Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_02_04_342-seq263 translatedText "Dear colleague, the first thing to say is that I would urge the parliamentary secretary to be correct, because the Commission proposal does not attempt to justify the declarations of those administrators who have not submitted declarations of Cash to 1 February Butthe Minister's proposal, in such a case, is an attempt to justify part of the insolvency administrators so that there should be some consistency to the Second, what I want to say to Redzat, we are dealing once again with the essence of the Cosmetic Cosmetics Problems, which was why officials were given the status of insolvency administrators ,- there were two main objectives: firstly, to step up monitoring cases and, secondly, to increase publicity for the work of insolvency administrators and the public's awareness of the effectiveness and adequacy of the remuneration received by all aswhat has now been proposed, and what is now the subject of a dispute, conflict, or with other methods and other methods, and one of the methods on which we have already talked, is to reinforce the role of the insolvency administration so that it can publish a reference on its website. Only about the progress of the insolvency proceedings, expenses, wages and so on, this whole problem does not take account of the responsibility of the law enforcement authorities who are encouraged to monitor and control these matters. Let us try to continue in any way in cosmetic surgery or to improve this case, and in substance, the Justice Minister's proposal does not address this matter, I would therefore urge the Minister for Justice to reject the proposal, despite the fact that the Commission has supported Thank you".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 number "262".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 spokenText "Paldies. Tātad 2.priekšlikums ir atsaukts. (Dep. S.Āboltiņa: “Vēl nav! Tikai tad, ja atbalstīs!”) Nē, vēl nav... Jūs teicāt... Paldies. Vārds deputātam Sergejam Dolgopolovam.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 translatedText "Thank you very much for the proposal: " not yet!!.....................".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 mentions Q435407.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq262 mentions Q2340280.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 number "261".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 spokenText "Ļoti cienījamā priekšsēdētājas kundze! Kolēģi! Es runāšu par abiem priekšlikumiem uzreiz. Vispirms jāsaka, ka šo otrdien komisijas sēdē Tieslietu ministrija jau faktiski bija sagatavojusi uzmetumu ar priekšlikumiem par to, ko nepieciešams grozīt, lai, tā teikt, ieviestu Satversmes tiesas spriedumu. Tā ka laika ziņā šeit vilcināšanai nevajadzētu būt. Tieši tāpēc es uzskatīju, ka gadu ilgs termiņš, lai atliktu šīs lietas ieviešanu, ir pārāk ilgs laiks. Jāsaka taisnības labad, ka komisijā mēs ar frakcijas kolēģiem palikām diezgan lielā mazākumā jautājumā par to, ka būtu ātrāk sperami šie soļi. Tomēr, skatoties uz iesniegtajiem priekšlikumiem, jāteic, ka juridiskā doma pa šīm dažām dienām nav stāvējusi uz vietas, tā ir attīstījusies. Un es uzskatu, ka... man pat bija bailes cerēt, ka mans priekšlikums varētu “iziet cauri”, kur nu vēl tik radikāls, kā iesniegusi Tieslietu ministrija... Tā ka es aicinu atbalstīt Tieslietu ministrijas priekšlikumu, kurš, manuprāt, ir labāks un stingrāks, un loģiskāks. Tā ka aicinu atbalstīt, un attiecīgi tad es savējo, ja šis tiks atbalstīts, atsaukšu. Paldies.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 speaker Vilnis_Kirsis-1980.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 translatedText "Madam President-in-Office of the Council. - (NL) Madam President, colleagues, I will speak on both proposals straight away to say that this Tuesday's commission at the Justice Ministry had actually prepared a draft proposal on what it is necessary to amend, so that ,so to say, introduce the Constitutional Court's verdict Since the timing of the delay here should not be true, so I considered that a long time ago to postpone this matter is too long to say justicein the interest of the Commission, with a group of colleagues we ended up in a rather large minority on the issue that it would be quicker for these steps to be taken, however, when you look at the proposals that have been tabled, legal thinking has to be made available on a legal basis for a few daysnot standing up to the site, it has evolved and I believe I even had to fear that my proposal would' go through', let alone as radical as the Ministry of Justiceso I call for support for the proposal of the Ministry of Justice, which is, in my opinion, better and more stringent, and more logical that I call for support and, as a consequence, I am theirs if it is supported, I will have to withdraw it.