the Law on the Prevention of Conflict of Interest in the Activities of Public Figures in Public Officials on their websites: public office officials: name, name, public office ,position held, the incriminated criminal activity, the nature of the criminal offence and the time of the commission, the decision on the initiation of criminal proceedings, the decision to close the criminal proceedings of the State and the local authorities on the Internet after having entered thethe provisions in force do not apply to offences committed by officials of a national security authority subject to the criteria laid down in the' For State secrets' principle in connection with the concealing of an identity by fellow Members, if we are also debating today at first readingon the issue of the abolition of administrative immunity for Members of the House, and the administrative immunity of members, As well as informing the public about the question or whether, on a case-by-case basis, the public was given the possibility of beingI am confident that officers of the same kind - whether in the administrative or the criminal procedure, are making a case if we exclude one or another criterion of immunity, but in parallel to establishing a mechanism to ensure that allthose anonymous MPs who would have caused accidents would, however, be published on the names of He's words to be publicly known, and the public could assess the extent to which the officer referred to it or the MP has behaved legally.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq33 translatedText "I would like to thank Mr One Member for the referral to the committee on the referral of the bill to the Commission, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orloum to the Defence, Interior and Corruption Prevention Commission stating that it is responsiblethe Commission, please, the voting regime, please see the result!: 19, against: 50, abstentions: 1Members of Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee are expected to vote on a resolution on the Parliament's annual report on MEPs' questions to MEPs on the Parliament's website. Potapkina, the Globe and Orlova Bill tabled by the Committee on Human Rights, stating that it is the responsible Commission, asking for the result! Please vote!: 21, against: 51, no draft committee has been referred to MPsthe Bureau proposes to transfer the Bill of Female, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orlova to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission and impose it on the chairman of the Commission, Andread Elin Hodgson, to speak on behalf of DEP. The politician: Elencey, you are not sick of? ") colleague, I think that the scope of immunity for the national security authorities is, in my opinion, completely outside any understandable border, and I may read you what is written in the Law of the National Security Council - Constitutional Protection Office, Securitythe police, the Military Intelligence and Security Service - The level of criminal procedural immunity of officials from none of you, national security authorities may detain, bring back duress, search or search, personal or service facilities, personal or service facilities ,as well as prosecuting the vehicle only with the consent of the attorney general, the consent of the prosecutor shall not be required, but must inform the Attorney-General and the Head of the State Security Authority or the Head of the Office From the National Security Authorities Act 18parts of the article state that officials of the State security authorities in the national territory cannot be held criminally liable, including administrative detention, search or inspection ,whether the vehicles subject to the service are not subject to the Criminal procedural Limit only in cases where they have been caught in order to commit a criminal offence, what is the amount of administrative immunity of the national security authorities? If a competent national body or its official found thatthe official or servant of a national security authority shall have committed an administrative offence to inform in writing, within 24 hours, the Head of the national safety authority, who should give an opinion on whether there are circumstances which exclude the responsibility of a dominating officer or servant in the case of Cientulos, we really doliving in a police state, the volume of immunity of executive officials who exercise authority against other officials, against the legislator, is not limited to the extent that there is not even a mechanism for detecting and effectively monitoring the application of the rules in real life withwe have a simple situation where the politicians in charge, who are going to be in the presence of one commission or other commission, say the Defence, Home and Anti-corruption Commission or the National Security Commission, are influenced, monitored and determined by the circumstances and what cases should be detected by the economic operatorslook back and so, if you are so honest in all of those my speeches, then I would really call on you to review and take a decision on the presence of the Institute as a whole and not separate one of the criteria for a fellow Member of Elder. No one has asked MEPs against any objections to the fact that the bill is being passed to the Commission? The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, when establishing that it is responsible to the Commission, would please the voting regime, yes / 53, 53, abstentions - no draft law has been passed on to Saeima, Ageshina, Potapkina, Female and Orloon. Tabled in the bill " Amendment to the Corruption Prevention and Prevention Act " to be transferred to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission and the fix that it is responsible by the commission Does MPs have objections to Please calling, Ageshina, Potapkina, Fempinska, andsubmission of the bill " Amendment of the Anti-Corruption Prevention and Prevention Office Law " by the Committee responsible for the Prevention of Corruption Prevention and Prevention, with a request to the voting regime, please see the result!: 21, against 53, abstentions - 1 Law Project Commissionthe Saeima Bureau has not referred to Elin, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orlova to refer to the Committee on Legal Affairs the application of the Committee responsible, Mr Andread Elinin, to speak in favour of the passing of the bill to the Commission".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq32 translatedText "The highly esteemed Saeima, the esteemed colleague of the opposition, sought to convince us that a whole package of legislative packages should be reviewed at this stage only to give us a very clear and convincing explanation of the administrative immunity of fellow Members. In a way, we can address this issue step by step, but in any case we need a two-thirds majority of votes - the majority vote here in Little House here in the audience of the audience is certainly not able to understand why two thirds of us arefellow Members are voting' no' until after another, one by one, there are various draft amendments, against which we are voting So in this case, before Speaking on your hypothetical case - about the alleged prosecutor who would have been drinking andcommitted offence (No pill!!'), you can tell you that, unlike the colleagues present in the Commons, you can also throw the stone in my direction in the eyes of the Prokurors for such an offence simply being dismissed (From the floor) :" the same thing had to happen to you!... There is more to be discussed in the second place in this case, as we have reminded us today, go step by step, and recall that, in this case, instead of taking one afteron the other hand, I would like to call on the President of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Parliament to take a decision on this subject last week.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq31 translatedText "Your MEP Veiko Spokuri He applied to speak against the commission of the bill".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq30 translatedText "Dear colleagues, Parliament, by rejecting our previous proposed legislation, has, to a large extent, already shown that resolving the immunity issue for Members of the House, and only in that part, should not receive parliamentary consent to the prosecution of MPs. Only the fact that Members do not wish to address the issue in a complex, institutionally and in the light of all the criteria for immunity from each other, in a single scheme, I would once again like to show you the extent of immunity of a member of the Cabinet Member Well, guess what elsethis is? Criminal immunity ministers - zero! Ministers can be prosecuted in criminal proceedings without any monitoring mechanism from above (No medication:' distraction!') There is no need for decisions made by the Supreme Court or the Inspector General of Teacher. Whatever he wants, if the minister abandons a violation of the right, it is up to ministers, if they commit an administrative infringement, to carry out an exercise by any authorized minister, even local police officer Should being unpopular andhe knows that the Prime Minister's immunity is not the same! The prosecution of the president requires parliamentary two-thirds support for Well, that I think, in general, it is acceptable to accept that the president, however, is aware of Now I want to tell you what is going on with prosecutors in the Best Emergencythe administrative breaches are accounted for in the protocol because, if the prosecutor shows his or her licence, he would not see the prosecutor in his side on the road, but he would not see the prosecutor on his side on the road But if the public prosecutor commits an administrative offence, let's say, the Prosecutor's drank (heckling )drunk driving, him at the administrative responsibility of a non-permanent state! Prosecutors' administrative responsibility at all as the Institute does not provide for a breach of the Latvian Administrative Code across a 300-wide offence; there is a description of where the person commitsa breach is not true! The law is written: for the administrative breaches committed by the prosecutor punishable by disciplinary indiscipline, Mr Spolina will now come to speak in He's drink - all he has! - fine-handed, prison sentence, legal withdrawal, prisonhe continues to work in Parliament! (DEP A Caroma: " sitting in the Commons and getting the money! ") If all the prosecutor commits to him, he has no responsibility to dismiss the Attorney General and let him sack himlabour remains the Bet Cash, a jail term and everything else - absolutely nothing for a fellow Member, support the passage of this bill! Prosecutors' administrative responsibility is more equal than everyone elsein such a system, when someone, by committing an administrative offence, has no administrative responsibility? Any kind of excuse for this, we do not see any more We really did not see it as a very difficult issue for Ms lace in the past. You here - fifth, tenth How you vote there, look at Trad--and all else listen to me, there are concrete proposals, in particular, draft legislation, there is a definite idea which should be supported".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq29 translatedText "Your time to go: it has already been 10 seconds.