Saeima |

Saeima

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

Showing items 27,701 to 27,800 of ±28,678 with 100 items per page.

first
previous
next

2015_02_12_285-seq120 translatedText "Thank you for not registered: mark Bondars, Lolita Chigane, Rihards Kohl, Aināris Mehulis, Inoutdoor Murniece, Nikita Vilks, Nikos Thank you".
2015_02_12_285-seq118 translatedText "Members of the economic, agrarian, environmental and regional policy commission, at 10 35 will gather at the commission on behalf of the Commission.".
2015_02_12_285-seq117 translatedText "Name of the statement to the Member, Mr Romiane".
2015_02_12_285-seq116 translatedText "Members of the Legal Affairs Committee, I invite you, on a short sitting of the Legal Affairs Commission, to gather after 5 minutes on Legal Affairs's premises, Thank you".
2015_02_12_285-seq114 translatedText "Honourable Members of the Committee on the Budget and Financial (Taxation), I invite you to take the sitting in the chamber of the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission now, after 5 minutes, please!".
2015_02_12_285-seq113 translatedText "12 March: there is no objection to the Glass colleague, the time has come for the regular break, but the Saeima Bureau has received five MEPs - Stadurska, Abola, SMILTHENA, Abu Meri and Brigin -the request to make a regular break for half an hour, so that at 11: 30 Does MEPs have reservations? (no cure! ") Members not to oppose the interruptionup to 11 o 30 But before the break, we must register a call, please call the registration regime! While the results of the registration are collected, the name of the Member, Carlim Schmidt, has been compiled.".
2015_02_12_285-seq112 translatedText "In view of the fact that a proposal is expected to be enough, it would be possible to introduce a deadline of 12 March for the submission of proposals.".
2015_02_12_285-seq111 translatedText "Thanks to Please, we will vote in favour of the draft law on the " prohibition of the prohibition of retail trade in retail trade ".".
2015_02_12_285-seq110 translatedText "Please support the second reading bill on the " Unfair retail trade ban law "".
2015_02_12_285-seq108 translatedText "Yes And so the last is the proposal made by the Commission on the entry into force of the law.".
2015_02_12_285-seq107 translatedText "Yes - Members are asking for a call for votes: 13 - a proposal from Mr Pimenov@@. Please voting regime! Please see the result!: 24, against - 36, 19 without favour".
2015_02_12_285-seq106 translatedText "A 13-minute proposal, yes, I call on the Commission, on behalf of the Commission, not to support the 13 proposal".
2015_02_12_285-seq105 translatedText "13 Proposal now!".
2015_02_12_285-seq104 translatedText "The last is 14 - the chairman of the commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq103 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote for 12 - a proposal from Mr Pimenov@@. Please voting regime! Please see the result!: 26, against - 36, 22 have no support".
2015_02_12_285-seq102 translatedText "Yes, on behalf of the Commission, I would like to add a look at the Commission, the responsible Commission has at very long and very long discussion about whether all the rules of this law should apply to all traders, or by traders: small, medium, large. The debate was wide-ranging, but the opinion of the commission was that all the provisions of the law should apply to all retailers; I personally may not all agree with That number one number twoArticle 9 (4) of the same article states that the Cabinet Office will lay down a procedure for the imposition of fines, which means setting the criteria for setting fines, mitigating factors of responsibility and aggravating circumstances, and so on at the Commission's meetingrepresentatives of the Competition Council very sacred argued that the penalties to be implemented fairly, taking into account the actual turnover of each retailer and, consequently, the actual offence, I must ask for 12 and 13 proposals not to support".
2015_02_12_285-seq100 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, I spoke to the Latvian Association of Tradgers to draw attention to the fact that the fine provided for in the second paragraph of Article 9 may be disproportionate when it comes to retailers with small annual turnover - As they are - by retailers witha small or low-annual turnover? No two giants - Rimi Rimi and Maxima, which exists in our retail market - are also large networks and co-operation, with a turnover of between 30 and 150 million per year And theythere is a network called Mego, " " Sun, " " Prizma, " " Beta, " as well as " Elvi, " " lats, " " Top lats, "shops below 5 million per year in These stores are more reliant on market conditions as Tie may make it easier to erase attempts to adapt to the market and further analysis of the causes of the offences they may have allowed to measure are likely to be made to determine penalties ,what would be a really proportionate level of irregularity would, therefore, be put forward rather than imposing a financial penalty, but to delegate this competence to the Cabinet Office, which should analyse each individual case or class and then to establish rules that are more precise ,rather than deterring our traders from specific action on the market, but rather to motivate them to do more effectively, there is a more severe situation, there are shops with even lower turnover than they weighs more strongly if they are less thanat 175 thousands of euros per year, they are subject to a penalty rate - but a certain amount, EUR 350 per year, if the monthly turnover is around EUR 5 000, which is €5 000, which isin fact, the two working days in which It is actually likely to put the shops in a very serious situation, and this particularly applies to rural shops in counties, especially in Latgale, I think it would be better if a specific document be drawn up directly by the government, which would be a sensible one. Tradespeople, who would be more detailed rather than we formulate statutory fines and a cash penalty rate on my proposal to support, encouraging the country's national trader in the countryside to better adjust to the market, which is gradually taking off after the Regiment of the crisis. Let us get better and probably we do not need to interfere with harsh penalties for them to do the same - to Please support this proposal - the 12 - and, at the same time, 13 proposals with a similar reasoning, which I have just tried to explain to you.".
2015_02_12_285-seq96 translatedText "And 10 - The Department of the Department of Agriculture, Armanda KRZES, supported the inclusion of 11 - the proposal from the responsible Commission, which I must ask to support".
2015_02_12_285-seq94 translatedText "9 - The mayor of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Edgar Merge, has not received any support in the Commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq92 translatedText "8 - MEP's proposal for an Elin sponsored Committee".
2015_02_12_285-seq90 translatedText "7 - MP Pimenova's proposal has garnered support for the commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq88 translatedText "So the 6-member parliamentary committee is not in favour of Bet to add that there could, however, be a problem with a short marketing deadline for the marketing of goods, if, say ,a discount on shares will not be able to apply to non-commodity selling products, however, it is still a third reading, so that it is hoped that any proposals will be made.".
2015_02_12_285-seq87 translatedText "There are no objections to the vote, but no objections to the vote, but the vote on the vote will be voted on by the full Parliament. 5 - A proposal from Mr Elin asking for the voting regime, please insert the result! - 64, against - 3, abstentions - 14 proposals in favour of 14 proposals".
2015_02_12_285-seq86 translatedText "5 - MP's Elin proposal too admirably sponsored".
2015_02_12_285-seq84 translatedText "Member Pimenova's proposal is partially supported to include 4 - the proposal drawn up by the Commission responsible to support".
2015_02_12_285-seq82 translatedText "2 - MEP's proposal to support it in the Commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq81 translatedText "As the motion is withdrawn as a proposal withdrawn, it would, in theory, not vote in favour of 2 proposals".
