Saeima |

Saeima

Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }

Showing items 28,501 to 28,600 of ±28,678 with 100 items per page.

first
previous
next

2014_12_18_279-seq275 translatedText "Thank you to Members of the Chamber (heckling from the Chamber)".
2014_12_18_279-seq274 translatedText "Mr Many, colleagues, it looks as if, in support of the many proposals yesterday in the 2015 national budget, Saeima has taken swift credit to the government of the Republic of Latvia, but already today, this rapid credit crunch will have to be handed over without even asking whereit will then be spent on (No Drugs DEP L Chigate heckling) And then, when the Department of Finance and Finance (Tax) was asked the question: " how then will you spend those funds here by shying away from the governmentunforeseen events?, their response was: " the country has the need for a lot " (heckling:' right!') Yes, it was true! Yesterday it was all about the church and the fraternity That was all there! The interests were started a little bit, but however, I met Ziniet, I, too, in 2014, met people (faction unity heckling) who might have been the winners of yesterday One of them was a Children's Hospital surgeon at 11 p.m.in the evening after a long day of work it had just came out of the floor after running operations to find out that he faces two more operations, or two operpenable children I met, Mrs Barčas, also a teacher of the DEPa Barca: " and? ") which was home to young children and who was able to survive on those incomes that we wish, three weeks out of 30 days, I also met a guy who has been standing for years on Latvia and Latvia. Seeing a large proportion of their colleagues replaced by a service against man-to-man life, they, Mrs VIŅĶELES (Chamber of laughter), made it to your long list of yesterday's DEP E Smiliety:' Mr Bonthing ,on the matter....) I am afraid, in this miracle, that, in the miracle of giving the government more than 2 million, the government will take care both in a biblical manner that the number of doctors in the hospital can be a necessary number of doctors andso that teachers cannot only survive on their pay, but also to live and that the security of those who protect the Latvian state for your hope of a biblical scenario is the only excuse for your vote on' Thank you'.".
2014_12_18_279-seq273 translatedText "Thank you for the debate at the Bonds Bondaram".
2014_12_18_279-seq272 translatedText "Dear colleagues, as has already been expected in the light of yesterday's entire budget debate and taking into account this very specific timetable for a very specific budget, EUR 1 million has been diverted and I hope that colleagues and also you ,those of us working in a coalition who are working in a coalition are aware that they are only 0.013 per cent of the entire budget and for them - and only for them! - we, the Members, can respond to this 0.013 per cent of the government we have had as such. The mazulim graveled, and we took a good faith on it, swung and cougged and cougged, and it allowed the government itself to split more than €2.30 million from unforeseen funds But appetite is already growing in the pudding and it looks like the Cabinet Officeto be privileged to be this generous Christmas Day, to be generous to Christmas Day As otherwise we might understand this draft decision by MPs, who will scrap MPs' budget programmes to redistribute another €2.8 million for unforeseen events? Now, with some specific meteorological conditions, does the National Security Council have any description of the dangers to Latvia? The government is going to deal with it? At the same time, when discussing the country's budget for 2015, we had no way of supporting practically nothing - no extra funding for rehabilitation measures, no teachers " salaries, no health promotion measures, and honourable Members, I would like to draw your attentionon the fact that, in the proposal, we are redistributing the funds planned for Saeima from the capitulation: is it really only our fracturing to feel that something is wrong? Firstly, we have to ask why we should only ask ourselves in late December for ourselveswe have noted that the funds have not been used appropriately, and we are going to allocate the funds to the government after their own sense? Secondly, we should answer the question of why, in this case, the provision of the ACT budget, adopted in this case, is not being applied. It is in these cases where the introduction of an investment project has been delayed by legal and responsible transfer of funds to transfer appropriations in a reserve for the further construction of the Jekkaba Street building at 6 / 8 instead of the rush to be spent this year in order to redefine themagain, in addition to the planned 2015 Budget, It is not responsible and equal for all institutions, and unfortunately once again make sure that the principle of' one right and one law for all' is not for everyone! For the highly distinguished Members, the possibility of splitting the 2015 budget by €1 million in return for calling for a generous Christmas gift - the permission of the government itself to split another €2.8 million, even if you have voted on the 2015 budget a very long time ,this is the time that Saeima should be aware that, with its decisions, we should lead the way for the latter to fail to support these amendments by allowing the next year to start with a financial margin of 2.89 million, if this is the case next yearthere will be a need for resources for something significant that the government would be less able to cover the pretext that there is no money and that there is no money and that this morning, after reading the news, that those people who still need rehabilitation and who are victims of the Zolitude tragedy have suffered ,as well as the relatives of those who are still in need of this rehabilitation, the funds have ended, please respect the part of the society that deserves us to notice that they are very much in need of our support, thanks to the (NSL faction applause)".
