Saeima |

Saeima

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

Showing items 24,301 to 24,400 of ±28,678 with 100 items per page.

first
previous
next

2015_06_04_304-seq170 translatedText "9 Proposal for a proposal by the Parliamentary Secretary of the Ministry of Transport, KORNAS, does not support it in the Commission".
2015_06_04_304-seq169 translatedText "So - 9 proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq168 translatedText "No proposal can be taken on the 8 proposal because there would then be a contradiction".
2015_06_04_304-seq167 translatedText "So watch the next one - 9 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq166 translatedText "It is not voting".
2015_06_04_304-seq165 translatedText "That is not the case for the vote.".
2015_06_04_304-seq164 translatedText "There is a support for 7 proposals, so the 8 proposal does not vote as it is the alternative (No floor to DEP V Ageshins:' why? He is in the table!')".
2015_06_04_304-seq162 translatedText "Thanks to the colleagues, you have supported far harsher penalties compared to the 8 proposal (No floor of the DEP V Ageshins:' vote!') No, supported by".
2015_06_04_304-seq161 translatedText "Thank you to the debate on behalf of the Commission for nothing to be added? Please call, vote on a call, the Minister for the Interior, at the place of the Minister for the Interiorthe proposal submitted by Mr VENIA, please voting regime, please see the result!: 51, against - 37 abstentions - no proposal is supported".
2015_06_04_304-seq160 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I would like to draw your attention to the spirit of 7 and also, in principle, 8 of the proposals, even though, after you vote, you could interpret your position and not simply point out that, well, it was decided and so it was donewe are now talking about 149 of the Rules of 149 that Saeima has begun to work on this issue a year ago, and in the 12 Saeima Commons we continued to provide 149 for speeding and, in fact, we have on this issue. We spoke on this issue in a number of hearings and the Legal Affairs Committee has also continued the discussion with So - for which we have no doubt? That the penalties should be greater! Let us not say that, if we ask the CSDD representatives and also the experts how much penalties should be increased, we could not receive an answer that would have added some evidence, but there are opinions and you have the opportunity to support it today. 7 or 8 The proposal, according to experts, can improve the situation with road safety and will be effective But what is the difference between the two proposals? A fine of up to 10 kilometres will no longer be subject to a fine, but there will only be a warning against this warning, but the administrative penalty But further is the difference: 8 in the proposal: €15, and then there is an increase -fifteen, 30, 60, 120 This is a step in Savuthly 7, a step in the top 20, and then followed by 20, 40, 80 But both proposals, from the perspective of the system, are logicalparts and we wanted to maintain the system and that is why it is not split by halves and I call on each colleague to take a decision and take a decision But take note: both 7 and 8 are important, and one of them should support Thank you".
2015_06_04_304-seq158 translatedText "7 - Minister at the Home Secretary's proposal to the defence minister And it is supported in part by the inclusion of 8 proposals in the proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq156 translatedText "6 - Legal Affairs Committee proposal".
2015_01_22_281-seq217 translatedText "6 - Legal Affairs Committee proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq154 translatedText "5 - proposal by the Legal Office, which is supported by".
2015_06_04_304-seq150 translatedText "3 - The Legal Affairs Committee proposal supports this, as it is also linked to one proposal by 6 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq148 translatedText "2 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which also makes sense, supports".
2015_06_04_304-seq146 translatedText "Dear colleagues, today's draft bill on the Latvian Administrative Commission (No 27 / Lp12) has received and examined 12 proposals in the Legal Affairs Committee: 1 - Legal Office proposal This is technical and supported by the Commission".
2015_06_04_304-seq145 translatedText "The next item on the agenda: the " Amendment of the Latvian Administrative Code, " third reading by the Legal Affairs Commission - Member of the Committee on Legal Affairs".
2015_06_04_304-seq143 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the second resolution of 24 May 2012 on cooperation in the field of protection of witnesses to the Lisbon Treaty of 24 May 2012 on cooperation in the protection of witnesses. After the final, reading, please see the voting regime!: the result: 90, against and abstentions is not a legislative proposal in the second, final, reading".
2015_06_04_304-seq142 translatedText "Honourable Members, honourable President, dear President, dear colleagues, are working with document No 867: draft bill on the accession of Latvia to the Treaty of 24 May 2012 on cooperation in the protection of witnessesthe Crown Committee on Foreign Affairs considered this bill at second reading We did not receive any proposal to invite me to invite you to support this bill in the second, final, reading".
2015_06_04_304-seq141 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Electricity Market Law' in the second, final, reading - please vote!: 90, against and abstentions - there is no legislative proposal in the second, final, readingthe next item is the second reading of the Accession Treaty of 24 May 2012 on the accession of the Latvian Republic to the Treaty of 24 May 2012 on cooperation in the field of protection of witnesses".
2015_06_04_304-seq138 translatedText "Good morning, colleagues, in the second reading of the Electricity Market Act, the Commission proposals have not been received unfortunately or fortunately, given that the bill is urgent, I call on you to support this bill in the second, final, reading".
