Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }

• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 speaker Juris_Vilums-1982.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 translatedText "The highly respected President of the Parliament, Mr Minister, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, first of all, it should be noted that last Thursday, when we looked at the report on national security, the speaker was far less inclined to see that events outside of us have been visible over the last two years. The country's borders are able to directly influence the country's violent agenda as Russia's violent sovereign Ukrainian border shift has brought serious attention to the strengthening of its security structures and the consolidation of a relatively divided society, while the massive loss of populations in the Mediterranean brings with it some concernwe would like to expect two things from the foreign service to expect to see two things in this very positive way in the circumstances of the open Europe, in such a way: firstly, a much more proactive attitude on these matters and, secondly, a much more proactive explanation of the current situation and of Latvia's position on our own. The public would like to see weekly (or at least monthly) explanations from our embassy in Kiev about what's going on in the country, on the situation in eastern Ukraine and the Tie in Crimea would be non-exhaustive with the comments of Latvian and other European Union countries on their position and its changes. The Foreign Ministry website has already shown a good start, only to realise that the weeks back-to-date information in our times is no longer taken seriously, where there is still a number of months of enormous work still to be done onthe clarification of the content and substance of EU sanctions imposed on Russia by the whole of Mani is unaforested by the uncertainty of the Russian people about the real reasons for the sanctions, the uncertainty about the purpose of sanctions and their methodology, but if I have to listen to the questions of the border residents about the reasons why the government of Latvia is heard. Agrees with a ban on the sale of foodstuffs and medicines by the European Union to the Russian people and, with our interpretative work, there is indeed something of a mess about refugees in southern Europe and Central Europe, which seems to be even more of a mess, even more so ,that formal information is lacking, the information is incoherent and unable to give the real-time answers It all forms the ideal ground for rumours, half-truths and the boundaries of the shamanery of balansore horror stories, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on the use of information on social media, often on social media, often on thethe heavily questionable content of the internet leaves the Among other, one of them to freely advertise the rear of taxi's rear We are often seen on social media for often seeing stories of refugee violence, but at the same time we have the samewe have to answer most recently in public media the statistics that each third UK woman has suffered a domestic violence charge ?( as in many other European Union countries), the main task of diplomacy is to fight for lower " refugee quotas " figures, rather than asking completely legitimate questions about why poor people are allowed to sit in life-threatening bathing water in one war-free country, for examplein Turkey, to then go to another war-free country, such as Greece, so as to cross another official border of one or two other European countries, a public debate on the ability of our own immediate neighbours to protect its borders - Te mark Estonian border guardsthe case of the abductions, and just from Finland's next information, that refugees in the Russian Federation are involved in the special services of our diplomats and the media with several hundreds of so-called Western refugee refugees, across our eastern border, during the annual financial yearthe journey is being transferred to at least the half-hearted illegal immigrant neither from the Foreign Office nor any of the government as a whole to follow any notable actions, at least the wider public does not feel the caricature of Mr Nupat's card has been obtained by Mr Schmidt's card andpainted by a number of natural trails of â Teli, the Slam nature trail and, of course, the eastern half of the Vietnamese nature trail And yet another theme about which UK foreign affairs seems more likely to speak more often than Home or national security. To give you a drop, but (interjection from the floor) wrong, Mr Kaimir, this is an area to which I wanted to draw attention to this: it is Latgale, although the Constitution stipulates that in international treaties Latvia is made up of Kurzeme, Vidland, Zemgaleand Latgale, indeed before the 1918 official meeting of the theatre and the joint photo, many important actions were organised in the regions whose centenary will very soon be marked just as the National proclamation of Culture, in cooperation with the municipal and non-governmental organisation of Latgales. Representatives of the working groups set up together, discussed ideas, looked for ideas, set up a summary not only for the 2018 but also in the 2017 Tika measures including joint funding estimates, in addition to the municipal and national fund programmes ,less than 168 000 euros When it looked at this estimate among the elected members of Latgales, someone indulged to say that it looks too humble for such an important anniversary in terms of the news that the Ministry of Finance also deems too much of an amount, andnot planning to support the Centenary of the Congress of Latgales Has Latgalese will have the support to call off a gas importer or perhaps a wealthy Revenue