2014_12_18_279-seq270 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, in this year's Budget programme,' securing the functioning of the assembly' will not be used for EUR 2 million in €894 thousand 552, and I call on you, colleagues, to agree with this appropriation for redistributing the state budget programme' Measure'".
2014_12_18_279-seq268 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 23 December 2009".
2014_12_18_279-seq252 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 23 December 2009".
2014_12_18_279-seq267 translatedText "Thank you for asking the bill,' Amendment of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic,' at second reading! - please voting regime! Please note the result: 89, against and abstentions: there is no legislative proposal at second reading to approve the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq262 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, we are working on the bill in the Law of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of thethe two Legal Office proposals Abi proposals are editorial and they clarify the text of the bill 1 - the Legal Office proposal is supported by a proposal from the Legal Office".
2014_12_18_279-seq261 translatedText "Hans-Gert Pöttering, on behalf of the GUE / NGL group, who drafted the report on behalf of the Republic of Congo".
2014_12_18_279-seq260 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: 30 January 2015".
2014_12_18_279-seq236 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: 30 January 2015".
2014_12_18_279-seq259 translatedText "Thank you for the call. We will vote on the bill' Amendment of the Law on the entry into force of the 1937 Civil Law of the Republic of 1937, the entry into force of the Law on the Law of the Republic of 1937 and the entry into force of the Law on the Law of the Law of the European Union" at second reading, please voting regime, please see the result! - 87, against and abstentions - there is no legislative proposal at second reading in favour of the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq258 translatedText "We have therefore looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission to support the bill in the Law on the entry into force of the 1937 Civil Law of the Latvian Republic of 1937, the entry into force of the Law on the Rights of the Republic of 1937 and the application of the law " Second Reading "".
2014_12_18_279-seq256 translatedText "And also 2 is the proposal by the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Justice, who is now calling for the deletion of the entry into force, which has unfortunately already passed. But the commission will certainly work to put this bill into practice as soon as possible and that the Commission has supported it at a later stage.".
2014_12_18_279-seq254 translatedText "Fellow Members, the draft legislation is related to the amended Civil Law Convention, when the Commission has received two proposals for a proposal from the Justice Minister, the Minister for Justice, which provides for the exclusion of transitional provisionsthe paragraph currently giving rise to the right to set up this shared ownership, bearing in mind that it will be possible to enter into force after the third reading of the Civil Law Convention on the Institute for Built Law, this provision will not require the Commission to have supported".
2014_12_18_279-seq253 translatedText "No objections to the next item on the next item: the " Amendment of the law on the entry into force of the Law of 1937 of the 1937 Civil Law of the Republic of 1937, " " Second reading, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission - Member of the Committee on Legal Affairs".
2014_12_18_279-seq251 translatedText "Thank you very much for calling!' on the recognition of the transfer of the Law on the People's Front of the People's Front to the Public Council of the People's Front',' Second Reading', please seevoting regime, please see the result: 83, against and abstentions: the legislative proposal adopted at second reading is not the deadline for the submission of proposals for a third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq248 translatedText "Also 2 is proposal by the Legal Office And this proposal has more to do with the need for legal technical compliance and has gained the support of the commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq246 translatedText "Fellow Members, the report on the transfer of immovable property to the People's Front of the People's Front to the Museum of People's Front on the lapsed " Legal Affairs Committee has been accepted by the Legal Affairs Office, which has been sponsored by the Legal Office - which is supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq245 translatedText "The next item: draft legislation on the acceptance of the " People's Front of the People's Front of the People's Front of the People's Front to the Public Council " by Gaidis Berzins, MEP on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee -".
2014_12_18_279-seq243 translatedText "23 December Members object".
2014_12_18_279-seq242 translatedText "The Commission proposes 23 December of this year (No floor to DEP J Urbanovic:' unstoppable')".
2014_12_18_279-seq241 translatedText "Thanks to Please, we will vote in favour of the draft law on " Amendment of the Reading, Wrong and Independence Act " at second reading! Please vote! For - 84, against and abstentions - do not seek a second reading of the proposed deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq240 translatedText "Honourable colleague, the Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima committee has considered the bill " Amendment, the transcript and nationality change law " and has decided to support it and to advance a hearing with the members of the committee. At second reading, the Legal Affairs Committee did not make any proposals, and therefore, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs, would call for this bill to be supported at second reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq239 translatedText "Yes, so, as of 30 January 2015, they are not asking the next item on the next item: draft bill on Amendment, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee, the second reading of the Legal Affairs Committee.".
2014_12_18_279-seq238 translatedText "30".
2014_12_18_279-seq237 translatedText "30?".