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq28 translatedText "I have been debating".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq27 translatedText "Mr Elin, with the chamber talk is unacceptable!".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq26 translatedText "Distribute it, yes ockey!".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq25 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Pret: " no one has asked Members to speak to the Members there are objections? There are caveats to Please call, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orloon's Committee on Legal Affairs' passing on to the Committee on Legal Affairs. There is a committee responsible, please voting, please vote! About - 19, against - 52, the Commission's draft law has not been passed on to Saeima, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zematinska and Orloon, " Amendmentsin the Committee on Legal Affairs, the House calls on the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary steps to ensure that all Member States comply with the laws and powers of the Member States. Referral to the Committee on Legal Affairs stating that it is the responsible Commission, asking the voting regime, please the result! About - 19, against - 47, the Commission's draft law has not been passed on to MPs in Elin, Ageshina, Potapkina, Fempinska. And Orlova's motion for the " Amendment to Public Prosecutor's Office " to be transferred to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission and fix that it is responsible by the chairman of the First Commission, Andread Andread He will speak on the transfer of the bill to the Commission (heckling from the floor)".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq24 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the principle of equality enshrined in the Constitution is breached when a certain group of people whose legal provision is applicable in comparison to the other addressees of the same legal provision shall be subject to a range of different treatment in the circumstances where such unequal treatment is notobjectively justified, Mr Neimminbi, chairman of the Latvian Administrative Society, welcomed the idea of waiving the immunity of judges in respect of the administrative breaches referred to by Mr Him (I will quote):' we, the judges, are ashamed that we have been distributed from the rest of the public administrationin the case of Shia privilege, in the Democratic Society this has no longer justified this issue from 2010, the Parliament has not done anything about it, but Parliament has nothing but empty speeches, which is unjustified in linking with parliamentary immunity, " Capitre said. The end of the Pie finds itself, by the way, by the Lithuanian Constitutional Court of 28 May 2010, which recognises that the administrative immunity for the public service police officers has the opposite effect on the contrary, notes that the various regulations are also envisagedon the issue of informing the public of breaches of administrative breaches by public officials on the administrative breaches of judges, prosecutors and national security officials and staff of national security authorities, the public will not be aware at all, but the administrative breaches by Saeima and the Ombudsman by Saeima and the Ombudsmanto give its consent to the partial solution of the administrative responsibility of public officials to the prosecution of state officials under the Law on the Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Public Figures, to be turned up by my colleague Mr Andrei Elkin, but also thisthe bill states that only violations of this law in the Anti-Corruption Office and the State Revenue Service are obliged to inform the public by posting information on the website of the institution concerned in order to boost public trust in government officials and ensure greater openness whileit is necessary to lay down the following arrangements for the conduct of immunity and criminal proceedings of all officials, as well as the conduct of criminal proceedings for all officials, in respect of the offences committed by all officials and shall vote in favour of the draft law".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq23 translatedText "Thank you to the Committee on Legal Affairs to refer the tabling of the bill to the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Legal Affairs on the transfer of the bill to the Commission. The responsible committee, please, the voting regime, please the result!: 18, against - 51, abstentions - no draft law has been passed on to Saeima, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orloon. The " amendment to the law " On the judiciary " to be referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs and determining that it is the committee responsible, Valery Agesinam He will speak in favour of the passing of the bill to the commission (DEP K Sadat:' can't be about everyone at once?')".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq22 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the law currently includes a very diverse approach to the issue of the prosecution of Members of the Parliamentary Assembly and individual national officials on administrative and criminal proceedings, the judges, including judges in the Constitutional Court, and the prosecutors, onan infringement of an administrative offence called for by the members of the Saeima and the Ombudsman of Justice of the Ombudsman to Savun Savuthly requires the consent of members of the national security authorities to provide an opinion to the head of the national security authority - orthere are conditions that excludes dominators or worker liability Pret lawmakers can prosecute and conduct criminal proceedings only with the consent of members of the Pret judge and the criminal ombudsman to prosecute only the prosecutor but to arrest and prosecute criminal proceedingsthey can only consent with the consent of the members to the President or members of the Cabinet, or members of the parliamentary assembly or other state officials, of any immunity from prosecution in the many European countries, with the independence of the judiciary. Strengthening the idea that the Institute of immunity in the 21 st century is no longer an indication of the fact that, in certain European countries, such as the Netherlands, parliamentary immunity does not necessarily constitute a constitutional principle of national action based on the rule of lawcompliance implies the possibility of adopting differentiated legal frameworks, but should be based on an objective situation, with a compulsory focus on equity and equity, as well as the need to ensure that people are treated before the law, therefore call for this bill to be put to the vote.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq21 translatedText "Thank you for not saying to Members that this bill is being passed on to the Commission? To the Rules of Procedure of the amendments to the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs referred to the committee, stating that it is the responsible Commission, asking for the result! On - 20, against - 51, abstentions - 1 legal draft committee not referred tothe Saeima Bureau is proposing to the Elin, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zemelinska and Orlova, the Bill of the Constitutional Court, to refer the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Legal Affairs and the committee responsible " For the applicant to speak to Valery Ageshin. "".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq20 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, it is known that the extent of immunity of public officials varies greatly, and therefore, the consistency of the faction calls for the establishment of this system and the waiver of immunity both in the case of administrative infringement cases and on criminal matters by members of the public and other national parliaments. Officials - judges, prosecutors, ombudsmen, officers and other staff of the Office for the Prevention and Prevention of Corruption, and other services We believe that public officials may not go unpunished for maladministration, nor have any privileges in criminal proceedingsthey are involved in the equality of the Constitutional Treaty for all persons, the extent of equal rights and responsibilities required by It must be complied with, both by the adoption and application of the laws, which does not preclude this principle from ensuring a different legal framework for thefor certain categories of persons present in different situations, but absolute privileges granted to certain groups of individuals in a number of cases actually provides an opportunity to avoid prosecution and be considered unconstitutional and remind you thatindeed during the 11-year-old MPs, during 2012, our faction proposed lifting immunity in the cases of MPs, judges, prosecutors, bureau employees, special services and other state officials, and to rule out the cases where the authorisation of the MPs would be required ,in order to bring a deputy or a judge criminally liable or perform at its raid at that time, such a suggestion was not upheld, the consistency of the faction of the faction finds it possible to address the problem now, in the light of the sudden rise in the majority of MPsthe desire to re-open the discussion on this issue is that we believe that it is not possible to discuss this subject seriously in just one part of the bill and the problem is to deal with conceptually, systemically and complemental Thank you to vote in favour.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq19 translatedText "My thanks to Mr One MEP, one for the referral of the Bill to the Members of the Parliament, Ageshina, Potapkina, Zargin, Potapkina and Orlolio's Constitutional Amendment, all MPs' committeesthe Commission is the responsible Commission, please voting, please vote!: 21, against - 49, the Law Project has not referred to the draft law by the Bureau of MPs, Ageshina, Potapkina, Female and Orloon, " Amendments to MPs. The order rully referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, and the disclosure that it is responsible by the commission Under the order of one MP to speak " about " one - against a referral to the First Commission of Valery Ageseam Ageseam Agesinam He will speak in the " concerning " speech on Oct.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq18 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, Mr Elin spoke a great deal, a lot about sympathy, about what we have decided in the Committee on Legal Affairs, I would like to say, before I turn to the draft legislation, that I really have sympathy for all the Members who are hardworking andworking professionally, and Mr Elin is certainly among those drafted in the draft, there is really a great deal of work done but let us not be so naïve and look at the works, not listen to the fine words! That a few weeks ago, when the Constitutional amendments on the repeal of administrative immunity, Mr Elin's faction voted against Mr Elin, the Legal Affairs Committee, when preparing this Constitutional Amendment, would also vote against the' No' vote .