Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }
- 2015_06_11_309-seq174 translatedText "31 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq437 translatedText "30 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq306 translatedText "30 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq172 translatedText "30 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq435 translatedText "29 - Legal Affairs Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq433 translatedText "28 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq298 translatedText "28 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq431 translatedText "27 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq429 translatedText "26 - Members of the Liepsis and the Bites Proposal Without Support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq294 translatedText "26 - Members of the Liepsis and the Bites Proposal Without Support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq427 translatedText "25 - Members of the Liepus and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq426 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on 24: the proposal tabled by the Members of the Members and the Bites, please voting. Please, the result!: 25, against - 35, 13 proposals are not supported by 13.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq425 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this is a general principle, specifically to protect the rights of the child, that 12 years is generally regarded as a time when the baby is psychologically mature so far as to be able to be fully aware and expressing their opinions and to express their views so far in the age of this year. A child is always listened to regardless of whether he is maybe two, three, four, five, six years or another He is listened to, along with the person who is close, or in the presence of a psychologist, to find out according to his age as he isLula, to find out if he is' about' or' no' to a question These 12 years is certain both for adoption and for the patronage of a childhood to decide which parent he wants to stay in Soit has also been laid down in a series of other substantive legal provisions in the Commission's sitting, we have heard a judge who recognised that the Court had the possibility of applying the general principle of a direct hearing in the Latvian legal system as a romangan- legal system, that is not new, Mr Buzek ,the application of the general principles of legislative principles - But in general terms, the general principle of' good' now does not oblige all children to come to trial, because there is no such problem we were not convinced that there would be a problemwhat a seablet or a ten-year-old child because they were not heard would have been adopted against his will, because, as I said, a child is heard, his will is clarified according to his degree of maturity, and the Commission did not support this proposal.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq424 translatedText "Thank the debate on behalf of the Commission?".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq423 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, today, in the last time, I will make it difficult for you to turn your attention to the 24 proposal It states that, when deciding on the issue of adoption, the court, if it considers it necessary, can invite the children of his adoptive children, irrespective of the ministry of his agelays down an age limit of 12 years to be invited to trial on grounds other than the one in which such a child is considered to constitute a serious consideration of 12 years of age limitation. In other cases, we believe that the issue of adoption, especially when it happens abroad, is a sufficiently sensitive issue to enable the court to listen directly to the most directly involved - hence the child's opinion and, if anything, a childbehaviors and body language, which may indicate a person with whom a child does feel safe, restrictions on unaccompanied minors to take part in court hearings involve the need to protect children from injuries that can be caused by what is happening in the trials of Taseithe issue of adoption, traumatic childhood situations should not occur in the presence of a child, or want to be adopted, otherwise adoption by the District Court of the Legal Affairs Commission is not acceptable, the Court of Justice of thein applying the principles of the courts, a child who has not yet reached the age of 12 should therefore call for a deliberate absence of the situation in which the court may do contrary to the text of the law written, and it is therefore necessary to support this 24 proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq421 translatedText "24 - Members Liepus and Bites proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq290 translatedText "24 - Members Liepus and Bites proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq413 translatedText "20 - A proposal by the Minister of Justice of the Rasnachs was incorporated into 21 and 22 proposals".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq411 translatedText "19 - Members in the Liepus and the Bees proposal, which provides justice for the trial of psychologists on his own initiative, should also be supported by the Commission, if the Commission considers it necessary".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq410 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on the proposal tabled by 18 MEPs and the Bites, please, the voting regime! Please see the result!: 29, against - 28, 10 proposals are not supported by 10.