2014_12_18_279-seq235 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the Bill on Civil Law, I ask the voting regime, yes, the result! For - 84, against and abstentions - the draft legislative text at second reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq234 translatedText "We have looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs to support the Second Reading Bill on Civil Law".
2014_12_18_279-seq232 translatedText "8 is a legallegic proposal from the Minister of Justice, the Minister for Justice, and that is supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq230 translatedText "7 is the Legal Office's proposal, which is sponsored by".
2014_12_18_279-seq228 translatedText "6 is the proposal by the Minister for Justice, Dinzintara Rasnaka, who is sponsored and has a editorial character".
2014_12_18_279-seq226 translatedText "5 is the Legal Office's proposal, more technical in nature, and is supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq224 translatedText "4 is also the proposal by the Minister for Justice, Dinzintara Rasnaka, who supports the".
2014_12_18_279-seq222 translatedText "For its part, 3 is the proposal of the Minister of Justice, the minister of the Ministry of Justice, for which I have already made a statement on 2 proposals, which is supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq220 translatedText "2 is a proposal from the Legal Office which states that all third party cases, established on the Saviod Law Saviod Law, shall cease all the right of office to be established (unfortunately also referred to init also provides for situations in which the right of construction cannot run out without the consent of third parties back to 2 / 2, as I have already said, that is the proposal of the Legal Office, which is supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq218 translatedText "Dear colleague, the Chair of the sitting, I would like to remind you of the bill,' Amendment of Civil Law', that the draft law introduces a legal framework for building rights, so as to avoid a so-called split law in the futurethe Property Committee on Property has received and examined eight proposals for a proposal by the Minister for Justice, the Minister for Justice, which is editorial in nature and supported by".
2014_12_18_279-seq217 translatedText "The next item is the next item on the next item: the draft legislation on Civil Law, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq216 translatedText "9 January 2015".
2014_12_18_279-seq215 translatedText "Thanks to Please, we will vote in favour of the draft law on the " Sétteres National Park Law, " a second reading, asking for the result! On - 82, against and abstentions - there is no second reading in favour of the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq212 translatedText "And Visufinally, 5 - The Legal Office's proposal for a regulation in force until the entry into force of the provisions of the Cabinet rules referred to in this statute has also been supported by the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq210 translatedText "4 - The Legal Office proposal, more such a editorial, and the commission also supports it".
2014_12_18_279-seq208 translatedText "3 - Proposal by the Legal Office on the building framework in the neutral zone, which has the support of the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq206 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the Legal Office, which the Commission asks to support".
2014_12_18_279-seq204 translatedText "Dear colleague, your attention to the Bill of the Single Park law, the second reading of the Commission's Legal Affairs Committee, has received five proposals for the Legal Office, which has the support of the Commission.".
2014_12_18_279-seq203 translatedText "1 Feedback to the Members of the European Parliament before we see the next item, I would like to inform you that there is five Members' proposal (No floor to DEP V Ageshins:' names!') - to continue the sitting without interruptionuntil all items of order have been tabled, did Members have the object of this? Yes, the House of Deputies, Abu Meri, the politician, Brigmanis, Brigmana and Zardiola (No floor:' Shia are heroes') So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") So are heroes! ") S@@Member States have reservations about the future of the European Union - MEPs will vote on a resolution on Thursday.".
2014_12_18_279-seq202 translatedText "Sorry for a long report, but the reform is very important! The deadline for proposals is 1 February 2015.".
2014_12_18_279-seq201 translatedText "Thank you for the first reading of the' Public Service Law' Bill, please vote!: 59, against - no, abstentions: the 27-27 draft legislative proposal adopted at first reading".