( DEP A Elkin:' was the alternative proposal, Brian!') And today, as if alternative proposals had quite a single purpose - the Legal Affairs Committee's very wide variety of members of the various bodies and officials - and I agree that it should be consideredwe also understand that something can only be done if a structured follow-up step by the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Legal Affairs Committee has already been told that the immunity issue will be held, but the immunity of judges, prosecutors and other judicial authorities we cannotsee if we have not engaged the Justice Council (this is the rule of the judiciary!) And we will do it - the Justice Council will involve us on this issue of the political tributes, I think it would not be correct against the judiciaryadmirer of Mr Elin's working abilities And I believe he could write to us in a new Constitutional Project (DEP A Elin:' I'm ready!'), without immunity, and say that it is the right way forward for us todaya realistic amendment of the Every Constitutional Amendment can only be accepted if three-thirds of MEPs voted in favour of the question of immunity - whether through criminal and administrative matters - that we have triumphed on no more than once by those who were alsoin the previous legislature, it is very well-known that it was precisely this complex issue that was dealt with in a way that prevented us from withdrawing from a shrub of immunity that I very much hope that we are prepared to waive the administrative immunity that this is the will of the real Members ,with a two-thirds majority of votes cast by Mr And, if we are going to sit back today with the Legal Commission today, we will, of course, get to this decision at some point, only it will be much, much longer, harder, as the Legal Panel is very professionalwe are not looking at any of the legislation before us, we invite experts, and the experts will have what to say about all of these concerns, are we going to ask the Committee on Legal Affairs whether to put it on an obligation today? Or trust first of all to amend the question. On administrative immunity to Members, to lead by example, to say to judges and to all the other public authorities and judicial authorities that they also want their involvement in the matter of immunity? I hope that we will come to a very good solution to the Elin courseMr President, once again, I express my admiration and gratitude for the work you have done, and I think that this study will certainly be useful in the work of the Legal Affairs Commission, But I call on this and future legislation not to be opposed to this and not to support their referral to the Committee on Legal Affairs".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq17 translatedText "Thank you to the Members of the Eligindu Members' delegation - Egnesi His speeches on the tabling of the bill to the committees".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq16 translatedText "Well, here is the true thing in our parliament, too! We want us to issue some or no punishment for punishing Members, not from what the letter of the law is, but what we have of sympathy, or what we have. The antipathy to this or that of other Members is, for example, Article 30 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, which we are proposing to exclude What it says? (this debate has also largely been launched by the Coalition parties) on Pret MPsa member cannot prosecute or impose an administrative penalty on him, without the consent of members of the Member State of affiliation: if we take around one issue - around the issue of immunity - it should also be abolished in two wordsI wanted a bigger poster, of course, to bring together We should lift all of those rules in the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia concerning the incorporation of the immunity criteria if you believe that you can judge the opposition in Parliament today of the opposition, then weI will be happy to discuss justice over you (DEP I cry:' the court will judge!') when you will be in opposition, and so, and so what, ladies and gentlemen, today are conclusions from the common institutional framework on immunity? There are no indications at all, and there is no justification for establishing different degrees of immunity from individual officials, the bureau has administrative responsibility, the Security Police has no administrative responsibility, since there is no clear and clear criteria for the initiation of criminal proceedings against certain criminal proceedingsit is all about an inexplicable form of immunity after the severity of the offence, as, for example, the ombudsman without special authorisation can only be detained for serious and particularly serious criminal offences, the mechanism for the immunity of Crafts Personsin some cases, certain officials have a disproportionately high level of Well, for example, judges of the High Court deciding on detectives and compulsion in relation to the judges and the ombudsman, but as regards MPs, ministers and all others, does not decide Aquinsconcepts such as " compulsion, " " detention, " " estate inspection, " " takedown, " are intended as criminal procedural immunity, while they do not justify the extension or administrative processing of this immunity, for example, many of you have worked in the municipality or by local police. The local police can do a lot about what we, colleagues, you are offering you? We offer you a real support for this bill and to launch a complex, comprehensive debate to address this issue in substance, it is not possible for you to decide on this issue.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq15 translatedText "The MEPs have reservations about extending the time for speaking time?".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq14 translatedText "Good y, dear colleague, I will not be able to answer the question of what is happening in Krishtopans, but today the question is very important: this is an issue that has been going on for many years in the past, even at the end of 2012. Before the adoption of the budget by the Coalition politicians (back then, the politics of the coalition of justice politicians!) raised the question that, at long last, we need to get to grips with the evaluation of immunity from MPs, in order to do a great deal to get rid of archaic vestiges which, byeven to this point, there is What I would like to say to you, all of our colleagues, to say to you, all of our colleagues, that the faction of the faction has, at this moment, been tabled in this respect by at least 10 bills affecting the institution of immunity in general, if you and all of us togetherand every single one is that this issue should be dealt with in the context of mutual respect and the legislator's thorough analysis of the need and spirit of this Institute, we must recognise that immunity exists for very, very many public officials -Members of the House, judges, prosecutors, ombudsman, national security authorities, the President of the State, I will tell you a very interesting thesis to you who, at all, do not have any immunity from us in the country? (heckling A Berzina You don't believe it), but they areMembers of the Cabinet! No minister, no immunity whatsoever - no immunity whatsoever - no administrative legal or criminal legal immunity Today consistency offers a range of legislation aimed at generally evaluating the activities of the Institute of Expenses in UK And what consistency offers ,in view of the fact that both MPs in the Legal Affairs Committee, as well as the members of the previous sitting, supported - and that is the House that supported - the Parliament, in terms of the debate on this issue, as regards the amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, we are now proposing to exclude Article 29 and 30what is the point of this? Article 29: " the MP cannot be arrested, done with his search, otherwise restricting his or her personal freedom if it is to be opposed by a court ruling that a search must be made by a Member of Parliament that a search must be made ;there is then a need for the consent of the House to consent to the House, as we know we are getting, historic searches either never happen at all, or any other MP at home from the chimney cake, " a member of the MP can be arrested if they are caught on their ownthe crime committed by each member of the assembly to be imprisoned within twenty-four hours by the Sejm, who is to be brought before the next meeting of the meeting of the next meeting of the meeting of the meeting of members of the Saeima committee on the rekeeping of an MP in custody, say MEPsthe offence - the election script is held by the voices of He wrist, and then the parliament, the Coalition and the politician vote against the extradition (heckling from the floor), but also, we believe, to be largely an archaic rule which prevents them from taking action againstthe decision taken by the Court of Justice by the Member of the Court of Justice, but cannot be determined by the Bureau until the opening of the part-session, on the detention of members of the Parliament is decided by the Bureau of Saeima, arrested by a judge ,and those people, after the appointment of the political affiliation, get together and decide - will be in Eldo in custody or there will be no (No to the floor:') Reid, if there is unity in power, then Elin will be in power, if there is consensus in power ,there will be unity in custody that there is real sense of its life, which shows to a large extent that the Institute as such has no place, as politicians largely decide whether to be in the presence of a politician or another politician in detention, or to conduct or bring to justicethe Spent cannot fail to decide whether Ko is proposing today for the Coalition? I may ask me for three minutes, because the question is indeed complicated (heckling by DEP A boss:' to the death penalty')".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq13 translatedText "I would like to thank Mr One Member for the referral to the Commission for Bondo, Liepads, Kaeusa, Kyleston, Kyleston and Šica, by means of a draft bill to the Public Administration and Local Government Commission ,as the committee responsible, please voting regime, please see the result!: 26, against: 30, the 24-24 Draft Commission has not referred to the draft bill introduced by the Bureau of Deputies, Ageshina, Potapkina, the Latvian Parliament and Orloon'sthe Republic of the Republic will " surrender all members of the House to the Committee on Legal Affairs and to establish that the Legal Affairs Committee is responsible by one of the members of the committee, one can speak of " one-to-one " referral of the draft bill to the Members of the Commission.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq12 translatedText "Good morning, dear colleague, if our historical memory is not so short, then I will call on you to recall (From the faction, Dombrovski!'), an historic period when we had the Prime Minister, Krishtopi and the head of his office Bondars And, I will say: if we havethere is a look at the future, so I voted with both hands on whether the Center for the Coordination of Inresors remains as it is a certain counterweight and a guarantee that if ever the reality of life happens something similar to the Prime Minister, Kritopanam and his officethe driver, Bondaram, is at least a guarantee that we in the country, regardless of how the election coincides with elections, are professional experts (No pill:' who can't do anything!'), capable of even putting such a' dream cross' into a policy frame( DEP M Bondars:' you were already a professional minister!') With their previous speech, I think it simply made clear that there is a greater threat of unsupported food in the country of loud, hard and unprofessional politicians Thank you (applause from the faction:' Bravo!')".