Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

• 2016_04_21_359-seq108 translatedText "We now come to the most contentious section of the bill and in the article on the illegal acquisition of state secrets by many and different words, including mine (I would be very proud if I have the merit, which is not actually there), and this Articlethe jewelry is called a journalist's article, but in reality it is a verse about the illegal acquisition of state secrets, I will try to justify why this article has been created, and to dispel some myths and to leave some dialogue from apologies in advance if it isperhaps, as a result of this long-standing commission, the Commission has ruled for a delay in the viewing of this article as a whole, I believe that my obligation to inform why this article in this bill is what the risks of the bill have been, andso far, the experts referred to these risks to these risks, So as to why this article is a state secret, the information that the state must provide at the highest level, and the state has exclusive ownership of state secrets under the secrecy of the statebe protected accordingly and the country must be able to safeguard the purpose of safeguarding State secrets to the purpose of the fact that such a rule has come about, it is necessary to harmonise the responsibility for illicit activity with state secrets, by highlighting state secrets as a specialist subject to commercial secrecy, which provides for muchmore effective criminal justice protection than national secrecy, It has also, in substance, also been protected by the public in this example of a recipe for a recipe for a state secret, which is a state secret, a state secret, a military, political ,the economic, scientific, technical or other information contained in the list approved by the Cabinet and whose loss or unlawful disclosure may cause damage to the national security, economic or political interests of the Law on State secrets to an object ,consideration must always be made of the consequences of disclosure or non-disclosure of the relevant information, contrary to what is so many worry about - that each of those who wants toif you simply do not want to talk about something, then a' cloaked',' restricted',' restricted' or even' state secret', and thus simply does not talk about it or say So' State secrets', clearly states ,what information can be recognised as a state secret To dispel myths, I will call you, too, what information it is prohibited to determine a state of secrecy, natural or other disasters, on the environment, health, education, culture ,the demographic situation is information about violations of human rights, the level of crime, the crime rate, the cases of corruption, the illegal behaviour of officials, I would stress once again - that is referred to in the Bill, which is now referred to by journalists in the context of this lawhow will the state secrets protect ourselves so that journalists cannot write about the potential of our or official figures, or the potential for illegal action in the Law on State secrets, that information on the behaviour of officials cannot in any way be recognised as a stateinformation on the economic situation in the country, on the implementation of the budget, on the standard of living of the population, as well as on the salaries, privileges, relief and guarantees of the public and local authorities, privileges, facilitation and guarantees of state-run health - all information I am making- I would like to emphasise once again, it cannot be recognised as a state secret, it cannot be said that it is a state secret on which journalists should not be able to write and which they would not have the right to use in different ways and to inform the public about these. In this case, any unlawful acts which cause damage to the national interest or information about a country's detriment cannot, by definition, be classified as a state secret bearing in mind that liability is provided for the risk of a particular protected object, liability shall be limited to the liability ofthe illegal acquisition of information which, by definition, is to be regarded as the subject of the illegal acquisition of information of a State secret, to which the law is intended to establish the status of state secrecy, cannot be justified under any circumstances to emphasise that State secrets arealso, the information relevant to NATO, the European Union, the European Union, other international organisations as well as other international organisations, and that the purpose of the status of state secrecy is to protect the public security and defence and to protect public safety with information intended for such information ,what is essential for the development of civil society and whose obligation to inform international organisations and the public is that the status of national secrecy does not apply to the status of national secrets, which was proposed by the Task Force on Criminal Justice (probably we will return to this bill), but againhowever, I will pass on two concerns about the arguments about the way in which, at the very least, they were trying to dispel them at least, it was not dispingered by the concerns of journalists that they couldin some way, they restrict their freedom of expression and their right to inform the public about current events, even in this very important discussion on this article, the opinion of our representative at the European Court of Human Rights and the Ombudsman's opinion on the Legal Affairs Committee have sent a very broad view of the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Legal Affairs Committee. An analysis of this and, on a number of occasions, it emphasises the importance of allowing journalists in a democratic state to provide freedom of expression to journalists, But of freedom of expression and freedom of the press in a democratic society, it is not absolute and may restrict its limitations. Journalists are also subject to Article 19, third paragraph, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in order to protect the rights or reputation of other people, national security and public order and public health and moralityArticle 10 of the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as legitimate targets for the restriction of freedom of expression, shall be determined by the interests of national security, territorial cohesion or public security in order to prevent disorder or crime, health or morality, protect the dignity or rights of other personsdisclosure of information or to ensure the judiciary and impartiality, And in all such judgments, the European Court of Human Rights states that all persons, including journalists who exercise their right to freedom of expression and expression, assume responsibilities and responsibilities to the extent that they are dependentthe case of the case cited by the Ombudsman in the " Sie (Stoll) against Switzerland, " a fine for confidential information on the disclosure of confidential information by the Ombudsman in the Swiss Criminal Codethe session correctly pointed out: here's the disclosure of So it's even more narrower, I would say narrower in this scope because of the fact that a journalist is doing his job and revealing some information about this in accordance with the Swiss criminal codewe currently have the responsibility for the illegal acquisition of state secrets in this project, But so this information contained pieces from the letter of the working group sent by the Swiss ambassador to the USA (Strategy Paper), in which he spoke about Jewish organisations in Switzerland Runa was on compensationthe cost to Jews for their losses during the Second World War, the expressions of ambassador for Jewish organisations were negligently, the publication of this letter in the newspapers was caused by a scandal in order to establish whether the remedy - if necessary in the case - of the European Court of Human Rightsaspects of the case: the interests of the person, consideration and assessment in national courts, the conduct of applicants and the proportionality of the penalties imposed by the European Court of Human Rights concluded: " the subject of uncertainty could certainly have been caused by the desire to show the disadvantage of the disadvantaged. The light of Ambassador Rent left a paralyzed effect on Swiss foreign policy and a particular diplomat's career as a journalist did not allow readers themselves to draw their own conclusions, while the ambassador only gave the impression of ambassador antisemitic statements to the European Court of Human Rightsthe Swiss government's view that the article was aimed not at informing readers, but rather the creation of an unnecessary scandal at the European Court of Human Rights, concluded that Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Stoll) in the European Court of Human Rights" Switzerland mentioned that the kidnapping of a journalist about the disclosure of confidential information to the public can be dissuaded from the public publication of important news reports, so the press will no longer be able to play the role of his guard, And it has been emphasised on many occasions that journalists operate in good faith in relation to the fact that journalists operate in good faith in relation to the fact that they are working in good faith. The base and providing reliable and accurate information according to journalistic ethics, It is once again a question of if journalists feel threatened by this article as a chance to assess each of these cases (interjection: let us continue tomorrow!') andI am really sorry! - just a few minutes into the reply of Ulda Leitan to Mr Leitan, who had the opportunity to represent the Association of Journalists' views in the Committee on Legal Affairs, namely to speak and express my concern - and, in my opinion, the biggest expert in criminal law at the moment .- Professor Philip Krastia answered him in the context of their eloquence, which was made (possibly because there are press speakers who walk around with all the instruments around us) on state secrets - this is the case of the' ForState secrets -- This law has laid out why public confidentiality should be protected By this law has been asked by the Cabinet Office to draw up a list of state secrecy sites it has done and that is the basis of the law from which the law is based, in the case of Katra ,if any doubt arises from an investigation, they need to be clarified by the Regulatory System well enough if someone does not like any object that is included in the list of state secrecy, then this list should be amended on the basis of the current legislative framework which is the basis of the current regulatory frameworklasting We have this standard forged between journalists' parties is such a naivety, pretending that nothing can already be understood as the objects of state secrecy, their retention order, that there is a strict regime that has a signature theregive and a variety of other formalities should shout down on what is strictly prescribed, which may and should not be done by the state secret If you sit there and be a security officer, you should have taken a signature that you should not disclose this newsyou have surrendered And if you vs the law they will make it, then you will have to answer and if you have a colleague behind you, you looked at exactly what the state's secret is, or something that has been taken ,this case will be a case of Unregret that you have not understood at all exactly what the secret of the country is, and how it is guarded if these rules are being flouted, then responsibility for this is and, in this case, responsibility for the protection of those who must be protected ,both the one who has used the guardian's negligence and firsthand this information to the long-known Show many times here has been talked about: if it's gone out in the world and beyond is being distributed, it is not supposed to be criminalisedthese situations