Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

• 2014_12_18_279-seq127 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote for the continuation of the bill on the' psychologists' law', asking the voting regime! Please see the result!: 84, against - no, abstentions - 1 legal draft referred toin the previous Saeima Commons the Social and Employment Commission Was Members had reservations about the proposed legislation, the House did not object to the deadline for tabling proposals for a second reading.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq126 translatedText "Thank you to the draft law for the professional activities of psychologists in the country, with clear criteria for the education and experience of psychologists, the rights and responsibilities of psychologists and psychologists as well as the responsibility of psychologiststhe requirements of their professional activities in the Law of Professional Conduct will ensure that the public interest in access to quality psychologist services will ensure the protection and confidentiality of sensitive information on the protection and confidentiality of persons, psychologist customers ,any person who, due to the harm caused by psychologists, has the right to defend his rights and interests, to defend his rights and interests, to defend his rights and interests.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq125 translatedText "27 March Was other proposals? Other proposal isn't Thank you the next item - a bill called " psychologists " law, " To ask MPs to reel the order in accordance with Article 39the 12-minute meeting of the Saeima committee has also been addressed by the Committee on Social and Employment Committee, Silvija Shimfa, who has already addressed the bill.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq124 translatedText "27 March 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq123 translatedText "Yes Do Members have reservations that the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission looks at this bill?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq122 translatedText "No enough colleagues, these three legislative proposals are, of course, in a coherent way, and it would be a good thing for our commission to reply on taxes and charges.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq121 translatedText "Thank you for the call, we will vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Law on Taxation and Charges', the continuation of the voting regime! Then there is the proposal that the commission is responsible for, as I understood that the previous Saeima committee responsible was the Committee on Budgets and the Financial (Taxation), but it has just been said from Mr Schadurska that he would like the Commission to be considered by the Commission on the Social and Employment Commission".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq120 translatedText "Dear colleague, this bill is linked to both Mrs Schimff's remarks, and it would be logical for the Committee on Budgets and the Commission on behalf of the Commission to be the co-responsible Commission on behalf of the Commission for the continuation of this bill in the 12 Saeima Commons.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq119 translatedText "27 March Are there are other proposals? Another proposal isn't So 27 March Thank you the next item - bill " Amendment to the Law on Taxation and Charges, "the House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq118 translatedText "The Commission's proposal is for a second reading of proposals to be submitted by 27 March 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq117 translatedText "Thank you for the call, let us vote in favour of the draft law on the' Amendment of the law on the regulated professions and recognition of professional qualifications '. The Commons committee responsible for this legislation was the Social and Employment Commission as to whether the committee has reservations about the fact that this is a responsible commission in the Commons?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq116 translatedText "Good afternoon, colleagues, I will speak very briefly in the Committee on We really looked at a bill related to this bill and that it is based on the basic law, and this is something that we may have perhaps less attention to ,because this is related to the essence of this Bet is the next thing I am going to say about So this bill states that a profession of psychologist is established as a regulated profession and that the demands of a psychologistand certified psychologist education and professional qualifications are determined by the law on the professional conduct of psychologists and that a person's right to provide psychologist services in the form of a psychologist certificate of the legislative proposal is directly linked to the legislative text. The Bill of' psychologists', which includes the key aspects of the psychologist's career regulation, including issues related to psychologist certification, competences and responsibilities, ask the Commission, on behalf of the Commission, to include the matter on the agenda".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq115 translatedText "1 March So we have two proposals in the first part to vote on the future deadline for Please call! We will vote on the proposal for a deadline of 1 April please the voting regime! The proposal for 1 April is not supported by the deadline of 1 March for the next item: the bill " Amendment to the parliamentary professions and recognition of professional qualifications " by (No cure: " regulated. "), I am sorry ," on the subject of the regulated professions and recognition of professional qualifications, " the draft reel of the Saeima House of Commons asks for further examination of the 12 Commons Cabinet Office this bill has also been examined by the Committee on Social and Labour and on behalf of the Commission - Silvija Shimfa".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq114 translatedText "My proposal: 1 March 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq113 translatedText "1 April 2015: will Members agree? (DEP M Bondars applauding) Members agree I am sorry to see the microphone of MEP Lolitai Chigan!".