2015_02_12_285-seq80 translatedText "Thank you So the first thing I want to convey - that the Member is going to withdraw this proposal, believing it to be a little premature to take a look at what I care about, so this proposal determines on Sundays andthe holidays do not work for those retail companies that employ more than 2 000 workers, There is talk of big supermarket monds as, in my understanding, a man, family Sunday and holidaynot to spend the endless " tours " of these retail monds, but the family have much more worth to travel, say, look at Gaujas sendown, if not to come to the zoo, rather than pointless wandering through the supermarkets I hopethat we are going to come back to this discussion, but at the moment, I believe that I have withdrawn this proposal simply as premature, but with the idea that we will, however, think about getting on with it.".
2015_02_12_285-seq79 translatedText "MEPs will debate the future of Europe with the Council and Commission.".
2015_02_12_285-seq78 translatedText "Thank you So this will be a new law - the Directive on the prohibition of the prohibition of the law in retail trade and the rule of law - to put retailers and supplier relations on hold, so that the large retail networks should be a little bit shortlimited in terms of this procurement power, Mr 1 - a proposal from Member of a Member of the Member States Not support Un ling would also like to say something in the debate if the Andris Berzins pressed the button".
2015_02_12_285-seq77 translatedText "Member States will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
2015_02_12_285-seq76 translatedText "12 March".
2015_02_12_285-seq75 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the' Amendment of the Competition Law', please voting, please see the result! For - 88, against and abstentions - the adoption of the proposal for a second reading by the Parliament".
2015_02_12_285-seq74 translatedText "I therefore call for support for the second reading of the' Amendment to Competition Law'.".
2015_02_12_285-seq72 translatedText "And, also, 3 proposal No, I am sorry, 3 is the chairman of the committee responsible for the entry into force of the law So then I call for its support.".
2015_02_12_285-seq70 translatedText "2 proposal is also supported by a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by the Commission.".
2015_02_12_285-seq68 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleagues, so your amendment to the Competition Law These changes are necessary because of the top new law - the Unfair retail rule ban law (next we will look at the bill " for the Unfair retail practicea ban on the law "), and consequently, a corresponding amendment to the law - the committee responsible under the Competition Law Commission - has tabled three proposals for a proposal from the Legal Office, which is supported by the Commission's proposal.".
2015_02_12_285-seq67 translatedText "2 April Members not to raise questions on the next item on the next item: MEPs to vote on a resolution".
2015_02_12_285-seq66 translatedText "Deadline for submission of proposals for second reading: 2 April this year".
2015_02_12_285-seq65 translatedText "Yes, thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Act' For Recience to Children for Children', at first reading! Please note the result: 86, against and abstentions: the draft legislative text adopted at first reading is not a deadline for the submission of proposals for a second reading.".
2015_02_12_285-seq64 translatedText "Commissioner Piedij, colleague, colleague of Cabinet, Human Rights and Public Affairs committee has considered the bill's proposal for' Amendment of Sentitentiary Recience to Children', " the draft law provides for a custodial sentencethe Commission considered the bill and decided to support this bill during the first reading, and decided to support it at first reading, and decided to support the measures adopted during the first reading of the procedure.".
2015_02_12_285-seq63 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the draft legislation on the' Amendment of the Civil Process Law', final, reading .- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 BRI-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
2015_02_12_285-seq62 translatedText "Consequently, we have looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Commission to support the third, final, reading, reading of the Commission's request for a bill " Amendment of the Civil Process Law. "".
2015_02_12_285-seq60 translatedText "10 - The proposal by the Ministry of Justice, which is partly supported, included in 11 proposals, which is due to the Commission's endorsement of the Commission's proposal for a revision of the transitional arrangements.".
2015_02_12_285-seq58 translatedText "9 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
2015_02_12_285-seq56 translatedText "8 - The Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which has been sponsored by Mr And here, should mention the fact that the commission was also an issue and I would like to explain - whether the claim of a state of the State should be deemed to bethe claim from the letter of unauthorised conduct and the opinion of the Commission in this case was - no! Claims from unauthorised acts are other types of claim and, in this case, the claim of the SRS on tax charges is eligible under the legal procedure under which the claim was madealso, as required by Article 73 of the Insolvency Law, I am sorry rather than long, but it falls directly into the order of Article 73 (2) of the Insolvency Law, provided that such a claim is not announced by the Commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq54 translatedText "7 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
2015_02_12_285-seq52 translatedText "Colleagues, so 5 - the proposal of the Parliamentary Secretary of the Ministry of Justice, which is partly supported and incorporated in the Commission's proposal, which is to be noted in this House, was that the commission was also in a position to discuss what the court should say in the court decisionthe termination of bankruptcy proceedings, provided that no creditor envises its claim, as well as the commitments being made by the Commission and the Legal Office, indicated that it was about the liabilities of the creditors, which may in fact beabstract commitments, rather than concrete commitments, since the Court could, in the first instance, not be aware of those obligations, which the debtor has and which, in turn, has not been declared, and secondly, even if certain obligations were certain, the court should be invited, possibly, to trial these creditors. As the interested party, which cannot actually be able to make special trials, the court would therefore not be able to assess the potential dispute between the creditor and the debtor.".
2015_02_12_285-seq51 translatedText "Thank you very much for the vote, we will vote on 4 - a proposal from Mr Elin, please voting, please vote!: 22, against - 55; 1 Proposal not supported".
2015_02_12_285-seq50 translatedText "A proposal by Mr Andrei, who was not supported by the Commission in the form of Mr Andrei Elin, wanted the Court to decide, in addition, to decide on a reduction in the execution plan, but the Commission and the invited personand the Legal Office also pointed out that, at the moment, the first paragraph of the Civil Process Act, 363 28, paragraph 4, provides that the court should decide whether to discharge a physical person's default plan and confirmation of its amendments and its amendment, and thatthe reduction of payments is undoubtedly part of the plan for the amendment of the relevant plan, which should be presented to the court and confirm that this regulation is in fact already in place, and the question is probably about its application, which is why the Commission did not support the proposal".
2015_02_12_285-seq48 translatedText "Therefore, the 3 proposal, which is a proposal of the Legal Affairs Commission, which is also linked to the introduction of a deposit of insolvency proceedings in the Commission, is therefore supported".
2015_02_12_285-seq46 translatedText "Who, too, is sponsored, yes".
2015_02_12_285-seq45 translatedText "Who, too, supports".
2015_02_12_285-seq44 translatedText "The Chair of the sitting, ladies and gentlemen, we are working on the draft law on the Civil Process Act, the Commission has received 11 proposals in the former Department of Justice, the Ministry of Justice ,linked to the introduction of a deposit of insolvency proceedings scheduled for the insolvency proceedings of the Insolvency Law, partially supported and incorporated into the Commission proposal".
2015_02_12_285-seq43 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the draft legislation on the Latvian Administrative Code, in the third, final, reading, of the voting regime! Please see the result!: 80, against -abstentions: 1 Law adopted by the next item: - / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
2015_02_12_285-seq42 translatedText "And, consequently, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission, I call for the draft legislation to be supported by the third, final, reading".