Service agent? Imitating action in this direction, â this is indeed an important issue for both national security and, I will say, the issue of international relations In cross-border cooperation, there have been certain successful cooperation projects in the field of tourism, culture and sport, which are genuinely very administrative in the regions of Latvia. It could help the government to build closer links between the Baltic States and to create an economically favourable environment for the border area, where the population of both councils and these 25 years of independence have suffered a disastrous decline precisely because of a lack of national responsibility. Residents living in the border area should be the best guards of the Vuss that could best, fastest, be the most effective whistle to report to an unknown person who keeps trying to neak up a man with it all - and the development and security of each Member State is based on the Man Manand related regional policy - If we already have such a broad debate on national security in the Commons, on foreign affairs, I think it would be really valuable to have some high-quality negotiations on regional policy in the context of Latvia, the Baltic and the whole European Union.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q822919.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q211.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q4294791.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q2660080.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q191.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q193089.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q458.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q33.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q39731.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q159.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q8436.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q4459436.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q15628977.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q212.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q1419663.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q41.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q43.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq63 mentions Q1899.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 type Speech.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 number "62".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 date "2016-01-26".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 isPartOf 2016_01_26_340.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 spokenAs 118.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 spokenText "Vārds deputātam Jurim Viļumam.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 language "lv".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 translatedText "Name of MEP Jurim Vilnius".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq62 mentions Q13585891.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 type Speech.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 number "61".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 date "2016-01-26".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 isPartOf 2016_01_26_340.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 spokenAs 92.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 spokenText "Labdien, kolēģi! Man jums ir jautājums. Vai jums, tiem, kuri klausās šīs debates, brīžiem nerodas sajūta, it kā jūs būtu bērnudārza laikos atgriezušies? Bērnudārzā bija tāpat – tur bērni savā starpā lielījās katrs ar to, kuram kāds tētis, ko viņš spēj izdarīt. Un gandrīz nemaz netiek runāts par to, kas ir mūsu pašu spēkos, par to, ko paši esam paveikuši. Vēl vairāk! Nav nekādas analīzes par šo veikumu. Es saprotu, ka tas ir kaut kādā ziņā saprotams, jo ir pamatoti jautāt, vai mums vispār ir sava ārpolitika un vai vispār ir mums kādas iespējas īstenot šo ārpolitiku, jo lielā mērā mūsu ārpolitiku nosaka Eiropas Savienības ietvars un mūsu stratēģiskie partneri. Latvijas gadījumā tas varētu būt arī kā liels, pozitīvs pluss, jo Latvijas politikā vismaz ir viena joma, kurā ir kaut kāda skaidrība un paredzamība. Protams, mēs varam sevi par to lielīt visu laiku un sist sev uz pleca, taču šeit slēpjas nozīmīgi riski un arī apdraudējumi mums pašiem, jo esam kā tāda dēle, kura ir piesūkusies pie okeāna lainera sāniem un visu laiku priecājas un slavina sevi par to: “Cik mēs esam vareni, šķeļam okeāna viļņus, sasniedzam pašus tālākos, pašus globālākos mērķus!” Mēs sākam aizmirst par to, kāda ir mūsu pašu reālā varēšana, un šeit ir tie riski. Es absolūti nesaku to, ka šī izvēle izmantot kādu kuģi, kādu laineri, ir nepareiza. Nebūt ne! Tas ir arī politiski stratēģiski un pareizi mūsu gadījumā, jo tādā veidā mēs tik tiešām varam sasniegt kaut ko, bet ir svarīgi arī paralēli apzināties savu varēšanu un strādāt pie tās, jo pretējā gadījumā var izrādīties, ka tanī brīdī, kad laineris pēkšņi ir apstājies vai sāk iet ne tanī virzienā, mēs varam tikai bezspējīgi kūļāties un slīkt savā bezspēcībā, kā to uzskatāmi parādīja bēgļu krīze. Kolēģi! Tas bija pats uzskatāmākais piemērs tam, cik mēs esam varoši savā ārpolitikā. Tanī brīdī, kad laineris pēkšņi apstājās, mēs vispār nesapratām, ko mums darīt, pusgadu nespējām atbildēt uz elementāru jautājumu, cik mums būs bēgļu un ko mēs ar viņiem darīsim. Joprojām nav šīs atbildes! Un tagad, kā mēs redzam, šī bēgļu krīze dod mums divējādu mācību. Otra mācība, ko mēs neesam sapratuši. Tanī brīdī, kad tas laineris uzņēma virzienu, mēs pēkšņi ieraudzījām, ka tas virzās ne tanī virzienā. Mēs sapratām, kāpēc tāda politika, kāpēc tas ir nepieciešams Vācijai. Vācija tādā veidā risina savas darbaspēka problēmas. Ko izdarīja mūsu bāleliņi? Viņi