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq261 mentions Q2498135.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 number "260".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 spokenText "Paldies. Vārds deputātam Vilnim Ķirsim.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 translatedText "Thank you to the tide of a member of the tide of Cologne.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 mentions Q661684.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq260 mentions Q13460949.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 number "259".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 spokenAs 62.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 spokenText "Cienījamie kolēģi! Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisija sagatavoja šo priekšlikumu, lai izpildītu Satversmes tiesas spriedumu. Un šī likumprojekta anotācijā ir ierakstīti ļoti saprātīgi vārdi. Proti, tur ir rakstīts, ka līdz tam brīdim, kamēr Saeima grozīs nepieciešamos likumus, šis pārejas periods ir vajadzīgs. Un līdz ar to es saprotu, ka Saeima sev bija nospraudusi uzdevumu, ka līdz 1.janvārim ir iespējams šos likumus grozīt. Konkrētajā tieslietu ministra priekšlikumā ir divas lietas. Pirmā lieta. Šie pārejas noteikumi sašaurināti attiecināti tikai uz advokātiem, tāpēc ka Satversmes tiesas spriedumā runāts par advokātiem. Taču tieslietu ministrs, tā teikt, ratus ir nolicis priekšā zirgam un domā, ka tā vezums kustēsies uz priekšu, jo Satversmes tiesa nav pateikusi spriedumu pārējos gadījumos. Vai mums neiznāks tā, ka pēc mēneša vai diviem mēs atkal grozīsim pārejas noteikumus un attiecināsim uz pārējiem administratoriem? Otra lieta. Kā es saprotu un kā tikko Tieslietu ministrijas parlamentārais sekretārs pareizi teica, ir VID, KNAB un visas pārējās institūcijas, kas uzrauga tos administratorus. Lai tad šīs institūcijas normāli arī uzrauga un kontrolē, bet nevis mēs ar likuma grozījumu mēģinām padarīt to par personas amatam uzlikto... likumā uzlikto... noslēpumu aizsardzību kā pārkāpjamu lietu... Vēl viena lieta, kas šajā priekšlikumā ir. Ierakstīts 1.septembris. Cilvēki mīļie, saprotiet, ka tādā gadījumā Saeimai tiešām tos likumus būs jāpaspēj grozīt, lai amatpersona... lai advokāts amatpersonas deklarācijā nerakstītu to, kas visā pasaulē tiek uzskatīts kā advokāta noslēpums viņa sadarbībā ar klientu. Vai līdz septembrim tiešām mēs paspēsim izdarīt šos grozījumus? Es nezinu, ciktāl komisija ir gatava jau šādus grozījumus iesniegt. Tāpēc es domāju, ka saprātīgs bija komisijas priekšlikums - gan pietiekami ilgs laiks, gan arī var sagaidīt nākamo Satversmes tiesas spriedumu. Paldies.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 speaker Gunars_Kutris.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 translatedText "Dear colleagues, the Commission on Public Administration and Local Government prepared this proposal to enforce the judgment of the Constitutional Court and, under the constitution, has recorded very reasonable words in Proti, that until then, Saeima will amend the necessary laws, this transitional periodit is a necessity and I understand that, with that, I understand that Saeima had set itself the task of amending these laws until 1 January in the specific case of the Justice Minister, there are two items of the First Case These transitional rules have only been limited to solicitors ,because the Constitutional Court's ruling speaks to lawyers for the Minister for Justice, Mr Justice says, the cart has taken a bow to the horse and thinks its vezness will move forward, as the Constitutional Court has not said a verdict in other cases Does we not come afterone month or two, we will put a change to the transitional rules again and let us refer to the other administrators? The second thing, as I understand and as the Parliamentary Secretary of the Ministry of Justice rightly said, is the Revenue Service, the bureau and all the other institutions that monitor those clerks Sothese institutions are also normally monitored and controlled, but not by an amendment of the law that seeks to make it the protection of the law on a person's statutory secrets, as the one thing in the proposalentered in 1 September People dear, you understand that in that case, Saeimai would really have to amend them so that an official in the name of an unwritten declaration to an unwritten declaration by a solicitor in his dealings with the client Couldindeed, in September, we will be able to make these amendments? I do not know to what extent the Commission is prepared to submit such an amendment, so I think a sensible Commission proposal - both enough and can expect to see the verdict of the next Constitutional Court".