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq112 translatedText "The deadline for proposals is 1 April 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq111 translatedText "I will vote in favour of the continuation of the examination of the draft law on " Public services law. " The Saeima committee responsible at the Commons Public Administration and Local Government had raised objections to the fact that this commission is responsible in the Commons? (from the floor to DEP J Urbanovic: " maybe the Legal! ") was a serious proposal ?( from the floor of the DEP V Agešin: " no thanks! ") So, as I understand there are two proposals - to set the commission of the responsible Commission to the Commission on Public Administration and Local Government, or to set the committee's committee responsible For the First Commissionwe should vote on the first proposal - so that the committee responsible is a member of the Public Administration and Local Government Please call, we will vote in favour of the Public Administration and municipal Commission responsible for the bill. Please vote! Yes, 57, against - none, abstentions: 23 On a charge set by the National Commission for Public Administration and Local Government, Please make a proposal for a second reading, Dolgopolova, please click on the microphone to Dolgopolov.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq110 translatedText "Hello, colleague, Mr Kučinska is wrong in the sense that all the members of the Commission had voted' no' to Our faction, Mr Methodka, who said, first and foremost, I, Mr Loliti Chigate and Mr Dolgopova. To say: well, both of them are largely true, but we're moving on a bill at first reading, straight away That story is about to really not be confused in one putre of all - say, Portal www. Mr LV and those one-stop agencies in the regions Jo, in terms of the Business Register perspective, must say that, if it can speak, the money is provided to the Works Register only on the condition of Click www lenthe Companies Registry will provide electronic registration, but in the end neither www len could have been able to ensure neither the Company's normal electronic recording was able to provide electronic registration If it comes to regions, so I think I should say, all alone with absoluteone idea - to unify the aggregated points just because it needs to be done - I think it is foolish, because it is not all possible to have a smart approach, a differentiated approach and, of course ,work on this bill Jo cannot't blend the Revenue Service and the Works Records exclusively by the idea that they should be combined, and more still to provide a separate authority there, such as the birth list chapter, which should be sensiblethe approach of Bet, of course, is the challenge, already the law of writing Bet don't mix it in electronic, say, an aspect with one-stop shop! So we have to work quite seriously, because the bill is now quite serious".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq109 translatedText "Thank Devaine's name to Member Ringoldam Balodim".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq108 translatedText "I would, however, like to spell out all the credit to Mrs Čigano, but in the case of limited liability companies, by the way, I did not expect it to be a bad one, if we in every place are looking for a policy here, then in some ways, we will also beanywhere in the Commons will not go far enough, it was directed against ministries I will be going directly against the ministries I will hear shortly, starting with this bill: if we already provide coverage throughout Latvia at the moment, andif our services are already available, then why do we need even some institutions I think about the ministries, that every resor itself seems to be self-sufficient and that each resor, in fact, evenby not providing any kind of commitment between its agencies, I would certainly resist something else But it would still be half-hearted another one is also true to Mr Dolgopolova - on quality and whatit is already the law that is going to write about it - and the concept itself - that we will build a new institution which, as it will adjust to the existing institutions, is that we have a great risk of moving in the way of the existing oneas part of the legislative package, it'd still be across all communities around any new body, without reducing and doing nothing with the existing flow of documents, I would simply call again for us to be in front of us, which is in front of a grandiose. Saeima and the government, or regardless of whom we all have to do it, do not do it:' so they do, we will stay out!' is our common task, and we must do it for us.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq107 translatedText "Thank you to the House for a second time".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq106 translatedText "Dear colleague, however, I would like to make it clear, Mr Kučinska, what you said from the rostrum, I have already said in no uncertain terms - both on the result of the vote and the intentions of the Commission that the argument was made and accepted by the Commission thatwe have hardly been able to resolve this case, because it is only one of the ministries - it is not an excuse - because, to be honest, we have already specifically agreed on the fact that, instead of being proposed by the ministry of ministry, it was not going to be proposed instead of in Cabinet. The other Secretary of State, but rather the point of commission, one point, two If we are talking about e-administration, it must be said that this is not the subject of this law in the form of a separate legislation that should, and should be, separate to the Treasurer Should we talk aboutthis particular law, then seeing which of the 28 articles does not diminish the administrative burden of neither the population nor the business, although this was a primary objective and finally This is one of those legislative texts from the so-called Reform Party so-called SPRUDŽApackage Many of the Bill packages, many of them endured a rather sad fate, Tie, which had been accepted, was improved from A to Z and from zero to breaking point Schouri - I once again said! - is the responsibility ofputting out the Cabinet, from the Secretary of Government's shoulders to the Public Administration and Local Government Commission, to Saeima, to say to Saeima how you want to say that the capacity of the assembly is greater than the capacity of the Cabinet Office, I will unfortunately not be able to agree if you are going to saythat we need in any case to improve the number of other people prepared by the Ministry and the Cabinet, I would also not agree with this in the parliamentary republic, and cannot control what you yourself can urge myself not to support the continuation of this bill.