vienkārši automātiski nokopē šo risinājumu, saka: “Okey, mēs arī! Mūsu integrācija būs balstīta uz to, ka mēs šeit piedāvāsim viņiem darbu.” Kolēģi! Man jums jājautā: kādā pasakā jūs dzīvojat?! Tie ir cilvēki, kuri maksājuši tūkstošus, lai ierastos šeit, Eiropā, un kuriem, iespējams, visi radinieki ir vākuši šo naudu, lai viņi šeit varētu ierasties un lai viņi varētu šeit tiešām atrast labu vietu, veidot labklājību savai ģimenei vai, iespējams, visai savai dzimtai. Un šādiem cilvēkiem mēs piedāvājam: “Brauciet uz Latviju! Tur, Latvijas laukos, jūs varēsiet strādāt kādā fermā par pārsimts eiro.” Kā jūs domājat – tāda integrācija strādās? Tā ir fundamentāli kļūdaina. Vienkārši fundamentāli kļūdaina! Un tā būs ar nopietnām sekām. Tā ka tāpēc, kolēģi, ir tik ļoti svarīgi, lai mēs mācētu pievienoties pie šī lainera. Bet ir svarīgi, ka mēs domājam arī par savu varēšanu. Un, ja jau mēs runājam par to, ka mums tomēr ir sava ārpolitika, ir sava ārpolitiskā varēšana, tad šeit vajadzētu konkrēti runāt par konkrētām lietām, kuras neviens cits, izņemot mūs pašus, nespēj risināt... vai nu nespēj, vai nav gatavs risināt mūsu vietā. Piemēram, jautājums par dzelzceļa sliedēm uz Reņģi, kuras lietuvieši ir nojaukuši, lai tranzīts neietu cauri. Lūk, reāls ārpolitisks jautājums, kurš mums ar savu ārpolitiku būtu jārisina! Tā pati jūras... (Dep. V.Spolītis: “Tas tiek risināts, pateicoties Eiropas Savienībai!”) Tas tiek gadiem un gadiem risināts. Tāpat arī jautājums par jūras robežu ar lietuviešiem; tur mums ir strīdi par iespējamiem naftas laukiem. Kur ir risinājums? Labi, atskatīsimies uz pavisam neseno Eiropas prezidentūru. Mēs ļoti lielāmies ar to, stāstām, kādi mēs bijām malači. Kolēģi! Bet kur ir kaut viens konkrēts projekts, ko mēs paši priekš sevis, izmantojot šo prezidentūru, esam virzījuši un īstenojuši? Viss, ar ko mēs varam lielīties, – ar to, cik ērti mēs esam pakalpojuši, cik centīgi mēs visiem esam pakalpojuši, kādi mēs esam malači. Tāda sulaiņu domāšana vienkārši. Vai tiešām tas ir viss, ko mēs spējam ārpolitikā, – vienkārši kādam pakalpot? Tas arī nav slikti, bet, manuprāt, vajadzētu domāt arī par savu interešu īstenošanu. Vēl viens konkrēts aktuāls, es domāju, piemērs par to, kur ārpolitikā mums būtu jāspēlē liela loma, ja mēs saprotam to, ka mūsu valsts pastāvēšana, mūsu tautas labklājība ir lielā mērā ļoti atkarīga no tā, kā mēs integrēsimies globālajos procesos. Mums ļoti patīk runāt par to, kā mēs būsim Jaunā Zīda ceļa sastāvdaļa, kā nāks tranzīts no Ķīnas un ies uz Rietumiem. Bet ko mēs esam reāli izdarījuši, lai tā būtu? Ja mēs to salīdzinām kaut vai ar tiem pašiem lietuviešiem, kuri reāli tiešām strādā, kuriem jau ir reāls loģistikas centrs, kurā ķīnieši piedalās? Viņiem ir sadarbība ar kazahiem, un viņi ar Baltkrieviju par visu ir vienojušies. Un kāda ir mūsu ārpolitika? Tātad mēs sapņojam, ka šis tranzīts notiks. Bet ko mēs sakām kaut vai tiem pašiem kazahiem, kuri aicina mūs piedalīties pie viņiem notiekošajā EXPO. Mēs viņiem sakām: “Ziniet, bet mēs pie jums nebrauksim!” Kā jūs domājat, kā pēc tam mēs kaut ko ar kazahiem varēsim sarunāt? Kā viņi uz mums skatīsies? Vai tiešām mēs būsim viņu vēlmju sarakstā kaut kur topā? Es spēcīgi to apšaubu. Runājot par mācībām, ko mums vajadzētu gūt no bēgļiem. Tātad mums ir jārēķinās ar to, ka var būt situācijas, kad šis laineris tomēr aiziet ne tajā virzienā vai kaut kas ar to notiek, un mums jābūt tam gataviem. Tātad no bēgļu mācības mums vajadzētu izdarīt secinājumu arī par pārējiem riskiem. Kas ar to saistīts? Tas, ko mēs redzam, ir ļoti nopietni draudi un riski, uz kuriem pamatoti tika norādīts un kuri ir saistīti ar Eiropas Savienības integritāti. Es domāju, mēs visi ļoti ceram, ka šie riski neiestāsies. Taču gadījumā, ja tie iestājas, lai mums nesanāk atkal, kā bija bēgļu krīzē... Vai mums jau nevajadzētu sākt preventīvi par to domāt? Kāda ir mūsu stratēģija, kādi ir mūsu risinājumi šiem jautājumiem? Un, iespējams, varbūt jau jāsāk meklēt kaut kādi mūsu domubiedri, lai neiznāktu tā, ka atkal būs kādi citi, kas veido politiku, kurai mēs pēc tam skriesim nopakaļus un mēģināsim stāstīt, ka tā nevajag darīt, ka, redziet, mums tā būs slikti. Jo, kā māca kādas tautas gudrība, kuru dzīvē mums var nākties drīz ielāgot: uz Allāhu paļaujies, bet savu kamieli piesien. Tā arī mums vajadzētu rīkoties. Tālāk. Es pieņemu... Labi, es saprotu tīri cilvēcīgi, ka darīt konkrētas lietas ir daudz grūtāk nekā runāt par kaut kādām globālām lietām. Es varu piedāvāt vienu praktisku priekšlikumu, kas ir aktuāls arī globālā līmenī visam lainerim... nē, visam lainerim. Pamatoti tiek runāts par to, ka viens no lielākajiem draudiem ir globālais terorisms. Šodien pat jūs varat lasīt ziņu portālos – Daesh ir paziņojis, ka tas ir gatavs globāla mēroga teroraktiem Eiropā. Es ļoti ceru, ka tas nebūs saistīts ar kaut kādu jaunu masu ieroču tehnoloģiju iegūšanu un tie pareģojumi, ko mēs dzirdam, kas ar Eiropu var notikt, nepiepildīsies. Taču, ja mēs paralēli ņemam vērā to, ka savulaik Amerikas Savienotās Valstis bija uzsākušas palīdzības programmu Austrumeiropai pēc “dzelzs priekškara” sabrukšanas, proti, palīdzēja finansēt zinātniekus, kuri nodarbojas ar militārajām tehnoloģijām, lai viņi nenonāktu globālā terorisma apritē, tad jāņem vērā, ka pašlaik ASV šo programmu ir pārtraukušas. Līdz ar to, ministra kungs, iespējams, ka tā varētu būt Latvijas iniciatīva, kuru mēs varētu iniciēt un aicināt partnerus Eiropā apspriest to, ka varbūt ir vērts Eiropai pārņemt šo programmu. Un, ja mēs redzam šos riskus, kuri reāli var pastāvēt, ja mēs paskatāmies, kas notiek mūsu austrumos, – šīs globālās situācijas dēļ, sankciju dēļ, konfliktu dēļ reāli pastāv tāds risks. Un mēs zinām, ka ekonomiskā un politiskā situācija tur būs sarežģīta, mēs zinām, ko dara politiķi ekonomiski sarežģītās situācijās: pirmais, kam viņi nogriež