2015_06_04_304-seq137 translatedText "Thank you, on behalf of the GUE / NGL Group. - (PL) Thank you, Mr Barroso, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.".
2015_06_04_304-seq136 translatedText "Honourable President, honourable gentlemen, honourable gentlemen, the adopted version of the bill states that the municipal financial smoothing system has so far no longer been achieved - quotation! -' all governments have sufficient financial resources to carry out their functions' (end of quote) and thattherefore, the annual public budget law has already been laid down (again quotated since 2010) for " special transitional solutions to support low-rating municipalities to support " (end of quote) This interim solution for the authors of the bill was seen as a failure of the system and evidence of this ,the fact that the municipal financial smoothing system was incomplete, and therefore the development of the draft law, means that the new system would already genetically signal as far as possible the government's delimitation of the municipal financial contribution to the Galawe reading law that confirms that :this concern was justified, unfortunately, by the New municipal financial smoothing system being built on a clear mathematical basis: local authorities are tasked with further developing themselves as a self-organising system, but, at the same time, it is decided by local authorities ,based on economic development at various levels, such a future - to achieve an equalisation of economic development - is primarily financed primarily by the Tiksr government grant in the new municipal financial smoothing formula as the size of which, according to the faction of the faction, isthere is very little room for influence over the way in which this is provided by law, with the adoption of the national annual budget once a year, and no cross-border coordination between the Latvian Government of Local Government and Government to adapt to the real economic adjustment mechanism ,the country does not have the New statutory Municipal Financial Adjustment Fund that will not do so, because the board has a very narrow competence to monitor the functioning of the smoothing Fund - and only to the fact that the newthe establishment of a municipal financial smoothing system has resulted in the maintenance of government grants in the 2015 budget to the level set by the 2015 budget, only strengthening our concern that the current government will seek to distance itself from local financial smoothing and pile up regional economic developmentthe burden on the local authorities in the Second Reading was the presentation of sensible proposals to support municipal tax revenue in the municipal tax revenue share, as well as a certain lower adjusted income and greater contribution to the equalisation fund. In favour of an adjustment of the state with the development of the economy and the calculation of balanced equalisation, given that these proposals were rejected, and aware of the risks described above, the fraction of the vote on the Bill of Local Government's Financial Adjustment Act refrained from Thank you for your attention".
2015_06_04_304-seq135 translatedText "Thank you very much for your request that we have received a request to read a report on the motives for voting on the bill' Local Government Financial Adjustment Law', MEP Igor Pimenovic, MEP".
2015_06_04_304-seq134 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, I am grateful for your support for this man's project.".
2015_06_04_304-seq133 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the bill' Local Government Financial Adjustment Act', the second, final, reading, please vote! For - 61, against the 22, the 22 Law Draft is sponsored by the 22-22-12".
2015_06_04_304-seq132 translatedText "All the proposals have therefore been examined and I call on you to support the draft legislation at the second, final, reading".
2015_06_04_304-seq130 translatedText "And finally, 38 - The chairman of the committee responsible, supports".
2015_06_04_304-seq122 translatedText "Also 34 - Legal office proposal supported by".
2015_06_04_304-seq114 translatedText "30 - The proposal by Mr Dombrava, supported by Mr Lamassoure, to explain that this was due to the fact that, in Annex 1, Mr Dombrava was incorporated into a formula that he had already proposed as an additional factor and which we discussed earlier in the Commission".
2015_06_04_304-seq111 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the motion tabled by Mr Schimfa! Please voting, please vote! About - 36, against - 46, 9 proposals are not supported by 9 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq110 translatedText "No thanks, the Commission did not support the proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq108 translatedText "Colleagues, however, I do not lose sight of the hope that, if one proposal would still be supported, I think that the proposal could still be acceptable to the Coalition Te at little money, but with these non-national ones, Saeimaand the government could be really fair with regard to local authorities, because normally, let us say, the spearhead of reform also provides the means for this reform of the enforcement of this reform and we know the Option is the new option after the reforms aredesigned for Tur is its own budgetary resources, but this implementation process is usually funded by reform proponent And my proposal is due to the fact that the bill is supposed to mean that in 2016 no revenue from the local authority's adjusted revenue can'tto be less than earnings this year - in 2015, and to ensure this, the next year the Treasury is planning to fix local revenue growth limits, meaning the share of local revenue has already once again been phased out to give back to themfor those local authorities with less than a 2015 equalisation proposal, the point of my proposal is the provision that revenue cannot be lower than 2015 and is provided from the national budget ,but, however, from the means of reform, not from the local council itself, the redistributed should, in my opinion, be made conditional on a lump sum, and the Ministry of Finance would have estimated that it should beit takes 10 million euros, but the Government of Local Government's calculation is much more modest at the expense of the Latvian Local Government at the expense of real facts and also on the basis of the previous proposal, But that is not the question! I now have a requestto support at least this proposal, because, according to the estimates of the LPS, it is only €2 million, and I think it would be logical and fair for this reform to really be put at the expense of the reform creator, Thank you very much to support my proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq106 translatedText "28 - A member of the Shimfa proposal Without sponsored".