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq11 translatedText "Thank you, MEP, for the " no " votes in the " No " votes to the Commission proposal.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq10 translatedText "Honourable Members, honourable Members, the backyard can be as overweight - easy to grow up, but hard to get rid of by a man with overweight and other types of problems in the hands of the Member States. Too much is a problem because it costs too much, is too ineffective and fails to provide services which the people need, which is why politicians in their speeches, particularly in the election speeches, are very much in favour of a smaller, more efficient and more professional country. The Governance Coordination Centre was at least on paper in order to make the governance of the public administration more efficient and more professional, on paper, the normal coordination between the institutions in the countries of the institutions, such as the Office of the Prime Minister ,during its creation, Valdis Dombrovskis, for some reason, chose not to increase the number of officials, not to increase the capacity of the political office and not to increase the capacity of its entourage office staff rather than being employed by the prime minister's office on Liberty Street but was sent to work at various public officesin the company Af, Gints Freimanis was sent to work on " Full Air Traffic, " a very generous and well-paid job, and at Valda Dombrovska was only working with a special task of Af to cleaning up his credit issue and to resolve the issuethere is no cure for the public relations of Valda Dombrovska's public relations, but did not? To do a day-to-day job at the prime minister, saying there was a need for coordination between the public institutions, the creation of a coordination centre for re-resories to address the risks that could prevent him from ending up in Brussels Then, the government of Valda Dombrovska's government fell, and the site came with nothingas the centre of the political office, as the political office, as the political office, as the head of the political office, as the chairman of the Political Office, it will normally be a more influential person than Minister Just I will sayfair: the bureau of the political bureau of the Society does not really know, therefore, that it is not worthwhile to grow additional overweight in the public domain, but we can save 800 000 euros a year, and to spend them on more efficient and better purposeshonourable Members, honourable Members, there are politicians who are only talking and doing nothing (DEP politician and other fellow Members: yes, there is yes!') and feels like kidneys are afraid of the politicians who want to do thaterr and fear that these narrow groups of interest will put pressure on them and then there are the politicians who are doing the same today, colleagues, to urge you to be among those who do and reduce the number of employees in the public service. Centre of coordination, believe me, no one - no one! - I notice that Latvia's budget will save EUR 800 000, and you will be able to share this money for other important things for Latvia (DEP A Lejins:' Negratitude: world pay!')".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq9 translatedText "Thank you Neyone for not speaking out against the referral to the Commission Was MEPs have reservations about the fact that this bill is being passed on to the Commission, and then we will vote on a call from Bondo ,Liepsis, Kaiminus, Ruka, Kleinsteberg and Šica, on the transfer of the Internal Security Office, the Defence, Home Affairs and Corruption Prevention Commission stating that it is the responsible Commission, please voting the result !- 22, against - 50 abstentions: 1 draft law Commission is not referred to the Bureau of Saeima, Liepse, Kaeusa, Kyleinberg and Šica. The council and local commission set out to determine that it is responsible by the commission Under the order of one MP to speak of a " one-stop " bill, one " against " bill passed to the Commission, MEP Martin Bondaram told Mr Bondaram to speak out on the issue.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq8 translatedText "Honourable colleague, dear colleague, dear colleague of Latvia, is of the opinion that, as the ruling coalition is concerned, the number of officials in the public administration needs to be reviewed, it is necessary to evaluate the functions of each public servant and, in substance, the optimisation of public administrationit must be said, unfortunately, that this is not the first time that the government's words are not in line with the actions of the Latvian Association of Regions calling for the annulment of the Internal Security Office law for two main reasons: the targets set out in the adoption of these laws, andit is useless to remind taxpayers of the money to remind you that the " Internal Security Office law " preamble reads that, in view of the compliance of the system established in Latvia with effective investigations of effective investigations, one of the criteria highlighted is the criterion of the independence of the Inquiry ;persons engaged in inquiries should be independent of the persons involved in the investigation of the incident, it shall include not only independence from an institutional and hierarchical nature but also of apparent independence resulting in critical assessment of the evidence in the context of this criterionin the case of investigative bodies which are investigating the actual offences committed by officials of the same institution, the conflict of interest may be established by the National Police, Security police, the Financial Police, Military Police, OAS and National Border Guard investigations in SavuthlyArticle 4 of the Office of Internal Security Law on Office functions reads: " the functions of the Office shall be to detect, investigate and prevent criminal offences committed by officials and staff of the institutions existing in the Ministry of Interior, other than the Security Police andstaff () " The aim of setting up a single authority under the Ministry of the Interior under the authority of the Ministry of the Interior, which would only deal with the discovery, investigation and prevention of criminal offences committed in the performance of official duties and related violence is manifestly not achievedat the same time, the Security Police is also under the authority of the Interior Ministry, and it has the right of inquiry in respect of criminal offences committed by national law enforcement authorities as it would not only be logical to extend the functions of the Security Police instead ofto maintain another law enforcement body? I would also like to point out that the security police are a professional body with a broad delegation of functions towards the narrowly delegated Internal Security Office, when the publicly available information is not lying, the security police budget saysthe planned Internal Security Office's budget, which is over 4 million, is just over two times higher; this, I think, is indicative of the waste used in the reasoning that Latvia would lose to the European Court of Human Rights. The criticism, as the estimated EUR 300 000 per year of compensation paid for in compensation is disproportionate to the College's budget, I urge you to be responsible and support the transfer of this bill to the Committee on Defence, Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq7 translatedText "My thanks to the MEP' Pret' to speak to no one has asked MEPs to object to the fact that this bill is being passed on to the Social and Employment Commission, stating that it is a responsible panel? (from the floor:' yes') Membersto oppose this issue by voting at Please call, we will vote in favour of the Bill Bite, Venice, Kleinsteberg, Ruka and Šica, with the referral to the Social and Employment Commission on the transfer of the Social Welfare Law to the Social and Employment Commission by stating that it isthe responsible committee, please, the voting regime, please the result!: 33, against - 22, 26 abstentions: the 26-26 legal draft committee has not referred to the Saeima Bureau's proposal on the draft law tabled by the Social and Employment Commission: the Amendment to Social Services and Social Services. The Law of Aid to be transferred to the Social and Labour Commission and determining that it is responsible by the commission Does MPs have reservations? I am sorry, this is excluded from the agenda, but for me it is still a mistake in Mape!, the Bureau of the Saeima, Liepins, Kaeusis, Ruka, Kleinberg and Šica - to pass onthe Defence, Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption Commission says it is responsible by the commission Under the rules of one member of the order one can talk about, one - " against " the passing of the bill to the Commission, MEP Jaromis Rukam He will speak on the subject.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq6 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, the third paragraph of Article 13 of the National Social Security Act stipulates that the country's social security benefit is lost to a person who has not reached the age of ovenage, lost one or both, and that no marriage allowance continues to be paid if that person( does not affect English version. )marriage has the potential to suggest that a person no longer needs social security benefit if it has set up her family, Unfortunately I have to say that the family can also establish otherwise there are people wholiving together without marriage, and in a way, those who are in marriage are treated in an uneven and discriminatory situation compared to those who do not want the marriage to be shut down, but living together in the same vein of the bill, we asked the National Social Insurance Agency :if the payment of benefits has been interrupted by the fact that a person entered into a marriage? I must say, unfortunately, that the National Social Security Agency could not provide an answer to this issue, nor can we fail to tear up the possible impact of any draft bill on the budget. I believe that this impact is more symbolic: it removes a discriminatory situation rather than a real impact on the budget, therefore, colleagues, I would ask that young people who are entitled to this sort of betting be closed, and please support the proposed bill Thank you".