2015_02_12_285-seq40 translatedText "2 - Legal Office proposal on the date of entry into force of the law, supported by the Commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq38 translatedText "Good y, dear colleague! - Two proposals have been made in the third reading of the " Amendment of the Latvian Administrative Code " and both are linked to the last laphews, i.e.as regards the arrangements for entry into force, the Legal Affairs Committee considered these proposals on the proposal of the Legal Office, which clarifies certain specific actions when the law was adopted by the Commission in support of the Paris Agreement.".
2015_02_12_285-seq37 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the Bill of Criminal Justice', second, final, reading! Please vote!: 66, against - none, abstentions: 18, before we move on to the next item on the next item ,we have to decide on another possible amendment to the agenda for today's meeting, the Commission on Agriculture, the Environment and Regional Policy, to ask the Commission to include the draft legislation on " Amendment of the Internal Market Act " to the agenda of today's sitting. No objections to MEPs if no objection is given to MEPs? (no' No!') Members not to oppose the adoption of the agenda for the draft legislative resolution on the draft law on the Latvian Administrative Commission, Third reading, Legal Affairs Committee".
2015_02_12_285-seq36 translatedText "Yes, I would urge you to support the bill at the final reading.".
2015_02_12_285-seq35 translatedText "Andrei Judin".
2015_02_12_285-seq34 translatedText "In keeping with the procedure, I would like to call once again".
2015_02_12_285-seq33 translatedText "I would like to express my understanding that you called on the Commission, on behalf of the Commission, to support the bill? The rulli explained to everyone that we are currently voting on the proposal of the Legal Office, which the Legal Affairs Committee has supported to Please the voting regime, for - 83, against and abstentions - there is no proposal on behalf of the Un Commission then again".
2015_02_12_285-seq32 translatedText "Thank you very much to my colleagues on the questions that have been asked, about the debate, I think they have a role to play, although some people seem to have little point to speak and that it is not binding on anyone that I know very well that we are very often too oftenwhat we are talking about here is helping the judges to take the right decisions and thank you for the questions, because if there is a question, then there's a question of answers and then you can see and better understand what the legislator's idea isI am going to repeat myself again, I said at the beginning, but yet again, the questions of responsibility will be provided for actions deliberately targeted when someone realises he is doing what he is sendingwhen the information is important to him? We are talking about criminal justice Proti, that means that the person who received the shipment must prove something, if the prosecutor or the police are suspected, then they mustprove that such an action has been carried out and is prohibited under Criminal Justice, you can safely send your shipments to Ukraine, and you will not have the responsibility of you and other people in the case of humanitarian actionthere is no criminalisation of us having no intention of predicting responsibility and, of course, we are now drush out now from, say, the issue we have to discuss, because we are basically not talking about the provisions Bet (heckling )DEP A Barca: " it is a misfortune that it does not talk about the proposal! ") In fact, Jo's proposal is grammatical in fact But, colleagues, I would like to emphasise once again that the relevant rules are important, and I call on you to support both the proposal and the Bill.".
2015_02_12_285-seq30 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, it is indeed very good that we are debating both the external and the domestic debate on this very important piece of legislation, and I would like to emphasise, contrary to the previous speakers, that everything that we are talking about here in this debate on the bill ,the Court will then be bound by the interpretation of the specific legal provision; that is how the will of this legislature is in the form of a given rule, what we are debating here both on behalf of the commission and by Mr Judin at the hearing of the Legal Affairs Committee and its Memberswhat is said to support the specific proposal of the Legal Affairs Office This is all part of the telephoric and historic translation of those who have studied law, noticeably noticeably by no judge in court. A little bit about civilians and humanitarian rights, Latvia, as a democratic state, has joined not only the Geneva Convention of 1949, but also a series of other international law which protects the civilian population and mine, like any Irish MEPas a Member, it is absolutely essential for the civilian population to care for the civilian population. This amendment to the Criminal Code is in no way targeted against the civilian population or against the provision of aid to the civilian population, and this speculation is indeed not true of any court of the Latvian Republic, although, as is perhaps later, by one of the Latvian authorities. Let us interpret this law, let us not allow this proposal, colleagues, this proposal, which has been submitted by the Legal Office and which we are now debating, is of a purely technical nature - the wording that Latvia is carrying out in accordance withon commitments for civilians and humanitarian law, I am really calling for this bill to be supported by This Bill not the result of a rush That has been dealt with in a series of permanent criminal justice working groups at the Justice Ministry, it has been dealt with in several jobsat the sitting of the Group of the Home Office, work has already been carried out at the office of 11 lawmakers and, at the moment, the number of months of work has come to an end, and I think it is the culmination of a very good bill in the spirit of the fact that similar draft legislationtop across the European Union, as the ongoing use in Ukraine and Ukraine in order to finance terrorist organisations, unfortunately also affecting other European countries, I can see that this law in our law is indeed also the result of the Presidencythe law is a very good basis, which can help other countries, we understand what is happening in Ukraine, we support the civilian population, and we really have the heart of these civilians and this bill is needed directly by the colleagues of the College, to support this proposal!".
2015_02_12_285-seq29 translatedText "Thank you very much to the MEP, Idesei Lczinrei, who is a member of the House.".
2015_02_12_285-seq28 translatedText "Well, dear colleagues, I will not vote' yes' for these amendments, too, because of the Dieregret rule, if there is no new version of Mr Judin's speech today, and so our courts will not be shattered by this. Whose interpretation of this law is the rule I can justify it with concrete examples from the life of Manai mai's sister in Ukraine, the Donetsk, town of Dzzinsk, This woman is 70 years old, and she is sick of pensions, since they currently do not pay their pension at present, mineMamma sends her money And (heckling from faction of unity: " where is the problem? ") No, wait, wait, I can't imagine what I read here today :my mommai at all - with her sick heart! - someone will ask the question: " did you really know or know that your sister, which is neighboring maybe? " Imagine it here:' on whatever financial means orthe addition of a collection or transfer of another estate, " I am sorry! Without reservation, " the addition of definitions contained in this article of the Criminal Law allows for an anti-humanitarian interpretation of the ConventionI would therefore like to add that I would like to add that I would like to add that I would like to add that all the speeches that the Red Cross dealt with all that perfectly in the way that I am trying, for example, as a Member for several days, to contactin the red Cross, to obtain information on the extent to which the sending of humanitarian goods to the Ukraine Red Cross is currently avoiding any contact between them or the names of human names. I do not know, I do not know, because I do not know, I do not know, because I am not in a position to communicate with one of the representatives of the Red Cross on the question ofsending humanitarian goods to Ukraine, and so I cannot answer the questions of my constituents, I would therefore ask you not to vote' yes' in a single package about this package of three amendments and not to accept a rush from the legal other".
2015_02_12_285-seq27 translatedText "Thank you to Devaine Lochmeleiule, MEP".