naudu, tie ir zinātnieki. Līdz ar to šeit var rasties nopietni apdraudējumi, nopietni riski, ka šādi zinātnieki var nonākt kara apritē pie globālā terorisma, kas spēs viņiem izteikt piedāvājumu, no kura viņi nespēs atteikties. Man būtu aicinājums par to padomāt: tie ir nopietni riski. Nobeigumā varbūt vēl viens tāds svarīgs aspekts. Mēs zinām, ka tuvojas noslēgumam (nu, vai vismaz zinām, ka kaut kad tās noslēgsies) Transatlantiskās tirdzniecības un investīciju partnerības līguma sarunas ar Amerikas Savienotajām Valstīm. Es domāju, visām mūsu nākošajām paaudzēm būtu ļoti svarīgi runāt par to, kā tad būs ar šo ģenētiski modificēto organismu apriti. Indikācijas liecina, ka tā sākotnējā brašā apņēmība, kas ir bijusi Eiropai, pamazām tiek salauzta. Iespējams, šeit arī mums vajadzētu nest savu artavu, iniciēt to un preventīvi gatavoties tam. Un, iespējams, šo situāciju mēs vēl varam glābt. Nobeigumā es vēlētos novēlēt mums visiem, lai miers virs zemes un cilvēkiem labs prāts. (Starpsauciens: “Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!”) Paldies. (Aplausi.)".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 language "lv".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 speaker Ivars_Zarins-1969.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 translatedText "Hello, colleague, I have a question for you, for you, for those who are listening to this debate, sometimes as if you had returned to kindergarten times, while the nursery school was boasting each other with what one boasts, what airwaves he had with what he isthe ability to do a draw And there's barely any talk about what is at our best, about what Another ourselves have done for more! There is no analysis of this performance I realise that it is, to some extent, understandable, because it is justifiedask whether we have a foreign policy at all and whether there is any possibility whatsoever for us to implement this foreign policy, because to a large extent our foreign policy is governed by the European Union and our strategic partners in the case of Latvia, that could also be a big, positive plus ,because Latvia's policy at least has one area where there is some clarity and predictability of course, we can lean on it all the time and beat ourselves on the shoulder, but there are important risks and also the dangers of ourselves as we areas a son of a neighborhood who is drunk at the ocean, the lainera sideways and all the time is happy and glorifying yourself: " as far as we are formidable, divide the ocean, reach the very least, achieve the same global goals! The real variant, and here are the risks, I absolutely do not say the fact that this option of using a ship, a liner, is not wrong, it is also politically strategic and rightly so, because we can really do so in this way. To achieve something, but it is also important to be aware of their variance and to work on it, because otherwise, it may turn out to be a moment of tanning that, suddenly, the lainer has stalled or takes no direction, we can only have a foothless cake andcreaking in its helplessness, as highlighted by the refugee crisis Fellow, this was the most obvious example of how strongly we have been in our foreign policy at a time when the liner suddenly stopped, we were not fully aware of what we were doing, half a year ago, in answering a basic question ,as far as we are going to have the refugees and what we are going to do with them I don't have this answer! And now, as we are seeing, this refugee crisis gives us a dual lesson that we have not realised at the time when this liner took the direction we have been in. Suddenly, we saw that it was moving neither way in the direction of We realised why a policy of why it is necessary for Germany's Germany to in this way tackles its labour problems, Ko did, saying,' Oh, we too! The integration will be based on the fact that we will offer them work here,' Collei, I have to ask you: in a fairy tale you live?! - people who have paid thousands to arrive here in Europe, and which, perhaps, all relatives have collected this money forthey might come here and so that they can really find a good place here, build prosperity for their family or, possibly, for the whole of my own birth And such people we offer:' go to Latvia! There, you can work on a farm on the pitch! The euro, " What do you intend to think of such inclusion will work? It is fundamentally flawed, fundamentally flawed! And it will be with serious consequences, that is why, colleagues, it is so important that we teach us to join this lainer But it's important ,that we are also thinking of our own power and, if we are talking about the fact that we still have our own foreign policy, there is a foreign policy, then there should be specific mention here of certain things that no one else, other than the rest of us, is able to deal witheither unable, or not prepared to address our place, the question of the site on the railway track to the Redgers, which Lithuanians have broken down, so that transit would not be done through the Lima, a real foreign question, which we should deal with with its own foreign policy !