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq5 translatedText "Thank you very much for signing the solemn undertaking to thank Please call, vote in favour of the draft decision by Alexander Jakimova,' please vote! For - 81, against and abstentions - no decision has been taken on Mr Jakimovu's decision andI urge you to take up a seat in the chamber - (applause) Ladies and I are now starting to look at the next agenda: the reports of the Bureau of MPs on the legislative package submitted by the Bureau of the Saeima Cabinet are proposing the bill's " Amendment to the Law on the estate tax " to the Budget and Finance( tax) committee and the determining committee is that the responsible commission Does Members have objections to the draft law, the Bureau referred to the Bureau of lawmakers proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for a Guarantee Agreement between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of GermanyRepublic of Estonia, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Austria, the Slovak Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic ,the Kingdom, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Britain, the United Kingdom of Northern Ireland and the European Investment Bank on loans to investment projects in the European Investment Bank in the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries and overseas countries and in the Overseas Countries and Territoriesas the committee responsible, the committee does not have objections to members of the Legislative Council referred to by the Bureau of the Saeima committee, to propose a draft law tabled by the Cabinet Office of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland, Ireland, Greecethe Republic of Spain, the Czech Republic, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Austria, the Slovak Republic, Romania, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom ofthe United Kingdom of Northern Ireland and the European Investment Bank, which monitor payment and reimbursement procedures under the Guarantee Agreement for investment projects in the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries and overseas countries and in the overseas countries ,to set out that the committee responsible is not opposed to the draft law, the committee referred to a draft law passed by the Bureau of Ministers referred to by the Bureau of Ministers of the Council of Ministers of the CARIFORUM States, on the one hand, and the European Community and its Member States ,on the other hand, " transfer to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and to set out that it is the responsible Commission, Does Members have reservations in the case of MPs referred to by the Bureau of the Parliament, proposed by the Bureau of Members, Providence, Cleinin, Ruka and Šica - " Amendment of the Public Social Benefits Bill "the law " transferred to the Social and Work Commission " and set out that it is responsible by the commission Under the order of one MP to speak of a " one-to-one " transfer bill to the First Commission, Deputy MP Ingai Ingai said in a statement to His bookings to speak " About " on Oct.".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq4 translatedText "The EU, Alexander Jakimov, will be committed to the Latvian people in Latvia, strengthening its sovereignty and English as the only countrythe language, the defence of Latvia as an independent and democratic state, will honour its responsibilities in good faith and in the best sense I undertake to respect Latvia's knowledge and laws".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq3 translatedText "Thank you Anyin Alexander Jakimovu to make solemn pledge".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq2 translatedText "Honourable Members, honourable Members, the mandate, the Commission on ethics and application have examined a request made by a group of 12 MEPs, Mariana Ivanovusjevas, on the application of the parliamentary mandate by Alexander Jakimov@@. He agrees to take on 12 members of parliament's office, the Commission unanimously approved and decided to move the draft decision on the draft decision of Alexander Jakimova to Saeima, " Please support the drafting of the draft decision".
• 2015_10_29_325-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, the clock is 9 00 - Please seat!, let us start telling the House of 29 October 2015 before we proceed to deal with the agenda of the sitting of the meeting before us, we have to decide on possible amendments to the agenda for today's sitting. The Working Committee is seeking to amend the agenda for today's sitting and to include in its draft Decision on the change of the date' on the regulated professions and recognition of professional qualifications', " Does Members have reservations? The order has been amended by the mandate of Savuthly, the Commission for Ethics and Application, seeking to include today's agenda for the draft decision " For the approval of Alexander Jakimova as a member of 12 MPs " and to examine the draft decision before the first item of businessMEPs are opposed to the agenda as a result of changes to the agenda: the politician, Upenieks, Loskutov, Lejs and Kurtte - are being asked to make changes to the agenda for today's sitting - to exclude from its bill the Law of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic. Council and county council election law' included' and included on the agenda of the 14 January 2016 meeting Could MPs have objections to the agenda as MPs have amended the Savunod politician, Trudeau, putra, Silver and debtors are calling forto exclude from today's agenda the draft agenda of the draft law on payments to regulatory authorities in the mining industry or in the development of primary forests on payments to regulatory authorities, " It is written, difficult to read) Does Members have reservations? MEPs will vote on a resolution on Thursday on the adoption by the European Parliament of the agenda for the next sitting of the sitting of the European Parliament and of the Council on the subject.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq281 translatedText "My thanks to Member Ingunai Sudrabai (who spoke to you today - have expressed your views that you were listening to you a day! To hear you!".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq280 translatedText "Hello, esteemed audience! This week's work would describe the Commons as a warm-up run ahead of the start of the Battle of the 2016 Draft and their accompanying package of legislation and the content of what these laws have in the Aaktic Commission, especially in the Budget and in particular, in the Budget and in particular. The Financial (Taxation) Commission, launched in this package of Bill And I think, the term " Waterloo " accurately describes what our opposition members expected in November, when a draft review will be held in the Commons today! Â Ahead From Heart Latviaboth analyse the draft budget and also evaluate all legislative proposals to provide sound proposals for the improvement of the budget package and what is this next year's budget? I will quote Finance Minister John Reira, who says that this budget is a well thought out and responsible budget ;that there is a substantial increase in the budget for national security and all other sectors; that we will be able to see that every citizen will see it in their coffers that cash stays more So everything will develop, everyone will be very happy to say because you arehaving said no one can actually test this untrue veracity But at the same time we also understand that the reality is that Medick and teachers are already preparing for strikes, businessmen protesting against tax changes, including pensioners asking the government to understand their situation I thinkthat at last the finance minister has come to come out of his Cabinet and start talking to teachers, medics, pensioners, businessmen about their " great happiness, " either as he vows the following year, But it should also be noted that the tradition that we already have in place is that we already have the tradition that we already havehaving watched the work of the previous Budget And government increasingly want to inform MPs about how this budget is drafted, and â it's even worse! Â cynically ignoring what is required by the law âonly to submit the figures to the Act requires that the draft budget also provide clarifications on how this money will be spent in the following year, which will be done in each budget programme, the objectives of which will be met by our specific demands from civil servants ,what they are going to answer at the end of next year, when all the money is going to be spent in the Premiership, as we did not receive this information, we asked the finance minister:' why do you fail to act, please, Members do not have the information they have. 'the Finance Minister is cynically responsible that the government has decided that it will be lucky enough to see information on how the budget will be spent the following year, two months after the budget has already been approved by the Commons, so long as the nihilist attitude is nihilistbusiness as well as against educators, and fundamentally against society as a whole, well why should there be some kind of special respect for the Members? And, as such, incomplete, while explaining, at the same time, something for itself: no one would notice! As the first responsible and the national budget, it has increased the remuneration of its own apparatus by €690 000 to answer the question from where the resources will come from and to whom it will be remunerated, the explanation may be granted only on the basis offor a total of 180 thousands And again, the finance minister believes: " enough is enough for you, Members, with the fact that you know where the 180 thousand will be spent on the other? But why is the answer to be towed out with the stangles, if it is a simple duty to respond to the way you've drawn up the budget?! I believe that these budgetary explanations should be complete and meaningful, so that everyone is clear about which measures areand to what extent the funding will be increased or reduced, and what will be the result of the fracture of the fraction " From Heart Latvia " believes there should be good faith in the way taxpayers are treated and a transparent draft budget that would allow every citizen of Latvia to understand where it is usedthe taxpayers' money is that we will be able to ensure that people are genuinely interested and engaged in decision making and that much-needed trust in the government and country is also thanks for your attention and wish for all to have a successful day!".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq279 translatedText "Mr Raidaam, Inguna Sudraba, President of Inguna Sudraba, said.