Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

• 2016_05_19_365-seq110 translatedText "6 - RINKĒVIČA proposal by the Minister for Foreign Affairs".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq108 translatedText "5 - Secretary of State for Transport, Tavara proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq106 translatedText "4 - Secretary of State for Transport, Tavara proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq104 translatedText "3 - Transport Secretary Edgar Tavara, Secretary of State for Transport".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq102 translatedText "2 - Motion for a resolution by the Foreign Minister, Edgar RINKĒVIČS, has endorsed".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq100 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, we are working on a bill of 12 proposals in the Overall Amendment Bill 1 - the Commission proposal has been supported by the chairman of the Commission.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq99 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the bill in the third, final, reading, of the bill in the buffer of the bill, please the voting regime!: 85, against and abstentions -the law has been adopted on the agenda of the " Amendment of Electronic Communications Law, " the third reading by Edward Smilman, MEP on behalf of the Economic and Regional Policy Commission - Member of the Committee on the Environment and Regional Policy".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq98 translatedText "It therefore asks for the adoption of the bill in the' Amendment of the buffer law' at third reading.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq96 translatedText "And finally 3 - Minister AŠERADENA has also supported it in the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq94 translatedText "2 - Economy Minister AŠERADENA has supported the Commission's proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq92 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleague, so your attention to the bill' Amendment to the buffer law', I would remind you, in the third reading, that the package has been opened up to the situation regarding the gas and service stations that the Commission has received three proposals in the Commission's proposal.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq91 translatedText "Ingumar gue, MEP on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq89 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the " Latgales Special Economic Area Act, " the third, final, reading, for the voting regime!".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq88 translatedText "All the proposals are therefore dealt with by the Charter to support the third, final, reading of the law.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq86 translatedText "And finally, the proposal of the Legal Office, the Legal Office, has also received support from the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq84 translatedText "8 is the proposal of the Legal Affairs Office, which is supported by".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq82 translatedText "7 - Proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq80 translatedText "6 is Environment and Regional Development Minister Kaspara Gerharda's proposal, which the commission has also garnered support".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq78 translatedText "Likewise, 5 is supported by the Legal Office's proposal in the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq76 translatedText "4 - The proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission is also supported by".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq74 translatedText "3 - Legal Office proposal also sponsored by the Legal Office".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq72 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission".
• 2016_03_03_350-seq79 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission".
• 2016_02_18_348-seq10 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq264 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the Legal Office for the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq70 translatedText "Good afternoon, Madam President, dear colleagues, we are working with the Latgales Special Economic Area Act (No 486 / Lp12) So on the third reading, nine proposals were received, mainly on the Second Reading. Crucially, this law was rewritten by both the commission and with the Legal Office's involvement in Little to the third reading there are nine proposals now left in round 1 - the Legal Office's proposal in the Commission supports".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq69 translatedText "On the agenda - " Latgales Special Economic Area Law, " third reading in the Group of the Economy, Agriculture and Environmental Policy - MEP Anry Matshort".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq67 translatedText "Thank you very much for calling the bill " Amendment of the Rules of Procedure " in the third, final, reading, of the voting regime!".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq66 translatedText "Thanks So all the proposals are examined in the Ashes to support the bill's " Amendment to Rules of the Rules " at the third, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq64 translatedText "Thank you, as I support the 1 proposal, then 2 is the related proposal of the Legal Affairs Commission, which also supports and establishes the mandate, the ethicaland the application committee the right to request information from the Sodu Registry under the procedure laid down in the Sodu Registry to prepare the notification as to the administrative provisions already notified to Members in accordance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq63 translatedText "I would like to ask you to call, please vote, on the proposal tabled by the Legal Affairs Commission, please voting, please see the result!: 71, against - 6, 4 abstentions: 4.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq62 translatedText "Yes, I would very briefly like to tell you, on behalf of the Commission, that Saeima is first to be informed about the penalty decision already in force on the Member already in force, and that, on the basis of the decision in force, information will take place in a verbal form. It will be announced from the rostrum, and that at which point this will happen is the mandate, the mandate of ethics and application of the commission to ask the Bureau of MPs to include this issue on the agenda of the meeting. Indeed, the Legal Affairs Committee had a discussion as to whether or not such information should be published at all, but the majority of Members of the Committee on Legal Affairs supported this particular proposal was that the main objective was for information to be sharedas regards the administrative breaches of Members, the administrative immunity of Members would still be open to the public, in order not to undermine the general public's knowledge of the right to be informed, the Legal Affairs Committee considered that such a proposal was a welcome step forward".