2014_12_18_279-seq200 translatedText "Dear colleague of the sitting, I would like to see a bill called' National Service Law', This is a successor to the National Civil Service law, which has been in force for more than a decade, which means that since 2001 there has been both the improvement of the law and the development of this standard. In the application of the Public Administration to a competitive employer, not only in Latvia, but also in Europe, the current trend of reform of the European civil service reforms is marked by the equalisation of employment conditions of officials and public administration, the role of private sector experience, career developmentand the creation of a pay system; linking the pay system to work performance, widespread use of performance assessments; open competitions on any job, flexibility in employment conditions and the delegation of responsibilities to direct cabinet ministers some time ago, 2012, isthe concept of human resource development adopted by the Public Administration and, on that basis, have in fact, in fact, been drafted in the draft National Service Law, which, so to speak, will be put forward by a number of other legislative proposals, but this is therefore the keywhat does it plan to do otherwise than the previous Public Service Law, the development of legal relations between public administration, the creation of a single employment relationship between the public administration, the introduction of the principle of " public administration as a single employer " (already uniform )the legal framework for officials and employees in the area of remuneration and performance assessment), the creation of a single employment relationship between direct government authorities in Wembley will no longer be covered by two different rules, Little and partially - Labour law, but also Labour law ,in future, there will be one - National Service Law It is an opportunity to address the issue of single disciplinary liability for officials and employees of the Little employees only to apply two disciplinary penalties - a note or a reprimand for a single employment relationship, more effective and with less resourceswill be able to ensure that the staff record in the function of the institution as well as in the event of an employment dispute, there will be no need for deep knowledge of the regulation of two different procedural rules and the practice of Little too much resources spent on the establishment and maintenance of staff and for the remainder of the periodthe implementation of the Common Human Resources for Strategic Development Matters is also a condition for the introduction of a functioning system of mobility within the governance of the public administration and the implementation of the idea of public administration as a single important change in the Second landmark: the contest will be open to candidates. All posts on the Open examiner's competitions are currently exclusively organised on official posts but in the future they will be both civil servants and staff members, incentive systems and refresher arrangements, the development of a system for the creation of a free training programme for new officials and staff, institutions, as well as a talent management system, Extended opportunities to organise internal competitions in the public administration, with a view to promoting the development of public administration experts in the context of extended rotation, as well as within the framework of public administration, including the possibility of temporarytransfer official or employee office to a municipal authority, or even in a commercial society, is aimed at increasing the expertise of experts and not losing the best experts, allowing expertise elsewhere, and good governance, full use of the resource available in the long term will also contribute to the promotion of a common humanas part of institutional culture and cooperation between different resonders, this law will therefore not apply to officials of the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Justice under the Special Service of the Ministry of Justice through the Special Service of the Ministry of Justice. The grade and the staff of the state's security staff and members of the Cabinet Office, who are office managers, advisers and so on, also will not apply to municipal officials, although initially such an idea was Bet then, the commission saysconsidering the issue, local authorities said they approached it in very pragmatic terms, Tour said: " let us see how this will succeed in the administration of the country, if it is well managed, we will probably be able to join in the opportunity to join this system, " And now I will be able to join. I would like to say a few more practical things that will then be achieved with this new bill, So, in fact, you will certainly, by going to a national body, ever come across perhaps some kind of special treatment for the workers there. Misunderstanding it and therefore know how the opposite side feels - especially the operators, going to a clerk who may never have had so, hasn't worked in the private sector, so it really does not understand this entrepreneur's pain or his problem casesin fact, in fact, at this moment, with this law, even officials will be able to rotate even when officials on a national level or similar to create them with this experience, which is, of course, a positive one. There have even been cases where a official and an employee have been subjected to the same offence, and one by one, each at the same time, one is one punishment, and another for the other, which now is not logical! (from the floor to DEP A boss :" oh, it is clear! "; DEP V Orlov: " in short! " )or the opposite (No medicine DEP J Urbanovic: " enough is enough - there are a few more things - such as mediation - that are included in the bill, but there is mediation in the name of the Commission (applause)".
2014_12_18_279-seq198 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, constructive proposals on the commission wait until 9 January 2015".
2014_12_18_279-seq197 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on the bill' Amendment of State and municipal property privatisation and privatisation of privatisation certificates at second reading '. The regime, I ask for a result! About - 83, against and abstentions - does not have the legislative proposal adopted at second reading to establish the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq196 translatedText "Consequently, all three proposals are examined by Please that you support this bill at second reading".
2014_12_18_279-seq194 translatedText "And 3 - the last - is the proposal of the Legal Office, which has the support of the Committee.".
2014_12_18_279-seq192 translatedText "Also 2 is proposal from the Legal Office, which supports".
2014_12_18_279-seq190 translatedText "Labor, colleagues, are working on a bill called " Amendments to State and local government privatisation of property privatisation and the establishment of privatisation certificates, " the Commission in general has tabled three proposals for the Legal Office proposal and is supported by the Committee.".
2014_12_18_279-seq189 translatedText "Thank you for the call, we will vote in favour of the draft law " Amendment of the Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism in the Law on the Prevention of Terrorism. The House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
2014_12_18_279-seq188 translatedText "Fellow Members, let us work with the document No 250, the draft law on anti-money laundering and the prevention of terrorist financing, " the proposal for a draft law by the Commission on the proposal for a regulation".
2014_12_18_279-seq185 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the second, final, reading of the Bill on the Law on the Law of Law.".
2014_12_18_279-seq184 translatedText "On behalf of the Committee on Education, Culture and Science, I call for a second, final, reading' Amendment to the Copyright Law'.".