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq105 translatedText "Thank you for the second time in a debate with Mr Dolgopolov, MEP".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq104 translatedText "Dear colleagues, it is a great pleasure for Mr Kučinska and thank you very much for your understanding that this bill is necessary, and thank you for the promise to vote in favour of Mr Dolgopolova that I, too, have already served as a member of the Public Administration in the last Commons. And the local commission and the Public Administration and Local Government Commission had lengthy discussions on the bill the Commission had decided by a majority to oppose the bill, though the draft bill was sponsored - precisely for the reasons mentioned by Mr Kučinska .- because a draft law on the single public service is simply necessary for citizens at the moment, there is a situation in which different public and local public services are highly fragmented in territorial terms, difficult access for the population, and remote counties in one-day residentsto travel to receive this service is, in principle, incapable of having had two successful pilot projects in Rig and Aucé, and with experience I have been aware that this is where the heads of this country have said that the opportunity for citizens to offer both the public and thelocal services in one place and a sufficient amount of time to help, possibly, to complete any forms or explain exactly which person is entitled to this is very necessary in particular for small severance people in the ROJA population of somethere are services available at Talsos, but some - Whentpad Well, think about the geography of Latvia! How can these people vote to receive these services, on these different cities of Latvia?! Having wanted to cooperate is typical of Riga's problem, because in Riga, for example, companies believe they are so sovereign that information, including information about their own financial data, should not even be given to the city council's members Becausethere are problems, however, I would urge not to abandon the problem of problem-solving by saying that there is some sort of legal loophole, but still be ready to deal with fellow Members, one of the priorities of the Latvian Presidency is a digital Europe. In the first half of the year, Latvia will have all the digital priorities of the European Union and the main driver of digital solutions, and it is very interesting that, in negotiations with our European Union colleagues, we often conclude that we think about our ability to finddigital solutions are much better in Europe than we often think of them, because we are quite far away in terms of digital solutions But, you know, it is not thanks to public policy in some situations, but in spite of the country'sthe policy that we simply cannot accept the necessary solutions in time and agree on the necessary solutions, despite the difficulties, we know very well that, for example, that we do not have the means to authenticate us by electronic means. Commercial banks offered such a service And for a very long time we provided public services via a portal to www the len, the authentication of these private-holder services is a very good opportunity to move one-stop agencies through information technologyservices We have made huge investments in existing information technologies and their solutions to Ciennautic colleagues, simply promote this momentum by supporting this bill! But its imperfections will be possible here, in the Commons, We must simply want to do so! Thank you.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq102 translatedText "Honourable President, honourable Members, a lot where Mr Dolgopolova is right, because the opinion of the Legal Office was indeed rather draconian, and in fact it means de facto that someone has to be taken and this law does not. Does it start to re-review from scratch and transform it to one sense entirely in the sense that everyone voted and everyone unanimously rejected it and decided to give it back to the government To return the we did only because of the fact thatit was found to be a compromise that this working group, which will be processed, will result in it as outside the Cabinet, to the VARAM base, we will help and then take it back to Why Members? Therefore, is in favour of no-one. The need for such a bill does not call into question that it is necessary, but at the same time everyone is aware of how difficult it is to introduce the introduction of We were on a 1-point meeting and looked at it in the one-stop shop, and the result is such a one-stop shop. A rather sad conclusion (that is to say, it is a bakery for the future): to see all the difficulties, for example, the Ravas was, in trying, well, to force its holdings to recognise the need to establish the place where they areservices with IT assistance are common in a single system, it is very difficult to come before our ministries, those who are not affiliated with the regions, to provide these services at all points in the second issue that needs to be addressed - or theirthe ministry will be able to do this, not because of the potential for it to be created, but only because it is one of the ministries, not the " Ministry of Justice, " which others would have listened to: how to pushbut today, however, we have also decided to come back to the fact that we will vote for the Greens and the farmers to vote in favour of the referral to the Commission this bill, though in some respects a revision of the Well andas the Saeima Commons has had, then it is simply good to come in But - only in the name of the fact that this service is very necessary! Only on the behalf of the people in all regions, thank you".