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq60 translatedText "Dear colleagues, as I have ever had the honour of leading the mandate, the ethics and application committees, all these things that we are discussing today are very close to the fact that I would like to share this issue in three parts of the First - we are talking about immunitythe decision to take it is one thing the decision has been taken, the administrative immunity has been taken for the second time being notified of the irregularities of Members who have been penalised in an administrative manner on the basis of the National Regulatory Equipment Act ,in saying that there are a hundred Members for whom we are talking today, because we are not amending all the laws together, but only the rules of order of the Saeima rule, from the National Regulatory Equipment, to the highest structure as all the othersofficials are being directly or sub-designated by MPs or appointed by MPs or some other legislative documents That is the point of two point three, or whether the well or ill sounds of these new proposed amendments to the order of the House, thisthe regulation is undoubtedly better than the prior notification procedure available in the public domain, the call for the extradition of It still did not mean that it did not mean that it did not mean that this sentence had not been imposed. The appeal of And I think that here in the Chamber, too, is the Members who, through the court proceedings or the mediation, managed to remove the penalties imposed for this type of punishment, which was due only to the first stage of the process that a Member is being brought to justicewhat the next steps are, the general public was not aware of this, and it is a step forward - it is a step forward if we are talking about justice and aboutthe logic of And third, what I want to say naturally, I agree with the fact that Today was about to change to the system Should talk about officials - it should also be extended in the direction of the Member State But that is not the case. The subject matter of the conversation It is an idea that is really worthy of discussion, And there really needs to be think not only of how public office breaches are published, but Maybe should first of all be able to think about actually reducing the health of public health officials. The circle and the number, as more than 50 thousand officials - forgive me, to the best will - is excessive; it cannot be controlled publicly nor how otherwise I think these proposals are a step forward for Thank you".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq59 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2015_10_15_322-seq89 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2015_09_10_316-seq33 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2015_04_23_295-seq429 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2015_02_12_285-seq358 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2015_01_22_281-seq69 translatedText "Thank you to Mr Dolgopolov, Member of Parliament.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq58 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, when I hear from the rostrum that many Members are in doubt, I would also like to express the arguments on these proposals for other officials - prosecutors, judges - to discuss, of course, that we have already talked about several times here ,the fact that this conversation is now up for Members For other officers is the other talks that are probably needed for the violation of the infringement of other officials in the same way: yes, it is probably the nation's right to know what's going on in the Cabinetwhile the Member State or the senior civil servants of the country, neither is it another conversation and certainly not as part of a reel of the Rules of Procedure for Members' administrative immunity, Saeima must rule on the issuing of Yes, the publication of this informationthere is no direct objective of the rules, but the fact that the meetings are open means that this information goes to the media and the public at its disposal, and the publication of information in fact is, in fact, a by-product of the existing regulatory framework in the Aaxy, with administrative immunity, we allowto punish Members in the same way as any other member of the public, And this is necessary! But these proposals involve leaving this by-by-product - or the passing of this information to the public, So, we take away only the administrative procedures that the State authorities had to comply with, the National Police ,with a view to ensuring that the Members bring administrative responsibility to Te, it was mentioned that resources will be spent to select this information and to pass on to the Saeima committee Yes, it is probably possible to agree on sufficient resources to prepare all documents andto send them the mandate, the ethics and application to the Commission, and that the official of a sodover authorities enter into the mandate, the ethics and application committees and the reasoned opinion of the commission and to get through all the documents relating to the administrative immunity of Members Te wasit has also been mentioned that it will be time to open the offence between the date of the offence and the Members who will have committed such a offence, there will be a double whistle at the time of the newspaper Well, it must be said that it is now also a long time ago that it takes quite a long timethe time at which the offence has been committed, until all documents are arranged and obtained by the commission of the mandate, ethics and application, and that it does nothing to make it anything worse than the current situation Information will be receivedon one particular occasion, every three months, depending on the length of the session, the situation which has now been established - that information about what Members have done - is public and, consequently, on behalf of the electorate".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq56 translatedText "Dear colleagues, such a solution to the Latvian Administrative Code is indeed the best thing we could achieve in this situation, and unfortunately, unfortunately, our proposals, which we had expressed and tabled by both the Committee on Legal Affairs and a number ofpolitical parties, on how to address this issue, were not conceptually supported by the issue at all, as is the existence of an institute of administrative responsibility and administrative immunity in the legal system - we remain open to the legislative authority, with the previous voteat the same time, we have a number of other countries in the country where the administrative immunity has remained, even to the extent that the administrative immunity is so much the same as the general one, that someone is never calledwith the administrative burden, the law on the Crown Prosecution Service provides that if a prosecutor sits drunken at the wheel and catch him, then their loose hook If the drink is sitting simply by a natural person, MP or, I do not know another official ,he then paid a fine, there is a fine, there is an administrative seizure, there is also a possibility of confiscation of the vehicle, for example by means of payment of the money, with