may be different. It is retiring, and I apologise once again for so long, but as indeed, there has been very high public attention and journalists very keen to report this, I wanted to inform you about thisthe provisions of the bill and those on those versions of My personal conviction were that there was sufficient reason to discuss this norm in We discussed this, and that was also supported by Bet, given that only members of the Committee on Legal Affairs were probablythere are detailed information on these arguments in favour and against, and that journalists are very likely to have additional discussions, and that such a discussion may also require a majority of the public, the Legal Affairs Committee has decided that this draft bill has not yet been sponsoredhowever, the Commission unanimously welcomed the fact that, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission, we are appealing to the Ministry of Justice's working groups, too, at our representative on the European Court of Human Rights and on the Ombudsman, to try and explain to interested groups the importance of the provisions of this law to the countryprotecting the security interests And so the two weeks await other wording I want to underline again: the legal rule of this rule at this moment is not likely to remove the rule of the order of the order of order that we could not make with a separate decision to remove itso the only way we could now postpone this provision is to vote that this rule is not supported yet again by this provision: it is necessary in this bill! And is likely to come back to Parliament within two weeks. And it will return as a separate bill like So So there are two identical rules on the table: one is Mr Andrei Judin, the other - the Legal Commission's Abi proposals are on the exclusion of those rules, and the commission has now supported them".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq106 translatedText "The 23-member interior minister, Riharda KOZLOVSKIS, who also supports".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq104 translatedText "22 - is the Legal Affairs Committee's proposal to So, as I have already mentioned, it has been developed by the Department of Justice working group, clarified and debated in a number of the Legal Affairs Legal Affairs committees of the Legal Affairs Committee as its proposed wording has been supported".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq103 translatedText "The vote on the vote will be voted on by the members of the votes on 21 votes in favour, 19 against, 63 abstentions.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq102 translatedText "21 - also faction consistency proposal not supported by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq101 translatedText "Please call, we will vote in favour of the 20-minute proposal, asking the voting regime! Please see the result!: 19, against - 62, abstentions - 5 have no support".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq100 translatedText "Yes I will once again say once again about the undisclosed particulars they are concerned with or not? Article 200 of the criminal law establishes responsibility for leaking sensitive particulars with regard to the private sector, andArticle 329 of the criminal law - if a criminal offence was committed by the public institutions, So these are articles which are unrelated to spying and the rest would thus be legally non-legal in this billthe Commission therefore did not support this proposal for a discussion on whether this is to be seen as part of the support, to which the Legal Office strongly stated that, in this situation, it should not be considered as part of the proposal the Commission did not support.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq99 translatedText "The debate closed with a comment from the rapporteur?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq98 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the original wording of Article 85 has been narrowed down and I also believe that the proposal of our faction partly supports, however, the general wording of the proposed article 85. Information on sensitive information, including any information about limited access, including, for example, personal information on the personal and health-related information, the person may be liable to be held liable for suchdisclosure of information, such as that an organisation of a Lithuanian or Estonian organisation or a business with such extravagant examples, might conceive of the content of the norm, so our proposal makes it clear that the responsibility lies withonly for the purposes of the collection of sensitive data relating to the national security interests to be transmitted to the foreign country or foreign organisation, I believe that the norm of the Criminal Law must be very precise and clear in order to support 20 proposals".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq96 translatedText "20 - faction consistency proposal does not support the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq95 translatedText "Please call, vote on the motion tabled by Mr Sterenenko, I ask the voting regime, please see the result!: 2, against - 59, 23 proposals are not supported by 23.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq94 translatedText "The Commission's justification before we started on this article, and the clarification of Mr Berzins, confirms this again to the only thing that can still be added: in this sitting, it really was very important that the opinion on each of the possible amendments should have an opinion from us. The representative of the European Court of Human Rights, and also from the Ombudsman, Bet, was, of course, not only such a protest letter that was directed against this article, which was very interesting that the sittings were open and in those meetings as I doas I mentioned at the outset, lawyers for Un was here attending a lawyer who, Well, let me have a conflict of interest with her because she was a lawyer against me in the trial of Linderman against the Abolathe question of whether she really represents the views of the Zarten Lawyers Council, she repeatedly asserted: " yes, " although, I have to say, I have not received a written confirmation after the next meeting was directly elected by the Latvian Council of Zachute Lawyers ,whoever claimed that she was unlikely to have such a mandate, And of course, she also opposed those rules of the law So want to emphasise once again that the Legal Affairs Committee had listened to all the views of those experts who were in that situationit could be answered whether or not these provisions are relevant to the Constitution or European human rights, it would confirm that such rules cannot result in any other harm to Latvia because this proposal was not supported by the Commission, and, on behalf of the Commission, please not to support it".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq93 translatedText "Thank you for the conclusion of the conclusion by the rapporteur on behalf of the rapporteur? Cake, Mr akes - the debate is now closed.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq92 translatedText "Honourable President-in-Office of the Council, dear colleagues, I would like to give a brief opinion on the considerations made by Mrs Steeutenko, specifying here some concrete examples of news gathering or evidence gathering in the court I really do not understand what the evidence-raising court has to do withthe illegal gathering of non-sensitive messages to the foreign intelligence service I did not understand Mrs Steunenko's example - in which sense what was said? On this issue, or the reference to the so-called' Open Governance Partnership' in Latvia is probably for manythe letters sent to Members by Mrs Steunenko forgot to say one crucial thing in the Proti, in each of those letters this association highlighted the fact that the bill has not been negotiated with the president, with our representatives in the European Court of Human Rights How we arewe know that this is not the case, Mrs Vassiliou, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, said that at each meeting the relevant officials or the trustees who spoke and supported by the specific proposals made by the Legal Affairs Commission and the Home Office, Thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq91 translatedText "Name of a member of the Gaidim capo".
• 2016_04_07_357-seq105 translatedText "Name of a member of the Gaidim capo".
• 2015_09_17_317-seq232 translatedText "Name of a member of the Gaidim capo".
• 2015_05_21_301-seq79 translatedText "Name of a member of the Gaidim capo".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq90 translatedText "Dear colleague, we have reached the very same esences of amendment and also, by the very least the most dangerous one, to be aware of the repetition of terrorism once again: when Europe shakes up one terrorist act after another (the President of the Chamber has increased the noise of the Presidenthammering with the hammer), our agenda is not the fight against terrorism, but the trapping of spies, following an assessment by the safety authorities, is the greatest threat to the population, not a suicide bomber but a spy, when the amendments are to be tabled as a matter of urgency in the original legislative proposal. There is a lot of talk about Ukraine's scenario And now, with the adoption of this law, the authors are thrilled - to be humbled! - that saved us from the Crimean scenario Bet or what is suspicious of the scenario that Crimas we have at allunlike Ukraine, we are a NATO member? Or do we really have to keep up with this fear? Or do we not trust our allies? Of course, there is still a misunderstanding as to whether the shortcomings of the law, as the authors of the bill have repeatedly said, are already hampering the use of spies? Under the law, you are currently affecting most of the population of Latvia, except perhaps children and whistle-gazing, by criminalising any kind of news collection - no matter how much they are going to make use of the power of a giant power to prosecute practically any person who, for example -collecting evidence in court to protect my property Collei, you have repeatedly written and sent members letters from " Open Governance Partnerships in Latvia, " which sees much of the hazard in this article of counter-espionage and their concerns are as: the security threat to the country will beintroducing a dangerous regime that will deter citizens from defending their rights in the form of letters sent to me by the Society, I would like to quote a few comments made by the association saying in their letter:' the proposed modification of the penal code opens the door to abuse of the justice systemthe use of " witch-hunts, " the censorship of the various piers of Latvian indigenous peoples, as mentioned, the collection of information on transactions of credit institutions to Latvian citizens in civil courts against unfair claims shall beas a spying as of February of this year, Saeima has received a letter of five associations on large-scale tax evasion schemes, which was estimated at around 650 million, and the appeal of associations to open the names of genuine beneficiaries to the potential of such whistleblowers. The use of this or other new articles With amendments to the Criminal Justice Act, unlimited and uncontrolled copper in the hands of the narrow-party group Should accept these amendments of the law, we will shame and foil Latvia more than unfriendly foreign media trolches for decadesthroughout the fight against television and the singer there is nothing compared to the fight against your country's citizens, I support the wording proposed by me, which provides responsibility only for the transfer of information (not gathering) for the specific purpose of countering the Latvian State, Thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq89 translatedText "A joint debate will be sufficient