( DEP V SPolician:' this is addressed through the European Union!') This is the case for years and years and the issue of the maritime border with Lithuanians is also being disputed; there is a dispute over possible oil fields, if there is a solution? The recent European Presidency, we very much boast about what we were a guinea Fellow, but where is the one concrete project that we ourselves have been promoting and pursued by this Presidency, and everything we can carve out, âwith just how comfortable we've been, how diligently we all have been hated by what we've had in the malasei Tskin sulaks thinking simply Can't that be all we can in foreign policy, â simple to some, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, but not bad, but, in my opinion, not bad, butit should also be thought that the exercise of my own interest, Another concrete, is, I think, an example of where we should play a role in foreign policy, if we understand that our country's existence, the prosperity of our nation is very much dependent onthe way we integrate global processes We love to talk about how we'll be part of the New Silk Road as part of the transit of China and will go to the West But what have we actually done so it should? Compare the same Lithuanians, who are actually working really, who already have a real logistical centre in which the Chinese are taking part? They have cooperation with the Kazakhs and they have agreed on everything about our foreign policy? Dream that this transit will take place in But what we say to those same cats who are calling us to take part in the EXPO We are going to tell them: " you know, but we don't want you! " With the Kazakhs we can talk? How are they going to watch us? Or are we really going to be on their wish list somewhere wealthier? To be in a situation where this liner does not, however, leave it or something about it, and we should be prepared for this from the training of refugees we should also draw a conclusion on the other risks, What with it? We are seeing, there is a very serious threat and the risks to which the integrity of the European Union was rightly pointed out and which are linked to the integrity of the European Union, I think we all very much hope that these risks will not come if they insist that we do not meet again ,it was in the refugee crisis that we should not start thinking about it? What is our strategy, what are our solutions to these issues? And perhaps already start looking at some of our collaborators so that it will not happen againwhat others are making up the policy to which we are then running to die and tell us that it does not need to do that, you see it, we will have a bad Jo, as the wisdom of a nation that we may need soon: the confidence of Allah ,but its kamieli drops It, too - we should take action in the same way I accept Labi, I understand purely human, that doing certain things is much more difficult than to speak about some kind of global act that I can offer one practical proposalthere's also a global level for the whole lainer no, the whole lainer is rightly talked about by the fact that one of the greatest threats is the global terrorism Today even you can read the news in porn News it's declared readyI very much hope, on a global scale, for Europe's terrorist attacks, that it is not going to be linked to some new mass of mass weapons technology and those of those who we hear of, which can happen in Europe, you will not be able to take it back to the fact that, at the time, we take into account that timethe United States had launched an aid programme for Eastern Europe following the collapse of the Iron Curtain, which helped to fund military scientists dealing with military technology in order to prevent them from circulating in the global terror chain, it should be taken into account that the United States is currently suspending the programme withthis may perhaps be the Latvian initiative, which we could launch and call on the partners in Europe to discuss the fact that it is perhaps worthwhile for Europe to take on this programme and if we can see these risks that can actually exist if we arewe look at what is happening in our east, as a result of this global situation, because of sanctions, of conflicts, that there is a real risk that we know that the economic and political situation will be difficult, we know what politicians are doing in economically difficult situations: first ,by whom they are cutting money, they are scientists so there can be serious risks here, with serious risks that such scientists may end up in war chain at global terrorism, which they will be able to make an offer from which they will not be able to refuse Ita call to think about this: there are serious risks to Noalingh perhaps another important point that we know is coming to a close (well, or at least know that at some point they will close) the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement negotiations with the United Statescountries I think all of our future generations can talk about how this genetically modified organisms' circulation indicator shows that its initial bravery commitment, which has been knocked out of Europe, is gradually being fractured, here toowe should bear our fair share of this and pre-emptively prepare for this and perhaps we can still save this situation in Noah, I would like to wish all of us to peace above the ground and to give people a good brain (" Merry Christmas! ").".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q211.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q193089.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q458.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q1020384.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q148.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q8436.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q12378391.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q183.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q184.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q30.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq61 mentions Q27237459.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 type Speech.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 number "60".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 date "2016-01-26".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 isPartOf 2016_01_26_340.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 spokenAs 118.