the disproportion of the power offend to power offendthe scope of administrative immunity has remained as such, we started with members of the House with members of the parliament that we are taking What we are making in return? What type of system are being offered in relation to the notification procedure that has been made so farand will it perhaps continue? What was the order of the sitting so far? As MPs, there is plenty of MPs who have been held in breach of administrative responsibility, in breach of the Republic's satusy, because Saeima did not have to issue these deputies to the administrative responsibility system, with the system already in place untilthis has also worked wrong as What we are proposing at the moment, and what solution has been reached? The solution is - and this is not the best - that if a state official, a state MP, is called off with administrative responsibility, then the mandate of the MPs ,the ethics and application commission once in a quarter will request information on the Members who were called' administrative responsibility', indeed, this information obligation will only be required after some time when it has been convened by the Coalition of Unfortunately. The introduction of a uniform system, such as the declaration of national titles in the public database on the public database, can look at how debt and stocks and stocks in the Un there could also be accompanied by an additional section containing administrative irregularities ;what someone has done in this case is the only solution that could be applied so that the rule in question would act as a cake, said no MP, including that of the Latvian Administrative Code, of an obligation to provide information onfor jobs, the Sodu register would mark a mark that, like the MP (name), has been called off to the Administrative Accountability Area, the name, called the only answer to this issue, is the mandate, ethics and application of the Saeima. The Commission's request of 100 Members by sending the word and personal code to the Information Centre requesting information on those who are held in the Sodu register will be available in the Sodu register with one, so to speak, the computerised processingthe relevant officer of the system will simply get off the button and will automatically receive the printed on the list of persons held with the administrative responsibility of What I wish to say is the solution, but it is not the best solution that we could introduce in terms ofMembers who have been brought to justice as well as all government officials as a whole will So indeed we, I think, have to work on the review of the Institute of Administrative Expenses to all branches of the judiciary (such as the Security Police, Law Enforcement Office ,the bureau, the courts, the prosecution service, the law enforcement agency and so on, while setting up a common information framework for the provision of information about the administrative liability of officials of a State whose administrative responsibility has been obtained by the current information system showing the declarations of national officials".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq55 translatedText "" You don't like lawyer Andread J Urbanovic: " you don't like your lawyer! ")".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq54 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleague, I realise that most of the votes in these proposals have already been decided and that it can only be picked up - I am sorry! - on the instructions from the leaders of the factions, I would just like to tell you someobjective considerations on this proposal, and also 2 on the proposal, I think that if we look at the law called the' Rules of Order', let us think what this law regulates This law regulates the order in which Saeima is working - that is the order of the day. Rullis And usually the rules governing the rules governing the rules on which MPs are to vote' yes' or' against' are decisions, laws, no matter who, Why was this provision, which we are proposing today, rather, what he proposed at second reading? Not so much with the administrative immunity of Members, as the imperor had not actually been prosecuted by the Members of the House, the decision was not made, and it was usually decided that this was the decisionthe mandate, the Commission on ethics and application shall prepare, negotiate and put before the hearing before the hearing before the hearing, in which case neither the proposal nor the 2 of the proposal deals with the manner in which Saeima looks at these matters. While there is a decision to make There is only a decision by fellow Members, all those participating in the meeting will be notified, all from the press, that the individual Members have committed an administrative offence during the last part-session or during the session. Punishment and punishment have entered into force according to substance it is a question of whether we want to satisfy any curiosity, or want to demonstrate in a populist way that, to say so, we are bleyer for the highest clergy to find out about this punishmentthree months later, It is at little time for the press release and the mass media of the Member States of the Has will have long been described in all newspapers at the time of the offence, without waiting for the decision to enter into force or before it waswe handed out the punishment, told the public:' sow!' but after a person gets to court, it turns out that the court has not even shut up the case, and I realise that this proposal means that there will be additional resourcesconsumption Yes, it will be maybe not so many members of the commission (you here in the chamber, they have a few minutes to listen to who are then penalised), but it will be in the hands of Home Office employee consumption who will be in the pipeline after MPs mandate, ethics and applicationsthe Commission's request of the people who are then penalised (interjection:' one interjection', and everything! ") Freezing that, when administrative protocol is drawn up, there is no requirement for you to fill in the table for the jobs Finally If we want to make it publicall the administrative wrongdoers well, not all but at least public officials do well, not all government officials, but at least the chairman of the state's ministers are different than MPs, and whether the people should know ,which minister has committed an administrative offence? Why should we then have to incorporate it in every law? But maybe in a single law let us write in no uncertain terms? The list of public officials in the Interior Ministry's Information Centre, for example, is issued, for example, at the Aiz's official Journal. The notices " Wisle looking for the police " could be included: " these officials are penalized " to be satisfied the curiosity would be consumed, but the people at least know all their heroes I think the order of the order should not regulate these issues, Thank you".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq53 translatedText "Thank you for joining the House in the first half of the year.".
• 2016_02_25_349-seq179 translatedText "Thank you for joining the House in the first half of the year.".