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq409 translatedText "Yes, on behalf of the Commission, we also really have very many debates on this proposal: we heard from the Centre for the Protection of the Child, the beakecourt itself, the Welfare Ministry, NGOs and also the decision of thewe will certainly come back at the third reading on procedural regulation and, perhaps, this regulation will have to be supplemented by the fact that it will certainly not have to be completely excluded, as the authors of the proposal call upon in the name of the Commission, not to support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq407 translatedText "Honourable President-in-Office of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, indeed, Saeima has supported amendments to the Civil Law (3 and 4 proposals), but it seems that fellow Member Mr Vilnius is not familiar with the current regulation of civil lawin Article 203 Proti, there is talk of the fact that the law of custody of a parent is interrupted if the lawyer recognises that they are abusing their rights to So Turn in this case, if we are talking about a failure to comply with judicial decisions ,there is probably also a question of possibly malicious action and, in my opinion, this rule actually applies to such situations, and with it no contradiction here is not to support the position of the Commission for Thank you".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq406 translatedText "Thank you for the debate and vote on a resolution on this topic.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq405 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the draft law on the' Amendment of the Civil Process' Bill is related to the proposed 3 and 4 proposals, which have already been supported by the Legal Affairs and Saeima amendments before, before the bill, so the bill will therefore be included in the bill." The amendments to Civil Law " The supply of an original ministry submitted implied that parents being suspended under the law of custody, or, in the language of the people, taken away from a child if the parent fails to comply with a court ruling in the case arising from the custody or the right of contactthe fact that the court rulings in force have been enforced, including the use of various means of coercion, the use of a child in the form of such coercion is unethical and morally and legally unacceptable, as the situation in which the conviction is not met ,the anti-legal action of his own parents is also sanctioned by the Legal Affairs Committee in an argument that the Supreme Court in one particular case has already issued a verdict of this kind, one verdict based on a particular case based on individual casesin particular, the actual circumstances and the evidence do not in any way oblige the legislator to change the direct nature of all the law, the way in which the legislator is legitimised and, in accordance with the principles of the division of state powers, may affect the judiciary and preventthe repetition of such judgments in the form of the exclusion of the sentence imposed by the Commission and also by the Saeima have already supported substantive law, there is no reason to maintain this in the procedural law, therefore please please support the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq403 translatedText "18 - Members Liepus and Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq272 translatedText "18 - Members Liepus and Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq395 translatedText "Dear colleague, ladies and gentlemen, we have been going to look at the first 13 proposals, and I will continue to report 14 to the proposal by the Minister for Justice, the Minister for Justice, which is a editorial character of the Committee of Justice.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq394 translatedText "Brian CROWLEY (EPP-ED, IE) said: " I want to call on all the members of Parliament to take their seats.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq392 translatedText "Thank you to Little, colleague, not registered: Sergei Dolgopolov, John Dombrava, Andrei Elkin, Ojia Kalnins, Ivan Klementyev, Carl See, Carl Seehas Sergei Potapkins, Artis Rasmanis, Romualds Manuins, Juris Vectirana, Dzintars (DEP A Caroma: Dainis Liepins, Dainis will!')".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq390 translatedText "Honourable Members, I recall that the sitting of the Legal Affairs Committee will take place after 5 minutes.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq389 translatedText "Mr Gaidim, the chairman of the MEP, told the House that".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq115 translatedText "Mr Gaidim, the chairman of the MEP, told the House that".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq388 translatedText "Honourable members of the Committee on the Budget and Financial (Taxation), I invite you to a short sitting on the premises of the Committee on Budgets and Finance (tax) after 5 minutes".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq387 translatedText "The House will also vote on a resolution on this topic. The 45-year-old celebrated Member and, on behalf of the House, we welcome him! (applause From the DEP A boss:' Dinner!'".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq386 translatedText "13 - The Justice Secretary's proposal, which considers that, when dealing with cases arising from custody or contact rights, the court shall, in addition to other circumstances, take into account all cases in which the personwishes to use custody or contact rights, use of violence against children or child-to-child abuse cases arising from custody law, the Court of Justice shall, in addition to other circumstances, take into accountthis proposal for a regulation of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention and Prevention of Violence against Women and Domestic Violence".