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq101 translatedText "Thank you to the House for a debate".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq100 translatedText "Honourable Members, in fact, the situation in the previous Commons was similar to that of the Public Administration and Local Government (DEP S Dolgopolov: " the Commission did not support the bill, while the members of Parliament had different votes. The phase since the first reading has actually gone into quite a lot of work and also the proposals for the safety of these proposals can only be improved at the moment, and I therefore feel that it is right that this bill should be supported and continued at the moment. Its examination of the deadline for tabling proposals and preparing its proposals for a second reading, So tai here is, of course, some legal dispute: whether these principles are superfluous in the law or under the Law of the State of Well, saythere is a discussion, namely that the developers of the bill considered this law to be broader and affect not only the public administration facilities in the statutory scope but operate more broadly, which it can discuss as Per Gear ,but, however, the creation of this e-regulatory and one-stop agency would move forward, I think it is appropriate for us to give this support once again today to continue the examination of this bill and then to address the further questions already at second reading.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq99 translatedText "Thank you for the debate at the Evening Cilinskim".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq98 translatedText "Saeima, the High Representative of the High Representative of the Council of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic ofsome questions in the First question: is it imperative to have a law to build, say, one-stop agency, for which pilot projects have already been carried out? Several agencies already work long enough as long as they require a separate law to improve eco-management? There is a need to define the principles of good governance, as Article 10 of the National Regulatory Equipment Act already lays down these principles and that these are all issues that should be asked - and they were also asked !- The Ministry, which presented this legislation in a rather long debate, the result of which was that the Commission did not support the move further to Pret to continue the examination, of the Commission's 12 members, who were members of 9 Members representing all factionsnot all but a majority, 2 abstentions, and no one was on to further examination of Now on the substance of the No 28 articles of the majority of the most absolutely declarative statements from experts who took part in the debate - none of which I participated inhaving said that, I had not expressed the idea that this bill would be screened without amendment by a number of experts, including very reputable experts, such as the Ministry of Justice, which was strongly opposed to its viewing ,and our MPs' legal office, which, in a very rare time, shall submit a written opinion on the bill even before a zero reading of its repudiation, with the decision of the commission to be the one that Saeima, today, will support the Dutchman todayerrands, this bill would move the Dutchman, then come out quite an interesting wedding: once it had already been considered, the opinion was worded once, but now, under pressure from the Department, we are trying to change what is upheld by That is Point one. The point of the matter in the case of the case in the Commission is also that the MoD will improve the proposed legislation, in the light of all the criticisms that were expressed and will submit it to the Commission on Savuthly Commission on its behalf, circumventing lengthy bureaucratic procedures ,what is provided for in the Cabinet Office's equipment will be submitted to the enhanced legislation, if it has been improved, in the Commons further consideration of the Treasures, which I would like to say today with any force to push this bill into a very basic thing -remove the responsibility for the number of brothers that has been produced, because today, what has been mentioned by the Parliamentary Secretary with all due respect! But the examples he mentioned are not about the substance of the law and not on the substance of this law, andwhile talking about more than anything else, which concerns the effectiveness of our national regulatory structures in general, and it is a very different song and a very different story on behalf of the Commission, I call on you not to proceed with the examination of this bill in 12 of the Saeima Commons.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq97 translatedText "Thank you very much for starting the debate in Devil Dolgopolov, MEP".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq96 translatedText "(from the floor of the DEP J Urbanovic: " you are going to get away from the final, otherwise you will forget! ") Yes, thank you for giving the floor once again to the need for a refinement of the public service system of the mayors of the site's site-based customer service centres in Tsaithe DaugavCastle, Valpacia, Auces and Rojas county authorities also showed early in the 2014 ISS survey that 85% of respondents in the bill would support the implementation of the pilot project on the public service system in the following year ,support for this activity, and the support of the European Union's Structural Funds under the new period, provides for large-scale funding to improve governance with the draft law, with a working group of 30 people, consisting of almost all ministries and their respective institutionslawyers and members of the working group led the bill as a result of the Assembly's approval, and agreed with all ministries and union's Local Government, however, given that the bill will have a significant impact on the work of national regulatory authorities in the course of the harmonisation processsome lost a series of preliminary terms to The problem, MPs also told the Legal Office and the Public Administration and Local Government Commission, including 11 in the Commons, but the bill's move was backed by the No party side's authority to confirm that all the necessary ministry forces will bedevoted to preparing and consulting the proposals of the Legal Office of the Republic, which will be understandable and welcome to the 12 members of the House, and therefore, honourable Members, I call for a thorough examination of the nature of the bill for citizens and business people and to support it with a move forward to the Commons.