for the debate on whether to debate your debates with three minutes, and has received a request from Members, SMILTĒNS, Brigue, and Abu Meri's requestthe House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq88 translatedText "The next proposals - from 19 to 23 - relate to the article on which there was a very wide debate - on the article on espionage And, as I foresee the debate here, I would like to inform you of why there was a need for change of espionage. The regulation, and on some aspects of what is proposed in the new version of So spying, is carried out by both the use of intelligence services and the direct involvement of other state institutions or organisations at the Thus Intelligence Service is only one of the instruments that foreign sources can use for self-harm information. If the secret or sensitive information is being spied on by the state, it does not matter in a foreign institution or organisation that such information is of crucial importance to the fact that information in the possession of a foreign power is conducted in an illegal manner, in particular by disregarding the classification of the statutory declaration of any information as a countrysecret or undisclosed details, one of the purposes of preventing such information from being illegally entering foreign action should not forget that spying carried out by the National Security Authority has identified systematic, constant foreign intelligence interest in obtaining multiple information in the UK, includingwith the involvement of residents of Latvia in obtaining such information, it constitutes a threat to national security in the collection of information useful to foreign national intelligence services, which may contribute to the realisation of foreign interests through the use of a person's specific expertise in the reports of the collection or transfer of a foreign intelligence service ,there may be events, processes, opportunities to influence decision-making in foreign intelligence services in the future, the use of hate activity in Latvia, for example in order to obtain favourable decision-makingas a non-sensitive information or a state secret, of persons who may be affected by significant national decisions or have access to the protected information of the State to create favourable conditions for further spying activities or other harmful activitiesthe security of Latvia's national security, So sung, was the justification for this article which is necessary and I will now inform you of some of the terms referred to in this Article and of the way in which they are translated or understood by thisthe bill does not contain information about the transmission of sensitive information to criminal liability already provided for by Article 85 of the Regulation on the disclosure of spying information is not universally available; the law provides for specific operating procedures for such information and clearly specifiedthe prohibition on the dissemination of such particulars has, understandably, also been understandable in the light of the article in the section on' crimes against the state', the subject of spying crime is an undisclosed description of the state of security that Latvia holds for Latviaas a harmful national security interest, Savuthly's general disclosure of the disclosure of sensitive information is provided for in Article 200 of the Criminal Law (where disclosure of sensitive particulars has taken place in the private sector) and Article 329 of the Criminal Law (where the criminal offence was committed in the public office) ,the fact that, in the event of a espionage case, it is compulsory for a person to pass on undisclosed information directly to the foreign country or foreign organisation and the fact that sensitive information has been transferred to a foreign country or an organisation in addition to the espionage of the State, What is the task of the working groupa enhanced version of the Criminal Law? Working Group has added a set of standards to disposition the words offered to the ombudsman " with a view to transferring " in a clear and unambiguous way, under Article 85 of the Criminal Law Criminal Law on unlawful collection of non-sensitive messages only when evidence is shownthe person's intention to transfer this information to a foreign country or a foreign organisation in addition clearly indicates that there are no offences that may result in negligence in the conduct of criminal liability for the collection or surrender of unlawful actsthe exchange of foreign organisations or foreign organisations with certain use-limits is governed by laws and international treaties applicable to Latvia in the form of a prohibition on the exchange of relevant information or of such a ban, but subject to the conditions laid down, personal arrangements will be legal in Savuthlyfor other particulars other than the information disclosed, the liability of the person will be obtained only if it has been collected or forwarded to it once it has received a specific task from the enhanced version of the foreign intelligence department So Sirte clearly stating that the person isbe fully aware of the fact that the task comes from a foreign intelligence service and that the person is collecting and transmitting these messages rather than on its own initiative, while complying with the tasks of the foreign intelligence service on its behalf, the collection and transfer of foreign intelligence services, acting on its behalf, in its own right ,harmful and unacceptable activity, as the person in favour of the power of foreign intelligence activities to carry out intelligence and counter-intelligence activities in Latvia is restricted to the Latvian national safety authorities, which, under law and in Latvia's binding international agreements, have the right to exchange information with So Pao's information. There is a justification for the creation of this article, and also the justification for what was subsequently advocated by the Legal Affairs Committee in a joint proposal at the First Proposal on this' espionage article', which is 19-member of Yulia Steunenko's proposal, which has not been sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq87 translatedText "Members ask for a call for votes, vote on the proposal tabled by the Legal Affairs Committee, please voting, please see the result!: 62, against - 18, standing in favour of 5.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq86 translatedText "On behalf of the Commission, I call for support to be given to".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq85 translatedText "Thanks to So 18, the two fossutes support the debate on the conclusion by Was Rapporteur: what does the rapporteur wish to add.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq84 translatedText "Good morning, once again, in joining Mr Judin, I believe, however, that, on a case-by-case basis, the texts of a particular person must be judged very closely and scrupulously, as it may also be that it is as if it is as if it is as if it is a thingat the same time, what kind of internal problems does the country face, but at the same time, this text is intended to, say, be able to turn to Latvia against Latvia in any other way, I simply have to quote a small extract fromin light of my bitter experience, let us not quote the author, I will only quote the text on which the criminal case was even prosecuted, but the person was generally acquitted and still speaking' understand that Latvia is the same absolute evil '. As a Nazi state, but fortunately, much weaker and more cowardly, it is an unforgivable mistake for our generation to make such a mistake and there is no risk to the Russian schools of doing away with this country. Our task is simple enough tactically - to achieve maximum concessions through enemy weakness and cowardice, but not forgetting that it is the enemy of strategic - to pass on their views on the next generation Not always on the headquarters of the legislature ,but quite successfully, because no one knows when freedom will come, " Well, there is enough text for this person, and I think that these amendments of the law finally will allow me to ask him:' shut my mouth'.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq83 translatedText "Thank you to MP Carlim sergeant".
• 2015_05_28_302-seq21 translatedText "Thank you to MP Carlim sergeant".
• 2015_05_21_301-seq73 translatedText "Thank you to MP Carlim sergeant".
• 2015_04_30_296-seq415 translatedText "Thank you to MP Carlim sergeant".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq82 translatedText "Yes, when dealing with this article, it was not easy for us to see the proposal from the Legal Affairs Commission here (before the Minister of the Interior, which has been withdrawn) We had a lot of discussion about quality and that was onefrom the articles on which I also had the opportunity and, I believe, a duty to put some unpleasant questions to the people of the security police, I think it was not easy to answer the people, as I said at the very beginning of working with the bill, to think about it. On quality, I can see that this article is also an example of the fact that our objections, both from the position and from the opposition, were taken into account and that is not the first option that we will now vote on, nor the second; itit is the third or fourth version you could see - at first reading there were major risks to this. At first reading, it was intended to establish responsibility for " assistance in the event of the harmful conduct of a foreign or foreign organisation " and I recall my questionI am going to ask the experts whether it really will - if someone, for example - speaks to foreign journalists who, for example, represent a television that regularly carries out some kind of action against Latvia, then we will call the person whothey will talk to them and, as a result, will actually help them now to take harmful action now, because they will be able to refer to what he said to them:' will we call him to account? I remember the initial reaction was' Well, no, let us not be held to account! '. Yes, of course, the intention was not, but reading the article, there was an option that Our reservations were taken into account, and we are now seeing another version of the working group, And it is important that:' for the purposes of action, 'to help the foreign country or the foreign body to oppose the national sovereignty, sovereignty, territorial integrity, state authority, state powers, state equipment or national security; Prog@@. To bring to justice one, it should be established that the action was carried out for the appropriate purposes, andthe person is acutely aware that an activity carried out by another person is against the Latvian Republic, and that is another fundamental problem for the Latvian Republic at the moment, and that is what I was obliged to speak about in the Committee on Legal Affairs; is it one thing: is it one thing: is it one thing: is it one thing :the security services will be capable of proving all this?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq80 translatedText "18 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, drawn up in the Ministry of Justice working group and which removes the potential Sundance raised by Mr Ageshina from the rostry, the Commission supported this proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq79 translatedText "I would like to thank Please, 17, on the motion tabled by my fellow Member Yulia Stereneenko, please vote! For the results!: 1, against - 76, abstentions - 5 have no support".