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 spokenText "Paldies. Vārds deputātam Ivaram Zariņam.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 language "lv".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 translatedText "Thank you to the MEP, Ivar Zarneam".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq60 mentions Q11714346.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 type Speech.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 number "59".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 date "2016-01-26".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 isPartOf 2016_01_26_340.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 spokenAs 150.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 spokenText "Ļoti cienītā Saeimas priekšsēdētāja! Augsti godātais Saeimas Prezidij! Ārlietu ministra kungs! Kolēģi! Šodien apspriežamajā ārpolitikas ziņojumā puslappusīte ir veltīta Latvijas ārpolitikas darbībām Baltijas jūras reģionā. Atzīmējot, ka 2016.gadā Latvija ir vadošā vai prezidējošā valsts vairākās šī reģiona organizācijās – Baltijas Ministru padomē, NB8, Baltijas Asamblejā –, no savas puses vēlos vēl papildināt, ka kopš 2015.gada septembra Latvija uz gadu ir prezidējošā valsts arī Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē. Tā kā man ir uzticēta atbildība šobrīd vadīt divas no šīm starpparlamentārajām organizācijām – Baltijas Asambleju un Baltijas jūras parlamentāro konferenci –, vēlos šodien nedaudz pieskarties abu šo organizāciju darba aktualitātēm un Latvijas izvirzītajām prioritātēm šajās organizācijās. Jāatzīmē, ka abām organizācijām šis ir 25.jubilejas gads. Vispirms par Baltijas Asambleju. Uzņemoties vadību šajā organizācijā, Latvijas delegācija Baltijas Asamblejā ir izvirzījusi trīs sava darba prioritātes: pirmkārt, Baltijas reģiona drošības stiprināšana, stratēģiskā komunikācija un kiberdrošība; otrkārt, sadarbība augstākās izglītības, zinātnes un kultūras jomās; treškārt, kopīgas uzņēmējdarbības vides Baltijas valstīs veicināšana un stiprināšana. Kā jūs zināt, Baltijas Asamblejas galvenā darbības forma ir darbs izveidotajās Baltijas Asamblejas komisijās, to darba rezultātus rezumējot Baltijas Asamblejas darba noslēguma sesijā, kas šogad notiks 27. un 28.oktobrī Rīgā. Līdz ar to tas, cik sekmīgs būs mūsu veikums Latvijas interesēs, būs atkarīgs ne tikai no tā, cik aktīvs un prasmīgs būs mūsu deputātu darbs šajās komisijās, bet arī no tā, kāda būs mūsu prasme sadarboties ar pārējo Baltijas valstu valdībām un ministriju pārstāvjiem, īstenojot sadarbību starp Baltijas Asambleju un Baltijas Ministru padomi. Līdzšinējā sadarbībā ir gājis visādi, ir bijis gan gandarījums, gan vilšanās. Šeit mēs varam atcerēties gan kopīgos iepirkumus medicīnas vajadzībām, gan darbu pie Rail Baltica projekta; ir bijuši gan tādi brīži, kad darbs ir virzījies uz priekšu, gan ir bijusi tiešām stagnējoša darbība, stagnējoša situācija. Nedrīkst nepieminēt Baltijas Asamblejas sadarbību ar citām starpparlamentu institūcijām – Ziemeļu Padomi, Beniluksa parlamentu, GUAM valstu parlamentāro asambleju, Višegradas valstu starpparlamentāro organizāciju, kā arī sadarbību ar Barenca jūras valstu parlamentāro asambleju un Melnās jūras valstu ekonomiskās sadarbības parlamentāro asambleju. Katrs no šiem divpusējās sadarbības formātiem starpparlamentu asamblejām ir devis iespēju labāk izprast tās dažādā veida problēmas, kuras skar dažādus Eiropas reģionus, un līdz arī to arī veidot izsvērtākas savstarpējās attiecības ar attiecīgajām valstīm un to parlamentiem. Mums, parlamentāriešiem, tā ir bijusi laba skola, iespēja paskatīties uz jaunām, aktuālām savstarpējās sadarbības sfērām. Piemēram, aizvadītajā gadā Beniluksa parlamentā bija diskusijas par kopējas triju valstu mobilo sakaru telpas veidošanu. Bija diskusijas par izglītības dokumentu bezierunu atzīšanu trijās valstīs kopumā bez papildu pielīdzināšanas darbībām. Tās ir jomas, kurās Beniluksa valstis darbojas, apsteidzot Eiropas Savienības kopīgās iniciatīvas, un par šādām lietām droši vien der padomāt arī mums, Baltijas jūras reģiona valstīm, it sevišķi trim Baltijas valstīm. Protams, pēdējā gada laikā sevišķu akcentu Baltijas Asamblejas darbībā ir ieņēmis sadarbības jautājums ar Ukrainas parlamentu. Gan tāpēc, ka Ukraina 2015.gadā bija prezidējošā valsts GUAM parlamentārajā asamblejā, gan vēl jo vairāk situācijas attīstības dēļ pašā Ukrainā. Šādas aktivitātes galvenais uzdevums ir bijis, izmantojot savus sadarbības formātus ar Ziemeļu Padomi, ar Beniluksa parlamentu un arī ar Eiropas Parlamentu, nodrošināt tiešas, nepastarpinātas tikšanās un dialoga iespējas starp GUAM valstu, jo sevišķi Ukrainas un Gruzijas, parlamentu pārstāvjiem un Rietumvalstu un Ziemeļvalstu parlamentāriešiem, tā dodot viņiem pieeju nepastarpinātai informācijai par situācijas attīstību šajās Austrumu partnerības valstīs. Otrs karstais jautājums šo citu starpparlamentu organizāciju diskusijās aizvadītā gada laikā, protams, ir bijis bēgļu jautājums. Regulāri piedaloties citu reģionu parlamentāro asambleju darbā, mums, Baltijas Asamblejas pārstāvjiem, ir bijusi iespēja vērot arī valdību un parlament��riešu viedokļu transformāciju atbilstošajās valstīs. No izteikti bēgļu uzņemšanu atbalstošas attieksmes līdz izteikti piesardzīgai vai pat klaji noliedzošai attieksmei. Vēl vēlos teikt dažus vārdus par Latvijas prezidentūru Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē, kas ilgst 12 mēnešus, no kuriem gandrīz puse jau aizvadīta. Šajā formātā sadarbojas 11 nacionālo un 11 reģionālo parlamentu delegācijas, ietverot gan Baltijas valstu, gan Ziemeļvalstu, gan Polijas, Vācijas un arī Krievijas pārstāvjus. Protams, šādā plašā formātā, ņemot vērā dalībvalstu deleģēto pārstāvju politisko uzskatu dažādību, ir visai ierobežots to jomu spektrs, kurās ir iespējama produktīva sadarbība. Neskatoties uz to, tomēr