2015_06_04_304-seq104 translatedText "27 - Committee on Legal Affairs, too, supports the proposal of the Legal Office,".
2015_06_04_304-seq102 translatedText "26 - Proposal for a Legal Office proposal".
2015_04_30_297-seq273 translatedText "26 - Proposal for a Legal Office proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq98 translatedText "24 - MEP Schulz, Kuchinska, Kyrne, Adamović and Kyleinvic proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq96 translatedText "23 - Presentation by the Chair of the Commission's proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq94 translatedText "22 - MEP Schulz, Kuchinska, Kntica, Adamović and Kleinvic proposal have been partly supported and included in the Commission's 23 proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq92 translatedText "21 - Throughout Mr Dombrava's proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq86 translatedText "Dear colleague, 18 - proposal by the Legal Office, supported by".
2015_06_04_304-seq85 translatedText "Please call, we will vote on 17-MEP's motion for a resolution, please voting! Please see the result!: 37, against - 47, 10 proposals are not supported by 10.".
2015_06_04_304-seq84 translatedText "No, ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the Commission, it seems that there is no further mention here, as the committee's order of order does not allow the Member to speak for a third time in the debate, I cannot respond to Mr Elin. The sayings, which I believe violate the code of ethics of the MPs And if it hadn't been Mr Elin to say it could offend, that, dear colleagues, I call on me not to support 17 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq83 translatedText "The debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission has yet to be added?".
2015_06_04_304-seq82 translatedText "Dear colleagues, Mr Šadurska, you were indeed elected from Latgale, but in this parliament, from Latgales, you did not be elected and nor did you describe this story clearly, in Russian one is more precisethe expression and the English - you have it - you have to' stay' to Latgali and then let me leave it in the case of what Mr Adamovic has said, then the additional benefits of this bill will not give any further benefit to Another: benefits. There will be a decrease! You know this very well on the other hand - why is it necessary to have a law in general? To regulate the legal relationship for everybody, what you are talking about - on the various places referred to :there are already products you are proposing, not creating a mechanism - fair, equitable and fair for all the municipalities, to all regions - but you are often offered, as you do, on the basis of criteria, whether you like it or not. As a local driver, to grant him the funding of his government under his leadership, following the political closeness criterion of this situation, I call on me to support the proposal made by Mrs Schimfa and to stop handing out the money that you actually do not have".
2015_06_04_304-seq81 translatedText "Name of MEP Andread Elin, second time".
2015_04_30_297-seq62 translatedText "Name of MEP Andread Elin, second time".
2015_06_04_304-seq80 translatedText "I call on me: colleagues, please look into these things.".
2015_06_04_304-seq79 translatedText "Thank you, Mrs Stimfa - your speaking time is over for you".
2015_06_04_304-seq78 translatedText "Colleagues, I will use my opportunity again, however, to address you on this matter, that it must be clear what we are talking about in this case by adopting a completely new law, we are hopeful that this House should havebetter, it must better clean up this municipal financial smoothing system, which, to date, let us say, many are disappointed, but, for years now, it has been held and acted on in this brand-new system at first sight when you look at the figuresto name again these provinces of the Latgales planning region, if this new law is due to the poorest, the largest in the country of difficulty, which should be earmarked for special national programmes, revenues from the same revenue shall lose out already the following year after the introduction of this law, EUR 6,11 million. The law is not wrong! And, even if the Riga planning region's provinces are going to lose this next year, this 4.7 million is going to be lost, so there is nothing wrong with that - why there is a bill for the equalisation of the local community ,if, however, part of the local authorities keeps the poor, keep the cons?! 53 municipalities as a whole will lose 22 million, and 66 municipalities as a whole will gain €22 million from such a bill? And with good reason I was calling for this to be incorporated into this bill? In the bill the Local Government Charter of Local Government Own Revenue for Own Revenue We can't put one box inside of both the municipal revenue itself, which is meant for the long term, which is the municipal revenue base and the same " box " to put special programmes into account".
2015_06_04_304-seq77 translatedText "Name of MEP Silvy Shimfai for a second time".
2015_06_04_304-seq76 translatedText "Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, thank you also, Mr Stadurska, by the way, Mr Schmidt, if I am not mistaken, in 2009 no one was elected to the constituency of Latgales in 2006, and I understand that Mr Shadurska was Latgalesthe problems are sufficiently well known, and I think it is now being said that we will look at how this law will work and then look for a solution, so sorry, we are already looking at 25 years as it is! The solution, however, is not offered, and this particular bill in general will only make the situation even worse by Pavisam's brief that the Latgales programme is being mentioned with 52 million It really is a good programme, but it will help base it againthe big local authorities, the big cities of the Small provinces of Small provinces, will not gain anything more than it would rather be, as these areas, which are designed for these 52 million of these former industrial areas, are, of course, small counties of course. It is simply not the case that this bill does not plan for the fiscal influence of Latgale, as Mr Adamović has said, I do not fully agree with this, as the fiscal impact, in other words, of the local budget, and in other wordsdealing with this issue for 2016 or 2017, when then maybe we will look and decide on it and let us decide on this, I agree with what Mr Elin said, that viewing this bill as a matter of urgency is unacceptable to you".