2014_12_18_279-seq182 translatedText "And 4 is the Culture Minister Daces Melbeard's proposal, which aims to top up the bill with a clause on the entry into force of the Act It states that the law enters into force on the day after its announcement in the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq180 translatedText "3 is the Culture Minister Daces Melbeard's proposal, which relates to the extension so that the Ministry of Culture can successfully develop the legislative documents to be drawn up by this draft law obliging it to support it in the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq178 translatedText "2 is the Legal Office's proposal for terminological nature, supported by the Legal Office".
2014_12_18_279-seq176 translatedText "Dear colleague, the Education, Culture and Science Commission has examined and prepared the draft Bill on the Copyright Bill as a proposal of the Legal Office, sponsored by the Legal Office, sponsored by the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq175 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the Second Amendment of the Insolvency Law, the final reading, the reading of the voting regime! Please see the result!: 53, against - 22, 10 abstentions: 10adoption by the next item on the draft legislative resolution on the law on copyright".
2014_12_18_279-seq174 translatedText "Thank you for examining all the proposals on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee to support the Second Amendment of the Legal Affairs Committee on the Bill Insolvency Law, in this case, the final reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq172 translatedText "Colleagues, 8 is a proposal from the Legal Office, which is more editorial in nature and has gained support in the commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq171 translatedText "I would like to thank you for asking the vote! Please vote! Please vote, please see the result!: 27, against - 47, 10 without support".
2014_12_18_279-seq170 translatedText "No thanks the Mini proposal has not received any support".
2014_12_18_279-seq169 translatedText "My thanks for the end of the debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission is what else to add?".
2014_12_18_279-seq168 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, Mr Elin, you know very well, as an experienced MEP, that the Ministry of Justice does nothing for the Legal Commission in the way that you are doing it (heckling From the DEP A Traffer) You know very wellthe fact that the Justice Ministry also includes in the legislative process the discussion in the working group involving experts Tik Wow, on 6 October this law was announced and at the same time work on the aforementioned amendment in the Tikko Amendmentthey were drawn up, they were submitted to the Legal Affairs Committee and you know very well that during this time, there were also elections for the Saeima meeting that the Legal Affairs Committee did not possibly have the rhythm that it should have done in the everyday process for Thank you".
2014_12_18_279-seq167 translatedText "Thank Devaine's name to member Gaidim the capo, for the second time (No pill: " last! ")".
2014_12_18_279-seq166 translatedText "Mr BĒRZA, may I agree with you on one point, the only thing I have to say to you from you just now is:' we are where we are', the President of the European Council on October 6 has announced amendments to the Insolvency Law on 6 October! Answer question: on which date the sitting on the Legal Affairs Commission brought you - really brought back! - amendments to the Civil Process Act? Well, in which case? You could tell you what time did you need? The issue was referred to on 4 December, you referred to your previously signed civil procedure amendments, as did you, why? - because you suddenly reached an agreement - shifting this question to March, you are in the position of hypocrisy on Monday ,that is a matter of vital importance and it needs to be adopted, and on Tuesday you are saying' well, you did not support us on Monday, so we are going to take you now', but you are going to do it. A faction to colleagues to accept Bez's five 10 moments before the Legal Affairs meeting we are getting your prepared project But you don't even say' well, we'll give it inside!' and you are not giving it to us! " Doing justice to the justice minister, asking the Committee on Legal Affairs, and what do you wish for us now, within five minutes, that we do not look at any documents, not under any documents, to tell you:' yes, we are going ahead and we will support what you are making!'".
2014_12_18_279-seq164 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I also do not understand the duplicity of Mr Elin, because if you would indeed have wanted to accept the corresponding amendments of the Civil Process Law, to which you are referring and who have a certain connection with this bill, you, as an experienced lawyer, believe, in my opinion ,you could have read these individual rules from the Ministry of Justice that I think that you will be able to navigate these rules quickly and present them to Members of my faction as well, because when you obviously understand it ,what we are dealing with in these amendments to the Civil Process Act was, too, too late for the only time that you had no time to focus on perhaps this issue, however, we are now where we are, and the Saeima Committee on Legal Affairs has referred thesethe amendments to the Civil Process Law Commission on these amendments will undoubtedly work, and I think that it is our intention to introduce this regulation from 1 March, I would certainly say that at least in this section, which was discussed in the Elin. Mr President, the reduction of the maturity limit, As we recall, was the goal which led to this law being opened, I think that any transfer deadline of 1 March will not, at least, at the National Association with the followingI will not come down and let us all make sure that these deadlines come into force, knowing also what the situation is with the number of debtors who are unable to fulfil the debt yet of those times when the banks have policy' gas' policy".