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq95 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, please take the seat! Eleven is the clock and there is one minute to keep up with the session of 18 December 2014! I remind you that we began on the agenda for the 29-point agenda before the break." The Law of Public Services " offered by the House of Procedure reel in accordance with Article 39 of the Act, and the name was given to Secretary of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Secretary Edgara Tavara, Mr Tavara.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq94 translatedText "Please, colleagues, have not been registered here: John Celeton, Raimonds Bergmanis, Araims Arzaims, Arturs Kimburner, Sergei Potapkins, Thank you".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq93 translatedText "Break up at 11 p.m. Continuing the results of a check-out by Secretary-General Andre Gunar Gunar".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq92 translatedText "Dear colleagues of the Committee on the Budget and Financial (Taxation), I call on you, in this break with the Committee on the Budget and the Financial (Taxation), immediately, after 5 minutes".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq91 translatedText "I call, however, to complete the report after the break, as we have a Christmas event, So, to register the call of Members, please see the result! Please, before the delivery of the registration results, colleagues, I would like to invite youto gather in front of the MPs on the Christmas event, where Christmas trees will have a chance to get their Christmas trappings together, enjoy some hot drinks and pepper All are welcome! Word of the Member's statement".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq90 translatedText "I could fit into 3 minutes".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq89 translatedText "The project consists of a potential substance, which is why the ideas of the Latvian Confederation of Labour and the Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry are supported by more than 100 different workshops across Latvia ,by at least 2 000 local staff and institutions, Mr Tavara, I would ask How long will you report how long?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq88 translatedText "Madam President, honourable Members, honourable Members, honourable gentlemen, honourable gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, there is now no legal provision in the national legislation that clearly lays down the common basic principles that should apply to all public services the legal framework is fragmented and is not forgottenopponents of the draft law therefore created a Public Service Law project to be created in order to reduce the administrative burden on citizens as well as businesses and improve the efficiency, quality and accessibility of public service provision to ensure that the concept of a public service concept must be ensured ,as well as setting basic principles for the provision of public services and management, a legal basis should be created for the implementation of the single service provision in the national regulatory authorities and municipalities, while creating a framework for the joint coordination of the parties involved in the provision of services in the framework of the draft legislative proposalin the last three years, the priority of the government in 11 of the Commons is the adoption of a draft law and the draft law is adopted at first reading based on the Cabinet's 19 February 2013 ordinance of 58 (on the concept of the development of public services) ;several points in the declaration of the Cabinet Office of the Government led by Valda Dombrovska, the First Minister of the Government, said that we will continue the development of the public service system, to pass on the draft Public Service Act to the Commons the one-stop shop. Pilot projects, and based on the results obtained, will clarify the concept of the refinement of the public service system, point 27 and 28 of the Government declaration states that further development of a professional, efficient, modern and result-oriented governance of the state is necessary in order to facilitate remote access to work andthe introduction of e-management principles to public service provision should also regularly assess the administrative burden and make proposals to mitigate it directly through the adoption of the public service system and the Commons Public Service Law This Bill is one ofthe priorities of the Department for Environmental Protection and Regional Development, as the provisions of the bill are applied throughout the public service One example of the current situation where there is no regulation on the provision of municipal services If the businessman wants to develop its own company in Baltinave, thenit is a fact that the Rural Support Service is only the mark, but the Republic's Business Registry and the Food and Veterinary Office - Rezekne - will, if necessary, be eligible only in Riga ,in case of tax issues, the case must be seen in the Daugavcastle, but the Board of Governors is Vilnius: from Baltinuahu to Gulbenia - 68 miles to Rezeknei, 60, until Riga - 160 km of, until 160 miles ago. The question: why should these citizens and businesses who want to achieve a single objective have to hop from the institution to an authority to get the sounds, their permits?