2015_06_04_304-seq74 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I fully agree with what Mr Adamovic has said, and will not look at this law as the only instrument, we have other instruments - the Latgales programme that has already been mentioned - and the other opportunities for this is not a panacea -financial smoothing Funds, too! What we will adopt today, is not cast in stone, we have the opportunity to look, adjust, see how it works, and to look for other tools to help them to sum up the subsidies from the grant. The municipal financial smoothing fund will not allow full development of this idea of this law, the very idea I think is very right to keep it than simply mechanically equaliser finances but keeps them in tools that encourage local authorities to thriveand, of course, other things need to be looked at as well, how we can help them, where funding per person is under-represented, It will continue to work on these problems but will, well, be honestwhen I say that if we were to support 17 proposals, then I do not know what would happen, because if I find a third billion? Who knows to show where it is, but the Greek road is, quite frankly, not going to go".
2015_06_04_304-seq73 translatedText "Thank you to the Member for the Carla Shadurskim, for a second time".
2015_04_30_296-seq413 translatedText "Thank you to the Member for the Carla Shadurskim, for a second time".
2015_06_04_304-seq72 translatedText "Hello, honourable President-in-Office! Colleagues, as the chairman of a former Latgales planning region, I want to say that, indeed, this law at the moment in Latgalei does not plan for me to simply surprise my colleagues from other parties today:' on those occasions when we dowe discussed with the people of the Ministry of Finance, with planning regional councillors, that you were simply not present on " We have many things drawn up, all in favour and against, " and in that respect I can say that in Latgale, I can say that there are two cities that are development-driven ,- Rezekne and the DaugavCastle - much to gain with this new law, of course, we have discussed further steps with the Treasury Department on how to help those same Latgales crossings who are going to be in fiscal respect for the losers and not just in Latgale, so it is alsoin Kurzemi and, I suspect, in other counties, as well as helping, there will be negotiations between the Latvian Municipality Union and the Ministry of Finance to specifically address these issues as early as 2017, the Planning Region Management Request for this transitionthe period of extension of up to three years, Dieregret's deadlines were already over, we really hope that in 2016 we will come back to this law so that it is open and observable, and look at how to work beyond Little thanks! Latgalei, also 52 millionthe development on 21 local authorities will have a separate program, which has been approved and there are other avenues in which to help through European fund programmes for all Latgales communities that it is not true that we are not taking care of, but arewe must balance the potential and this real financial financial offer that I call on the majority of mayors in Latgales to say' yes' in the name of the mayors of Latgales, but we need to come back to this issue in the aftermath of that, thank you.".
2015_06_04_304-seq71 translatedText "Thank you to Aldim Adamovičam".
2015_04_23_295-seq235 translatedText "Thank you to Aldim Adamovičam".
2015_06_04_304-seq70 translatedText "Dear Madam President-in-Office of the Council, dear colleagues, I am very much in the direction of my thinking in the comfort zone in which several Members of the Latgales who are currently working for the coalition coalition are dealt with in two readings; it is urgent; a third reading cannotto submit any major clarifications to Mr and Mr Shadurska it would approach it very dogmatically to its rules governing body and tell them: " well, the first part pays so, the second part pays so, the third is so, fourth - so, a lot of it costs a lotand just because maybe a quarter pay very high national budgets, we will not approve any standards at all. " This type of position is completely short-sighted, particularly in view of the functioning of the smoothing Fund for the futurewhat do I want to say? The Commission and also the Coalition do not even come to the point of the proposal in terms of any alternative offer Well, even though they would have made some concessions to Latgalei, though perhaps something better in this structure! And which II would like to say to Members from Latgales, especially those coming from the Latgales party and who work in unity, in a coalition, I have listened very much to how Mrs Schimfa is fighting for his proposals and how you are actually sitting in silence, simply bysay, head-down, and do not have anything to answer for, But or else not to start standing up for the interests of the Latgales, the interests of the region from which you come from ?- and shunts about it all! When you need it and when you need Latgale you need you go there and stand up from there, but when you have to vote for the interests of the region, you just sit on the floor".
2015_06_04_304-seq68 translatedText "Madam President-in-Office of the House, ladies and gentlemen, first of all, I would like to say that this proposal is now 17, but before that the table on the budget had been dealt with as 19, so thatthese are the various proposals We are now talking about in the proposal, which at one time was 19, but at the moment is 17 And on this proposal we also met - those members of parliament who are elected from Latgales, we discussed itand came to the conclusion that this should be supported by Mr Schadurska's speech about this particular bill and the fourth part of my argument, a third of which, in my opinion, provides precisely to ensure these90 per cent of local authorities from mid to local could work and fulfill their functions and And definitely the most important thing I would like to say to Should we talk all the time that Latgale is a separatismthe threat is surrounded by the region that local authorities, which are poor, are somehow truly separatists and that they are fed from rich local authorities, in this case the whole of this bill and, in particular, this proposal for debt ,that the government and the rich government are involved in separatism, as they distinguish between these governments and local authorities, but the local authorities in the situation and in places both at the border area and beyond, where it is simply objectivethe fact that these revenue cannot reach the average level in the country, Ms Un Šimphas, has already mentioned that this level of income in these municipalities is also lower at the same time if we increase the ultimate minimum, the mass of the tax, fromthe council budget, which also estimates the budget, remains even smaller with the fact that we are not allowing for a smooth local development in the country and our new, most recently, to the President elected in his speech after being elected, said he would standon the smooth development of the region, So, I also call on the President of the State to support the views expressed by the President of the Republic and, in particular, to support the 17 proposals put forward by Mrs Shimfa and, to a large extent, on the proposal of the Latvian Government of Local Government for Thank you".