2014_12_18_279-seq162 translatedText "Honourable Members, there is a need to say a few very interesting things that we had not talked about previously, Well, it must be recalled why, in its transition to 1 March, the answer is very simple: the Ministry of Justice has not tabled any necessary amendments to the Civil Process Act in due course ;in order to provide for the provision of the substantive amendments we adopted due to the insolvency reform we took the entry into force - 1 January And then came the way that suddenly one of the deliberations of the Legal Affairs Commission was suddenlyfive minutes to the sitting, the National Alliance - in the person of the Minister for Justice! - submitted proposals to the Committee on Legal Affairs Well, please then perhaps, on my behalf, then, then, the Legal Affairs Committee did not support it then, including the Commission ,when the National Alliance had left five minutes before the sitting, asked to include this item on the agenda for What was the legislative procedure now, because it was not able to introduce amendments to the Civil Process Law, proposals have been made. And to move this essential reform to 1 March, as the banks have suddenly started pulling together the Members of the Coalition and saying that, however, we should try and, somehow, to try and slow down much of what the National Association of the National Union is all about. The hysteria of rich theses was devoted entirely to all about their lack of support for the civil-process amendments, but at the same time they are in favour of moving this reform to 1 March at the same time as the amendments to which you have worked on this reformwith the responsibility of the board members, you intended, in one sitting, to examine two readings to submit a first reading review and, at second reading, a bill on the responsibility of board members, or it is not something of a double standard operated by the same National Associationdo not want the amendments to come into force? Under current ministers, it was secretly hoped that the President of the President simply did not prioritize this crucial package! And, as a result, a regulated mechanism, how it could enter into force, did not accept that they made the mistake and demonstrated their incompetence, but which are now usto obstruct the adoption of amendments to the Civil Process Law in one sitting? And today, we are showing in the amendments on the responsibility of board members that it is possible, Well then I call for this to be done! In order to support us in the proposal for which the amendments to the Civil Process Act are not necessary to reduce the exit deadlines for persons in the insolvency process and which are also requested by the Association of certified insolvency administrators, Mr Berzinsknow very well what the negotiations are going to make to make this process easier, but he also goes with the goal of transferring it to 1 March Well, what is the point of not supporting this proposal, if not just by lobbying the banks? Drowns try, however, to breathe a little while, and until then 1 March, however, this reform, too, to shift this reform to a much longer period, I do not really understand the ambivalence that the National Alliance in this matter demonstrates, I do not understand their duplicity ;what the Committee on Legal Affairs does by voting in favour of a series of proposals - initially by supporting them and then abruptly rejected them by the consensus reached by the coalition, so that, however, I would simply call for a great deal of prudent use andthis proposal for one of the rules, specifically on the entry into force of the transitional arrangements, in order to support the support of this rule in any modification of the civil proceedings law is not necessary, this provision really is valid and necessary for our people".
2014_12_18_279-seq160 translatedText "7 - Deputy Andrei Elin proposal, not supported by commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq158 translatedText "Thank you for the proposal of the Legal Office, which is more editorial in nature, we see that these modifications have been made in first reading, so the proposal is supported by the proposal.".
2014_12_18_279-seq157 translatedText "The vote will be voted on by the Members of the European Parliament and to the Council, asking for the vote! Please vote!: 20, against - 49, 15 proposals are not supported by 15 proposals".
2014_12_18_279-seq156 translatedText "5 proposal in turn is a proposal by Mr Andrei Elin, which seeks to extend the time that the physical person - the debtor - has the right to submit an application for the discharge procedure in accordance with the proposedthe new regulation would not be 30, but the 60-day Commission proposal did not receive any support, given that the entry into force has now been suspended and the issue is therefore not on the table".
2014_12_18_279-seq154 translatedText "Yes, thank you, 4 - The Legal Office proposal This is a technical proposal which is sponsored by the Commission".
2014_12_18_279-seq153 translatedText "I would like to thank Please the vote on 3 - Mr Andrei Judin's proposal! Please vote, please vote! For - 43, against: 20, 21 of the amendments in favour (Some unity members applauding Members of the European Parliament)".
2014_12_18_279-seq152 translatedText "I would just like to add, on behalf of the commission, that the wording that you have proposed, Mr Judin, does not provide for the possibility of redress when there is such a administration decision that the Commission did not support the proposal".
2014_12_18_279-seq151 translatedText "My thanks to the Debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission? (from the floor of the DEP A boss:' no! Don't frighten!')".
2014_12_18_279-seq150 translatedText "This time, very briefly in the case of the Constitutional Court Yes, very often we hear such an argument: not to change anything better, because the Constitutional Court can cancel and have consequences for the College! I would like to draw attention to the fact that there is a case that has been launched, but it has been brought up in accordance with the wording of the law applicable until 2010 by 2010the situation that could not appeal to the Now Law has been amended and that is because of my suggestion: neither today nor in the future do not scare people of the Constitutional Court when there is no reason for you".