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq78 translatedText "I did not say anything about my proposal, I want to remind you of my proposal: I have not given any guarantee that we are considering a specific bill which has a list of specific powers that I shall report on behalf of the Commission and, as far as possible, to tryto set out the arguments presented in the Commission's many hearings; some of them, and I have just said well in the previous speech, I said that this was still a matter of each persongodapes who turn to the country and their human decency, who will apply those standards to the Youth Guarantee - or oral promises to give - this is not the case of Bet anyway, the commission's member Yulia Stereenko's proposal did not support the proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq77 translatedText "The debate closed with the rapporteur, as rapporteur, to explain the opinion of the Commission?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq76 translatedText "Dear colleague, this time I called on the Commission very briefly, instead of a useless article, to come to the main objective of amending the Constitution - the Constitution's sacrosanct, but my proposal was not supported by But, commenting on the discussions that were heard by the Committee on Legal Affairsand even today from the rostrum We hear oral guarantees that this law, this vast scope will not be used for abuse, I honestly don't know if we can post three days when the president is going to beforced to declare the law, to rely only on oral guarantees that have been made from the law of the author, the author and the guitar Madame It is just like having a credit: next time, we should not have to bring forward any cognitionto conclude and conclude any agreements; we will simply promise that we will ever give their money, and we will believe in the speech, and we will have to believe in the speech of all those who are promising us today that there will be no Thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq74 translatedText "17 is a member of Yulia Steunenko's proposal, which the commission has also not sponsored".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq73 translatedText "I would like to thank Please, on 16-16 - asking the voting regime, please voting! About - 19, against - 57, 6 proposals are not supported by the 6 proposals.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq72 translatedText "Yes, I would add that the consensus representative is not true, because, even in the commission of the original version of the text, perhaps it did not indicate this and, although the structure and the nature of the article indicate that this crime cannot be made by accident, the wording of which is not necessarythe Commission proposed at the Ministry of Justice a working group, clarifies the purpose and now reads:' for action to assist a foreign country or a foreign body to oppose the national sovereignty, sovereignty, territorial integrity, state authority, state power or national security', So now ,it includes both the purpose and the way in which this assistance might be directed at this point in support of the 16-faction consistency proposal which the Commission has been asked to exclude from the Commission's proposal.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq71 translatedText "Thank the House for the conclusion of the conclusion by the Commission?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq70 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, we believe that the wording of 81 1 does not actually improve the wording of Article 81 (1) which provides for the provision of very widely interpreted provisions of 81 1 of liability for the provision of assistance to a foreign country, a person, possibly without even realising that a foreigndoes a foreign organisation exercise any kind of harmful activity which is simply prewired against the security interests of the Latvian Republic, we have the impression that, according to the authors, it is not even necessary to identify the subjective part of a crime - it is onlythe finding stating that the term " provision of assistance " is very extensive, if the scope of its contents is not provided is very extensive and may result in the result of a subjective application of the proposal for a proposal for a proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq68 translatedText "The next proposals - from 16 to 18 - are Article 81 1 " Help of the Help of the Republic of Latvia against the security interests of the Republic of Latvia " So the first proposal under this Article is 16-fractions of the proposal, which has not been sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq66 translatedText "15 is a motion tabled by Member of Ingas Beites, which has not been sponsored by".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq65 translatedText "I would like to thank Please, on 14, on the proposal tabled by the Minister of the Interior, KOZLOVSKIS, by asking for the result, please see the result!: 58, against - 20, 5 are supported by the Parliament.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq64 translatedText "Yes This argument was hanging over the Legal Affairs Committee over and over again:' where are we hurrying and why do we need it, and why then the old rules can't work?' and then not on this one, much more challenging ,to the point where we end up, one of us here, the chairman of the Aivars Borovkov of Aivars, said: " stop but pretend! About the norms and the bodies are clear, it is confirmed by both the security police and the public prosecutor's office and to judges; they are perfectly clear about which wayin the way these standards apply No as you are now suddenly scared?' and you also take a lack of confidence in law enforcement!' and I also have enough people to come out and talked about my negative experiences in relation to what law enforcement has been calling forMr peat, and what we were discussing in the numerous hearings of the Legal Affairs Committee, can an ideal judge, a dishonest official of a security institution or a dishonest judge, be unable to interpret the way that it was misused by Probably - no Probably, ideal ruleswe are not in a position to create what we are able to do at the moment, to give a sufficiently modern instrument to those people who care about our safety and care for each particular case in which human rights are violated, in which human rights are being questionedto realise the rights or rights enshrined in his Constitution, guaranteed to him by the Council of Europe's Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Convention, there is a possibility, in particular, to challenge the following mechanisms to you in relation to thethe so-called article on how such a thing is being decided and what the analysis has been for Bet in relation to the 14 - the Home Secretary's proposal was supported by the Commission, and on behalf of the commission I asked Members to support it.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq62 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleague, I understand that Saeima must adopt the quality laws and, if passed through the last reading bill, even the Coalition's members recognise that this is not a quality, the question is: what is the aim of adopting the law? The 14 proposals that the Commission supports, but in substance in this proposal, are incorporated into the same rules as previous articles, which in general you have already advocated, the understanding and application of these standards can be very varied if you care carefullyread this article, which provides responsibility for a crackdown on certain of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia's Constitution, you will pay attention to a particular case! On the development of the Latvian country, about the launchpad and the development of democracy, the Constitution will be organised in the form of the Constitution, where people, respecting the Constitution, have the freedom to express their opinion and the world perspective, will speak with speeches. A rally man talks about the Latvian state continuing to operate in such a state and unwilling to join Sweden or Russia - choose which word you want (DEP R Manuising:' Estonia!') or Estonia, or whether we will see itthere is a national crime or not? I think it is not because, in the form of the Constitution, someone has been asked to speak Where you say that in such a situation it should not speak, then the criminal justice and the security police must start using the specific article onthat the internet calls for something to join, it sees that there is a crime in Now, let us think that the next day there is a similar rally in which people speaking in the debate say,' You know, we are a united European Union as a single country '. Perhaps a federal, but united country, giving up sovereignty because a federal sovereign nation is going away with " Sakiet, please - or in this second case, should there be a criminal process? (" yes! ") Does this mean that the security services process the processat the end of my subjective vision or following a political order? Dear colleague, if the rule of law is so inaccurate, perhaps the Committee on Legal Affairs should have listened to the assessment by the Venice Commission and the experts of the Venice Commission whether such articles can be inaccurateto be a Criminal Justice it is very difficult to vote' yes' to Articles But, thank God, the Criminal Justice articles on the state crime still exist, they are not deleted if working and a spiece can catch, if there issuch an obscure version, I think, rather than encourage those experts who still have to judge the last article, and then perhaps others to reassess why we should take a non-quality law and then re-evaluate?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq60 translatedText "14 is the proposal tabled by the Home Secretary, Riharda KOZLOVSKIS, who was sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq59 translatedText "Thank you for asking you to vote, I would like to ask that the voting regime be voted on, please see the result!: 18, against - 56, 7 proposals are not supported by 7 proposals".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq58 translatedText "Yes, on behalf of the Commission, I would, of course, thank the Very Ne only on this article, I will perhaps also answer Mr Kaiminau, who did not expect to answer the question of why this bill is urgent and ill-timed? This was necessary already. The day before yesterday, and I have asked a number of journalists too: why then so long worked? So long as the safety authorities worked so long, together with the experts, to prevent it from being misused and that it was trying to talk about urgency in each of thesethe votes in the Commission were called for twice by the Commission in an attempt to lift the urgency of this legislative project, and each time such a vote was rejected, that I think this bill, as I have already mentioned, was the five sittings in which we analysed each of these proposals But Wellafter its highly imaginative fairy tales, which we were told by Yulia Steunenko, I will still read out perfectly what security, from the law, from the letters of experts, even though there would be no Yes, I was in the study where people areafraid of the earthquake, Vusi is also afraid of the neighbour, Mrs Steunenko, who, most often, is afraid they will not be able to pay for their medical treatment But it is not the body of the law that we are currently talking about in this bill and in this sectionwe are now looking at how law enforcement can make a real tool in the event of a crime against a country in So'o the issue of Security Security has determined the condition of a characterization feature of the National Security Act in the first part of the first subparagraph: " national security is state and publicdelivering on a single, targeted measure has achieved a state of independence, constitutional installation and territorial integrity, society's perspective of free development, welfare and stability, " If public safety is the guarantee of the functioning of the normal society, national security isto describe the state of existence and the normal functioning of the country, Tizza's targeting of national security includes not only a crackdown on certain fundamental