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq278 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear radio audience! - in the context of the vault of the sergeant, I can only express my delight that the proposal of the Latvian Association of Regions has, indeed, gained the support of the Saeima, although, of course, this was not being pushed at the moment. The proposal of the region of the Regions, which was rejected at the time, is, of course, a result of what is, of course, a result, and this celebrated day in law is now a draft decision, which has been raised earlier by other colleagues and which is with thatperhaps the very dry title of the 2012 draft Decision on the fulfilment of the obligations laid down in the 1963 Vienna Convention on the Consular Relations, " One of the most tragic and very painful stories lurking in the dry name behind this dry name, and not only by one but many othersI am therefore unable to join the satisfaction of colleagues on the withdrawal of the draft decision, and what is this story? This story is that, for children from UK citizens' families in Britain, the British authorities are violating this mentioned convention âthe Vienna Convention Â, because they did not inform the Latvian authorities of this event: well, then there is a large amount of simple information there, but if the Latvian authorities do not have information that the child has been removed from the family then the Latvianthe authorities cannot be involved in this issue and to support my own citizens', to support both parents and children, and possibly to bring these children back to Latvia Jo, if we are talking, for example, of a specific case, which Mrs Chigate mentioned, for example. It must be said that it was precisely because of this lack of awareness that the situation has been brought so far that a child was found in the UK with a foster family with another citizenship (apparently with British citizenship) and, in fact, the process is now so far away that it is already there. Nothing can really help but really Bet the draft decision but does not talk about any particular child on a specific name and surname; the draft decision speaks of the obligation of the UK to respect the Vienna Convention! And, even if, in one particular case, help isit is difficult, with regard to the future possible cases of other cases, that this assistance is not only possible, but also necessary and very important, it is nice that the Foreign Minister has sent a nod in 2014 But it is now the 2015 conclusion, and unfortunatelythe UK has not taken this note into account, and unfortunately we are still getting along some side roads or detours of information about cases where children have been removed from their families and find that the British authorities have broken again and againthe Vienna Convention and the Republic of Latvia have been informed that the child has been removed from the family of course, it has to be acknowledged that there are cases to be sorted out here, too, in Latvia, in the case of the House of Duty Committee and the House of Duty. I regret to conclude that, here in Latvia, there is not a single person who would really take on the best interests of the child, because unfortunately, it is regrettable that the interests of the child and of the elderly are not always in line with, â sometimes, parents who have no interest infor our children, we, the Latvian Republic, should, in any case, have an interest in their own citizens, especially for their children, Wusie, but citizens! I would like to mention another bill that the faction of the Latvian Union of the Regions has today signed andsubmitted to the Commons That is the bill, which includes amendments to the State Social Benefits Act And have revealed a  with the help of voters Since that it should be said, the honourable radio audience that wrote your e-mails and letters are gaining traction in having someone out of the electoratehas drawn our attention to the fact that the Latvian state actually punishes its citizens if they enter a married Proti, the survivor's pension is paid to children under the age of 18, or, if they learn, up to the age of 24, or untilwell, if they got married before the age of 24, then payment is interrupted, then payment of such a sentence we cannot see because a person can live in another, can live with another personin the early days of my life, There are different situations in Thad they're not penalised but if the marriage takes us, then we have submitted a proposal to correct this situation, Manas speaking time has ended, thank you".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq277 translatedText "Thank you very much to the Member for the Carlim serger, Member of the Latvian Federation of Regions, Inga Bite Please.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq276 translatedText "Yes, hello, dear radio audience! Since colleagues have already talked about the opening of the gas market at length, then I will not stop there but talk about two others, which will also affect some of the people in the First Nations that it's prettyrevolutionary changes are expected to be in the Law of Sport, as today, at first reading, Saeima amendments that will prohibit any manipulation of sporting competitions or unforeseen results, or harassment thereof, are a law against jewelry ,what's unfortunately been a widespread phenomenon in Latvia, And in this here, we have had a small country, in this business we have been quite powerful, let's say it, the players, and there have been absolutely fantastic results in the race as â as7: 1, for example, and making money for such an exact outcome of the game, of course, so far, the dodgers of both China and Taiwan are vying thanks to such a sporting class-action, say, in millions of measured amounts and will be madethe amendments to the criminal law will also provide for criminal sanctions for Few cases already prosecuted by police, but, well, let us hope that the amendments of the law will simply make such manipulation about the impossible of the other case I would like to congratulate everyone in the statepolice and National Border Service officers, as today's final reading of Saeima, finally adopted a law on changes to holiday and holiday commemorations And it predicts that state police in the future of 5 December and the National Guard on 7 November will celebrate their professionalfestivities With the oldest generation scares of an unwittingly confluence of dates, as we remember those dates from the times of the Soviets But well, luckily, a new generation has grown that these dates don't know the longer we leavethe ghosts of frightened ghosts such as the worse we should therefore take on the police and border guards well on these days, all the more so as the historical roots of the day in 1918, when these institutions were also being held by the independent UK, Thank you for your attention.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq275 translatedText "Thank you to Members of the Group of the Greens / EFA Group, Carliya Sergeant, to Please!".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq274 translatedText "Thank you hello, dear radio audience! Parliament's fracture of consensus calls on both the administrative infringement cases and criminal immunity of MPs, as well as all other government officials, Â judges, prosecutors, members of the Corruption Prevention and Office of the Services, Wewe believe that public officials must not go unpunished for the administrative breaches that have been committed and that they, including the members of the House, do not have any privileges in the criminal proceedings in which I recall that the fraction of immunity was already proposed in 2012 for the waiver of immunity from administrativein cases of misconduct, MPs, judges, prosecutors, bureau staff, special services and other state officials will be excluded, as well as to exclude cases where permission would be required for a deputy or a judge to bring criminal proceedings or conduct off its detectives at the time from the coalitionpart of this was not supported by the parties; our faction believes that this situation can be tackled now, given the sudden willingness of the majority of the parliament to resume the discussion on the issue of immunity. We believe that there can be no serious discussion on this subject in just one single bill. As is happening now, as is happening at the moment, it is necessary to address the conceptual, systemic and complex nature of the package that our draft bill will be handled at 29 October, And we want to see MPs' vote of conscience, not' Hammonon', Thank you for your attention.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq272 translatedText "Hello, honourable radio audience: looking back at the meeting today, from the National Union, I would like to highlight some of the decisions taken today in the Third Reading to amend the National Regulatory Equipment Law, building on the need for clarification of the conditions for a public person's business of business, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a view to clarifying the conditions for a public person's commercial activity, with a viewa public person is entitled to set up a limited liability company or gain participation in the current public sector, in so far as market failures are avoided, and in strategic sectors or strategically important property management Tika is also marked by the amendments to the Energy Market ,ensuring an efficient internal market and promoting competitive, secure and sustainable energy supplies to Latvia, as well as the expansion of choice for Latvian citizens, the National Association has today backed an amendment to the Fairtrade Bill, providing for small alcoholic drinks in small drinks and small wineriesâ incentives for licences if the total volume of wine produced or produced by wine produced does not exceed 15 000 litres per year and the total amount of alcoholic beverages produced in absolute quantities of 100 litres per year will reduce the administrative burden on small economic operatorsits production does not produce en masse to highlight the major events of the National Association's most important current events that the issue of protecting the rights of child-owned children outside Latvia is working to remedy the violations of the unforgivable international conventions that led to this year's violations of the international conventions. At a time when 61 children in Britain have been removed from the Latvian state, the Latvian state must protect the rights of their citizens, and in particular the rights of minors in Latvia, as one of the national obligations of Latvia, as has been mentioned by my colleague from the factionthe union, though the draft decision was removed from the agenda of today's meeting, the National Association will look into ways to raise the issue with the possibility of the National factions or members of the assembly to call on members of the British ambassador to give its ownthe explanation of the situation in Noah would like to draw attention to the fact that the question of the action plan prepared by the Ministry of the Interior on the reception of asylum seekers has not respected the task of the Prime Minister to find ways of reducing benefits, leaving the scope of the aid earlierproviding an incentive to continue to pay this benefit even if a refugee or an alternative status has entered into a lawful labour relationship, I would like to remind you that they would like to remind you of the risks of an openingby putting such proposals into the polarised society on the issue of refugees, such a step will not only be seen with confusion, but also as discrimination against the indigenous peoples As such, we will take the case for listening and meeting next week, all good!".