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq385 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on the proposal tabled by 12 MEPs and the Bites, please voting. Please, the result!: 32, against: 37, 9 abstentions: 9 without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq384 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this is the rule of law in the Proti Law Proti, a tool that the judge decides on court, and this provision allows the judge to assess all circumstances of the case, all the evidence in the case of the justices of the Legal Affairs Committee on practical termsthe problems in this proposal, which have previously been proposed by the Minister for Justice, are to allow the court to decide if a person does not arrive before the Court of Justice, so the court will always assess why, how many timesthe calls, in which a call is made or at all, have any information on whether this one's older or both the parents of the child cares when they were last seen Possible that this parent is on the maintenance birthplace of the 10-payer listfor years, the general rule for the child is not concerned, but the issue of a child's patronage cannot be solved (by the sitting of the driver to be hamstrung with a hammer) only because the judge does not even have this procedural rights assessment of this matter Herethe judge is appealing for a judge in the case of Barnincourt not to be put at any higher degree by Podesta or otherwise by the Barson Court, simply asking the judge to judge any circumstances of the case, and the judge will be deciding what decisions These judges have made to appeal. There are three of us, and so for each such case, if any party does not agree with the decision adopted by the judge, therefore the Civil Process Law should provide for such a procedural standard that there is a potential situation when a court and this baby remain with each trialas a parent of the sitting, he, in some ways, does not, in any way, find the ambiguity of the issue in favour of the Commission and the Commission (since this proposal is not supported), this rule is necessary in the civil procedure and I call on the Commission, on behalf of the Commission, not to support it.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq383 translatedText "Thanks So to the debate conclusion Does the commission have an explanation?".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq382 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the 12 proposal of the civil law law provides for the maintenance of the existing arrangements in the case of judicial proceedings arising out of custody and the right of contact in the Proti, regardless of who is required, such things should be dealt with in the presence of all concerned and ,if the defendant does not arrive without enough reason to appear in the trial, he shall be brought to justice by the Court of Justice, under the responsibility of the Ministria, to impose specific arrangements in case of a case in the case of the barn court in Shetney case could be found without the defendantparticipation should, if he is in accordance with the right of court to appear on the court but not to appear before the Court of Justice, introduce special incentives and advantages for the institution to deal with cases, while at the same time to the disadvantage of private individuals and the empowerment of citizens in the defence of their ownthe right of withdrawal is a sufficiently important limitation of the rights of the person, and in all cases it also affects the best interests of the child, and therefore claims by a bartribunal of custody disqualifications be considered as similar to other personal chargesif the defendant does not arrive for a hearing without a good reason, then, as in other cases, he lies and brought the case under duress Lietas if the search does not succeed, if such regulation were to succeedto consider this, it should apply to all cases, not just to the requirements submitted by the bungs, as I mentioned earlier, in a situation in which parents have temporarily gone to earn their families a living outside the Latvian court, a court in the court case may request. Sends a subpoena to parents " home states, unfortunately, of course, it is not informed and not informed about proceedings and the case is in absentia in cases arising from custody or contact rights, it is also important for the Court to assess the identity of the participants in the case ;this is distressed without their presence by Please not to single out the bunk as a superior to other members of the case and support this proposal by providing the barn with exactly the same rights and duties as other persons who have filed this type of lawsuit".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq380 translatedText "12 - Members Liepus and Bites proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq378 translatedText "11 - Proposal for a proposal by the Legal Office, with the support of".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq372 translatedText "8 - A proposal from the Legal Office of the Legal Affairs Committee, including the Legal Affairs Office,".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq370 translatedText "7 - The Legal Office proposal is supported by".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq368 translatedText "6 - The Justice Secretary's proposal for Partly sponsored Parks, included 7, 8 and 9 of the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq366 translatedText "5 - Proposal by the Legal Office, in the form of a proposal for a legal office, with the support of".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq362 translatedText "3 - Members' Day and the Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq360 translatedText "2 - Members' Day and the Providing Proposal not supported".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq358 translatedText "Fellow Members, this is the third one related to this very important area - the protection of the rights of the children 1 - Members of the Liepus and the Bites proposal are not sponsored by the".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq357 translatedText "As a result, the proposals should be submitted to the next 10 July of this year on the next item on the next item: the draft law on civil procedure, second reading on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq356 translatedText "Also, the Legal Affairs Committee of the attached Commission shall also ask the Commission to set a month, i.e. 10 July this year.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq355 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the second reading of the Bill of Barca Law, please vote! - 82, 81 against and no abstentions - I would ask the House to approve the deadline for tabling proposals at second reading.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq354 translatedText "Consequently, all the proposals that have been received and incorporated into the second reading are dealt with here, with the meeting of members of the meeting in Annapolis to support a second reading of the bill".