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 mentions Q1021632.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq259 mentions Q2498135.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 number "258".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 spokenText "Paldies. Vārds deputātam Gunāram Kūtrim.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 translatedText "Thank you to Member Gunar Kidman".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq258 mentions Q16357338.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 number "257".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 spokenAs 100.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 spokenText "Labdien, cienītās deputātes! Godātie deputāti! Tieslietu ministra priekšlikums no likumprojekta sākotnējās redakcijas atšķiras ar vairākām lietām. Pirmām kārtām ar to, ka tas šo deklarācijas iesniegšanas pienākuma atlikšanu attiecina tikai uz advokātiem, kas vienlaikus ir arī maksātnespējas administratori. Tāpēc, ka Satversmes tiesas 21.decembra spriedums attiecas tikai uz šīm personām, respektīvi, advokātiem. Satversmes tiesā gan ir iesniegtas vēl vairākas lietas, taču šīs lietas ir iztiesāšanas stadijā, un par tām Satversmes tiesa vēl nav lēmusi. Līdz ar to Tieslietu ministrija uzskata: ja Satversmes tiesa nav apvienojusi šīs lietas, tas nozīmē, ka Satversmes tiesa faktiski jau ar savu rīcību ir izdalījusi šīs divas kategorijas. Respektīvi, administratori, kas ir advokāti, un administratori, kas nav advokāti. Un tās nepilnības, ko Satversmes tiesa ir konstatējusi esošajā likuma regulējumā, izriet tieši no advokātu īpašā statusa. Līdz ar to ir lietderīgi šo likumisko regulējumu pārskatīt tikai attiecībā uz advokātiem, nevis uz visiem maksātnespējas administratoriem, kuriem jau šobrīd likumā ir ļoti skaidri definēts pienākums iesniegt līdz 1.februārim amatpersonas deklarāciju. Un šāda atliekoša nosacījuma pieņemšanu attiecībā uz šo kategoriju varētu uzskatīt par mēģinājumu attaisnot tos maksātnespējas administratorus, kas nav advokāti un līdz 1.februārim nav iesnieguši amatpersonas deklarācijas, kā to no viņiem prasa likums. Interesanti arī, ka Satversmes tiesā par šo jautājumu ir saņemti pieci... ierosinātas kopumā piecas lietas. Tas liecina par to, ka, šo maksātnespējas administratoru ieskatā, amatpersonas statusa piešķiršana un deklarācijas iesniegšanas pienākums ļoti būtiski maina uzraudzības mehānismu un šis uzraudzības mehānisms tiek papildināts arī ar KNAB, VID un citu institūciju iesaistīšanu maksātnespējas administratoru uzraudzībā. Līdz ar to tieslietu ministrs piedāvā attiecībā uz advokātiem šo regulējumu - atbilstoši Satversmes tiesas spriedumā lemtajam - mainīt līdz 1.septembrim, bet attiecībā uz tiem, kas nav advokāti, atstāt spēkā regulējumu, kāds tas ir, ar visiem no tā izrietošajiem pienākumiem. Līdz ar to lūdzu atbalstīt tieslietu ministra priekšlikumu - atbilstoši komisijā lemtajam. Paldies.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 speaker Janis_Iesalnieks.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 translatedText "Well, honourable Members, honourable Members, the proposal from the Minister for Justice varies from the original version of the bill to a number of things, with the fact that it only extends this obligation to solicitors who are at the same time insolvency administrators ,the Constitutional Court's 21 December ruling only applies to those persons or, in other words, the Constitutional Court, both have been brought before the Constitutional Court, but these cases are in the form of a trial and the Constitutional Court has not yet ruled out with itthe Ministry of Justice believes that if the Constitutional Court does not bring together these things, it means that the Constitutional Court has in fact already, through its actions, been distributing these two categories to the administrators who have lawyers, and administrators who have no lawyers and weaknesses ,what the Constitutional Court has found in the regulation of the existing law is arising precisely