• 2016_02_25_349-seq161 translatedText "Thank you for joining the House in the first half of the year.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq52 translatedText "Yes, thank you So 1 is the Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which has been sponsored by the Committee, that the mandate, the ethics and application of the commission during a regular session should be reported to members of the previous part-session and with the notified members of the session in which the Communication is published. Includes information on the administrative infringement committed by Members, indicating the law of a legislative act that has been breached and the institution of the administrative penalty decision and the date on which the administrative penalty entry into force has entered into force".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq51 translatedText "Before Mr Lunzneres begins to report, I would like, colleagues, to inform you that the Legal Affairs Committee has asked to replace the 4 and 7 pages of the bill under consideration under the new 4A-7A page (DEP J Urbanovic:' this is nothing!') Please, Lcien-Egneres!".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq50 translatedText "Thank you, colleagues, for supporting the amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. The amendments to the rules of the Rules of Procedure of the Saeima committee, which require us, Saeima, to decide on the consent of the members of the assembly to the Administrative Accountability List when we examined the bill at second reading, I shall report to the Subcommittee on Justice Law and Law Enforcementthe major discussion in the Commission was whether, and in what procedure, the disclosure of administrative breaches by members of the Court of Justice by members of the Court of Justice had asked the members of the assembly to consider and discuss the matter with the views of the sub-committee on the judiciary ,but they were not made in the form of proposals, so the two proposals are already in the hands of the Commission, not as Members or factions' proposals to hear the views of the members of the hearings, the Legal Affairs Committee then had a conceptual vote in favour of it ,that the third reading is requested by the Legal Office for the third reading and today's proposals offer this Legal Office offer in cooperation with representatives of the Ministry of Interior Information and, consequently, the Court of JusticeI would inform you, at the Legal Affairs Committee, that the Committee on Legal Affairs decided to send a letter to the Ministry of Justice, the Justice Council and the Defence, Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption Commission, as the Legal Affairs Committee decided to send letters to the Ministry of Justice, the Justice Council and the Defence, Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption Commission. The abolition of the Members' administrative immunity from the rostrum was that administrative immunity should also be considered for both judicial officials and other officials and, as it is not exclusively the responsibility of the Legal Commission, wefirst and foremost, both the Commission and the judiciary and the judiciary, as soon as the answers have been answered, the Legal Affairs Committee will continue to report on these two proposals, which is on the amendments to the Rules of Procedure".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq49 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of Ireland " at the third, final, reading, and a plea to the voting regime! Please see the result!: 87, against andabstentions: there is no provision for the Law to be passed on the agenda - bill " Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Rules of Procedure, " on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq48 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, we are looking at the Bill of the Republic of Ireland's draft bill today, in the third reading, without any new proposals, But, as is the issue of the amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, II would like to inform you a little about the fact that this draft law provides for the constitution of Article 30 of the Constitutional Treaty to be made in a new version of the Prots, a waiver from the Legal Affairs Committee of Members of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice, both before the firstin reading, before the second reading, we heard from a number of law-makers - the constitutional experts - One of the topics that had been reinforced by the debate was that, in the event of administrative immunity, the immunity of a Member remains, in the event of an administrative arrest? And, as I said in the first and second reading, I can assure you that all the experts have convincingly boasted that administrative detention is governed by Article 29 of the Constitution and that Article 30 of the Constitution and the new wording of this Articledoes not affect the cases in which an MP has limited the freedom of his or her personal freedom in this case, no proposal for this bill was received in the third reading of the Bill, colleague, to support the Bill of the Republic of the Republic of Ireland, at third, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq47 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the Financial and Capital Market Commission in the third, final, reading, to the voting regime, please, the result!, on - 87, against and abstentions - the Law has been adopted on the agenda -Brian CROWLEY (PES, UK), speaking on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, will be tabling an own-initiative report on the Constitution. All Members should, therefore, before we take up this bill, have to register a quorum to Please call Members, please see the result!".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq46 translatedText "This way, we have looked at all the proposals in support of the bill in the third, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq44 translatedText "2 - The mayor of the Ministry of Finance in the Ministry of Finance advocates, editorial and".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq43 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the proposal tabled by Member of Ingunas Sudrab@@. Please voting regime! Please see the result!: 38, against - 38 abstentions: 9 without support".