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq352 translatedText "And, here, there is a transitional provision here, with the previous proposals not supported, the Legal Affairs Committee has created 51 proposals as its proposal, with a view to establishing transitional legal provisions and imposing these new requirements so that members of bunches before they take office would also be sufficientit is also time to prepare for the law applicable to professional ethics, the identification of photography, crew and recording, storage and publication arrangements, which should be developed by the Cabinet Office in order to introduce this practice in a uniform format approved by the Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq350 translatedText "50 - Mr AUGULIS, Minister for Welfare".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq348 translatedText "49 - Members Liepus and Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq346 translatedText "48 - Own proposal by the Legal Affairs Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq340 translatedText "45 - Proposal by the Legal Office, in the form of an editorial report supported by".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq338 translatedText "44 - A proposal by the Minister of Justice Rasnachs was incorporated, incorporated in 45 and 46 proposals".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq336 translatedText "43 - Proposal by the Legal Office of the Legal Affairs Committee, supported by".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq334 translatedText "42 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides for the addition of a legal provision stating that a sufficient number of persons may be able to provide a decision-making composition of the barn, the bargart in questionthe task of meeting Te's tasks is specifically aimed specifically at smaller local authorities, where perhaps this qualified urn staff are less likely to have the opportunity to make a quality decision to the Legal Affairs Committee it has sponsored".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq326 translatedText "38 - A proposal by the Minister of Justice of the Rasnacet was incorporated, in terms of 39, 40 and 41 in the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq324 translatedText "37 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq295 translatedText "37 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq322 translatedText "36 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal to lay down a procedure for ensuring a decision whereby a child is separated from an elderly, guardian, foster, execution (except in the case of the one-day discharge decision),".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq320 translatedText "35 - Welfare of Minister for Welfare".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq316 translatedText "33 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides local councils with the responsibility to provide legal aid for the preparation of a decision, " if a lawyer is not elected to a person with a higher profileeducation for legal science and legal qualification, " As I said earlier, so we, the commission, really want the work of the minibuses to put a clean up on this proposal is supported by".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq314 translatedText "32 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides that the General Assembly is being fixed in the minutes and is entitled to use the sound entry in the".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq312 translatedText "31 - Welfare Minister Ulda AUGULIS accepts the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq311 translatedText "I would like to thank Please, the vote on 30 - the proposal tabled by the Members of the Members and the Bites, please voting. Please see the result!: 31, against - 39, abstentions: 8 without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq310 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, indeed, the problem of barn problems exists, and both in the media we see a lot of problems and the Commission receives information about the problems in the framework of the Riga Legal Affairs Panel, which has been contacted directly with letters, to be monitored by Riga's seat-law ,because, quite simply, there is a large municipality in Riga and with this barber there are a lot of cases of Both State's National Child Protection Center, and the Department of Welfare admits that the council's urn problem has been challenged by thosethis and a series of other proposals are aimed at stepping up both the quality of the bunches and monitoring the Committee on Legal Affairs and the unanimous commitment of the Legal Affairs Commission: to do so by making proposals both at second reading and at third reading. It was also the task force that I mentioned earlier, where both the Ministry, the police and the local authorities, and the non-governmental organisations, to really find it - all the best possible solutions to this particular proposal do not address this particular proposal. The specific proposal in the article on the consequences of a single personal decision is that, when this one-day decision has been taken, Little Law tells the family to work, the family must help and the family must improve these conditions Betthe proponents of the proposal, since the words " subsequently " are replaced by " prior to this, " And we in the commission talked very much about the fact that, in nature and in legal terms, this proposal would not really be welcome, and the Commission did not support it.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq309 translatedText "Thank you for the debate on behalf of the Commission as to whether the Commission is concerned about the proposal?".