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq87 translatedText "So the deadline for tabling proposals - dated 20 January 2015 According to the House Order reel at 39, is proposed to continue 11pending the publication of the Bill of Public Services Act 12 to the Secretary of State for Public Services, Secretary of State for Environment and Regional Development, Edgar Tawar".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq86 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 20 January 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq85 translatedText "I would like to thank the debate for the continuation of the draft law on the " Amendment of the Civil Process Act " to the 12 Saeima votes, asking for the result! On - 53, against: 29, the bill will continue with 12 votes in favour of Saeima. The Committee on Legal Affairs responsible for this bill had not objected to the fact that it will be responsible for the bill, including 12 in the Commons?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq84 translatedText "Dear colleague, this bill is, in my opinion, to be very ambiguous, as it provides for the introduction of a new and unwarranted regulation of public duties in the bill for the transfer of procedural rights of the parties to the party proceduraltaking over the law in the event of a final decision to apply, to pay a new national levy on the New National levy payable to €30 in my opinion, is not, and cannot be, welcome, as the party, which has been leaving early in the process, isa national fee for dealing with the case is also not, in all cases, the party that takes over the right to come to the conclusion that half of the party's entitlement may come from half of the rules in the pursuit of their procedural rights, which tends to bring substantial documents to the TSA. Such a situation should not always be noted that the annotation of the processor, in my opinion, is generally very unfortunate, and the aim of the bill in the preamble to the draft law is to " improve the modalities of the procedural rights of the parties set out in the Civil Process Law, " So that improvement is possibleonly through the introduction of national charges against this, I think it is impossible to agree with, and similar thoughts are made by the majority in the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Saeima, as this proposal and the regulatory framework have been rejected once and for all to vote against the transposition of the bill.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq82 translatedText "Yes, thank you! This is a very small amendment to the Civil Process Law, which introduces a national fee of €30 in cases where, after the judgment is made, it is being asked to replace the claimthe recovery has been made for the Vidane in a year of about 3 000 such applications before the courts, which, of course, also creates a certain administrative burden on the courts, which would therefore therefore be subject to a request for such a levyput in place its size to be aligned with the fees required by a similar procedure for the application of the application procedure, and, on behalf of the government, please 12 Saeima to proceed with the examination of this bill Thank you".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq81 translatedText "So the deadline for tabling proposals - the 2015 2 March issue on the next item - bill the " Amendment of the Civil Process Act " to the House of Justice's reelArticle 39 of the Cabinet Office proposes to proceed with the examination of the Bill of the Civil Process Act 12 to the Regiment of the Justice Ministry's Registrar Janim Gear-Jiang, the Federal Ministry of Justice.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq80 translatedText "Colleagues, given that this bill is related to the amendment to the Public Administration Equipment Act, I call for the deadline for proposals to be set at 2 March 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq79 translatedText "Thank you for asking the bill,' Amendment of the Bill to the Republic of Latvia of the Republic of Latvia,' please vote!: 87, against - 1, abstentions - there is no So bill going into the 12 Saeima Commons. The Committee on Legal Affairs responsible for this bill was not in favour of the fact that, as a result of the proposal for a second reading, the proposal for a second reading of the proposal for a second reading by Mr Gaidim, please insert the microphone to Gaidim MP!".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq78 translatedText "Thank you too: the bill is linked to the establishment of a public interinstitutional register, And, if the Members were in favour of the first bill, which was " Amendment to the Public Administration Equipment Act, " then I call for the vote to support this - and the associated bill.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq77 translatedText "Next item under Article 39 of the Rules of Procedure, the Cabinet Office proposes to proceed with the " Amendment of the Law of the Republic of Latvia of the Republic of Latvia to the Regiment of Latvia's Law on the Works of the Republic of Latvia, " Regiment Jiangin Pazender, President of the Ministry of Justice.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq75 translatedText "So there is a proposal for a deadline for the tabling of proposals - for five minutes, did Members not have any objections to such a procedure:' there is an objection!') Members have to vote in favour of the fact that the submission of the proposalsthe deadline for " Amendment of the Law " is five minutes, which means that, until 18 December of this year, at 10 o'clock, please the voting regime, please see the result!: 51, against - 35, abstentions: five minutes.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq74 translatedText "The Commission is calling for the deadline for proposals to be five minutes and the deadline for today's sitting".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq73 translatedText "There are no objections to the Members?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq72 translatedText "If colleagues have no objection, let us not, in the absence of a review committee, support the draft legislation in the second, final, reading stage.