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq42 translatedText "Yes, the Commission did not support this proposal because, if the review had been carried out, the bank may, for two years, carry out its economic activity relating to money laundering, which is unacceptable. In this case, the Financial and Capital Markets Commission has explained in no uncertain terms that checks were made at the time when certain information on the unnecessary verification of alleged infringements is not carried out by no one, therefore, would call on him not to support the proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq40 translatedText "Good afternoon, colleagues, the essence of my proposal is primarily about the clarity of the law in recent times that we are going towards a police state where one party has the rights and the other only responsibility and, in this respect, I believe thatthis law also requires certainty to enable a individual to count on certain borders, the consequences of the conduct of national institutions or other action at the earliest opportunity, as far as the national institution can intervene in the activities of the Keyit means that the clarity of the law must allow the protection of individuals from the arbitrariness of the public authorities and, if I quote the doctrine of law, one of the opinions I chose today is:' the law should sufficiently clarify the scope of the mandate given to the competent authorityand their implementation in order to provide adequate protection against arbitrary intervention of an individual " What is the story? " The amendments to the statutory audit require that, in addition to the checks regularly carried out by the Financial and Capital Market Commission, it will also have the right to further appoint additional inspection of credit institutions Only the difference is that these additional tests will have to be paid for by Little credit institutions itselfthe wording of the draft bill does not lay down any criteria for determining such verification, the ratio between the aim and expenditure for which the verification is spent on Prauana, which has recently been observed when these credit institutions are paid for by such credit checks ,its costs are already low: between 1 and 3 million euros and no such legal framework, in which known principles with expenditure, the credit institution actually puts the credit institution in the position that it does not have the means to complain. In fact, because, in fact, any stop-stop points, the criteria against which or for which a breach of which I could complain and the nature of the proposal under my proposal, are the possibility of information being taken by officials in the Financial and Capital Market Committee Where we areit is true that the sanctions imposed on breaches of financial and capital market standards are, in fact, treated as criminal cases within the meaning of the European Convention for the Protection of the Rights of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedomsthose responsible for the officer, which has a certain responsibility and limitations on their conduct, mean that the official subject to the provisions of the conflict of interest law, Don't be so expert on an outsider and his evidence is that they are automaticallybeyond what evidence against a credit institution is a basic requirement: the law sets at least some minimal protection against expanding opportunities to use this right so that I can support my proposal so that the laws we have in place should give us a clear and business-friendly thank you".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq38 translatedText "Fellow Members, the' Amendment of the Financial and Capital Market Commission law', the third reading of the Law on the Financial and Capital Market Commission: two motions for a proposal 1 - Member of Ingunas Silrabs proposal not sponsored by the Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq37 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the adoption of the bill " Amendment of the Payment Services and Electronic Cash Law " in the third, final, reading, of the voting regime! No Law has been adopted on the agenda - bill " Amendment of the Financial and Capital Market Commission, " third reading Budget and Finance (Taxation) Commission - MEP".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq36 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to see the draft legislation on the' Amendment to Payment Services and Electronic Cash Law', the third reading we have not received proposals to Please colleagues to support the legislation at the third, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq35 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the High School Law " in the third, final, reading, and a plea to the voting regime! The law has been adopted on the agenda - " Amendment to Payment Services and Electronic Cash Law, " the third reading of the Committee on Budgetary and Financial Affairs - MEP Edgar putra".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq34 translatedText "Dear Madam President, honourable Members, the Education, Culture and Science Commission considered the bill' Amendment to the High School Law', the aim of the General Law of the High School, which requires the Cabinet Office to establish an amendmentpending the third reading, the proposals on this carefully crafted, good (interjection of the draft proposals by the Commission on behalf of the College and for the remuneration of academic staff are not received by any proposal on behalf of the Commission.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq33 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the adoption of the bill " Amendment of the Disability Law " in the third, final, reading, of the voting regime !- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq32 translatedText "Good morning, working with the Bill Disability Law, the Commission did not receive proposals on behalf of the Commission asking you to support the bill in the third, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq31 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Law on settlement finality in payment and financial instruments' in the second, final, reading. No law has been adopted on the Agenda - Bill Invalidity Law, third reading in the Committee on Social and Labour Commission".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq30 translatedText "Other proposals have not been considered as an urgent procedure, on behalf of the commission, please support it in the second, final, reading".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq28 translatedText "Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the proposal for the second reading of the Bill was received by only one proposal of editorial nature, tabled by the Legal Office of the Republic, and the Commission supported the proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq27 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the bill in the state of the state of Cadastra State cadastra Law', final, reading, please voting regime! Please see the result!: 85, against - 1 is adoptedon the agenda - " Amendment of the Law on settlement finality in payment and financial instruments in the settlement systems, " the " second reading " of the draft legislative resolution on behalf of the Committee on Budget and Finance (Taxation)".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq26 translatedText "Thank you, my colleague, Esam looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Commission to support the Second Amendment of the Law on the State of Cadastra property in the State of Real Madrid, at the end of the final period.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq25 translatedText "Members have asked for a vote by a call vote, we will vote for 3-MEP's motion for a resolution, please voting, please vote!: 34, against - 8 abstentions - 42 proposals are not supported".