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq308 translatedText "Well, honourable Members, honourable Members, there are a large proportion of our citizens who are not happy with the way in which the yvenal justice authority works, that is to say, this frustration is sometimes expressed through protests, with picket, that very often very often manifest itself in the very nature of these frustrations. A populist that is infuriating us, and I also understand But, on the other hand, there is a problem with the fact that there is a lack of discontent, but continues to evolve, suggesting that sometimes the decisions of the bartribunal are in fact and are actually causing moreharm than good, as is supposed to be in the law and also included in the barn, I also recognise that very often a child has to be removed from the family - from those families where the child is humbled, sit, not generally fed, but rather, rather, that they are fed at alland this is a very serious challenge for our society, not only there is a need for a particular child problem to provide, however, the rules that balance this dissatisfaction and the need to protect the rights of the child I as a Member receive from usfrom persons belonging to Latvia, complaints which, almost as sometimes as screams come from abroad, home to our fellow citizens, are precisely because of the fact that, in those countries, the yvenal justice authorities sometimes treat families very hard and against the parents of children. We are demanding, however, that these specific cases should be transferred to Latvian soil, Latvia's jurisdiction, so that it is in our legislative capacity to protect the interests of our fellow citizens, and we must take action to ensure that we do not make this stuff up forthe soil, we are again dealing with similar problems, with which they were confronted abroad, we have to provide legislation here, in Latvia, which would be a fair I believe that the specific provision in the 30 proposal is a good requirement which would balance these twothe necessity that we are now talking about is a very strong national body, but on the other hand, it is intended that, before the child is removed from the family, support is given to the family and to make sure that this work is carried outthe beach has brought its results - and this is very important - and, on the one hand, the rights of the child will be protected and, on the other hand, we will protect the family's ability to develop, change to allow it to continue raising its childrenit is very important! Let us remember that no one, only the family, will be better able to bring up their child if the family really want to do everything else, it is right and I think this particular proposal, which has been raised by MEPsand the bite that we are talking about here from the rostrum and which the Member spoke about here, I would ask that I please listen to the proposal in this particular proposal that It really strikes this balance between the needs of the public and the needs of a particular family.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq304 translatedText "29 - The Minister for Welfare (AUGULIS), which, after discovering this discussion of our discussion, is directly accompanied by an improvement in the regulation of the adoption of a single decision, that is to say, prior to this simple decision on the child's divorce from the family's primaryit is only possible to assess the potential to prevent life and health risks for their child by remaining in the family and, where it is not possible to prevent a child's rights to grow up in the family only then it can only decide to divorce the child from the familyso the adoption of this trepdth decision is meant by the assessment that, by nature, neither the child nor the family would have any additional burden - so, first of all, by preventing this health or life-threatening threat, and this is supported by the Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq303 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on the proposal tabled by 28 MEPs and the Bites, asking the voting regime! Please see the result!: 26, against - 40, 13 are not supported by 13 proposals".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq302 translatedText "Yes, in the Commission, too, there has been much debate on this proposal, and Mr Vilnius has already indicated that we already adopted a similar content proposal, that in substance there is always a mindcourt situation for either photo, or video, or a recording ,in order for this evidence to be carried out, and so that it can indeed assess the specific living situation, this particular article, which proposes this proposal, talks about the health of a child or the conditions at risk of life, and they are indeed particularlycases where a decision has to be taken on the ground and can only be adopted by the President of the Office, or by the Vice-President, and later collegiate then this one-round decision has to be concluded without immediate action, possibly by a childlife or health is a threat to me, colleagues, it really must be said that cases like the UK have, unfortunately, cases of paedophilia in the same way that perhaps it should not be first and foremost a child to help andthey should therefore, at that moment, be exempt from this life-saving and health-threatening situation, and therefore to place a trial duty first and making sure that the photograph is sufficiently well received, and only afterwards - that I think would be disingenuousthe Commission considered that this proposal was not to be welcomed, but it has, of course, supported the use of all these devices, as you, dear colleagues, supported in one of the previous proposals, and would therefore call on the Commission, on behalf of the Commission, to reject the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq300 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, this proposal states that, in cases where a judicial official takes a one-shot decision, the circumstances that this officer has recognised as a child's health or life-threatening life, as well as events at the time of decision, fixing video, photo orin another appropriate format, the Commission and the Saeima, voted 22 by the Legal Affairs Committee, have already supported the introduction of General Law for General Law, photography, filming and recording of a recording of the child's living conditions. Health and life-threatening conditions, however, I would like to say, however, that the one-time decisions taken by the public office-holders in society have the greatest discussion and doubt as to whether these decisions have been taken in the spirit of the child and the