2014_12_18_279-seq148 translatedText "Thanks for the proposal by Mr Andreja Judin, the proposal made by the Legal Affairs Committee on ending the operation of the certificate of the administration of the latter two years into the course of the operation of the last two administrator certificates has been accepted by the Committee on Legal Affairs. Times have recognised infringements of legislation, but the Commission here saw a number of problems in the first part of the first part of the Insolvency Administration to appeal, which is very important, despite the fact that :the suspension of the action by Mr Judin could not have been put before the commission to answer a question on how the administration of the Insolvency Administration, pursuant to Article 174, the administration of a legal obligation pursuant to Article 174, would have imposed a legal obligation, such asa review of the insolvency proceedings under the context of this proposal also indicated that it is very important to take account of this possibility of redress, which does not appear in the version provided for in this Article 3 1, it should also be specified thatas regards, well, perhaps a slightly similar situation, the Constitutional Court of 7 July 2014 has suggested a case for the conformity of the previously applicable Civil Process Act, the wording of Article 363 8 of the Constitution and on these arguments, the Commission did not support the proposal.".
2014_12_18_279-seq147 translatedText "We will vote for 2 - MEP Andrei Judin, please vote! Please vote, please vote!: 38, against - 18, 21 proposals are not supported by 21 proposals".
2014_12_18_279-seq146 translatedText "Yes, unfortunately, on behalf of the commission, I cannot say anything about the fact that the speeches made by Mrs Čigano were not based on this proposal the Commission did not support the proposal.".
2014_12_18_279-seq144 translatedText "Dear colleagues, yesterday we agreed in a very positive way about Latvia's budget for 2015, Very comforting, that we have received a positive assessment from the European Union about our budget, because all the basic indicators in our budget are very high. Well executed, which is why such critical comments as many of the many older Member States of the European Union, such as France, will certainly not get any comment in this European Commission about our budget being one critical remark: there is not enough investment in Latvia .- The volume of foreign investment for the Members of the Commission, how does it relate to this Insolvency Law, in the most direct way! For many months now, many of you have received publications from a number of banks operating in Latvia onthe fact that the very poor insolvency practice and administrators' irresponsibility and the irresponsibility of the judiciary undermine the willingness of these banks to give credit to investments which are sorely needed by fellow Members of the Latvian economy, Ciennisi, so that we need to reinforce the responsibility of insolvency administrators so that thisthe area must start to be adapted and that commercial banks are not afraid to give credit, to reproduce from the risk of going bankrupt in the case of a company which has received credit, will not benefit from unsecured creditors and will not be able to recover their financial investment in any waydear colleagues, this is a matter of an economic environment and, at the moment, our economic environment is seriously threatened by this very unpleasant Latvian innovation - the reiderism of a kind of insolvency which, in very many cases, I ask for support for this proposal,".
2014_12_18_279-seq142 translatedText "Mr BĒRZA is right in the sense that this proposal is also designed to change the situation and to ensure that administrators in insolvency proceedings work with an unorthodox reputation. However, the essence of this is that it is another law nowsituation: if a person was working as a insolvency administrator and suspended him twice in the absence of his duties: if he did so in two different trials, two different processes decided that he should not be a administrator, then thesethe case of a person can also appeal, so two more courts can see the matter and confirm again, and to decide that, yes, he may not be on the administrator And this man can be ruled out for this man's fatethe law reads that the decision of these people to end an administrator's certificate can be accepted, in spite of the fact that two or four courts considered the matter, he may lose the certificate but may also not lose Well, you can imaginethe situation that the man made that decision with a court with a court decision is done What's going on next to? The Association of certified bankruptcy Administrates Adjusted verdict, the decision that came into effect And may be presumedthe decisions, the decisions of the Court, this man may continue to work in my opinion, that is not right, and I call for the inclusion of an imperial rule: if there has been a case, then he loses the chance to work as an administratoror abstained in the previous vote, I call for this proposal to be supported, because it is still another and that, under no circumstances, if you vote' yes', the system will not have a clear legal effect: if they have been cancelled twice, then you will no longer be able to work for them".
2014_12_18_279-seq140 translatedText "Thank you, colleagues in Next, 2, and is also a proposal by Mr Andrei Judin that the Association of certified insolvency administrators in Latvia, when joining the preconditions laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 17 of the Insolvency Law, should be adopted - and so imperial! - decision onthe termination of the duration of the certificate, this decision should be made obligatory in the case where the administrator concerned has been twice lifted from his duties on Well, in a way, the proposal relates to the previous one, and the arguments were similar to which the Commission did not support the proposal".
2014_12_18_279-seq139 translatedText "On behalf of the Commission, there is nothing to add to Please call! We will vote in favour of Mr Andrei Judin's proposal! Please vote, please vote!: 10, against - 52, 23 proposals are not supported by 23.".