2015_02_12_285-seq26 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, Saeima today is preparing to adopt, at the final reading, a series of amendments to the Criminal Law covering up to the time and in our society a number of subjects have been discussed: unlawful participation in an armed conflict; funding armed conflict; recruitment, training and transmission in an armed conflictArticles 77 1 and 77 3 are more clear: our fellow citizens do not have to participate in the wars There is a clear and consistent position of our faction, however, in support of the proposal by the Legal Office of the members of the Legal Office 1. It is not clear to the risks associated with' an indirect collection or transfer of funds or other assets outside the territory of Latvia in connection with the ongoing armed conflict' ,civilians, for example, when someone sends a person living in the heated point to money or medicine, or in any other way provides humanitarian assistance without knowing whether he is involved in an armed conflict, then also for our fellow citizens( the President knocked the hammer on this indirect transfer with a prison sentence of up to 10 years? A number of questions and serious doubts can be raised about its application that it is not too good a practice - in a rush and as a matter of urgency, to amend the law by imposing them on a case-by-case basis or even on a case-by-case basisperson 77 (2) is not welcome in this text, as serious problems may arise in the future so that the faction of the faction, supporting the 1 proposal tabled by the Legal Affairs Committee, will abstain on the draft legislation on the whole package.".
2015_02_12_285-seq25 translatedText "We start with a debate with Valery Agešinam, MEP".
2015_02_12_285-seq24 translatedText "Dear colleagues, the second reading of the Bill of Criminal Justice Bill (No 164 / Lp12) has received one proposal, and I think that we will quickly be able to support this proposal in a nutshell, but before that I would like to draw your attention to the issues that we had yesterday. The Legal Affairs Committee meeting discussed matters of crucial importance to the questions asked from fellow Members, and it is very important both to respond to them and to ensure that the relevant information is kept in our verbatim report since we spoke about threethe new articles under Criminal Law And it is extremely important for prosecutors, judges and other parties to be perfectly clear about what the legislative idea is in relation to those rules, So amendment seeks to supplement the law with three articles determining responsibility for unlawful participationin the armed conflict, the financing of armed conflict and recruitment, training and transmission to the armed conflict, it is important to take account of the fact that only people who are aware of their activities and their nature are liable to be liable ;he understands that he is taking part in the armed conflict he understands that he provides assistance - either financially, or in cash or in a grain, but provides support to the persons involved in the conflict and take action toundermining the territorial integrity or political independence of another country, or engaging in political independence, carries out the recruitment, training and transmission of an armed conflict, It is one - so the person is very much aware of the Second Implement: the person acts deliberately - and thusthe intention is that there is no intention of someone, there is no criminal prosecution of another important nuance If we look at Article 77 with postcode 2, then we can see that the responsibility for financing armed conflict can be held in the event ofthe person provides support to the party acting for the purposes of undermining the territorial integrity of a country, its political independence or its contravention with Latvia's international obligations, So, in principle, in this case: if the assistance was delivered to one party, there is a criminal responsibility ;but if the assistance was given to the other party, then there is no liability, if we look at the previous one - so 77 of Article 1, there is another; that is, if a person takes part in the armed conflict in question, then he can be prosecuted independentlyfrom what side he decided to go to war we would not draw the' right' or' wrong' side and it is very important to follow, because after a first reading question was asked: what will happen if a citizen of Latvia, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party who, for example, will decide to help the party whoin this case, attempts to combat the activities of the rebels seek to prevent, say, divide the country or any other criminal activity? This is unacceptable! Our intention is under no circumstances for responsibility for carrying out humanitarian operations, aid for the civilian population, and Latvia has a number of international commitments, primarily stemming from the Geneva Conventions that took place in 1949, at least ,three conventions can certainly be mentioned that the action taken by the Red Cross is also to be welcomed and, in these cases, there cannot be a liability to another organisation carrying out similar activity, humanitarian action ,then the person cannot be held criminally responsible, It is a small preview of those matters that we discussed yesterday in Bet on the proposal, we had one proposal from the Legal Office, which is, in fact, editorial and which offersthe words " no joints " with the words " contradict " what is meant by " Ko " are " inconsistent "? Meaning the content under no circumstances has been amended, and in fact, the wording of Articles 77 1 and 77 (2) have been used in favour of Please support".
2015_02_12_285-seq23 translatedText "I would like to thank Mr One MEP for the one - to Please call handler at Please, to hear Mr Berzina, Mr. Chadurska, Einar CILINSKA, Augusta Brigue and Edgar Merit, with the determining authority of the determining authoritythe Commission, I ask the voting regime, please see the result! - 49, against the - 23 abstentions: the 9-law draft committee referred to next item on the next item on the next item is the amendment by the Bureau of the Parliament. MEPs in the committee also call on the Commission and the Commission, as the Commission / EFA, Commission and Commission, the Commission and the Commission. Consequently, we need a vote at Please call! We will vote for Members of the House, Kaimir, Free, Bondo, Šica, Vilnius, Liepsis, Ruka and Kleinberg's' Amendment to the Law on Local Authorities', stating that it is the responsible Commission. Voting regime, please see the result! - 29, against - 54 abstentions: the 6-6 draft law Commission has not referred to the draft law put forward by the Bureau of Saeima, the agrarian, environmental and regional policy commission on' Amendment of the Law on the Internal Market' ,the Regional Policy Commission and the committee responsible for the committee are opposed to the Commission's draft law, the committee referred to the Bureau of the Legal Affairs Committee to propose to the Legal Affairs Committee a bill to " refer the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Legal Affairs " to refer it to the Legal Affairs Committee. The committee responsible for the Legal Affairs committee referred to the Commission's draft law referred to Parliament's Bureau, the Committee on Regional Development, the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission and the Committee on Regional Development. No objections have been raised by the responsible Commission as to Members of the Legal Affairs Committee referred to Glass colleague, next item: " leave to leave " (No to DEP J Urbanovic: O!), on assigned unpaid leave to the Member of the European Parliament. In February, " the prosecutor in the House of Deputies had asked the Bureau of MPs to grant him leave on 5 February this year, the Bureau of Saeima this Leave has bestowed on him and, at a hearing today, has asked MEPs to grant him unpaid leaveon 5 February of this year, the outgoing Bureau of MPs on this leave has been bestowed on the next item on the next item on the next item on the next item :the Bureau of Deputies will grant him pay leave on 12 February of this year to the Bureau of MPs on this leave and the MPs at today's hearing will inform Members of the next item on the next item:' on the payment of unpaid leave from Ilowram Latkovskim from this year )between 25 February and 26 February, we shall vote in favour of Please call, vote on the award of unpaid leave to Ilowram Latkovskim from 25 February to 26 February, please the voting regime, please see the result!: 80, against andabstentions: the next item is the next item on the next item: on the award of unpaid leave to Mr Hosam Abu Meri on 19 March this year, we will vote on the payment of unpaid leave by Mr Hosam Abu Meri this yearon 19 March, I asked the voting regime, for the result! - 80, against and abstentions - there is no leave left to the Member, Mr Abu Meri, before we start looking into the next chapter on the' draft agenda', we have to decide on yet another chapter on the' draft agenda '. Two possible amendments to the agenda for today's sitting are requested by the Legal Affairs Committee, in line with Rule 86 of the Rules of Procedure, of the draft law on the law on the judiciary " For the judiciary "there are objections? Members do not raise the agenda of the amended Tautfarm, the agrarian, environmental and regional policy commission, in line with Article 86 of the Rules of Procedure of the Rules of Procedure, asking for the inclusion of a bill " Amendment to the Forest Law " for the first reading of the sitting, without reviewMEPs in the Commission object to the agenda as amended by the Commission.".