familyin the interests of defence, this doubt and discussion in both the public and in the event of a dispute can be prevented by fixing the circumstances of the seat office, so that they can be consulted at a later stage by both representatives of the person and, of course, the court proposal does not requiresignificant financial resources, since a digital fixation is now possible with almost any telephone order, the purchase of special apparatus for these needs is not required in substance by the Legal Affairs Committee in the argument that there is such a threatening situation. In which a trial officer is forced to flee with a child and, in such a situation, it would not be possible to make any fixation to say, even in such a critical situation, where a device, such as a mobile phone, is placed in a video or audio mode, it willat least, the audio recording that will witness these really threatening circumstances is offered to protect both children and their parents, and also of the barn's own neighborhoods and unfair insults and speculation to support the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq296 translatedText "27 - Welfare Minister Ulda AUGULIS, which develops a framework for the suspension and detention of a child's legal custody, the withdrawal and renewal of a case, in proposing a case for terminating a child's custody of a parent, carrying out a risk assessment (elicidal problems, problems )ignorance) inform parents about the consequences and instructs the elderly to prevent, within the deadline set by social services, the adverse conditions for the development of a child disadvantaged by the deadline set bythe child's life and health only, in cases a beach court decides on behalf of the parent and the separation of the child from the Family And Caucus this is supported by So in substance here, with far more amplified controls and support for the family".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq292 translatedText "25 - Welfare Minister Ulda AUGULIS accepts the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq289 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the proposal tabled by the 23 Members of the European Parliament and of the Beites, please voting. Please, the result!: 29, against - 40, abstentions: 8 without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq288 translatedText "On behalf of the Commission, I would like to state that we had very much debate on this proposal, precisely explaining the proposal's authors, in my opinion, that there was either family care, or out-of-family care that the family really understandwhat now for every family is - there are families who are divers, where either mum or child breed, or the father also adoption is family care too! And we arethis Family Photos (No floor DEP A Carote:' is it on behalf of the commission?!') on behalf of the commission of what we considered you have all not been in the commission, so I would be really interested in you understand what you vote for. So this family care should not be shared, as officials told the commission that analysing whether this family is natural or part of a natural will will find it very difficult to tell Savuthly Civil Law in a speech about a biological family that has no adoptionthe family, as a natural family at all as a legal concept, does not exist in the second aspect of this proposal, which was also debated and where representatives of the Local Government became involved in the money matter This is a money issue directly to the social services, because of coursethere should be more money in the communities concerned, especially in major communities, so that these families can improve their conditions, as they can be improved often by social conditions, in other words, indeed with a new place of residence, and indeed with logistical technical resources. Rather than declaratory provisions, the law should be incorporated but the money should be carried out in such a way that money should go to these families, but this proposal does not involve this well, but the proposal did not, of course, fail to get the Commission's support, colleagues.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq287 translatedText "I thank the debate on behalf of the Commission for a comment? (DEP I applicant Pimenovs and show screens:' look!'), the debate was closed! (from the floor to DEP A Carol:' let me speak'.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq286 translatedText "Honourable President, ladies and gentlemen, I understand that the bill's amendment proposal is always ideal for idealism, but by providing for the defence of and support for the presence of children in the family, and the need to promote this presence in the family ,the paradoxical situation is, first of all from a legal point of view, because, at the beginning of the law, where the terms have been explained, it has not been said that the natural family, if we are talking about rules of law, must also be fully aware of what isa natural family If we were guided by the Constitution, then the natural family is a union between a man and a woman, and then you meet that one's an elderly family or family where the children are bringing up a mamma with their mother, so twowomen - Mamma and grandmother - are a family of the obscurity And so it meets so that a barrister, according to your proposed amendments, will only support those families with no such problems, but a single mother will not receive assistance from a single mother. The lawyer and grandmother of a grandmother, who was reportedly leaving for the Irish, will not receive help from the barn-courts you want the barber to help only the natural family of this odd proposal not to support (a faction of unity applause)".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq285 translatedText "Thank you to the President of the European Parliament to continue his speech to the House.".