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq71 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the first reading of the Amendment of the Amendment of the bill, I ask the voting regime. Please, the result! About - 49, against - 29,abstentions: the 5 legislative proposals at first reading are supported by Mr Please, the deadline for tabling proposals for the second reading and the time for the hearing of the members.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq70 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, the Commission is asking for support for the draft legislation at first reading.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq69 translatedText "So the commission is proposing to accept a draft law on the urgent application of the bill, we will vote on the recognition of the bill " Amendment of the Commercial Law " as a matter of urgency, asking the voting regime! For - 48, against - 28, the 5-policy project has been declared urgent".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq68 translatedText "Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the draft budget package we supported yesterday included a bill called " Amendment of the Law on Works, " " This law amended the rule on the composition of the boards in accordance with the legal technical standards. The Comité Code is also amended by the Commission and the Commission asks for the urgency of the amendments to the " Amendment of the Commission " and to support it at first reading (No floor to DEP J Urbanovic: " where should you hurry? ")".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq67 translatedText "The other proposal is not the deadline for tabling proposals: the 2015 2 March 2015 Bureau of the Saeima Bureau informs me that I am sorry, so there was no other proposal (No to the Chamber:' there was no cure! It was not!') the Bureau of Saeima informed the Bureau that he had received five Members - You Šadurska, Edward SMILTĒNS, Hosama Abu Meri, Solvitas and Ainara Latwska - who were asked to amend the House's amendments. On the agenda of 18 December of the sitting of 18 December, and to postpone the agenda item 49 (Amendment of the Amendment to the International Amendment), before the agenda of the agenda of the sitting, 27 / 2005 /there are no objections to the agenda of the European Parliament on the agenda for the Budget and Financial Perspective.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq66 translatedText "Given that the issue, as Mr Baloha said, is very serious, I call for the deadline for tabling proposals 2015 2 March 2015".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq65 translatedText "I would like to thank the debate on the continuation of the bill " Amendment of the Law on the Public Administration Equipment Act " to the 12 Saeima votes, please the result! About - 87, against and abstentions - the bill will continue to be dealt with by 12 Saeima votes in the Commons 11. The draft law was not raised by the Public Administration and Local Government Commission as well as the fact that the 12-member Saeima committee will also be responsible for this bill?".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq64 translatedText "Good morning, honourable Members, so this issue of matero in the air from 2008 onwards, but when you look deeper into history, it was in 1998 that Māris Gulbis and Māris Gulbis began in 1998 that public authorities in Lithuania are, in fact, transparentin a public register in which the ministry is currently eligible to be represented and which, at the current moment, we have part of the accounts in certain ministries, partially non-State-State-in-Office, which would have a duty to conclude andpinpoint, which, for example, is currently a national controller, most likely if they were going to go and see a tane on their computer, I think Inguna Sudraba is still the Auditor-General of the Moderships I've worked as the chief executive of the public notary public, and thereforeI know about this case too and it's a story that, of course, you will ask them for information, they will look into the COPD, we have Elitas Kruma, but there is Inguna Sudraba Vuss to rewrite quickly andto give out the right information But at the same time, this is a step that the public authorities should be transparent about, not, say, each institution's website would have a different set of information These are serious amendments, and I would ask them to support them.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq63 translatedText "Thank you for launching the debate in Ringoldam Balodim".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq62 translatedText "Yes, this time, this bill will not be the same bill in the Bill This Bill is related to the next Bill (House of laughter) And this is due to the government concept approved on 22 August 2012 " For a single onein the Companies House, the Business Register will maintain a register of institutional units and economic activities, to ensure that all citizens and other interested parties have access to this list of institutions on a user-friendly basis, as they are now, say, the governmentlevel concludes that the public sector classification does not go to a sufficient level, which is why this bill will be put forward by the Government, on behalf of the government, to take over and see 12 of the Saeima Commons this bill".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq61 translatedText "Thanks to the debate, we will vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the bill on trade marks and geographical indications " to the 12 Saeima votes, please voting! On - 30, against - 37, bill 16 o'clock bill12 Saeima to look into " Bad DEP J Urbanovic ") Under Article 39 of the Saeima House of Commons' Amendment to the Law of the Law of the Court of Justice (Amendment 12 of Saeima)".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq60 translatedText "(from the floor of DEP A Elin: " something new! "), colleagues, I am sorry, but now for the fourth time in relation to the institutional property andon the Laws of Procedures as an accompanying bill, I would also like to reject the bill " Amendment of the Act " on trade marks and geographical indications " in 12 of the Commons Thank you".