2015_02_12_285-seq22 translatedText "Dear colleague of the sitting, dear colleague, Mr Elin, of course as a politician, is easy and refreshing to talk about bank profits, dairy cows, tanks and anything else I would also call on Mr Elin to assess these proposals as a lawyer (From the DEP A). Ellin: " either end up! ") And as the Insolvency Law's Article 147, the author of Article 147 has the right to assess what we generally understand by the principle of this warehouse principle, and what it generally means for us ,the debtor, the debtor who wishes to qualify for the process, will have to pay a national fee - about €70 - to pay a deposit on the two minimum monthly wages, an application to the court, which may perhaps not be as simple as may be possible, because it may be impossible to attract a professionalthe Court of Justice may judge the existence of a sign of insolvency proceedings before the Court of Justice may reject the application, so the trial concludes if the court application is met, the court shall appoint a creditor application deadline of around six months in total. Months after this deadline is announced, and only after the court approval of the auction act has been announced, the court of the court decision on the remaining liabilities in this case should also be judged whether this is the debtor's sole accommodationit will turn out that the debtor belongs to another property, that the norm will not be attributed to this process, as we are seeing, this process could last around, well, as a minimum - half a year, a maximum of one year, And the process is far from simplewhat we mean by the principle of a warehouse principle, I must also point out that this regulation does not apply to the previous transaction, So, we have already voted in favour of the amendment of the Consumer Law, where a similar principle is proposedin turn, the consumer will be able to choose the size of responsibility by not applying this insolvency process which, in our opinion, it is very important, however, that when talking about the maturity of the duties to the College, it is very easy for the Insolvency Law to judge the Article 155 of the Insolvency Law and the proposals we are tabling for So - what are the rules? The benefits - and what are the losses? - will you take some of the rules and give a balance, for example, in Article 155 of the Insolvency Law, there is a procedure whereby the debtor covers at least 50% of the total liabilities, then the maturity of the liabilities is reduced tofor a period of six months, that is to say that a debtor would be exempted from the obligation of at least 35 per cent of total liabilities in a period of 12 months, in which case the corresponding period shall be reduced to 12 months under the norm ,if the debtor covers at least 20 per cent of the total liabilities, the period for maturity of the liabilities will be reduced by 18 months, so that a period of 18 months would actually also be halved to this proposed regulation in Article 155 of the debt assessment, as appropriatein accordance with Article 155, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, compared to the current regulation, if we are to enter into force, the maturity deadlines for this scale will be reduced by half, i.e. 12 months for a margin of 155, fourth paragraph 2. Maturity deadlines, i.e. 2 years more than the €150 000 commitments, will be reduced by 6 months after the bankruptcy deadline will fall by 6 months on the substance of the proposal, the Insolvency Law Create Support!".
2015_02_12_285-seq21 translatedText "Thank you to Gaidim MP He He speaks about the passing of the bill to the commission".
2015_02_12_285-seq20 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I would probably remind you of one message that has been presented yesterday, that the profits of the bank in Latvia in 2014 had a €311 million meeting in Latvia last year and in each of the previous yearsplayed like a gravy cow And all of you know very well in market laws, the fact that the country's country is not governed by a policy of lending to commercial banks is not how much interest rates would be, nor how much interest rates would be, or how much. There would also be a callable first contribution so that there is no argument, obligations under that bill and the principle of a warehouse principle, with the fact that banks are being forced to increase their first contribution rate, nor does interest whatsoeverhaving done so before putting the principle into effect, they did so even afterwards, so they can do so tomorrow - without any kind of influence And now the question of Who from you could tell you that it is that 400 000 people areI have left the Latvian state, it is not up to UK's banks to come from a country that people have travelled from the country? So, you see, no one is standing up in the Bank's fault in having left the countrybut I would remind you that this issue today is because, for all of you, the 11 Saeima Commons supported the incorporation of the principle enshrined in the Law And that then you were supportive of you: every one of you ,every political party has taken on the percentage points at its expense, supporting the introduction of this idea in other words, that one in five members of parliament has been elected for the reason that its political party, 11, has supported the introduction of the key principle of a warehouse in Toyonce. Supporting this idea of introducing this idea Bet what happens today, the polls have passed, you have to face four years of work, and now you are suddenly getting stuck in the fact that you can have the same voters who you supported, just to put the most astonishment in this whole saga. Caused by the National Association of Well, today they may have bought Zatler tanks: such a flurry of floors on the key principle of the warehouse as the National Union, in my view, none of the political parties has been in the midst of the election! To defend this idea Bet today, they are among those who have signed the bill, among those who have been lobbying the banks of Vieni from them! Now Gaidis boss will go on the floor and will tell us the wise thing about it:' well '. All of a sudden, we thought that the principle would not be implemented and that they would not have been introduced for the abbreviated default deadlines for which we - at least part of you - have already debated 11 in the Commons' and what is going on today?' and what is going on today? You are not even Members! You are simply the people who go to the bank leash! Anotation, regulation, proposals - these are the proposals of the Latvian Association of Commercial Banks, who are rewritten in the name of you, but do you really have no shame? Put it down the bridge though, so that it is at least your proposal, not the bank! And today you are discrediting the idea of the Bank, today you are going to be depressed by the people of Latvia, But banks will not be in peace before the next elections. Once again you will be lauded by the banks and, once again, you will pick up on this idea; this thesis has no obligation whatsoever to your internal conviction, which you would have done in the past, not through your promises of sincerity and high human values, which you believe isI don't want you to go to the mandate, I do n't want to go to the mandate, the commission of ethics and application, but let me say it: it is regrettable That is really regrettable! (faction of applause DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP DEP".
2015_02_12_285-seq19 translatedText "Thank you for not speaking, but MEPs are calling for the vote to be voted on by the Members of the European Parliament, waiting for Mr Berzina, Stadurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and putras, " Access to the Budget, "and the Finance (Taxation) Commission, with the provision that it is responsible to the commission, please voting regime, please see the result!: 58, against: 23, abstentions: 5BĒRZA, Sigurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and Merit tabled under the " Insolvency Law " to refer the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Legal Affairs calling on Mr Elin Him to speak against the passing of the bill".
2015_02_12_285-seq18 translatedText "Dear colleague, that is what it comes down to as a spokesman, by pushing each of these things, this is an analogy, on the other hand, on the part of the credit-source, Toth, if the credit or part of itthe credit is deleted, then the amount of the credit repayments is reduced, so these gains, well, could be said, the income also doesn't include the income tax object So with these two draft laws - on corporate taxand on the personal income tax - we both sides - both credit and credit taker - make it easier for the credit taker to negotiate a debt commitment for the remaining old debt commitments cuts, Thank you".