- 2015_06_04_304-seq67 translatedText "Thank you to the President of the European Parliament to continue his speech to the House.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq284 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, first of all, thank you for the fact that you almost supported 1 proposal in this proposal, this proposal is similar to that and, even if we did not support 1 proposal, I would like to listen to what I have to say and assess: I would rather have neededsupporting this - 23 proposal This proposal provides for the addition of the General Service of the General Assembly to defend and support the presence of a child in the natural family and the improvement of this family situation in the Little Barca Law and in the situation in the public sphere. There is a misconception that a barn is on the same side but the parent of the child - the second, in fact, in the form of a struggle, rather than a relationship of cooperation between these parties, however, this distinction is absurd in its essence, as the barn is to represent them andto defend the best interests of Savuthly, siding against the child's parents, it always causes - or almost always does - damage to the child's best interests Only if circumstances really require children to be separated, this harm is necessary andthe justification for the proposal is to change the role of the lawyer in order to remove the separation of the child's situation in the family and, where the situation is inadmissible, the decision to withdraw the child from the family, it becomes something that helps andsupports the family in trying to provide children with the right conditions in time, so that a decision on the child unbundling from the family and any subsequent inevitable harm to the best interests of the child should not, at all, have to be adopted at the moment in several of its activities. Supports and contributes to the family, so as not to warrant the adoption of a decision regarding the child separation from the family in Tasei's other bunches that they do not have the right to do so, as the direct text of the law does not involve judicial cooperation with social partners. The municipal services are good, but part of the general proposal does not make provision for the addition of the law, so that such a disagreement does not arise even though the 1 proposal was not supported, but I call for support from this 23 proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq282 translatedText "23 - Members Liepus and Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq280 translatedText "22 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides for the right of a lawyer to photograph, film and obtain the sound records, if the child's life check reveals that the child is in danger of life and life in perilous circumstances, so as to contain thoseevidence of this in the event of a residence examination is clearly apparent to the child, whether life-threatening or health-hazardous, it could be demonstrated by these materials or obtained material or recordings obtained by the Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq278 translatedText "21 - The Welfare Minister's proposal, Mr AUGULIS, is partly supported, contained in 22 - the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq276 translatedText "20 - Welfare of Minister for Welfare".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq274 translatedText "19 - Members Liepus and Bites Proposal Without support".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq270 translatedText "17 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides: if the elected person elected by the lawyer is not mastered by a statutory training course, the duties of the President of the Court of Auditors and of the General Assembly continue to carry out their duties in the Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq268 translatedText "16 - Welfare minister's proposal for Partly sponsored, included in 17 - Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq266 translatedText "15 - The Legal Affairs Commission proposal, which provides that, for the first time, the Vice-President of the Legal Affairs Commission, the Vice-President of the Court of office, the Vice-President of the Court of office, the Vice-President of the Office, or the Member of the Court of Justice, shall acquire, within six months of his election, the statutory training course within the Commission.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq264 translatedText "14 - Mr AUGULIS, Minister for Welfare, sponsored a proposal included in the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq260 translatedText "12 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal also provides for the establishment of the same requirements as that of the candidates nominated for office in the Commission for the candidates nominated by the President or Vice-President of the General Court or Vice-President of the Commission".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq258 translatedText "11 - The Welfare Minister AUGULIS's proposal for Paralanders, a proposal included in the Commission proposals - 12 and 13 in the proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq256 translatedText "10 - Members of the Liepus and the Bites proposal were included in the proposal by the Commission on 12-12 December in the Commission's proposal".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq254 translatedText "9 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which also includes the proposal of the Minister for Welfare in the Commission, supports the request of the Vice-President of the General Assembly of the General Assembly and of the Vice-President of the lawyer-designate,".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq252 translatedText "8 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which also includes a proposal by the Welfare Minister AUGULIS providing for a period of 25 years to raise the age at which the President of the Court of Justice or the President of the Court of Justice is to be electedfurthermore, in addition to the education requirements already laid down in the field of employment and the requirement for language skills at the highest level in the Commission, the Vice-Chair will also be required to appoint a deputy.".
- 2015_06_11_309-seq251 translatedText "Members agree with the resolution: " no! " Members are calling for a vote by the President of the European Parliament to ask for a call for the vote! Please vote!: 23, against 35, seven abstentions".