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq59 translatedText "Thank you very much for the fact that we have a debate on the subject.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq58 translatedText "Last edition of this package of legislation passed to the Government on behalf of the Government".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq57 translatedText "I would like to thank the debate on the continuation of the amendments to the bill " Amendment of the Bill of Dodation in Law " and, please, the voting regime! Please, the result!: 30, against - 37, 16 So will not continue to handle the billunder Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure, the Cabinet Office is proposing an " Amendment of the Bill of Law on Goods Signs and Geographical Indications " to the Regiment of the Justice Department, Jiangia Reid, Jiangin Austranner.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq56 translatedText "(from the floor from DEP A Elin:' who of you first pagurs?'), colleagues, with identical motivation as on behalf of the Education, Cultural and Science Commission on 12 May, call for the repeal of the bill " Amendment of the Dodying Model. "".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq54 translatedText "Yes to the last draft legislation of this same package, which is also analogically appealing for support".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq53 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the adoption of the bill' Amendment of the Patent Law', 12 in the Commons! Please vote!: 33, against - 28, 17 So, 17 So will not go into considerationunder Rule 39 of the House's Rules of Procedure, the Cabinet Office is proposing to continue the pending review of the bill " Amendment of the No. " On behalf of the Ministry of Justice - Secretary of Justice, John Pasalner, on behalf of the Ministry of Justice".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq52 translatedText "It is with the same motivation as on the previous issue, on behalf of the Education, Culture and Science Commission, not to support this bill in the 12 Commons votes cast.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq50 translatedText "Yes, as I have already mentioned, this bill is also related to the Launch of Property Rights, and its adoption, say, the motivation is exactly the same: the specific law, whose terminology and standards should be brought into line with this law on the Government's behalf".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq49 translatedText "I would like to vote for Please call, vote in favour of the bill, we will vote in favour of the adoption of the bill in the Amendment 12 of the Bill of the Defence of semiconductors' products, please voting, please vote!: 28, against - 36, abstentions -16 Saeima bill So 12 will not go into line with Article 39 of the Bill of Law, proposing to continue the 11-minute draft bill submitted by the Saeima Saeima Bill to the Regiment of the Justice Department, Janim Gear-Jiang.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq48 translatedText "Honourable President-in-Office of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, as the Parliamentary Secretary of the Ministry of Justice has already mentioned, the question of the amendment of the protection of semiconductor products in the legal protection law relates to the bill, which was dealt with by the' 11 Saeima' and whose name was the' Shark of the Sharks '. The Act " Unfortunately this draft Sharo Property Law project was drafted in a very poor course, with the draft bill passed by more than half of the draft legislation, with more than half of the draft law of the Bill also a new name, under a new name, under scrutinywhich was copied by 12 of the Saeima Little 12 Saeima of the Commons, we have taken it over with 43 numbers and the' Anti-Workers' Institution and Procedures Act' has four accompanying laws, one of them beingthis - A semblance of defence of products from the protection of products that are necessary in this bill, in the light of the changes that have been made to the underlying law, is disproportionate to the issue of the Education, Culture and Science Commission on both thisthe bill, though, was considered for the next three minutes of its hearing and, given that the bill has been substantially redesigned, decided not to push it into consideration at 12 Commons votes and ask the Cabinet Office to draft legislation in a new version to ask him not to support the takeover of the bill".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq46 translatedText "Labor, honourable Member, honourable Members, the bill " Amendment of the defence of semicondents in the law on defence of products " has been linked to amendments adopted already adopted rather than adopted by the Education, Culture and Scientific Committee of the Education, Culture and Science Commission. As supported by the amendments adopted, the new draft legislation on the " Institution of Property Rights of the Union and procedures, " as well as the three successive legislative proposals in place, are linked to this amendment and these amendments are necessary ,to remove from the special rules their regulation into this industrial property law, to align the terminology in order to have common terminology, and therefore thesethis bill, and the next three legislative proposals, would be looked at in a single package with this bill, " The Law on the Institution of Property Rights and Procedures " in the Government, I call on the Government of the Government of the Government of the Government of the Government of the EU to continue the legislative and legislative proposals on this legislation.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq45 translatedText "So the deadline for submitting the proposals, dated 18 February 2015 Under the Rules of Procedure of the House of the House, proposes to continue 11 of the amendments tabled by the Saeima Cabinet. In a report adopted by the European Parliament, the House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
• 2014_12_18_279-seq44 translatedText "As in the past, 18 February next year.".

• first
• previous