2015_06_04_304-seq66 translatedText "Dear colleague, listening to Ms Chimfa, I have to say with great regret that I have the impression that Mrs Stimfa has not understood its motion, as Mrs Stimfa is talking aboutseven or 17 million of Tasei will see what this would mean in the text of the law, paragraph 3 lays down the ceiling of the grant, paragraph 4 of this proposal lays down the ceiling for contributions, but that these points do not raise the basic formula ,and if you visualize this formula in your eyes this sliding straight (The gestures depicted), the way in which local revenue is harmonised, the setting of a minimum grant or the imposition of ceiling contributions do not alter the formulathe pan does not create exemptions from the formula, but it raises this sliding straight to the bottom, to a minimum - in one case or a maximum - in one case, the criteria proposed by Mrs Shimff should, therefore, be regrettable. It must be said that it is not about the 20 million that it pays, but the third part of Ms Shimff pays 82 million per annum, while Mrs Shimff's proposal pays 254 million a year (From the floor) :" yes! ") Glass colleague, that is 336 million! I call on those colleagues who are friends with the world of numbers before voting on this proposal to think about whether there are amounts in our budget (From faction,' is!') Thank you.".
2015_06_04_304-seq64 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, I have already said part of the reasoning that I have already said on the 5 proposal for Parliament, This proposal aims to add to Article 8 with new parts, the third, the third and the fifth, the proposal for the third paragraph of Article 8, the third paragraph, in the first instance because of the fact that :this would protect local authorities from rapid and unforeseen revenue fluctuations, such as cases of closed or suspended operations by a company in which the population of a reasonably substantial population As an example I could still mention specific cases in the second partthe revenue reductions that would result from changes in the income tax policy have already been raised by the EU, but I will say once again that, significantly by increasing the minimum income tax, the low level of remuneration in the country's income tax can be reducedrevenue And Territorial Fall in Latvia's median wages varies by more than twice in this case, meaning a major fluctuation in the middle of the community, and again a large number of those in the community have already identified what I have already identified withblue colour It means that the big cons in the municipal revenue proposal in the fourth part of Article 8 are to ensure that donors are not removed by excessive volume of resources and the local courtship is being maintained to earn more parallels withthe existing equalisation is defined as the upper limit of contributions in this case, the preliminary estimate of municipal financial smoothing shows that in 2016, the four local contributions to the municipal financial smoothing fund will exceed 20 per cent of specific local revenue-rated revenue and total outstanding revenuethere will be around EUR 2 million, the fifth paragraph of Article 8 provides that the above-mentioned proposals in this article are exhausted from the national budgetary means: 9.5 million, which would be required by 45 local authorities, which are minus, plus 2 million. What has been taken out of wealthy communities, and this would have taken a total of €11.5 million to support our proposal, because, as a member of the Latgales, I would like to emphasise that, if this proposal is not adopted, in the Latgales planning region, in accordance withthe new model will get €6.11 million less than they could have obtained under the old model, and there are two planning regions who in this new planning model really lose the preposterous it is that the biggest loss - these 6,11 million- will the most of the majority, and the second-largest losers in the Riga programming region, which will be lost to 4.7 million Our municipalities, is not rich - not for its rich nor poor money they need! - and, of course, it will be painful too -to lose this 4.7 million But Latgale, which we are trying to save with all sorts of additional programs and various different inscriptions, remove from their own basic revenue of this money - it's totally non-governmental and negudri as we can't, let us say, we will be pouring this pit in ,what will happen, because it is a goose to the municipal own-se, using various programmes of Well, it is unreasonable to ensure that local authorities can live from own revenue and if the country agrees on some kind of support or a certain areato support certain programmes, there may be additional resources to invest in this case, its pistot is excavated and this new catch-up model now does not appear to be in the way of this pit, please And please support my proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq62 translatedText "17 - Ms Shimf's proposal Without sponsored".
2015_06_04_304-seq61 translatedText "Let us make a call to the President-in-Office of the Council. - please vote! Please vote! Please vote!: 2, against - 67, 21 proposals are not supported by 21 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq60 translatedText "The Commission has not supported the proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq59 translatedText "Thank you for the conclusion of the conclusion: we understand that there is no desire on behalf of the commission on top of that.".