from the special status of lawyers, it makes sense to review this legal framework only in the case of solicitors and not to all administrators of insolvency who already have a high level of insolvency law. A clearly defined obligation to submit an official declaration of up to 1 February on the declaration of such a decision on this category could be seen as an attempt to justify insolvency clerks other than lawyers and by 1 February no declarations of officials have been made, asit is also made by the law of them that the Constitutional Court on this issue has received five amendments in total five cases, as evidenced by the fact that, in the light of this insolvency administrator, the appointment of officials and the declaration of the declaration are madea very significant change to the mechanism of supervision and this monitoring mechanism is also accompanied by the involvement of the bureau, the Revenue Service and other institutions under the supervision of insolvency administrators, with the Justice Minister proposing this regulation - in accordance with the Constitutional Court's judgmentthe decision - to be modified by 1 September, but for those who have no lawyers - to maintain the regulation as it is, with all of the obligations arising from it, will be asked to support the proposal by the Minister for Justice - according to the Commission's Thank you".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 mentions Q1021632.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq257 mentions Q2498135.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 number "256".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 spokenText "Paldies. Uzsākam debates. Vārds Tieslietu ministrijas parlamentārajam sekretāram Jānim Iesalniekam.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 translatedText "Thank you for launching the debate in the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, Janim Sashsalger.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq256 mentions Q11731912.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 number "255".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 spokenAs 92.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 spokenText "Cienījamie kolēģi! Uz otro lasījumu ir saņemti divi priekšlikumi. Viens ir tieslietu ministra Rasnača priekšlikums, kurš paredz, ka zvērinātie maksātnespējas administratori tiek dalīti divās kategorijās un vienai kategorijai, proti, zvērinātiem advokātiem, nulles deklarācijas iesniegšanas termiņš ir pagarināts līdz šā gada 1.septembrim. Komisija, izskatot šo priekšlikumu, to ir atbalstījusi.".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 speaker Sergejs_Dolgopolovs-1941.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq255 translatedText "Dear colleague, there are two proposals for the second reading: a proposal by the Minister of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, which stipulates that the administrators of the jury are divided into two categories. And for one category, such as jury lawyers, the deadline for a zero declaration has been extended until 1 September of this year by the Commission, with the support of".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 type Speech.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 number "254".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 date "2016-02-04".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 isPartOf 2016_02_04_342.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 spokenText "Paldies. Priekšlikumi iesniedzami līdz šā gada 8.februārim, izskatīšana Saeimas sēdē - šā gada 11.februārī. Darba kārtībā - likumprojekts “Grozījums likumā “Par interešu konflikta novēršanu valsts amatpersonu darbībā””, otrais lasījums. Likumprojekts atzīts par steidzamu. Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisijas vārdā - deputāts Sergejs Dolgopolovs. Kolēģi, es aicinu koncentrēties darbam!".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 language "lv".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 translatedText "Thank you for submitting the proposal before 8 February of this year, the hearing of the Saeima meeting of 11 February this year on the agenda of the' Amendment of the law on the conflict of interest '. In the name of the Committee on Public Administration, Sergei Dolgopolov, a member of the Committee on Public Administration, said: " I am calling for the work of Sergei Dollioner to work. "".
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_02_04_342-seq254 mentions Q2340280.