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq24 translatedText "Also, the 3 proposal from the Commission did not support Mr There, although it is worth adding that the government already recorded this year's dated 19 April this protocol (31 § 4): " the Ministry of Finance, in association with the Department of Justice ,the Local Government Union, Employers' Confederation, called on the competent authorities to draw up and submit, by the end of the year, a cabinet amendment on the " estate tax, " which would ensure a reasonable increase in the tax burden on immovable property in the light of the estatethe Property Tax Base - Advastral Validity: rapid growth and the need to deliver budget revenue " There was a direct discussion of the fact that in this protocol there is an indication of the necessary amendments to the Law on the property tax, while Ms Bite is requireddraws attention specifically to the review of the cadastrial evaluation methodology Bet, as demonstrated by the National Director General of the Land Service, at this time, of course, they intend to focus on the issues raised regarding the methodology that the Commission did not support the proposal:".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq23 translatedText "The vote will be voted on by the Members of the European Parliament and of the Council.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq22 translatedText "A thank you 2 proposal is coupled and the Commission did not support the proposal in Accra not to support (interjection from the floor:' vote!')".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq21 translatedText "I would like to thank you for calling for the result that I asked for the result, please voting, the result!: 32, against - 13, 37 without support.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq20 translatedText "Yes, dear colleagues, as I have already mentioned, we have heard from both the State Public Service representatives and the representatives of the Latvian Government of Local Government and, among other things, the National Director General of the Land Service, that part of the property's new base of cadastral valuein particular, apartment buildings, which have been built during the Soviet era, could be reduced to the cadastral value base in the following period, and this aspect must be taken into account in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. In this case the commission had a discussion, but it has been pointed out on many occasions that there were more issues with tax policy to be resolved, rather than the evolution of a cadastrial assessment methodology by the Court of Justice, the National Land Service referred to some issues of concern about data sharing in Tosit is also intended to address the problem of data sharing on the setting of data on exclusivity criteria to the hearing, as I have already mentioned, the Commission decided to reject the proposal by rejecting, on behalf of the Commission, the proposal".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq18 translatedText "Dear colleague, good morning, thank you for allowing me to combine in good time on all three of the proposals, because all three of the proposals are Proti, the proposals are linked to the fact that we believe that the current process of cadastral values is not reallyfair, fair and fair: what is currently being proposed for the bill is to postpone existing cadaurial values for a year, during this time reviewing the system of property taxation, It is important, rightly and in need of the package we will support, but therefore we will support it ,it is not enough to make changes to the real estate valuation system itself, as this bill is urgent, we have not yet offered concrete solutions, because we agree that it would be worth discussing whether it would be worthwhile to discuss what is required by these proposals ;it is necessary to ask the Cabinet Office to draw up such a system and take into account the circumstances that we have indicated in the justification of our proposals in the Proti, the value of the current property market is very important in determining the value of cadastral values, with an example of the pensioner living in the home of all of its members. Life is fitting and it's fitting that his house is in the Martriver, the City or elsewhere, whose fast-moving site is being ruckled by many beautiful, large homes, then cadastral value in the climb in the sky and this pensioner can no longer afford to live in the skyif a person is younger then it probably doesn't give him a very big problem - to sell his property in one place and buy another where he can afford to pay this tax at the Tasei contusion very important to his roots and his only property ,so in this case, it is the problem of the second situation the Man has bought the property, which is intimacy, which is a run up bog, which in fact has no use in possession of substantial funds to repair, improve and eradicate it, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way, and every step of the way ,otherwise, it would improve, and the house is built, but it comes from the country and tells you:' oh, very nice, you've put a lot of money to sort it out!' if we look for a cadastral rating. The rules that are currently in place see that one of the things that cadastral valuation is used to be is the depreciation of the property and, you know, it appears that the use of the end-of-use is a National Land Service fare service: pay €80, and the National Land Service will find out ,that your real estate is in use and will take this fact into account in the definition of cadastral values! Not 80 euros - well, the property obviously does not deny the next current values, which are unlikely to apply for another year, but which are apparently intended to be applied in the future ,in fact, if we look at these valuations, we see the real estate in Old, Old Town it turns out to be as valuable as a new apartment as an apartment building in one square of newly built apartment blocks won't really be the case? Indeed, the property Old, even if it is long established and long ago referred to in service, could be as valuable as a apartment apartment flat? Well, I think it shows us this cadastral values developed by those rules, honourablecolleagues, I would ask for support for these three proposals, the first two of which aim to give longer time to ministries to work in Proti, currently given one year, but we are also offering an overhaul of the cadastral evaluation rules, and then it would be two years for Savusk 3the proposal instructs the Cabinet Office to draw up new rules for the assessment of cadastral evaluation, bearing in mind both the circumstances that I have already mentioned, and others here, I would like to ask that all three of the three proposals, the vote' on' all three of the proposals, be supported.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq17 translatedText "There are no objections to Members if the Inga Bite unites both sides of the debate in good time?".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq16 translatedText "Could I just bring the two together in good time?".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq15 translatedText "Thank you very much for the debate on the Ingai band.".