2015_06_04_304-seq58 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the discussion about the distribution between the towns and cities of the Republic is as old as the idea of smoothing the local financial sector, so far, as we know, every year when dealing with the budget law, and it has been very muchin a variety of discussions about this proposal by Mr Dombrava, we also had a cheerly debate in the commission about what to do with the over-the-back money, which Mr Dombrava now offers to share with the additional mechanisms, But well, on the substance of the proposalcolleagues, I hope that you are very closely familiar with the formula in the first annex of this draft law, I will also be showing a bit of visibility, but unfortunately the image is small and it is difficult to see (shown), but y-led ,what is the contribution of the council to the contribution and the size of the grant to the Guarantee Fund is made, well, after all of this good-hand formulas, if we make up these contributions or grants by all Latvian authorities, then we have a figure on the figure which ispublic budget grant Proti, the formula working in a way that is fiscally neutral - without this size d How much the council pays out - so authorities are also receiving, plus the public grant here is a smoothing depth ratio of 0.6 or 60the percentage that is equal to all local authorities and which provides fiscal neutrality to Mr Dombrava offers a leave rate of 0.6, but a factor of 0.5 put into the cities of the Republic of the DEP (heckling from DEP I Zarnous) and with it the formulano longer fiscally neutral Little in this situation at those municipal revenue, what is at this point realistic, does not stay across some of the millions, which, of course, could, of course, be divided up with some additional legislative acts, but let us remember, in theory, the situation ,that life in the counties moves well more intensively and better than in the cities of the Republic, and then this gap can become negative for Where to take out the missing money? And after much of the debate the panel also agreed that the formula is correctcrucially, the 60 per cent equalisation of this formula should apply to all Latvian authorities - as in the town and rural areas - and the proposal from Mr Dombrava did not support it, and I call on it not to support it.".
2015_06_04_304-seq56 translatedText "Even the Valpeacean will continue to benefit from a smoothing fund, although the lowest amount of those who receive it but, however, in Valpei in the restructuring fund of 800 000 000, would then be made from equalisationthe Fund will receive 40 000 proposals in this proposal to reduce this equaleable amount that the city of Little nuance can receive in the city of Little, that this amount should be subsequently transferred, either throughadditional proposals in this draft bill, or separately, in deciding on the allocation of these funds to the most deprived municipalities, which would have left this around 3 million or a few million euros left over if the proposal was to be supported by Thank you".
2015_06_04_304-seq55 translatedText "Colleagues, I call for a stay in the Chamber.".
2015_06_04_304-seq54 translatedText "(from faction consistency: " you weren't asking yourself! ") I voted in favour of the Commission at a time when the Ministry of Finance was asked, as the concept of the Republic of the Republic, no longer covered a reduced rate, after long hesitations. Well, it could be understood that this is the result of the Great Association of Great Cities's support, and the new situation that will result will be that of all of the cities of the Republic, only three cities in the Republic of the Republic will be part of the equalisation fund ,in particular, Riga, Riga and Ventousle (with the comment that there is also a reduction in this contribution from 2.7 to around 2 million) should be displayed on the basis of oddities such as' very remote' and' very poor '. Jelgava will become the recipient of this local financial smoothing Fund If Yelgava currently paid a small amount of equalisation into the fund, now that the new city of Jelgavas will receive an estimated 2 million from the equalisation fund Just Come Comethe amount will rise from 2.1 million to 8.8 million, the Latvian Parliament, from 0.7 million to 2.2 million (From the DEP DEP DEP:' right!'), Rezeknei, from 2 million to 3.9 million (in the floor)".
2015_06_04_304-seq52 translatedText "16 - Non-sponsored by Member's proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq50 translatedText "And 15 - the proposal from Dombrava, on which we actually already had a little speech before, has not been supported by the previous 11 proposals in the Commission.".
2015_06_04_304-seq44 translatedText "12 - Gerharda, Minister for Environmental Protection and Regional Development, has been partly supported and included in 13 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq43 translatedText "I would like to thank Please, the vote on the proposal tabled by MEP Dombrava, please voting, please vote! For - 29, against - 45, 13 proposals are not supported by 13 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq42 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, there is a need for a short explanation of this proposal for Article 6, which simply refers to the criteria for local government expenditure, and here Mr Dombrava offers one additional criterion for Savuthly thisthe essence of the proposal, if you look at your tables in your tables, is seen in the 15-point proposal, which deals with additional factors on the area of the area situated on the border band with which it essentially treatsthis proposal is determined - well, at least the Commission has set out - the treatment of the 15 proposal which was not supported after the debate, so I should call on you not to support the proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq40 translatedText "The honourable Saeima, Mrs Schimfa, has demonstrated during her presentation this new equalisation map, where a number of the border crossings really do this as they are from the municipal financial smoothing Fund, rather than on the increase from this new Local Government Financial Adjustmentthe main gains of the Fund will be major cities, if nothing is changed, but in certain border areas, these amounts will be reduced to a different extent by a few examples, Allem. About the 3 thousand they get from a smoothing fund, the Dagdas county - the county of 18 thousand, the DaugavCastle county - 364 thousand, Colourne county - 296 thousand, Zilriver county - 33,000 and Priedir county - 33 thousand This proposedthe proposal aims to introduce a new additional criterion: the coefficient; it is a border area defined by law and where an additional factor is to be applied, and the result would be that we either have a neutral or a neutral one in those areas, orwith a hint of a plus label - this is the amount that is received from the smoothing Fund, the question of whether there will now be other, perhaps also meagre, local authorities to get extrato reduce the amount that can be received by the cities of the Republic, as at the moment, as I have already said, the cities of the Republic are the biggest beneficiaries of this equalisation fund, even separately, on this proposal, but now, either or not ,that the amount of city cities affected by the smoothing fund is rising from 6 to 13 million (this is a very significant increase - about 7 million!), whereas in several counties where the citizens of our country also live, this amount is falling".