2015_02_12_285-seq17 translatedText "One member who had spoken' yes' to Please call! Will vote for the MEPs, waiting for Mr Berzina, Stadurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and the Merit Act, stating thatit is the committee responsible, please voting, please vote! For - 58, against - 23 abstentions - the 5-law draft committee has been passed on to MPs under the Bill of Brigue, Stadurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and Merit Launch, Brigue and Merit Billthe Law For Personal income tax " to be transferred to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission " to determine that it is responsible by the commission Will MPs have reservations?".
2015_02_12_285-seq16 translatedText "Dear colleague, listening to Mr Pimenova's emotional speech, I felt like an absurd theatre (No medicine I Zartins:' as the anecdoté!'), because the speech here was about everything, about first housing, about lending to the country at all; andonly there was not a single word on the substance of the draft legislation - very short of the draft law, and what is this bill? If a creditor with a borrower has written an agreement for the reduction or deletion of the credit obligation, then the lender of thethe cost of a loan reduction or cancellation is to be considered an operating cost and, therefore, it is not taxed on the corporate tax of the Glass colleague, a little thought about what we are voting on in this bill! It is about the old one. The credits here are about those credits where the collateral is already expropriated, but part of the commitment to a left So this bill offers additional interest to the bank in the negotiations with borrowers who cannotto settle their obligations so that they do not have to pay their corporate income tax firsts in order to create a more favourable situation for the negotiations on old credit transfers, Mr Pimenova, or you cannot everto say' understand', I have to say,' understand', what you are calling on you to vote for, so that the banks do not have any interest in the old credit checkout, darling Pimenova, attopiece! (some members of the party applauding applauding)".
2015_02_12_285-seq15 translatedText "Thank you to the Member for the Carla Shadurskim MP".
2015_02_12_285-seq14 translatedText "Honourable Members of the Bureau, dear ladies, gentlemen, we have before us an amazing document in the third column of the first Title of the Law Project, when you look at, in full peace, complacency and self-confidence, the true authors of the bill, even without trying to hide, as intereststhe draft legislation, together with three other proposals, together with the proposed legislation, will therefore make the proposed bill to the respected politicians, our fellow Members, rather of their rapper boys this bill, which consists of four legislative proposals, as we are seeingthese are: right now, the draft law, as well as draft " Amendment of the Act " " For people's income tax, " " Amendment of the Consumer Law and Amendment of the Insolvency Law " Backing on a bill, means also to support the abolition of the principle of the principle of derogation for mortgage loans afterwhen the banks' lobbyists did not permit the tightening of the key rules in the Insolvency Law, the stick - not hidden in public blackmail by the first payment of mortgage credit and credit prices - was dismantled at the time of the first home purchase programme. It now offers a carrot to the legislator offering a carrot to the consumer with a clear conscience to give the consumer a freedom of choice - in particular, their commitment to the transfer of pledged property to the credit institution or to remain completely responsible for the repayment of the loan. What is more or less a banking business knows that the banks will find hundreds of methods to discourage banks from disadvantage, but with this law it imposed on them in the product below this hypocritical, supposedly free-for-choice basis. And under the pretext of economic necessity, for example, to allow young families to get a first home or ease the price of rent at market sign-up, or perhaps do not sign up, but the support of those Members who, on 25 September last year, voted' yes' to the warehouseproviding the key principle with the amendments to the Insolvency Law, and it shows that they do not understand now and did not understand why this principle was introduced for mortgage loans, did not understand the economic meaning of this principle and that the specific bill ,we cannot simply fail to mention this economic meaning, which is, in fact, all based on this whole system, that it is not helpful for the mission of the key borrowers to be placed on the market, with regulations which require banks to lend against the pledged claimthe value of the property, while commercially hazardous, makes lending to the borrower's ability to return the bank all of its assets up to the last thread If the banks are lending against the value of the property, they will be commercially risky in exceeding the value of the property pledged in excess of the pledged propertythe value of it, and with its inflated prices in the property market, will make regulation not more expensive for housing, but vice versa, making them more available on the proposed two-speed facility that we are now looking at leaves the opportunity to lend to the borrowerthe commitment, not against the property, and this makes the entire system of the bill pointless, encourages the greed, preservation and maintenance of creditors, rather than eliminating the existing irresponsible mortgage lending practices, and as it does notthe Bill apologists and the chairman of the honourable Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission is, by means of a national word, the memberships of the first home purchase during all of his life This bill, as well as the remaining three draft acts, isbased on biased assumptions, pushed from one court - true, economically very strong! - in the self-interest of a society-class self-interest and runs counter to the long-term development demands of the entire company Shia Bill support cannot be voted against, colleagues.".
2015_02_12_285-seq13 translatedText "My thanks to Mr One MEP, one for the referral to the commission of the bill Please call, waiting for Mr Berzina, Stadurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and Merit, Environmental Law and Regional Policyto the Commission, with a view to the committee responsible, to ask the voting regime, please see the result!: 52, against - 24, the 6-6 draft commission referred to by the Bureau of the Parliament, waiting for Berzina, Stadurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and putrasthe amendment to the statutory " corporation tax " to be sent to the Commission and the Finance (Tax) Commission to determine that it is responsible of the commission of One MEP can speak of a' No' to the Commission's " No " vote against the Commission.".
2015_02_12_285-seq12 translatedText "Dear colleague, if Mr Zariis were to be less inclined to re-read the old anecdotal re-reading and study of car catalogues, but more focused on specific legislative texts, as well as all banking regulations in the Latvian Republic, it would probably not have been What they were talking about. There is a key in this bill? That parallel to the principle of a warehouse which, as the only entry into force 1 March if we did not amend the law, provides a second opportunity for both credit institutions to inform the customer on both options, to establish a timetable for payments and be allowedthe freedom to choose your credit holder will be this choice? I will give you a simple example of a mortgage credit being taken, which, for example, costs EUR 40 000, so far before the key tenet of the key legislation is built into the legislative base. The current practice was that the first instalment was about 15 per cent, it would be €6 000 for the key entry of Pie's first instalment, as we are already seeing at the moment, mortgages have surged to 30 and maybe more percent to 30a percentage of the 40 thousand euros would be 12,000 (No drugs From DEP I Zaria heckling) There is a gap - the first instalment of €6 000 or 12 thousand I have received very many messages from young families who are simplysurprised by this situation that, after going to the bank after credit, even with the help of the first dwelling, they do not qualify, because it cannot pay this first contribution to Mr Savioner Zariit that the credit institution has the right to apply for each of the projects for a credit contractdifferent rules for the honourable colleagues, this phrase could have been written by law and could also not be passed on to the law, as Latvia, as yet, has not yet been nationalised by the Prime Minister, and, of course, banks have these opportunities and alwaysas long as we have free competition in the area of credit institutions, of course, the credit institution develops its own rules in order to balance the risks both to the credit taker and to the credit provider, the Glass colleague, by adopting these amendments to the Consumer Law, we are simply opening up againthe mortgage opportunities that last quarter of last year await the entry into force of the new legislation, unfortunately, in Latvia, more than 30 per cent of the last year, bearing in mind that, dear colleagues, it is our choice of whether there is a mortgage lending in Latvia or there is no Thank you".