Latvijas prezidentūrai Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē kā prioritāte ir izvirzīts jautājums, kas sekmīgi Pastāvīgajā komisijā tiek risināts, proti, lai apzinātu to, kā Baltijas jūras reģionā varētu risināt problēmas, kas saistītas ar piedāvātās izglītības un darba tirgus pieprasījuma atbilstību. Nevis kādā atsevišķā valstī, bet visā reģiona kopumā. Tas ir ļoti būtisks jautājums Latvijai, it sevišķi izglītota darbaspēka mobilitātes vai – Latvijas situācijā – aizbraukšanas no valsts kontekstā. Otra Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē Latvijas prezidentūras ietvaros uzsāktā prioritāte ir saistīta ar darba grupas izveidi un tās darba uzsākšanu visam Baltijas jūras reģionam vienotas ilgtspējīga tūrisma attīstības koncepcijas izstrādē, balstoties uz multinozaru pieeju. Vēl viena Baltijas jūras parlamentārās konferences aktivitāte, par kuras tālāku risinājumu minētās konferences Pastāvīgā padome lems jau šo ceturtdien sanāksmē, kas notiks Briselē, ir jautājums par novērotāja statusa piešķiršanu Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē Baltkrievijai, šo jautājumu saskaņojot ar Eiropas Savienības kopīgo pēdējā laikā attiecībā pret Baltkrieviju īstenoto politiku. Ar lūgumu piešķirt Baltkrievijai novērotāja statusu Baltijas jūras parlamentārajā konferencē ir vērsusies Baltkrievijas parlamenta Ārlietu komisija, tās priekšsēdētāja Busko kunga parakstītajā vēstulē uzsverot vēlmi sadarboties ar Baltijas jūras reģiona valstīm ekoloģijas, izglītības, veselības aizsardzības un enerģētikas jautājumos. Kolēģi! Mēģināju šajā man atvēlētajā laikā mazliet detalizētāk iezīmēt to, kas skar Latvijas sadarbību dažādos starpparlamentāros formātos Baltijas jūras reģionā un kas šodien apspriežamajā ārlietu politikas ziņojumā ir izklāstīts ļoti konspektīvi, bez detalizācijas. Savukārt, ārlietu ministra kungs, novēlu jums veiksmīgu darbu šajā gadā, koordinējot Baltijas Ministru padomes darbu, kā arī tajā veiksmīgi sadarbojoties ar Baltijas Asambleju. Paldies.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 language "lv".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 speaker Janis_Vucans-1956.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 translatedText "The highly respected President of the Saeima, the highly-elected President of the Parliament, Mr Piedij, colleague of the Foreign Minister, who was part of the foreign policy report today, is dedicated to Latvia's foreign policy actions in the Baltic Sea region by marking that Latvia is the leading or presiding country in a number of organisations in the region, âin the Baltic Council of Ministers, the NB8, in the Baltic Assembly, I would like to add to the Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference in the Baltic Sea, since September 2015, the Parliamentary Conference for the Baltic Sea as I are entrusted with responsibility at the moment by two of theseI would like, today, to touch briefly on the current challenges and priorities of the two organisations in these organisations, and that the two organisations have a 25-year anniversary in the first instance of the Baltic Assembly. By taking the lead in this organisation, the Latvian delegation has set three priorities for its work in the Baltic Assembly: firstly, strengthening the security of the Baltic region, strategic communication and cyber security; secondly, cooperation in the fields of higher education, science and culture; and, thirdly, the promotion of joint business environment in the Baltic States, andstrengthening the Baltic Assembly's main form of work, as you know, is to sum up the work created in the Baltic Assembly committees, to sum up the work of the Baltic Assembly in the closing session of the Baltic Assembly, which will take place this year on 27 and 28 October in Vancouverour track record in Latvia will depend not only on how active and skilled our Members will work in these commissions, but also on how our ability to cooperate with the other Baltic States' governments and ministerial representatives through cooperationthe Baltic Assembly and the Baltic Council of Ministers have gone through Past, there has been both the satisfaction and disappointment that we can remember both for the joint procurement of the medical needs and for work on the Rail Baltica project; there have been some moments wherethe work has moved forward and there has been a really stagnant activity, a stagnating situation, not to mention the cooperation of the Baltic Assembly with other inter-parliamentary institutions, â Northern Council, the Benelux Parliamentary Assembly, the Visegrad National Assembly, inter-Parliamentary interparliamentary organisations, and cooperation withthe parliamentary assemblies of the Barents Sea Parliamentary Assemblies and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the Black Sea countries from these bilateral interparliamentary assemblies have made it possible to better understand the different types of problem affecting the various regions of Europe and to theiralso, building a more balanced relationship with the countries concerned and their parliaments, We parliamentarians, it has been a good school, an opportunity to look at new, topical cross-border cooperation between the three countries, last year, the Benelux Parliament had discussions on a common mobile network of three countriesthe creation of an area for the discussion on the unconditional recognition of educational documents in three countries as a whole without additional equalisation activities in the Republic are areas where the Benelux countries operate, ahead of joint initiatives by the European Union, and on such things too, to think of us in the Baltic Sea. The Baltic States, and in particular the three Baltic States in particular, have taken up a cooperation issue