2015_06_04_304-seq38 translatedText "11 - Non-sponsored proposal by a Member of the European Parliament".
2015_06_04_304-seq36 translatedText "10 - The Legal Office proposal supports and clarifies the wording of the".
2015_06_04_304-seq32 translatedText "8 - The Commission's proposal was supported by the chairman of the Commission in favour of:".
2015_06_04_304-seq31 translatedText "I would like to thank you for calling 7 - a motion tabled by Ms Chimfa, please voting, please see the result!: 32, against - 52, 5 without support".
2015_06_04_304-seq30 translatedText "Absolutely nothing, except that Mr Pimenova was consistent both in the commission hearing and now the Bet Commission's members did not support it because, however, the care for the sustainability of the country's budget was important".
2015_06_04_304-seq29 translatedText "My thanks to the debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission is to make a statement on the common position of the Commission?".
2015_06_04_304-seq28 translatedText "Good afternoon! All this danger that we have just described, Mr Stadurska, will really happen in the future, if our government takes pro-cyclical policies, as she did during the crisis, if the government is about to simply overcome the pro-cyclicalityand coming out of the crisis as soon as possible, it would not, in any way, mean that I encourage this submitted proposal and the proposal to support Labs in the future that it will ensure the survival of local authorities in any crisis rather than make this life even worse.".
2015_06_04_304-seq26 translatedText "Such a small historical view of the impact of the global crisis and the consolidation of our first budget on this crisis are influenced by the Glass colleague, let us imagine how the rule of this law would work, if it had been in force at the time of its adoption ,when the average salary in Latvia had risen sharply in the past it had grown very fast and we had to make a tough budget consolidation if this rule was to work, then, like it, the consolidation of the country's fundamental budget should beto be carried out at an incomparably greater extent, so that local revenue growth can be ensured at a time when the country's primary budget essentially collapsed so that such a rule could normally work normally at a time of steady recovery or a smooth drop-outwell, in that case, proportional pay reductions will diminish the local income Bet at the moment when we have these overstretched points in our cyclical economy, so this rule is unfortunately pro-cyclical and extremely largethe problem with the national budget, with the majority of the Committee on Budgetary and Financial (Taxation), was of the opinion that this provision should not be welcomed, and I also personally believe that it is very dangerous for me not to support it.".
2015_06_04_304-seq24 translatedText "Colleagues, this plan, of course, was caused by the most severe storms in the meeting of the Commission, I think that it is simply about not going into things, basically, because colleagues have seen here that there is too much demand for the local authorities, Mr Buzek said .- tie up the increase in the minimum income forecast for the following budget year, with the average annual pay increase per year before the Budget is due - linked to the fact that the pay change fact is linked to the fact that it is linked to theso far, the House of Local Government has spoken, and which I have spoken about here in the Chamber too - with the fact that economic growth in the country and the increase in the revenue of the state budget must be proportionate, alongside that ofthe increase in the income of the local authorities in Jo when the authorities were encouraged during the crisis to tighten their belts with the government, then local authorities did, of course, because local authorities have always understood the situation in the country and have always tried to post stability in the countrywhen Mr DEP's politician began to press the podium and press the poke - applying for a debate: " I am sorry! " From the floor of the floor:' disrupting!'), this economic growth, no proportionality, promises:' we'll take it '. And if you were in solidarity with us in difficulty, then we will also be in solidarity, as the economy develops' Unfortunately this is not happening! And this is why our proposal is therefore to consolidate this situation and this attitude between the country and the country ,this proportionality between national and municipal budgets, So Why, is linking the average pay of the population to the tax of the labour force, and is now suggesting that the burden of the labour force in the labour force is in practicelimited to the expense of income tax or intends to do so in such a way as a reduced tax rate, increased minimum income, a relief on dependent persons - these are just a few elements that reduce the income of the populationtax revenue It creates local uncertainty about revenue in the medium and long term for Shia's proposal is needed to ensure long-term sustainable, predictable and economic growth in appropriate revenue as local authorities have tired of living in permanent acute malnutrition and their developmentintend, on the basis of structural funds alone, because neither the increase in the revenue itself nor the country, let us say this, the budget grant or - do not God! - investment, say, introduce implementation in local authorities - we are actually not expecting to please support my proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq22 translatedText "7 - Ms Shimfas's proposal Without sponsored".