2015_02_12_285-seq11 translatedText "Thank you to the Member for the Secretary-General, Carla Sirurskim, will speak on the issue of the draft legislation to the committees.".
2015_02_12_285-seq10 translatedText "Good morning, colleague, good morning, President-in-Office, can I be heard? Very well! Today we are looking at the package of legislation that is connected with the principle of the so-called warehouse principle This is one of these pieces of the legislative process. That resembles a drive from the anekdotes (From the floor: " again! ") Yes, that the spies have come together and decided to play poker Lund - there is no analogy with the undertones! - shared cards, watches for other players in the gameand everybody says Tur sits in a wolf, a bird, a fox, the other spies He shared the cards and says: " play honest, without crooked, will get across my throat - will get across my throat. " The same is true with those same amendments to the law Tiek has been told by those who are pushing them, telling them that it is all in the public interest that the public will benefit from it, although in fact they know very well who will benefitat the expense of these amendments to the law, and which they target on the bill and this is precisely why this bill, although it is a single package, is insidious to a rift across a variety of commissions, so that no one would understand what really happensthe amendment to the Insolvency Law (the President knocked the hammer No floor to DEP J Urbanovic: " open up! Something knocking! ") This bill has worked in the Tautfarm, agrarian, environment and regional policy commission, but one wonders why thesethe amendments are directed to a very different Commission, the Tautfarms, the agrarian, Environmental and Regional Policy Commission being left behind only by these changes in this law, that is to say, the Consumer Law, which in fact, these amendments are simple as a cover to cover thembanks need to make the necessary changes that would allow them to further implement the debt bondage principle, it is one thing to look at in a single case, which is offered by these brave proposals, which are presented to the people as an opportunity, the first sentence:' creditthe giver and the consumer may agree with the transfer of the credit agreement that it will be sufficient for the credit institution to repay the credit' Excuse me if we do not write it here, then they will not have the possibility of reaching an agreement here? You know, Iyou would like to say that such an agreement is already being concluded, there are real credit institutions that work on such conditions and already agree - without all those records that you are now listing and presenting you as an opportunity, which you will generate ,Citadele, a " yes " bank, says that two credit agreement projects will have to be offered to the consumer by two credit agreement projects and it is said that the credit institution has the right to apply each credit facilityfor the draft Treaty for different conditions, the rules, what does it mean? Here is nowhere to say what the principles of these rules will be, and in fact, they will not receive any choice of amendments to the consumer. Conversely, they will provide the banks with the opportunity for credit providers to implement the game they need for Jo - look at the analogous situation! We might just as well think that every Opel seller has to sell Volkswagen on the same terms, But you think so ,under what conditions are you selling them for This is what you are now proposing! And what will the Opel dealer say,' OK, no problem, please come to our saloon; you will have both Opel and Volkswagen at Opel, you can buy it at Opel and Volkswagen to buy youon the yield convenience price, while Volkswagen will be the Lamborghini price, " The question is: what will the consumer who will come to choose these conditions? Therefore, colleagues, it is obvious that this whole initiative is directed not to give the consumer any choice. Possibilities, but in fact to give the banks once again the possibility of realising the principle of slavery of debt, forcing consumers to make a choice of choice, I call for such a bill not to be supported and a look at you before you vote in your conscience, as the RUS is your attacker".
2015_02_12_285-seq9 translatedText "Members of Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee will vote on a resolution on this topic. The Committee on Legal Affairs will transfer to all the committees, stating that the Legal Affairs Committee is the responsible Commission, asking the result! For - 43, against: 28, 21 abstentions: 21 Law Project commissions have not been transferred to the next item :" the announcement of the draft acts " by the Bureau of the Saeima is proposing a bill tabled by the Cabinet Office on " Changes in Maritime Administration and Maritime Safety " to be transferred to the Tautfarm, agrarian, environment and regional policy commission and to determine that it is responsible by the Panel WasMEPs have reservations about the draft law passed by the Bureau of Deputies referred to by the Bureau of the Parliament, awaiting the hearing of Mr Berzina, Sigurska, CILINSKA, Brigue and Merit, Environmental Law and Regional Development. The policy commission and the committee to determine that it is responsible, As I said, under the Rules of Procedure, one Member can speak' yes' to First MEP Ivar Zarneam in the name of' No'.".
2015_02_12_285-seq8 translatedText "Dear colleague of the sitting, my dear colleague, there has been a lot of intelligent words from Mr Vilnius, supporting the idea of launching a debate on the election of an open president, But I would like to remind you that, three years later, he has voted" against " the popular elected president's initiative (heckling: " Ooo!, " faction consistency and mayoral members applauding) And as once you, Mr Vilnius, then (heckling) And as you once did in the Zatlina Reform Party and as you once did in the Zatian Reform Party and as you once, Mr Vilnius ,the coalition with unity and the National Association, the degradation of the President elected by the people and, in fact, did not push it out, torpeding any initiatives we made at the time, three years earlier (heckling from DEP K Jafé u Spolska u V Spolilau V Spollivan) This debate is this debate. The debate is as once three years old as at least as regards the presidential open election of Mr And what we are saying, dear colleagues, we have a suggestion that the President should be the leader of the Latvian people (From the DEP I Vindrele:' another thing!' )in a situation you only want a situation that has once been the case for yours, Mr Vilnius, the previous election, the election of the President of the Republic, and your political ambitions are unrelated to the support of the idea, or whether I do not support it is simply hateful treatment. Against a popular elected president's initiative, wanting today to bring about the election of a future President of the State to the shame of the coalition to shame what has ever been a unity brokered by the Zatlich President (heckling from DEP I Winking I Winietele I Don't I give you even moreI would remind you what, then, when the secret vote was secret, before which the union had pledged support to Mr Zatlern as the President of the Saeima, they had been telling us after the vote that, well, sorry, we were in the position of Mr Zatlina. The vote, as then, to the Members who have formed a coalition, has provided a conscience vote on what you now have in the debate? That you, the individual parties in the Commons, want to agree with each other without any kind of debate, without any sort of argument about the next oneand vote in an open procedure by the presidential hopeful and vote in their open procedure with a thoughtful agreement with a thoughtful agreement in order to control all the presidential candidates in the presidential chamber (the consistency of the House and the mayoral faction)".
2015_02_12_285-seq6 translatedText "Thank you very much if you don't touch this button, you'll be a representative of a new association of political parties under the name' Green Favouré From the Heart of the President' (heckling from faction:' Ui!')".
2015_02_12_285-seq5 translatedText "OK! You can finish your sentence".
2015_02_12_285-seq4 translatedText "I ask to finish the idea of one sentence (heckling from faction consistency:' to finish!')".