• 2016_04_07_357-seq69 translatedText "Thank you very much for the debate on the Ingai band.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq14 translatedText "Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the Legal Commission has received three proposals for a proposal by a member of the Ingas Bites Committee, which is a member of the Committee on Legal Affairswe have not been supported in the Commission by the National Land Service, as well as representatives of the Latvian Government of Local Government, and the Commission decided not to support the proposal.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq13 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the draft decision,' For the release of the Ivetas Leader from the District Court', please vote!: 87, against and abstentions - no decision has been takenthe next item on the agenda:' draft legislative procedure: amendments to the Law on the State of Cadastra State cadastra law', Second reading of the Law Commission on Legal Affairs - MEP Gaidis Berzins".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq12 translatedText "At the hearing of the Legal Affairs Committee on 18 May of this year, the Saeima Legal Affairs Committee was dealt with in a draft decision on the release of Ivetah's District Court judge, Judge Wilson's order of 13 November 2014, by Judge Iveta Berzina, with effect from 13 November 201413 November 2014: suspended from the judge's office, the members of the Commission unanimously supported the draft Decision by the members of the Legal Affairs Commission on the release of Ivetu Bourne from the District Court's post-election law.".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq11 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the draft decision on the appointment of Vitas Russse for the District Judge of the District (city)', please voting regime, please see the result!: 86, against and abstentions- no decision has been taken on the agenda - the decision to exempt Ivetas from the district of the District Court's office, Mr Valery Ageshin, on behalf of the District Court of Justice,".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq10 translatedText "The Legal Affairs Committee hearing on May 18 of this year was dealt with in a draft decision made by Vitas Russe's appointment as a " district court (urban) court judge "Members of the Commission unanimously supported the draft Decision on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Legal Affairs Commission Vitu Rustin to be appointed Judge of the District (urban) court".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq9 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the draft decision on the appointment of the District Judge on Ilonas Ozolacueer on the District (urban) court. No decision has been taken on the agenda - Draft Decision on the appointment of Vitas Russse as a District (urban) court judge on behalf of Legal Affairs - Member for Valery Agešins".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq8 translatedText "The Legal Affairs Committee hearing on May 18 of this year was dealt with in a draft decision to appoint Ilonas Ozolinas-Klimpsis as the District Judge at the District (urban) courtMembers of the Commission unanimously supported the draft Decision on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Legal Affairs Committee on Ilonu Ozolacuñaga, Judge at the District (urban) court".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq7 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the draft decision on the confirmation of the district of the district of Gitas Zenff (city of the city), Judge of the Court of peanbooks, " please voting regime, please see the result!: 85, against andabstentions: no decision has been taken on the agenda - draft Decision on the appointment of Ilonas Ozolinas-Klimpsis as District Judge at the District of Legal Affairs, Valery Ageshin".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq6 translatedText "At a hearing of the Legal Affairs Committee on May 18 this year, the draft decision was taken on the draft approval of the district of district (urban) of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice. Unanimously supporting the draft Decision by the members of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Legal Affairs Commission, to endorse Judge Gitu Zenfu for the District of the District (urban) peanuary Division, without a restriction of the term of office".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq5 translatedText "Thank you for asking the draft decision,' For the release of Lauras Graudson from the National Audit Board', please vote, please see the result!: 83, against and abstentions? No decision has been taken on the agenda - the draft decision " on the approval of Gitas Zenfas for the District of the District (city) of the trial of a judge on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee - Mr Valery Ageshin".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq4 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, on 18 May of this year, the members of the Legal Affairs Commission of the Legal Affairs Commission of the Committee on Legal Affairs have unanimously endorsed the draft decision on the release of Lauras Graudson from the Member of the Commission. On behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, I call on the members of the Legal Affairs Commission, 29 June 2016, to release a list of 29 June 2016 from the National Audit Council to the European Court of Auditors as a result of his work as a member of the European Court of Auditors".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq3 translatedText "Dear colleague, under the law, this request will be made to the request to the Commission for the next part of the agenda: " election of candidates, confirmation, appointment, release or dismissal of trust, trustValery Ageshin, Valery Agechin, MEP on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq2 translatedText "Good morning, dear colleague, more than a month ago, MPs turned to Prime Minister Sarčinska with questions relating to the creation of " Mucenieki " to resettle illegal immigrants and Prime Minister KOZLOVSKIS Members have received Mr KOZLOVSKIS Membersthe answer, which was prepared in good bureaucratic tradition, but which in nature did not answer these questions, And the logic that they asked the minister to comment on these four-day replies to the Four Affairs Minister had not found a chance to order under the order of the MPs. I can see reel's demands and answer questions from Members of the House and I realise that, naturally, that is the beautiful slogan that is in the premises of the Cabinet,' One Law - one is right for all' - ministers do not apply to ministersmore specifically, the individual ministers, therefore, are therefore not working on this request, because the nature of the issue is too serious, so that the nuisance of the question of the answers given in Here There are two things in the First Was law is really compulsoryfor all? The second Does a rule that provides parliamentary scrutiny over those decisions, over the solutions offered by the government offered by the executive in general?".