2015_06_04_304-seq19 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the proposal tabled by Ms Chimfa, please voting, please see the result!: 26, against - 53, 9 proposals are not supported by 9 proposals".
2015_06_04_304-seq18 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this proposal is indeed linked to the 17 proposal tabled by Mrs Shimfa, with a share of 17 proposals, And, according to the Treasury, it costs €82 million per year instead ofthe amount that Mrs Schimfa has called for, as the Commission's meeting called into question the Commission - the commission put more trust in the Treasury's calculations under the commission, I call on the Commission to reject the proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq16 translatedText "Fellow Members, this proposal relates to a further proposal for the third paragraph of Article 8 of the bill, which says that this proposal also speaks of minimum income after the smoothing And the next article has been talked about ,that no less than 90 per cent of the national average rated revenue per national income per diluted unit cannot be assigned to the national average. This proposal provides for the establishment of a minimum revenue performance of municipal functions atthe size of the calculation is only calculated, but not the actual minimum spending requirement of the 2016 Preliminary municipal Financial Adjustment estimate, the 45-year-old local income-weighted income income per capita is less than 90 per centfrom the country's average rated revenue per capita and, according to the Council of Local Government calculations, it would be necessary for the country to equalise it and to reach these 90 per cent to the Member States. There would be no less than 95 per cent, it takes about €9.5 million on a map, as you will remember, I have shown who will be the authorities that will suffer if this issue is not resolved to support my proposal".
2015_06_04_304-seq14 translatedText "5 - Ms Shimfas's proposal isn't sponsored".
2015_06_04_304-seq12 translatedText "- / / EP / / TEXT IM-PRESS 20071019BRI11923 ITEM-015-EN DOC XML V0 / / EN".
2015_06_04_304-seq11 translatedText "The vote will be voted on by the full Parliament, which will be voted on by the full Parliament. The proposal tabled by Minister Gerharda, please voting regime, please see the result! About - 34, against - 43 abstentions - 13 proposals are not supported".
2015_06_04_304-seq10 translatedText "3 - Environment and Regional Development Minister's proposal Not upheld".
2015_06_04_304-seq9 translatedText "I would like to thank Please - I vote in favour of the proposal tabled by Ms Chimfa! Please vote!: 33, against - 34, 20 abstentions: 20 without support.".
2015_06_04_304-seq8 translatedText "Yes, thank you. Only a small comment from the commission of the committee discussed without denying the importance of the European Charter of Local Government, the majority of members of the Commission sung on the fact that, from a legal point of view, the single legislative act would not have been correct, becausethis could give the mistaken impression that the other laws have a lower or lower priority, but a list of all the rules that have to be complied with under this law are simply incapable of rejecting the proposal by the Commission.".
2015_06_04_304-seq7 translatedText "Thank the debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission prior to the vote?".
2015_06_04_304-seq6 translatedText "Honourable colleague, ladies and gentlemen, I would ask you to support this proposal because the Charter of Local Government of Europe is part of the most important international treaties to which Latvia has adopted its declaration at the same time as the 4 May Declaration, and sets out the key financial organisation of local authorities. The principles and the fact that the purpose of this law is to ensure the fulfilment of the standard of the European Charter of Local Government of Latvia with regard to the proportionality of national and municipal revenue and the local financial autonomy of local authorities, it is stressed that actions relating to municipal finances willbalanced by the principles of the Charter of course, the local budget negotiations will continue to take place annually, and I hope there will be an agreement and the results will be reflected in the annual national budgetary law and clarifies the overall direction and clarity in the long term. At the Commission's meeting on this issue, I received a counter-argument that this was not quite a law in which I would have accepted this provision, yes, that this normal should perhaps appear in the law on the national and municipal budgets, butit hasn't been built there and this law does, however, talk about local revenue and about the state of the community that local revenue is insufficient for the fault of the local community, but because it has built a national tax policyand in this way, the emergence of municipal revenue Bet here is a section on the state budget grant to compensate for this lack of municipal revenue and I think the incorporation of this article into the bill would be very important for usno longer talking about community budgets, with the following picture here, which you can see (shown in the document) these blue pitches in these blue houses, where local authorities have the cons of the introduction of this new Local Government Financial Adjustment Billcompared to the current situation, here's the next picture compared to the old Bill And here's the picture of this new Local Government Financial Adjustment Law, on which we are today talking about Thisthe blue slick remains a little minor, and its figures, which are inscribed in the municipality of the cons, also remain a little smaller But they still remain, as in both cases, the government grant to equalise this situation remains unchanged from what Wembley stays out of35.5 million people in the country are not going to change either taxation nor attitudes to local rights and opportunities to deal with economic activity, or against the size of the budget grant, or about 45 local authorities from 45 to 53 municipalities ,depending on a variety of calculations, the cons remain with its budget revenue and, as you can see, they are border authorities, especially many in Latgale, but there are enough in Kurzeme and Vidland, I would therefore ask colleagues to support my proposal!".
2015_06_04_304-seq4 translatedText "2 - Ms Shimfa's proposal Without support".

first
previous
next