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq270 translatedText "Hello, esteemed radio audience! Today I will tell the meeting of the members of the united meeting, Today Saeima, at the first reading of a very important piece of legislation The Amendment to the Energy Law, driven by the Ministry of Economy, and which is directed towards it in the near future. At the same time, it would be possible for Latvian consumers to receive natural gas supplies in their homes, as well as production sites that reflect the market situation As we know today, the gas supply to Latvia is provided by the Latvian Gasde, where one of the shareholders is also Russian gasthe company Gazprom's " Little Gasde " is in a monopoly position, and Saeima has already ruled that this monopoly will have to be put to an end on 1 April 2017 This bill, now proposed by the Commons Treasury, is another very important step towards the completion of the gasthe liberalisation of the market, as we know, is already possible today in Lithuania for the provision of alternative gas supplies and, for example, it has affected their gas prices themselves in such a way that Lithuanian consumers were able to purchase gas at prices that isfar more uniform European Union average gas prices, not those which Lithuania has previously dictated to Gazprom, are expected to be subject to very heated discussions in the Commons, and unfortunately, Latvia's Gason has proven its lobbying and eventhere is a very high level of pressure being exerted on the members of the assembly, which is why a thorough struggle here is expected to aim for the aim of the unity faction and the intention is that this bill be incorporated into the eventual rule of energy law with as little change as possible, as the Ministry of Economic Affairs is currently workingthe proposed " Gas Pipeline " model is indeed in the interests of Latvian consumers and will allow Latvia to participate in the European Union's Common Energy Market in a second issue, which I would briefly like to tell, is the 10 or so members of the draft decision made by Members' Forthe 1963 Vienna Convention, " The Consular Relations, " is satisfied that the draft Decision was, however, encouraged by the draft decision, since this draft decision, after the opinion of the Members of the Unity Party, is a draft decision ,what does not offer any specific solutions, because the situation of a given child about which there is an attempt to speak here does not in any way be addressed by the Latvian state, the Latvian state must take an interest and take care of the children of Latvia's citizens and of Latvia's nationals to follow their fate. And look to ensure that, as far as possible, they can grow up in a family environment in Latvia, however we know that due to the different choices of individual choices and individual choices, there is not always a situation where one might be here once it is entangledthe fate of a child in the UK however, the unity faction believes the MPs' proposal comes very late, as the British court has indeed recognised that British authorities had to inform UK authorities of the state of the UK about the situation with this particular child, Responding to this informationthe outage in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs back in June 2014 has sent a nown that our executive has done everything that was its duty to Thus Members who had made this proposal, in a sense, a mimic tempestuffed activity, as if in favourthe child's best interests, but in fact, this proposed draft decision would not, in any way, address a child's interest, as the UK would reach out to any unspecified authorities with a rather cryptic or nebulous message, which makes sense and, after all, it would not therefore be clear that a unity faction is therefore. Welcomes the fact that Saeima did not need to speak on the draft decision today and, consequently, they will obviously seek another, far more effective way of dealing with this issue, and I wish everyone a fine afternoon.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq269 translatedText "Thank you very much to the meeting of the meeting of the meeting of the meeting of the meeting of the House of Ministers, as well as other developments today, as well as other developments in the first word today, in the name of MEP Lolitai Chiggin.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq268 translatedText "Hello! Colleague, not registered today: Solvita Celević, Guntis Bellevic, Martins Bondars and Ivan Ribakov Thank you".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq267 translatedText "Thank you First Secretary for bied Gunar Kunar".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq266 translatedText "Dear colleague of European Affairs Commission, our committee meeting will be opened in the Red Chamber at 12 of 30 Colleagues, those working for the Committee on the Budget and Finance (Taxation) ,I might still enjoy Mr Stadurska's excellent company, but if we have the problems, please be ready to join the sitting of the Commission, thank you at 12: 30.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq265 translatedText "MEP Lolitai Chigan, MEP".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq303 translatedText "MEP Lolitai Chigan, MEP".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq264 translatedText "The honourable anniversary, my heartfelt greetings to you! But my statement to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission to colleagues in Atala all have to eat lunch to 11 o'clockat 30 Tautfarms, an earlier, environmental and regional policy commission, we could meet for the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq263 translatedText "Thanks to the fact that the debate is closed Please call, we will vote for the draft decision,' For the consent of 12 MP member Artusa Kaiminus to be held in administrative responsibility', please please vote!: 80, against - no, 7the decision has been taken by the Members of the College on the question and answer session today, I informed you that, in connection with the Members of Zarma, Mirska, R-Rubik, Prime Minister's Office, Potapkina and Orlousuri For the Office of the Ministry of Economic ivocations on " The mismanagement of the Ministry of Economics "the written reply to the applicants is not satisfactory, but the Prime Minister informed that he or she is unable to respond to the oral question to the Commissioner for Oral Answer to the Minister for Health and Security Policy, Guntim Bellark, to reply to the author of the reportthe Minister today cannot come to an oral answer to Mr Zarusis, Ageshina, A Rubik, Tutina and Ribakova's Minister for Economic Trade, " Fire to the Ministre informing the Ministrethe oral answer to the Minister of Deputies, Ageshina, A Rubik, Tutina and Ribakova, written in the Minister for the Construction of Conflict, shall be informed by the Ministre of the fact that he / she is unable to appear on oral answer in relation to theZariis, Ageshina, Tutina and Ribakova's question to Prime Minister Abdel Fattah Strauai The question of the written answer to the written reply of the Minister of Ministers to the Minister of Education is not to be informed that it would not be able to attend oral answer in Linz to Members of the Ministry of Deputies ,the written reply from Ministri, Platpera, Baloha, Baloin and Science Minister Seilei Seilei's written reply to the Ministre in the Ministre in Linz, Schimo, Messi, Baloin, andin the case of Michel Platpera, Minister for Education and Science, Seilei, " The availability of interest education and the development of the interest education system " received written answers from the Ministre informing the Minister that it would not be able to appear on oral answer in Linz, Schimfas, Messi, Baloin andin the case of Michel Platpera, Minister of State for Transport, Anient Matysam, " For the Development of the harbour and the Special Economic Zone, " the written response of the Ministrs to the Ministrs informing the Minister of his oral answer to Mr Zariis, Agechina ,Mr Rubik, Tutina and Ribakova's question to Prime Laimdotta " The Smart Specialisation Strategy " issue is addressed to the Education and Science Minister's written response to the authors of the written reply to the Ministre that it would not be able to appear on oral answer in Linz to Members ,Potapkina, Tutina, R Rubik and the question of Environment Protection and Regional Development Minister Kasparam Gerhardam The City of City's planning amendments have not received a written answer, and the Minister is informed that it would not appear on oral answer in Linz to Tutin, Tutin ,Ageshina, Steunenko and the question of Finance Minister Jianim Reiram have received a written reply from the Minister of State of State, who is unhappy with the Ministrs informing him that he could appear today in Linz, Tutina, Ageshina, Steunenko and Femardo. Justice Minister Dmitry Rasnačam has received a written reply from the Minister of Justice who was not satisfied with the reply to the Ministrs informing him that he may be present today (No faction:' wonder!') in Linz, Tutina, Urbanovic, Potapkina and AgeshinaMinister Jianim Reiram has received a written reply from Minister Jianim Reiram, who is advised by the Ministrs to reply to the Minister, Mr Tutina, Potapkina, Ageshina and Rubik, Minister for Economic Affairs" the relevance of the liberalisation model of the Latvian market in natural gas to Latvian consumers " has not received a written answer to the Ministre that it is not possible to attend today's oral answer to the scheduled question and answer session today at 17 p.m. and will arrivethe question was made by Minister for Culture, Urbanovic and Michel Platini, Minister of Culture at the Ministry of Culture, Meija, Platppers, Shimfa and balloon, the Minister for Culture, Meija, Platini, Sirate and balloon have submitted a question to the Minister for Culture, Meija, Platini, Shimfa and balloin. The issue of the' For Public Accounts Bill of 2016' To betray Finance Minister Jianim Reiram's response to Members Silver, Meija, Platppers, dove and Shane have submitted a question to the Department for Education and Science 2016 To betray Education and ScienceCommissioner, Commissioner, to reply to the College, the questions on the agenda are on the agenda (From the floor:' please congratulate you?') and we have to move on (From the floor:' to next Thursday') and we need to stop MPs from doing so. During the sitting, please call for the presence of Members of the Members of the European Parliament to celebrate the 50th anniversary today and we warmly welcome (applause) of my colleague (applause) of the 45-year-old colleague. Gaidis and the boss also welcome him (applause) And the 35-year anniversary celebrated our colleague, Romane, whose heartfelt welcome (applause) is welcome, but as long as the results of the registration are yet to be produced, the statement of the statement to Member of the Member State of the Member States".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq262 translatedText "Hello, dear Madam President-in-Chair, who is never lying! Good morning - I would like to explain to you, but, above all, I would like to explain to my constituents that, from the parliamentarian pace, I had a lack of experience and knowledge of the responsibilities of public officials on the occasion ofin the work of the country, I hope that the fine will be proportionate and appropriate to my husband, But I would like to express my gratitude to a man's husband, without which my forward-looking initiative may not be taken up here, I am thinking of you, Mr Orlova II admit that from the beginning I think you would like me Well, as I was appalled because I think you want me to degrade politically and personally, but then I understood: I misled me. I knew you were just looking very far and you have a lot of foresight, because always on the world stage it's been that there are people who see it further and that These people are better than the people who aren't so experiencedAtlanta's English husband, Mr Orlova, on a hail cream I am grateful to Mr Orlova, Mr Orlova, who deserved, ladies and gentlemen, has become the haemorrhage of our MPs (From the floor:' Cruz' )I am grateful for the opportunity to get to the list of Members who have been issued for punishment, I feel well next to the Jurim Vectirien, I feel well beside Guntim No, but Raimonde Bergmanim( from the floor:' not his!') You weren't, I'm right next to Dainim Liepinam, I'm fine next to Vegas Solvitai Bet I'm not particularly familiar with thisnot in the English design of the high-performance Range Rover driver Mr Urbanović, which attempted to track the unknown cycle of cyclists and taranded his car (DEP J Urbanovic: " wait! Shame Maybe I did not call anyone yet? Mr Nronislam Sir, well next to you I feel no other way to pass on this baton to my friend and acurplant Hosam Abu Meri (No floor:?') But maybethe time has come, Mr Brigue, that it is time to discuss seriously the idea of lifting the administrative immunity of Members, which is the pleasure of the public of Mr Orlova and Mr Orlova on the occasion of the honour, I would ask you to Saeima to issue my administrative punishment".