values, that is to say sovereignty, independence, territorial cohesion, the legitimate authority, the national apparatus, but also the targeting of those with responsibilitiesthis includes maintaining the situation, as well as a call to reduce the ability of nations and the country to protect the fundamental values defined by example: the situation where actions are taken to influence the armed forces' ability to protect the country in the pursuit of provocation or ideological coercionit can also take the form of recruitment, so that, at a certain point in time, they fulfil their civic duty - but, on the contrary, other actions, such as the National Security concept, have been mentioned in various legislative acts, such as the Nationalthe Safety Law should underline that the concept of national security is also enshrined in the Law of the State Security Authorities, clearly covering two areas - the country's internal and external security authorities are the only institutions in Latvia who are eligible to carry out intelligence and counter-intelligence actionsthe second paragraph of Article 3 of the law of the national security authorities describes, in particular, the activities of public institutions which intend to obtain information on the intentions and activities of foreign governments, their institutions, organisations or individual persons, which are or may be targetedagainst the Latvian Republic and its vital institutions, Savuthly, under the third paragraph of Article 3 of that Act, the counter-treatment is described as specifically authorised by the public authorities, whose purpose is to guarantee the national constitutional facilities, national independence, the country's economic, scientific, technical andthe protection of the military potential, state secrets and vital public interests and security against espionage, diversions, harmful behaviour, acts of terrorism and other threats, and special measures to prevent, eliminate or eradicate these threats, on the exclusive country of Minor Statethe definition of the functions characteristic of the safety authorities supplements the scope of the national security concept, also mentioned in various policy planning documents, but I think that it is quite sufficient to understand what is a national safety reason why this law is necessary. The articles in question and the scope of such a bill, bearing in mind the proposal made by the commission on behalf of the commission, but believed that this was not in line with today's demands, and supported the proposal by the Ministry of Justice's Task Force on this proposal that was not supported by the Commission.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq57 translatedText "Thank you for the conclusion of the closing session to explain the opinion of the Commission before the vote?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq56 translatedText "I would like to express my sincere thanks for the broad criticism, which is now being given to the existing norms, that My logic is by no means anti-national, or it is pointless to try and blame me, as any opponent of this amendment, to blame. The intention is not just to scare the country, but also to read it is very sad that recently, it has become popular to stigmatise Members after their vote Why we no longer have confidence in what was created in order to consolidate a newly revived, legitimate countryI can? Because this law, which we are talking about, came from the barricades of time - for Latvia, during the very turbulent times, you will not be anywhere in the form of an actual situation which is also intended to be addressed by the new articles, and you would also see the reasons for the urgencyevery law brings the public some benefit, I think that this will be an exception, I do not think that, with the strengthening of its power in the country, you will have looked after the citizens in the new version of Law Article 81 of the Act, that it would call for an appeal against the Latvian Republic .( e.g. against the state of the Republic of Latvia), the Constitution faces an unscheduled sentence of up to five years in a few days' time after the law comes into force, and the people talking about the country's policy will be very keen on how they can be determinedfor a suspect (for the conviction both I have so much conviction), there will be a broader, far-reaching broader than previously envisaged for Pietechis already with the launch of criminal offences against the state to dawn over any personal life in the EUI don't know if what is happening in our country right now with the financial structures and how fast it goes through these urgent amendments is to do with the influence of a group in politics, but one thing is clear: there is a strong desire to strengthen its ownI can and heddle that in any way it would not be in doubt when talking about security, I have to say that I was very recently in discussion, which was also called for by the President of the State to mark a great deal, such as the fact that the Latvian community is afraid offrom an earthquake that is a rarity of fear to be part of our everyday life, part of the sense of safety that, as opposed to fear, we are creating a community of union trust and trust in a higher power area, Copper will be sure that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that society in the country is safe, so that societythe elements that are destabilising the situation in the country to Izd the tenth chapter in the old version, the overall message is: " all who will try to disrupt peace in your life and confidence over tomorrow so that you, the citizen, can carry on with what they are planning in their lives, will be brought to justice" with the new amendments now, a completely different message is read: " because even your actions can prove to be criminal " The debate held at the State President of the State was another valuable opinion: a lack of communication between the state and the state of the people on the issue. Little appeals to their people, in my opinion, the most important dialogue in a country with an individual going into legislation When we have adopted this law, we will be able to safely assert that the country has shown the aggression against the people of the state is rather threatening as it isthe impact on almost every one of us And the last message from this controversy is this: security is not just about armure, law or the closing of guitar Security is health, peace and welfare We can't raise national security with a single repressive law ifother laws will destabilise public safety in other areas because, at a time when the country will have to protect the arms of the arms, which we have recently been carefully crafting, there will be no who is doing so, as part of a prison, part bank or a countrythere will be a property and it will live under the bridge, but some will stand in line with the doctor, so, colleagues, please stop speculating with security, which our citizens do not just have to go back on in the Commission with small clarifications. While maintaining the condition of violence precisely in order to protect those whose actions have so far not been criminalized but whose intention is not to target public safety, Why does this situation seem more dangerous than terrorism. Because if a person will spread an appeal from the Internet to dismiss the petition, rather than start collecting signatures, as is required by law, the police will bye their stairs in the stairs, but if a person on the Internet is going to call for acts of terror, then under the current regulation, before callingthe person in charge of justice, the Security police, will have to check whether they are just idle speeches or that the person in this situation bears witness to the security police will not wait at the door, but at the beginning of the day, you will check the entire Ambrella you have proposed to me.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq55 translatedText "No objections to the extension of the debate to seven minutes?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq54 translatedText "Madam President-in-Office of the Council, dear colleagues, to present the reasons why I have submitted proposals for this legislative project, I would ask me to extend my time, when you put together two speaking times".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq52 translatedText "13 is a member of Yulia Stereneenko's proposal, which the Caucus hasn't sponsored".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq51 translatedText "Thank you for the conclusion of the vote on this proposal.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq50 translatedText "Colleagues, in this case, the issue is the same as in Article 80: do we believe that a public call should be held for public provocation, if it is directed against Latvia's independence, or if it is only made in an unscheduled EU Constitution. Colleagues have told you, I sent my colleagues letters and explained to the Legal Affairs Committee that a possible discussion on this issue will not tell us that the people who will take action will not be told about the articles that were previously mentioned by Mrs Adam ;but they will talk about the 8 chapters of the Constitution and tell us that, by disseminating relevant information, by taking appropriate action, they exercise their freedom of expression, exercising their right to demonstrate, rallies and so on, it is very important to respect the opinion that wasread out that, in the future, content will also include content and, if we so believe, then where a person will use freedom of expression, it will be reasonable to speak of the fact that freedom of expression is not absolute and thus has a responsibilityperhaps, in principle, where is the difference between my approach and the approach that you will see in the next proposals? My offer was simple: if there is an appropriate action, I can see that the majority is a little bit more elaborate, but I can see that the majority is a little bit more elaborate, 'as the Constitution does not, it will be necessary to discuss with it before each application whether the person who carried out the actions has acted in the form of the Constitution or not, whether his rights have been widespread or not so extensiveI am not asking to vote in favour of my proposal, but, given that we already supported 4 proposals, I would inform you of a potential problem, though I very much hope that the practitioners will cope and that the appropriate provision will be effective for Thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq48 translatedText "The further proposals are on Article 81, " The violent overthrow of the State of the Republic of Latvia and the violent modification of the country's facility " The first proposal of this article with number 12 is MEP Andreja Judin, who has not been sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq46 translatedText "11-year-old is a member of the Ingas Providence Proposal, which the Caucus hasn't sponsored".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq45 translatedText "The vote on the vote will be voted on by the Members of the Internal Market Committee, asking for the result, please voting: 59, 59 against, 19 abstentions: 5.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq44 translatedText "10 is the proposal by the Home Secretary, Riharda KOZLOVSKIS, which clarifies that this article can only be applied if this action was carried out in the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq43 translatedText "Vote: please call the vote, please vote! - please vote! Please vote!: 1, against - 60, 23 proposals are not supported by 23 proposals".