with the Ukrainian Parliament Gan because, in 2015, Ukraine held the presidency of GUAM in the parliamentary assembly, as well asas a result of more developments itself, the main task of the activity in Ukraine itself has been through its cooperation formats with the Nordic Council, with the Benelux Parliament and also with the European Parliament, to provide direct, direct, direct meetings and dialogue between the countries of GUAM, in particularUkraine and Georgia, the parliaments of parliaments and Western and Nordic countries, making them approach directly to information on the developments in these Eastern Partnership countries in the Second List issue during the year, of course, has, of course, been the issue of refugees. With the regular participation of the parliamentary assemblies of other regions, we, as representatives of the Baltic Assembly, have also had the opportunity to see the transformation of government and parliamentary opinions in the appropriate countries, from a very pro-refugee perspective to a very cautious, or even discerning, attitude. To say a few words about the Latvian Presidency of the Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference, which lasts for 12 months, nearly half of which already works in this format between 11 national and 11 regional parliamentary delegations, including both the Baltic States and the Polish, German and Germanand the Russian representatives, of course, in such a broad format, taking into account the diversity of the political views of the representatives of the Member States, are limited to the spectrum of areas where productive cooperation is possible, and however, the Latvian Presidency, in the context of the Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference, as a prioritya question has been raised that the Permanent Committee is successfully addressing the way in which the Baltic Sea region is able to address the adequacy of the demand for education and labour market demand in the case of Nevis in a particular country, but across the region as a wholethere is a crucial question for Latvia, especially in an enlightened labour mobility, or in the case of the Latvian situation, in the context of the second Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference on the other part of the parliamentary conference on the Baltic Sea, the priority of the Task Force and the opening of its work is crucial. The development of a coherent concept of sustainable tourism for the Baltic Sea Region, based on a multinozar approach, on the basis of which the Permanent Council of that Conference will decide, as early as this Thursday, at this Thursday's meeting in Brusselsas regards the granting of observer status to Belarus by the Parliamentary Conference on the Baltic Sea, in agreement with the European Union's joint last response to Belarus, the request to grant Belarus observer status in the Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference has been contacted by the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Commission of Belarus ,speaking in the letter signed by its President, Mr Busko, underlining the willingness to cooperate with the Baltic Sea countries in matters of ecology, education, health and energy, I tried in that time to outline in a little more detail what is going on in Latvia's cooperation in the different parliamentary formats. The Marine Region, which is being discussed today in the report on foreign policy that we are debating today, I wish you a good job this year, coordinating the work of the Baltic Council of Ministers and working successfully with the Baltic Assembly Thank you".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q822919.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q211.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q2660080.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q193089.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q458.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q8889.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q39731.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q159.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q212.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q183.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q36.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q184.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q230.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q9005.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q12360039.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q670356.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q13116.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q326816.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq59 mentions Q208019.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 type Speech.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 number "58".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 date "2016-01-26".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 isPartOf 2016_01_26_340.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 spokenAs 118.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 spokenText "Godātie kolēģi! Aicinu ieņemt vietas Sēžu zālē. Turpinām Saeimas ārkārtas sēdi. Darba kārtībā – “Ārlietu ministra ikgadējais ziņojums par paveikto un iecerēto darbību valsts ārpolitikā un Eiropas Savienības jautājumos”. Turpinām debates. Vārds deputātam Jānim Vucānam.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 language "lv".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 translatedText "The House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 mentions Q822919.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 mentions Q193089.
• 2016_01_26_340-seq58 mentions Q458.

• first
• previous
• next