2015_02_12_285-seq2 translatedText "(from the floor of the DEP J Urbanovic:' Latgaliski!') Good President! Â The Republic's 12 female MPs! Exactly you're the Spokesman of VR's popular commitment to VR you're committed to fulfill your duties in good faith and after the best conscience they're really confident you're going to handle their actionsand the activity is supported by public confidence in Saeima, the amendment of this law to raise public confidence first of all on the decisions made and whether you really think that Latvia does not deserve to be as good or even betterthe President, what is it about Lithuania and Estonia? I couldn't really represent the whole people, because everyone knew that he had voted for him, about the absurdity of calling you well in the well-known Aivars Yes, the same Aivars of Ozolins! Or you'll knowyou don't actually know that already all state officials, all except the President of the State, have been elected openly for Members' votes to be publicly available for lawmakers, on all the Bureau of Commons, on the Auditor General, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control, on the National Bureau of Control ,the members of the Central Electoral Commission and members of the Central Election Commission, the President of the Financial and Capital Market Commission, the President of the Financial and Capital Market Commission, his Vice-President and members of the Bank of Latvia, on behalf of the Bank of Latvia, the Ombudsman ,the President of the National Council for Electronic Media Affairs and members of that Council, the Attorney General for the Supreme Court, the Chief Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, and members of the Supreme Court of Higher Education, Only a vote for the President of the European Parliament for the time being remain the only secret ballot to be voted on by the Commons. I would simply remind you if you've forgotten the beginning of Mr. Ageshina from this podium tried to shame MPs, saying that the majority of the parties in TAK had argued for the elected president of the nation, so the proposal for this open vote is not at allno longer making sense to speak in the liberty of remind you that Latvia's elected President, Latvia, will see at the earliest the year of 2019 and the idea that two thirds of the MPs are in favour of all three readings so that they do not confuse their heads! You have to remind you that this bill is already about electing the president in 2015, and please don't understand it, as if you did not understand it! If you think about it, I should be happy that last week you will not vote for this bill. The referral to the committees, as the matter would then, for example, be immediately rejected by the Legal Affairs Commission, with six votes to five, this bill, at first reading of the meeting of MPs, the current composition of lawmakers likely would not be able to reach two-thirds of support (NoDEP S Clippers: " commission by the majority! ") and, as a result, this important issue would be passed without the high hullabaloo, at the end of the general public spotlight, after the general public's attention to this issue, you still have the opportunity to correct their ownthe mistake you make is to trust your voter, just as he has once trusted Esi to be honest with himself and your constituents! Scared as he will judge your true decision! The fact that the party's secret market may have resulted in a weak president may be elected by a weak president in a closed vote your constituent will not find out that you're not at fault for being a mediocre or even a weak state presidential candidateand then again, you'll have to click on this vote If in this vote you won't be sitting in your seat as a member of your seat, you will not go to the ballot, then you will be disgraced by your constituents and be a representative of a new association of political parties.".
2015_02_12_285-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, the clock is 9 01 Please start the sitting of 12 February 2015 with members of the House of February 2015, before we take up the agenda for the sitting, we have to decide on the possible amendments to the agenda of today's sitting, and on its Budget andthe Financial (Taxation) Commission asks for changes to the agenda for today's sitting and to include a bill on the " Amendment of the Comparative Tax Law " for consideration at first reading Does MEPs not object to an amendment to the Agenda, which asks the Commission to amend the agenda for today's sitting. To include a bill drafted by the Commission on " Amendment of the Law on the Judiciary, " apparently in the section of the Bureau's reports, " Does Members have objections to the agenda of the agenda changed today, " he said. Under the Bureau's reports on the Forest Law Commission, MEPs do not object to the adoption of the agenda and the Commission's proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No... / 2005 / ECthe first item on the first item of this chapter is the case-law of the House of Commons: " the Constitution, " the Bureau of the Republic of Ireland, was proposed by the House of Commons on Tuesday. The amendment proposed by the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia to all MPs' commissions and the determination of the Legal Affairs Committee to be responsible by one Member of the Legal Affairs Commission in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of a single Member may be spoken in favour of, " One MEP: " in principle, ").".
2015_02_05_284-seq46 translatedText "So, today, all the items on the agenda are addressed in the Questions and Answer session I declare closed on The good-bye!".
2015_02_05_283-seq173 translatedText "So, today, all the items on the agenda are addressed in the Questions and Answer session I declare closed on The good-bye!".
2015_02_05_284-seq44 translatedText "Thank you to the House for another supplementary question? The sculf gives you this opportunity to ask you no longer to ask them to ask Question Time no more than thank you, Minister, thank you Minister, Minister, for the answers you have given.".
2015_02_05_283-seq171 translatedText "Thank you to the House for another supplementary question? The sculf gives you this opportunity to ask you no longer to ask them to ask Question Time no more than thank you, Minister, thank you Minister, Minister, for the answers you have given.".
2015_02_05_284-seq43 translatedText "My goal, when I proposed to opt out of the draft membership, had withheld the possibility of wasting public resources and Un stop at what is already done in the business of being the sort of principle: don't take good money chasing moneybad money, what is happening now, what is happening now, is, in fact, correct, you say: you cannot say that this is the money that is already spent on what is already spent in the funding ,who could be squandered if we do that, rather, that is the principle And about the funding that has already been used, I think: it is also our duty to explain whether it is good faithuse it and what is its useful return and its tangible values that we can use at the moment, so that we can make the most of the cuts already wasted on the funds that have been made up to now".
2015_02_05_283-seq170 translatedText "My goal, when I proposed to opt out of the draft membership, had withheld the possibility of wasting public resources and Un stop at what is already done in the business of being the sort of principle: don't take good money chasing moneybad money, what is happening now, what is happening now, is, in fact, correct, you say: you cannot say that this is the money that is already spent on what is already spent in the funding ,who could be squandered if we do that, rather, that is the principle And about the funding that has already been used, I think: it is also our duty to explain whether it is good faithuse it and what is its useful return and its tangible values that we can use at the moment, so that we can make the most of the cuts already wasted on the funds that have been made up to now".
2015_02_05_284-seq42 translatedText "Yes, I put what I previously started Just amicable negotiations to a sequel, otherwise we have a ghetto here that adds to We can't normally talk to each other, but Iwhy, I put this question to the public, I think it is very important that this project, either as a project which makes savings or as a project, also appreciate this project. Who has led to a fundraising waste To I wanted to highlight Well as officials can subsequently be held liable if the project is given an assessment that the project is giving money savings?".
2015_02_05_283-seq169 translatedText "Yes, I put what I previously started Just amicable negotiations to a sequel, otherwise we have a ghetto here that adds to We can't normally talk to each other, but Iwhy, I put this question to the public, I think it is very important that this project, either as a project which makes savings or as a project, also appreciate this project. Who has led to a fundraising waste To I wanted to highlight Well as officials can subsequently be held liable if the project is given an assessment that the project is giving money savings?".

first
previous
next