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq42 translatedText "9 is the proposal tabled by Ms Yulia Steunenko, who has not been sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq40 translatedText "Colleagues, with my proposal, I did not propose to completely waive the relevant provisions of the Man the idea that the appropriate provision could be included in the previous- in Article 80, bearing in mind the support given by the Minister for the KOZLOVSKIS proposal, which does not, however, withdraw the relevant regulation, I shall withdraw its proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq38 translatedText "Further proposals - from 8 to 11 - will apply to Article 80 1: an organisation of mergers with the aim of toppling the State of the Republic of Latvia with a proposal by Mr Judas of the Member State of Judas, who is not sponsored".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq37 translatedText "The vote on the vote will be voted on by the Members of the Internal Market Committee, asking for the result, please voting: 56, against - 1, 22.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq36 translatedText "7 - Motion for a resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Central Bank".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq34 translatedText "6 - A Member of the Ingas Providence proposal, tabled by the Commission, has not received any support for this in the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq33 translatedText "I would like to ask the House to turn a call to the President-in-Office, I would like to ask the voting regime, for the vote! Please, the result!: 19, against - 59, 6 proposals are not supported".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq32 translatedText "It must be recognised that, in any case, supporting the proposal is under no circumstances, but nevertheless, from the point of view of criminal law, If we write' performance-oriented', we are already pretending that it is workingit is deliberate not to be casually carried out, but is aimed at the achievement of some kind of goal, we have a number of articles where we are using such structures and we are not using the word' intentional', butit is about the crime of self-harm - it can only be done with the intention that this proposal cannot be supported legally not to write this word to the law Thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq30 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, it is hard to deny that the original wording of the bill has somewhat improved, though I would like to say that the regulation of 10 chapters of the Criminal Law clearly specifies the characteristics of the offence, i.e. for which specific actions a person may be calledthe provisions contained in this bill, however, are very general and non-criminal, and there is ample scope for interpreting the substance of our proposal, as explained in the preamble, as well as lengthy discussions in the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Legal Affairs Committee. It is not primarily about the proposals of the working group and not on Members' proposals - all of this does not believe that the provision of the relevant article will be comprehensible to the person asked for action to refrain from banning acts banned by law in the provisions of the existing articles of criminal lawthere is much more clarity in the provisions of the regulation on criminal offences and, in my view, it is now clear to people at this stage what action can be taken to bring about the criminalisation of Saviano 80, first paragraph, of any act of criminal justice, and this allows for a wide-ranging interpretation of the regulation ,in order to clarify this specific provision and to exclude unreasonable standards, it is necessary to provide that only intentional acts are required on deliberately intentional acts, and, in our opinion, it is important that the article contain the intention and the deliberate action to vote on the 5 proposal!".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq28 translatedText "5 has submitted the proposal for consistency and the Commission has not supported the proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq27 translatedText "The vote on the vote will be voted on by the Members of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq26 translatedText "Four proposals have been submitted by the Ministry of Interior, Rihards Kozlovskis, which has been debated in the Ministry of Justice working group with all experts and was taken as the basis for discussing this article in So I mentioned above with the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. The unforeseen nature of Mr Here is more precisely what Mr sergeant has mentioned in his proposal for an illegal way, with the explicit provision that the way in which the Constitution, as defined in the Committee on Legal Affairs, could be the basis for any change in the Committee on Legal Affairs.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq25 translatedText "Thank you for your proposal.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq24 translatedText "Yes, good morning, colleagues, I very briefly have already commented that there was a possibility, in the initial form of this bill, for the possibility of targeting people trying to change things in the country through a referendum and an opportunity that seemed unacceptable to mebut, given that the adoption of this bill was tabled by the Internal Affairs Minister, Riharda KOZLOVSKIS, which prevented this contradiction, I call for a vote on these proposals - for the fourth and seventh - but I withdraw my proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq22 translatedText "3 - A member's sergeant proposal has also not been sponsored".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq20 translatedText "2 proposal is made by a member of Yulia Steunenko's proposal, which has not received any support in the commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq19 translatedText "I would like to ask the House to turn a call to the President-in-office, Mr Judin, by asking the voting regime.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq18 translatedText "Well why not vote?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq17 translatedText "Is the request for a vote on the proposal to be maintained?".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq16 translatedText "Dear colleagues, before I begin to explain the substance of the proposal, I will try to describe in a few words the state of the art, It will help you better understand the essence of my proposal, I will emphasise that this bill is really very important for the lecture I can remember - I remember :before half a year ago, I told my fellow judges, the prosecutors, that the articles of our law which are in the relevant chapter are not applicable, we need to amend the relevant rules, and is pleased that the working group has made the appropriate proposalsit will be possible to address the problem of Bet, where the targets are important, it does not mean that content needs to be forgotten about the important objectives that we want to achieve, but it is also necessary to think about the quality of the legislative act, which is no secret to the firstthe reading-based project was not perfect and we had to work to complete it to ensure quality I can really thank all those involved (several were listed, listed and other people who thought they were going to solve the problems) ,and after each meeting, when we heard from the parties involved that everything was in order, after each meeting, there was already a working group meeting, where experts have debated the objective of addressing the problems and the underlying problems on this point. I think that, in my opinion, the law can still be improved, and that means that perhaps, after some time, we will have to come back to the Bill But pleased that I can again repeat that I can repeat that today, by votingalso on the whole bill, we will be able to do this safely, because the bill no longer poses any threat to the interests of which we are talking about Article 80, as for Article 80, it must be said that our criminal law currently provides for responsibility for actions aimed at the countrythe overthrow of power, the undermining of territorial cohesion, is required by The First Reading proposal - the provision was made to modify and from the three articles to form one, subject to responsibility for the relevant actions of Tashi: if we foresee responsibility for the actions offor actions against a country's equipment, then the fact is that people who, for example, think that a presidential republic is better than the parliamentary basis, or who, say, propose that Latvia should form a federation rather than to retain a statethat is the problem, and this is a problem and one that needs to be addressed, thinking about how it can be addressed, I presented a proposal to the essence of My proposal very simple: if one man carries out an action against Latvian independence, sovereignty andthe territorial integrity he has to answer for this must be clear, the law must be clear that this proposal was not supported by another proposal of Tika, which, in fact, this proposal, which we will certainly vote on, is not on its own terms. The nature and the ideas are worse, but I am, however, baffled by the wording in the 4 proposal: the action against the independence of the Constitution, Yes, indeed when we began to criticise this norm, appeared in the letter that spun outnot only does Wade also mean content in explaining the content we're really going to solve, but whether it would be better and clearer - the law to write that independence is protected and anyone who does something against independence is called atcriminally responsible? In fact, we are now armed with this letter, which has been read out to us by the opinions of experts, and I have no doubt that, in the case of judicial practice, the problem will be resolved, including the adoption of 4 proposals, But, in my opinion, my proposal is simpler and more understandable.".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq15 translatedText "" Why not rush out, tell us when to leave! "".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq14 translatedText "Yes, Andrei Judin's proposal is - so that Andrei Judin also comes and speaks (in the Chamber of laughter) I pleaded for the previous one here, I do not know what I am thinking of. Why are you setting up the sort of manipulation you can make here at the moment, but please explain why this rule is an urgency?! (DEP A Loskutov'we did this last time! ") This is all I am asking of Jo when there is urgency so the President cannot return to Saeima this question, Please, Members, come and explain the urgency!".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq13 translatedText "And the urgency of this report, Saeima, has already ruled in a possible debate on 1 - MEP Andrei Judin's proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq12 translatedText "Yes, yes! You can't stop you, you Yes, Speech".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq11 translatedText "Your neighbour, you have applied for a debate on 1 proposal, which does not involve urgency".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq10 translatedText "I believe that urgency undermines the meaning of these amendments and I would like to tell the Latvian public what urgency it means here in the Commons: this bill is passed in two readings".