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq261 translatedText "A thank you to your neighbour, Artusam's neighbour (heckling from the DEP J Addamsons:' Artus, tell me everything!' from the floor:' only justice!')".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq260 translatedText "Honourable Members, honourable Members, the mandate, the Commission on ethics and application have examined a request from the Corruption Prevention and Anti-Corruption Office to accept the prosecution of 12 members of the MP Artusa Kaiminus to the administrative responsibility of the Latvian Administrative Board at the request of 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Latvian Administrative Code onthe unauthorised office, contract or mandate of the statutory authority shall not be terminated within the deadline and after Article 166 of the statutory public official to breach the law of the State of affiliation, as well as the role of public officials in the conflict of interest in the Artus Caimance connectionas an assembly member with an unauthorised member of the executive board, the Commission decided to support the prosecution of 12 MP member Artusa Kaiminv's administrative responsibility for an administrative breach in the minutes of the Administrative infringement procedure.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq259 translatedText "The next item:' decision-making of draft decisions' Draft Decision of the European Parliament on the consent of 12 MP member Artusa Kaiminus to the mandate of the members of Artusa Kaims, on behalf of the Commission, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq257 translatedText "There is no objection to the Members? Voting regime, please see the result! - 87, against and abstentions - there is no legislative proposal in the second, final, reading it is supported by the law adopted".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq255 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, first of all, we should vote in favour of the urgency of the call call, we will vote in favour of the adoption of the bill' Amendment of the law on celebration, remembrance and numeracy'' for urgent! Please voting regime, please vote! About - 82- ,counter and abstentions: the draft bill on urgency is acknowledged by the Un Commission requested to support the first reading of the bill at Please call! Will vote on the bill " Amendment to the Law on festivities, Remembrance " and" support the vote! Please vote! - 88, 88 against and not abstentions - I would ask that the draft bill not be the result of the first reading of the draft regulation: support (No remedy:' Davaj:'))".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq254 translatedText "Dear colleagues, the Commission is proposing a bill to recognise this bill as a matter of urgency for this legislation: to determine the date of 7 November, the day of the border guards ;at 5 December, the Police Workers' Day Commission meeting had the will to adopt the draft law as a matter of urgency, as these dates are already up to our doors on behalf of the Commission to support this bill at first reading".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq253 translatedText "Thank you for tabling the proposals before 5 November this year on the agenda of the' Amendment of the Law on Day, Remembrance and Putting' on behalf of the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission:".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq252 translatedText "5 November this year".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq251 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the adoption of the bill' Amendment of the High School Law', asking for the voting regime! Please see the result!: 77, V- 6, abstentions: the draft law should not be accompanied by a first reading proposal on the submission of a proposal for a second reading.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq250 translatedText "Dear colleague, the House of Interior and Cabinet ministers' amendment to the High School Law (No 339 / Lp12) This amendment was carefully considered by the Education, Culture and Science Commission of the Education, Culture and Science Commission, with the participation of representatives of the institutions whose interests are affected by the amending act. The proposed amendment to the High School Law provides that cabinet ministers with regard to the Ministry of the Interior be subject to a different funding arrangements, including student self-governance funding, as well as academic staff, with the exception of who has a special service degree, the remunerationthe introduction of the modalities in the current version of the Act provides that the Cabinet Office may establish a different procedure for these colleges in terms of student manning and the approval of study programmes in the Commission's session, as part of the proposed amendment was not supported by the Board of the Higher Education Council ,part of the idea of the Latvian Students' Association was that, instead of the adoption of the provisions of the transitional provisions, it would be more appropriate to speak in the basic part of the basic text, where certain standards are already defined differently in the Ministry of Defence education authorities. A reprieve to the National College of Defense Tur has also been referred to the College of the Interior after a first commission of the commission was offered an explanation for changes to the High School Law, which the Education, Culture and Science Commission is still completely unhappy with Vote on Keeping on the Firstreading by the Commission was as follows: 5 in favour, 2 against, 2 abstentions.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq249 translatedText "Thank you for tabling the proposal before this year's " Amendment to the High School Law, " the first reading of the Education, Cultural and Science Commission, on behalf of the Committee on Education, Culture and Science.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq248 translatedText "29 October this year".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq247 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Law on the Movement of Spire Law', please vote! Parliament will vote on a resolution on this topic at second reading.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq246 translatedText "I therefore ask you to support the draft legislation at second reading.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq244 translatedText "Finally, a proposal by Mr KAUZES, Member of the Commission, which provides for certain administrative incentives for the marketing of small alcoholic beverages to support it".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq242 translatedText "And, also, 4 - a member of the MEP and the proposal by Mr Trupovifa - are partly supported and included in 2 - the Commission proposal".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq240 translatedText "With the adoption of the 2 proposal, the 3 - the KRAUL proposal - is partially supported and included in 2 - the Commission proposal".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq238 translatedText "2 - A proposal put forward by the Commission on small alcohol producers to substantially increase the amount of alcohol produced during the year to support Please".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq236 translatedText "Good y, dear colleague, so your attention to the bill " Amendment to the circular alcoholic beverage law, " the second reading of the Commission's Commission proposal has received five proposals for a proposal for a proposal for a change to the law of the Commission.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq235 translatedText "A thank you to Ingumar ling, on behalf of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq234 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 12 November this year".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq198 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 12 November this year".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq233 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill in second reading, please voting in the second reading of the Bill of Justice: 81, against and abstentions - the draft law should not lead to a second reading of the draft legislation: support for the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq232 translatedText "We have looked at all the proposals, and therefore, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, I call for the adoption of the bill' Amendment of the Court of Justice' in favour of the Second Reading.".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq230 translatedText "16 - The legal office's proposal, which has also been supported by the Commission".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq228 translatedText "15 - The Legal Office's proposal, which has also been supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq226 translatedText "14 - The Legal Office proposal which supports".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq224 translatedText "13 - proposal by the Legal Office, which also supports".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq220 translatedText "11 - proposal by the Legal Office, supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq218 translatedText "Also, 10 proposal is a proposal from the Legal Office, which is an editorial character and which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq216 translatedText "Also, 9 proposal is a proposal from the Legal Office, which is an editorial character and which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq214 translatedText "8 - Proposal for a Legal Office that is editorial in nature and which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq212 translatedText "7 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq210 translatedText "6 - Proposal for a Legal Office which is editorial in nature and which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq208 translatedText "5 - proposal by the Legal Office, which is of a technical nature and which is supported by".
• 2015_10_22_324-seq206 translatedText "4 is also a proposal from the Legal Affairs Commission, which has given its support to the Committee.".

• first
• previous
• next