2014_12_18_279-seq136 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I submitted three proposals to the relevant legislative project and, in fact, all of them relate to Article 17 of the Act concerning the suspension, termination or withdrawal of the administrator certificate, but all the proposals are different, but are alsoa shared idea of the Proti, I think it is very important for administrators to work for people with standing reputations But we can't write it because the immediate question will be: what does it mean and how then tarnished the reputation of one or the other? I propose three separate solutions and the first question relates to this situation Proti, where a person has an appropriate administrative penalty - to take away certain positions in commercial companies Proti if he has done some serious infringement in his action andhe has an administrative conviction, he cannot deal with his actions as a person to entrust a person to the administration of insolvency proceedings? In my opinion, no, I would suggest that you will not be able to do so in this case. Working for insolvency administrators, We have identified a number of cases in which he is unable to work, for example if he committed the offence or if he himself has declared the insolvency proceedings of the natural person of insolvency, as well as other casesI heard from our invited experts: if we do not ban him from work as a administrator, he will be penalised double But not at all, because if someone committed the offence and if he has a penalty, it would have different consequences for Allunderstood, for example, that if a person has been prosecuted, he cannot work as a prosecutor, on a cordon, he cannot work as a teacher, he cannot be elected as President of the State, and so on, So One is causing a number of consequences for Unthis should be the case here, too, if someone has the appropriate penalty, that he cannot work with me, I must not hold certain positions in commercial companies, so I think that he should not be a Thank you for insolvency administrators".
2014_12_18_279-seq135 translatedText "Thank you very much for starting the debate in Devil Judas.".
2014_12_18_279-seq134 translatedText "Honourable President! Colleagues, I would like to remind you, with the Bill Insolvency Law, that the ultimate aim of this bill was to postpone the entry into force of the previously adopted law on 1 March next year and the Commission has received 8 proposals. 1 - MEP Andrei Judin's proposal that the administrator certificate is brought to an end in the event of an administrative sanction imposed on an administrative offence, the withdrawal of certain positions in commercial undertakings in the Commissionthere was a discussion on this proposal, the Commission expressed the view that the question is of proportionality, as in some 26 cases the Latvian Administrative Code provides for such a punishment for just one example: the ban on the employment of foreignersin the event of non-employment failure, such employment is apparently not related to Tika's opinion that the result of the termination and withdrawal of administrative infringements and of the specific penalty, namely the certificate ,there could be, for example, an administrator, for example, having committed an administrative infringement in the area of corruption or insolvency, but such proposals have not been submitted to the Commission in the Commission that the proposal was not supported by the Legal Office on these grounds too".
2014_12_18_279-seq133 translatedText "Thank you for the call, we will vote in favour of the bill' Amendment to the Amendment of the law on individual (family) business and farmer or fisherman' .- 2, abstentions - adopted by the next item on the next item: amendment of the Insolvency Law, Mr Gaidis, a second reading of the Legal Affairs Committee, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee".
2014_12_18_279-seq132 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, we are working on the bill " Amendment to the law on individual (family) business and farmer or fisherman " in the light of the fact thatthe bill is urgent and that no proposal has been made to this bill, I urge colleagues to vote in favour of the bill in the second, final, reading.".
2014_12_18_279-seq131 translatedText "Thank you for the call, we will vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Law on Taxation and Charges' (registration number 134 / Lp12) in 12 Saeima! Please voting regime, please see the result!: 12, against - 73 abstentions - 2bill 12 of the Saeima Bill will not continue before we move on to the next chapter on the agenda for the next chapters, we have to decide on the possible amendments to the agenda for today's sitting, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgets. Changes to the agenda for today's sitting, and the removal of the draft agenda for the second reading of the agenda for today's sitting, as opposed to MEPs, will not have to object to the agenda of the sitting. The draft law " Amendment " by the rapporteur on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety".
2014_12_18_279-seq130 translatedText "Dear colleague, the Committee on Budgets and the Financial (Taxation) have already examined all the package of legislation that was not completed in the previous Commons, and has made its decision on each of these draft laws regarding the draft legislation we have not tabledSaeima's proposal for the continuation of this process, Little from the Cabinet Office, we have not received any new additional information that would require a review of this decision, which is why I call on the Committee on Budgets and the Commission on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control to refrain from examining this bill in 12 of the Commons.".
2014_12_18_279-seq129 translatedText "The 27 March List of other proposals is not the deadline of 27 March - the next item on the " Amendment of the Law on Taxation and Charges " " (registration number 134 / Lp12 )the House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
2014_12_18_279-seq128 translatedText "Deadline for submission of proposals for second reading - 27 March 2015".

first
previous
next