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq8 translatedText "Good morning, dear colleagues, so on 3 March we had a bill in this Chamber on the' Amendment of the Criminal Justice Bill' and that the urgency of this report was made in this Chamber, informing you of the bill, I said that this bill is very important for the strengthening of our national security ,because the rules governing the crime against the state are 17 years old and no longer morally unable to ensure that the law enforcement bodies are able to use the statutory instruments and to target those who, somehow, threaten our national security at the timefrom the rostrum, I pointed to the potential problems in this bill, which were pointed out by experts, looking into the bill before the first reading of the National Security Commission and the Legal Affairs Commission's 25 February joint session, as the principal stressed, it is very important in this situation to achieve ,in order to ensure a balance between the rules on criminal law and respect for human rights and democratic freedoms, and I also pointed to specific problems, certain articles that are more likely to be made clear on the evening of the same day are suddenly one part of the mediaI rang a very big campaign against this I will call these media, so that conclusions can be drawn for you themselves,' The jacket Seibon, BaltNews, Sputniknews en, RuBaltic rip, IMHOclub, tore, IMHOtube tore )the fact that these amendments are adopted As you may notice, is also a pick-up today, where people with red flags remind you of rights, freedoms and democracy, It is only a question of whether they recall European democratic freedoms andthe right of each country to protect the rights and freedoms of democracy and human rights, and human rights, or they remind you of their country, which does, however, the President-in-Office of the Committee on Legal Affairs wrote in a letter to the Committee on Legal Affairs, welcomed the fact thatsuch a draft law is the result and will be pushed and dealt with, while pointing out these potential concerns about the very important balance between human rights and criminal justice, and it is very important that people are not held liablewhat about the actions of the Constitution, which are guaranteed by the Constitution, the Legal Affairs Committee decided to convene such a meeting as much as is necessary for any expert or invitation to be reflective of, negotiated andindeed, in order to create a version allowing for the maximum possible interpretation and the abuse of the rules of law, the Committee on Legal Affairs was held at five sittings, 29 March, 12 April, 19 and 20 April - which dealt withthe proposals for the second reading of the Bill were received by 34 proposals, but, as you can see, today's table is 26 (on why, at the moment, there is 26, I will tell a few later) each of these sessions, which was made publicly available in the Red Chamber, was publicly available in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Red Chamber. The scroll is recorded in both objections and all the arguments in So'o anyone who wishes to challenge the legality of those rules is a chance to see in detail the provisions in Katra from those sessions attended by both the Security Police and the Military Intelligence Agency. And the representatives of the security service, both SAB representatives, were therefore represented by the three institutions which jointly drafted the bill, and also by representatives of the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice for a permanent working group on the justice ministry, so each of these caveats once againthe working group also brushed off the members of the Office of the Interior in the House of Lords (in particular, many thanks to Prof. Krastin!), the representatives of the judiciary, Mr Laalbes, from the District Court and Mr Bauma from the District Court; andMr Stuke was a frequent member of this particular member of the president's office for the president's office, so that the President would have the assurance that the concerns he has expressed in his letter to the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Court of Justice Pieshared by Mr Pieteau's lawyersRepresentative Borovkov And - most of all! - Billie Jansons (above all the hearings), and attended a Cabinet representative at the European Court of Human Rights Christine Lock (or her representatives) So they all took part in every single rule, every single proposalexpressed in relation to the possible wording of the Criminal Code, to comprehensively assess and hear all the views of experts, and to hear from all of these proposals (uproar by the President of the Chamber), mainly from the point of view of the wording or wording of the lawcould not create problems for Latvia in the European Court of Human Rights, and that is to create problems with respect to human rights, So, as I have already said, these amendments are considered to be very substantial, including former Constitutional Law Commission Member Lauris Lauris in the public debate on television on televisionit pointed out that this is one of the recommendations of the Constitutional Law Commission on how to strengthen Latvia's rules to protect our sovereignty in the Little Tables we see of the 26 proposals received from Members before we now look at each proposal, I will however read the expertopinions and opinions on this fundamental discussion - whether people can be prosecuted for offences committed by the Constitution or have not been prepared as well as a comprehensive Home Office response to those proposals as they are not all usedto read the transcripts of transcripts, I will read it to you now, So: the draft bill on the clarification of Article 80, first paragraph, 80 1 and 81 of the Criminal Law is to emphasise and establish that the person is liable to be held liable for such acts ,the way in which the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia is otherwise prevented from being interpreted in such a way as to prevent a person being held criminally liable in cases where it is implementing the Law of the Constitution to establish responsibility for actions aimed atagainst the Republic of Latvia's national sovereignty, sovereignty, territorial integrity, public authority or state equipment in the Constitution, the Constitution, the Constitution, which has concluded that the sacrosanct Constitution allows the nation of Latvia to withdrawthe current satusy and the creation of a new constitutional entrant It is this discussion as to whether we are allowed in the referendum to ask whether or not the people wish, say, the republic, whether it is admissible and whether it is admissible or not. A part of society could be penalised No! It is permissible, but it does not allow the dissolution of the Latvian state and its democratic apparatus to remove the constitutional legislator's constitutional amendment by amending the Latvian state's constitutional identity, if this could lead to the abolition of the country's democratic installation oreven in its own country, So, we can decide on the installation of an installation, but we cannot decide that we will abolish the state democratic system or to knock down our own country, So Constitutional, to protect its own national sovereignty ,independence, territory and its unity and democratic state facilities have been imposed on every citizen of the Latvian Republic, and the Latvian people cannot carry out actions against sovereignty, the independence of the Latvian state, the territorial integrity of the Latvian State and the democratic state of the countryit is therefore likely that the Constitution does not provide for a way of constitutionally breaking down the Republic of Latvia's independence, sovereignty or undermining the territorial integrity of the Latvian Republic in Vidoon from the founding of the Constitution, the words " Loss of the Constitution " of the Latvian Constitutionthe format does not only apply to the procedure but, above all, to the operational content of the Action Jau Bill as stated: " the way in which the Constitution of the Republic of the Republic of Latvia can be changed, enshrined in the same Constitution, while also covering the core of the Constitutional Constitution, which includes Latviathe existence of the country in Tizgod must in any case not only assess the scope for formal compliance with the Constitution, but also whether the activity not directed against the Constitutional nucleus of the Constitution, " No mentioned, is that action to meet the Constitution and in form and in form andthe content is legal and cannot be considered a criminal act is only unconstitutional, it is an act that focuses on a modification of the constitutional basis, circumventing the rules laid down in the Constitution, or even through the provision of a Constitutionthe actions aimed at the contrary to the Constitution This is the explanation that was most widely discussed on the question of whether any actions envisaged for the Constitution, in my view, are sufficiently complete and precise, with references to legislativethe acts have been drawn up by experts, and it was read in the hearings of the Legal Affairs Committee that the law and the provisions contained therein is a proportionate objective and responsibility, which is intended unconstitutional, is proportional to So that was a fundamental objection ,concerning the number of articles now considered in each individual proposal Article 1 is Article 1 on the release of the power of state power, and several proposals were received on this article by Mr Andrei Judin, who was not supported by the Commission".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq7 translatedText "I would like to thank Mr One for the one thing:' against' we should vote' yes' to the Bill in the Law on the transfer of the' real estate tax' to the Budget and Finance (Taxation) Commission stating that it is the responsible Commission, please voting the result! The 30-minute draft Commission has not referred to the next part of the agenda -' For the award of the leave' on unpaid leave from 27 April to 3 May from 27 April to 3 May 2010he has received a request from Member State Imanta to grant him an unpaid leave from 27 April to 3 May of this year, and we will vote for the award of the leave to be voted on by the Member of the European Parliament. Between 27 April and 3 May of this year, I asked the voting regime, please, the result!: 82, against and not abstentions: no decision has been taken on leave granted for an unpaid holiday at the Jurim Schulz on 4 and 5 May this yearin May, the Saeima Bureau received a request from the Bureau of Jura Schulz requesting that he be granted unpaid leave between 4 and 5 May of this year, the vote on the award of the holiday shall vote for the award of leave to a member of the jury at Jurim Schulz this year4 and 5 May, I asked the voting regime, for the result!: 85, against and abstentions - no decision has been taken on the request of the Member to be granted the next item: " election of candidates, appointments, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals, cardinals- Court of office, trust or motion of censure " on the agenda - Draft Decision " on the impact of the PCC of the Commission on Corruption, lobbying, organised crime and smuggling on the collection of taxes and the investigation of economic and financial crime, as well as of the Interior, Justice, Ministry and Financevoting for the election of members of other public authorities to respect the principles of personal responsibility and the election of members of good governance " There has been no candidate for Please call! - will vote for the draft decision on the impact of the Parliamentary Investigation Commission on the impact of corruption, lobbying, organised crime and smugglingconcerning the collection of taxes and economic and financial investigations, as well as the assessment of the personal responsibility of members of the Interior, Justice, Financial Secretary and other public authorities' principles, " please please vote !- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / ENthe Public Administration and Local Government Commission, " Please the voting regime, please see the result!: 85, against and abstentions - is not a decision taken on the agenda - draft decision to revoke Viktor Valaim from the Budget and Finance (tax) commission " PleaseI would vote in favour of the draft decision on the withdrawal of the draft decision by the Member for the Budget and Financial (Tax) Commission, " please vote! For - 84, against and abstentions - the decision has not been taken on the agenda - Draft Decisionelection of Mr Vilnius to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Committee, we will vote on the draft decision " For the election of Mr Vilnius, the Budget and Finance (Taxation) Committee, " please vote! On - 87, against and abstentions -the decision has been made on the agenda - Draft Decision on the election of a member of Viktor Valaim to the Public Administration and Local Government Committee, " Please call the draft decision, " On the election of a member of Viktor Valaim's election to the Public Administration and Local Government Committee, please see the voting regime! The result of the signature of the draft law on " the draft law on the Criminal Justice Bill " is not the decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs, the second reading of the legislative resolution adopted by the Legal Affairs Committee".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq6 translatedText "Good morning, colleagues, I guess I'm still a relatively new member for the Bite, and her female intuition unfortunately worked partly as the decision of course was taken this week in the Cabinet of Ministers, which was passed on to Saeima. Will include this cadastral value freeze over the coming year, freezing the value of cadastral values is not the only step Jr is expected to make up to 30 03 2017, as we will do a Very broad feature, I would say, such as those currently in placeexpressed from the National Land Service, for example, the introduction of a flat-rate dwelling tax - common to both land and buildings, the Union of Local Government has offered to identify a home-free area on the number of declared persons, with certain square meters, as you know, PortalManaBalss Sen has suggested the only housing infinitely in this case is now just under discussion, and the first step that we have already taken is that the government has put this cadastral value freeze in 2017, of course we will take the next stepsstep one: the next 30 March model will already be aligned with both the Local Government and other non-governmental organisations, and with the Department of Justice and the Department of Finance And after all, we will end up with this draft bill you made. At the moment, it does not interfere with the municipal budgets with the solvency of the population, it is aimed only in the same direction by the goal of the Parliament, though it is that such a balance should be And I hope that we will end up with this bill in 2017. The conclusion is that this wave of immigration, which, in essence, does not result in a sharp rise in property tax, will reduce even more Thank I call on the mayoral faction to refrain from voting on the proposal".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq5 translatedText "Thank you for " Pret " to speak to MP Edgar putra".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq4 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, Mr putras, you dismayed at me with my striker to speak against, because I am now in the floor with the aim of thanking you, colleagues, for the fact that, since last week, we submitted this bill for the first time in work. The government has rejected it, the government has made a decision, ministers have said, everyone has promised that a real estate tax will be reduced in the sole way that the sole dwelling tax will be reduced, so I was absolutely convinced that the bill will be reduced today. One case of support, of course, is to talk and adopt one thing in government, and a very different thing is a real bill and a real offer that is now passed on to commissions and, if any correction is needed, then three readings would then be made withthe proposals for Mr Walt will obviously come and say that a property tax for the sole dwelling is not to be reduced, that it is measurable ten times higher than it was a decade ago than it was so far, that it should continue to be renewable every year. Only upward changes to the values of cadastral values, and that in the future, the houses of people who live in their owners will be executed because they were built next to this house by a million, and has therefore jumped for cadastral valuecolleagues, obviously I still need to talk specifically about this bill, so that you know what the content of the Latvian Association of Regions has carefully explored in the real estate tax system, and I must say that it requires many and radical reforms in the light of it ,the fact that there is a record in the Coalition Treaty that no opposition proposal can be upheld, we are not coming up with a radical reform offer today, we are proposing a limited reduction in the property tax rate of 0.1 per cent of the cadastral values of the sole dwelling or declared property ,what could be either a flat, or a house and a adjacent land to one hectare, we are offering to give local authority the right to reduce the tax on immovable property to such some other assets, and that the local authority could do so when considering both its ownthe needs of the people, but also their own budgetary options, should be so that the current and existing property tax system is unfair, and the unfair direct treatment of residents who live long-term possession in a property in Jo is if the man can afford to buydo you build an expensive real estate - and we find it: yes, maybe he can afford a tax on the state to pay for this! - and a very different thing for years, if a person is living in property and whose cadastral value is changing, not because ofhe did something radically to invest or change the value of its own property, but only because someone has sold something, bought, bought, constructed, thereby altering the value of his property by a Fellow, we are worried about them ,which drives If a inherited home property tax must be paid in €1,000 a year, we pull people out of his house out of his house, the family home, is what's literature and heritage being portrayed as a very expensive and important contusionand these houses have always been emotionally very tough and hard It is what we are pushing our people to do when they realise that a 1,000 euro estate tax pay they are failing Labi if they are vacating on another place of residencesomewhere in Latvia, unfortunately, very often this is happening outside of the College of Latvia, I call for a policy of a property tax that allows people to take root, catch and stay in Latvia, not to pass on this bill to thank you".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq3 translatedText "Thank you for the objections to the commission of the bill? A bill tabled in the " Amendment to the Law on the estate tax " to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission stating that it is responsible by the responsible Commission to refer to Inga bite".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq2 translatedText "Good morning, dear fellow Members, in five minutes I will try to convince you to support this bill, the Social and Employment Commission has gone into cabinet and is asking for support for this bill because we are facing the challenge of the liquidators who are the victims of the emergencytrying to prove they have the right to damages Today is the kind of situation that we have in the 1900 liquidators (in the chamber noise of the sitting driver's hammer) who gets their damages at retirement and 1,100 people who have retiredafter 2000 and which do not have this reward, the panel believes that it is not fair and that we should join forces in the legislative path to eliminate We know that 28 requirements are brought before the Court and 20 of them are alreadythe consideration and the decisions are positive for those applicants, the emergency liquidators who sued the country today as this is not cheap - from the special social budget it will take 2.2 million, whereas in the coming days we will commemorate those people ,having saved Europe, saved us too, I think today it was not correct to speak about money, 26 April 1986, and a very large number of people who participated in the liquidation of the consequences, now very badly and irradiated by it, andall of the rewards that we may also try to pay them, will go to medicines and rehabilitation measures, I understand that the agency has accused us of other times that we are very active through the commission in driving attempts to increase pensions and allowances, but today ,after 30 years, the families of those affected by these emergency liquidators feel very damged on the part of the national party There the issue of prizes with medals or originals has not been considered by the president, and the capitulation of the Order did not consider our requestthere is no problem yet as we honour those people He becomes we are getting less and less every year, and I think if today we will resolve the issue of this damages, it will be a very good signal and a step thatlet us know that we understand and respect these people who, at the risk of their health, were protected by Europe from its disaster and its consequences, which their children also feel, today, I think I shouldmuch more money to invest in these rehabilitation measures, because today it is evident that this radiation has had an impact not only on liquidators, but also on their children, Please support - and the commission will ask this bill to take up this legislation at first reading".
• 2016_04_21_359-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, honourable Members, I call on Members to take up seats in the chamber of Saeima in the House of 21 April before we turn to the agenda approved by the Bureau, requests the amendment of the sitting of the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission to amend the agenda of the sitting. To include a bill called " Amendment of the Sodu Enforcement Code " Does Members have any objections to this amendment to the agenda? No objections to the draft agenda for MEPs' amendmentsand to include a draft decision on the revocation of a member of the Directorate-General Vilnius from the Public Administration and Local Government Commission, " Does Members have any objections to this amendment of the agenda? - Members are not opposed to the agenda as amended by the Members of the Valainis ,and others are asking for an amendment to the agenda for the sitting, including a draft revocation of the draft decision of the member of the Commission on the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission: is there not an agenda for an amendment to this agenda? The House will also vote on a resolution on this topic. The amendment is that no objections to the agenda have been amended by the Members Valainis, Zakis, Lejins, Judin, Sauderen and others to amend the draft agenda of the member of the Public Administration and Local Government Committee on the election of Viktor Valaim in the Public Administration and Local Government Committee's DraftMEPs have reservations about the amendment to the agenda? A bill tabled by the victims of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, to be transferred to the Social and Employment Commission for the purposes of determining that it is responsible to the Commission responsible Commission".
• 2016_04_14_358-seq239 translatedText "I thank the sitting I declare resumed on the conclusion of the Doha Round.".
• 2016_04_14_358-seq238 translatedText "Dear colleagues, not registered today: Guntis Bellevic, Gaidis boss, Gundars Many, Eric Kalnins, Romane, Nikos, Nikita, Nikos and John Tutin".
• 2016_04_14_358-seq237 translatedText "Thank you First Secretary-Secretary-General for the collection of the results of the registration".
• 2016_02_04_342-seq187 translatedText "Thank you First Secretary-Secretary-General for the collection of the results of the registration".
• 2015_10_01_320-seq304 translatedText "Thank you First Secretary-Secretary-General for the collection of the results of the registration".
• 2015_06_04_304-seq954 translatedText "Thank you First Secretary-Secretary-General for the collection of the results of the registration".

• first
• previous
• next