• 2016_05_19_365-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, let us ask the members in the House to take up the seat in the chamber of 19 May 2016 before we look at the agenda of the sitting approved by the Bureau, the changes submitted by the Bureau of the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission are requested to amend the proceedings of the sitting. The procedure and inclusion of a bill entitled " Amendment of the electronic media law " Does Members have any objections to this amendment to the agenda? As a result of its draft legislation on " Amendment of the Credit Act " and to include MPs on the agenda of 26 May, MEPs have reservations about the amendment to this agenda amendment: no objections to the agenda as amended by the draft legislative proposal from the sitting's sitting. The Legal Affairs Committee is asking for the agenda of the sitting to be amended and for the draft Decision entitled' For the release of Lauras Graudson from the National Audit Board', Does Members have any objections to this amendment to the agenda? As amended, the Legal Affairs Committee is seeking to amend the agenda for the sitting, including the draft Decision of the Court of Justice of the Area of Gitas Zenfas of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice, " Does Members have any objections to this amendment of the agenda? The Legal Affairs Committee has been amended to request that the agenda of the sitting be amended and for the draft decision on the appointment of Ozolacueer on the District of Ilonas Ozolacueer, " Does Members have any objections to this amendment to the agenda? The Legal Affairs Committee is seeking to amend the agenda for the sitting, including the draft Decision of the Court of Justice on the appointment of Vitas Russse as District (urban) court, " Does Members have objections to this amendment to the agenda? Asks to amend the agenda for the sitting and to include in its draft Decision on the release of Ivetas from the District Court's office,' Does Members have any objection to this amendment of the agenda? The draft agenda item: " the Bureau's reports on the draft acts tabled by the Bureau of the Saeima Council propose that the Committee on Legal Affairs be referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, stating that it is the responsible Commission if there is objections? The draft bill has been referred to the Bureau by the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose a bill " Amendment to the Administrative Process Act " to be referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, stating that it is opposed to MPs having objections to a draft law the Bureau has referred to the Bureau. A draft bill tabled by the Cabinet Office to refer " Amendment to Legal Affairs " to the Committee on Legal Affairs stating that it is responsible to the Commission / Was MPs to have objections to a draft legislative proposal from the Commission to the next part of the agenda - " For the award of leave, " For the award of the unpaid leave ,on 19 May this year, Ivanam Ribakov informed the Bureau of Members that he had received the request to grant him an unpaid leave on 19 May this year ,Saeima's " requests " by Members of the Conference of Members, Mr Glasnolova, Alexander Jakimova, John Zent Pimenova, John Agarova, John Ageshatis, John Urbang, Igor Ageshaw, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor Pimenova, Igor PimenovaHome Secretary Rihardam Kozlova, " For the future of an immigrant " Mucenieki " " Under the rules of order, has been issued and made available to all members of the Parliament to provide a word of motivation for Motivation to the Member, Sergey Dolgopolov,".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq187 translatedText "Thanks to MPs I declare the closed session of 12 May 2016".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq186 translatedText "Dear colleagues, currently not registered: mark Bondars, Lolita Chigane, Walter Dambe, Ivan Klementyev, Ivan Klitsche, Ivan Ribakov, Inguna Rihanna, Mourinski, Mourinho".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq185 translatedText "Name of filing results by secretary of state for thwart Gunar Gunar Kidnthree".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq184 translatedText "Honourable Members of European Affairs, at 12 30 days in the Red Chamber for the approval of Latvia's Agriculture and Fisheries Ministers on 17 May, Thank you".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq183 translatedText "30 May - / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 BRI-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / ENTretjackas and the Globe question The future of an immigrant " Mucenieki " center " This question is addressed to the Minister of the Interior, Rihardam Kozlova, who is told by the Minister of Home Affairs of Savunod that he or she will be informed that he will be from 12 to 19 Mayon behalf of the European Union, the President of the European Parliament and the President of the European Parliament will be invited to address the House by saying that he would be unable to turn to an oral answer, while pointing out that he will hold the oral answer, the second is the question of the President of the Member, Mr Diudrabas, Platpera, Baloin and Baloa." On an evaluation report on the proposals in the final report of the Commission's parliamentary inquiry commission " the written response to the applicants is not able to inform the President of the Prime Minister that, in the context of its participation in the working meeting on health care issues, it will not be possible to provide an oral answer to the third report on the matter. Members of the Education and Science Minister for Education and Science, Carlim Sirika, are not satisfied with written reply, but the Minister informed the House that " the written answer is that, as a result of earlier working arrangements, the written answer is given to the author of the study. It will not be possible to turn to an oral answer to the Polish MEP, Sudrabas, perfume, Messi and Platpera, Prime Minister of the Minister for Finance addressed to the Minister for Finance, who said he was not satisfied by Savuthly, the Minister of Finance, from having been informed of the report by the Minister of Finance. 10 to 12 May in a mission in London and therefore will not be able to turn up on oral answer to Savuthly Members Bite, Vilnius, Bondars, Russ and Schics have asked the question to Justice Minister Dmitry Rasnačam in writingthe answer, which the applicants are not satisfied with, but the authors are informed that they do not want to put supplementary questions to the Minister Sudraba, Shimfa, Platppers, Meija and dove have been asked by the Minister for Education and Science, Secretary of State for Education and Science, on Education and Scienceclosing and reorganising Latvian halls " There has been a written answer which the applicants are not satisfied with, while the Minister responds that unfortunately, unfortunately, it will not be possible today to turn to an oral answer to Mr Zariis, Ageshina, Arses Rubik, Tutina and Ribakova. Economy Minister Arvilam Asheradenam " In the context of MS's failure to provide an economic justification for the potential of the publicly traded company, " Gasde's " share of shares in line with the national interest " have been answered in writing, but the reply to the applicants does not satisfy the Ministry earlier because of the planned working timetable today. It will not be possible to respond to oral responses to the question and answer session today, I would not like to inform you that a new question has been received - the question of Ageshina, Urbanović, Potapkina, Ribakova and Jakimov, Minister for Justice ,the Maintenance Guarantee Fund Law will be referred to the Minister for Justice, Dinzin Rasnacham, asking the registration regime to please ask the registration of the results, the statement of the statement to Mr Alexang Kirstein, the statement of the statement to Mr Alexander.".
• 2016_05_12_364-seq182 translatedText "The deadline for submitting proposals for the third reading is 30 May this year.".

• first
• previous
• next