Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 speaker Imants_Paradnieks-1968.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 translatedText "Good morning, Commissioner, colleagues, I urge you to listen to this bill's motivations, we, ten Members of Parliament, call on the Committee on Budgets and the Finance (Taxation) Commission in 2010 to enter into force on the' Amendment of the Immigration Law', which was proposed at the time by the ŠLESERA party and against these amendmentsthese amendments set out a new arrangement whereby a temporary residence permit for a period of five years may be granted to nationals of third countries who buy in a Member State's property to a certain extent or contribute to subordinated bank capital or establish a company and, initially, was not in any particular casethe criteria thus manifested in the existence of a fictitious company, Tika, established in order that, for a period of five years, the First Year of 1 July 2010 to 1 July 2011 was 1 July 2011, before the 1 July 2011 deadlinean active advertising campaign has been launched in Russia, and by 1 July 2011 they received 456 people for the next half-year, so in the first half of 2011, permits had already been received by 510 people in So Go twice over the previous year. Why do I tell the whole story? Because, in view of the rapid pace at which these third-world citizens, especially Russian citizens, received this temporary residence permit, we amended the law and set a completely different procedure for first September 2014. In particular, limit the specific volume of purchases of these immovable property to a threshold of 250 thousand thresholds, and - and this is particularly important - the creation of the Latvian Economic Development Fund, in which these temporary residence permits are paid to either 5 per cent of the propertythe values, or €25 000 if the subordinated debt is paid, or in the case of the creation of more than EUR 5 million in Latvia's Economic Development Fund, From Latvia's Economic Development Fund to the Latvian Economic Development Fund in this period. The state Foundation has funded important programmes such as the reemigration plan and the first residential agenda, which has provided housing improvements for several hundred or even thousands of families of young families with children, this programme has provided housing improvements; there is a countrythe guarantees And straight away, straight away As you yourselves understand, can easily be measured: 2011 plus five years of So 2016 1 July 2016 this wave that began in the tanning will benefit the other to flood, and then theythe proposal to extend this temporary residence permit will be a very simple proposal? The proposal is for a very simple majority of those who wish to extend these permits for five years to enjoy special privileges at the outset of Mr ŠLESERA's party and the People's Party. I would remind you that, back then, " New Time " opposed these amendments: in the future, let us say, from 2016 1 July 2016, you will - like new temporary residence permit recipients since 1 September 2014 - will have to lodge the Latvian Economic Development Fund stateto provide vital programmes, not 25 000 euros, but Well, we will be more likely to be more open to the State and require as much as 10 thousand euros in contributions to of course, we can decide that they may not be 10 thousand .- it may be 7.5 thousand or 5 thousand - and accordingly then count on the contribution that we had in the budget that we had, if you turn your attention to the preamble, you will see that there is a table with estimates ofhow fundraising could the public gain And by offering these 10,000, then four in the five-year program they're considering that 60 per cent of the people will want their temporary residence to be re-elected, they will be about 40 million Nu, 8-10 million a year. The question: should we need this money or not? It will be at least a few million this year, even if we accept that there are only EUR 5 thousand in contributions because we will certainly be able to continue freelyand maybe even to extend the first residential programme to young families in May, we will certainly have to decide on additional funds for unforeseen events so that the programme can continue to normal, I would ask another minute? (heckling)? (heckling)".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q211.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q159.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q4459436.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q1357342.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq8 mentions Q1250133.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 number "7".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 spokenText "Paldies. Lēmums jāpieņem balsojot. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi likumā “Par interešu konflikta novēršanu valsts amatpersonu darbībā”” nodošanu Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisijai kā atbildīgajai komisijai! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 28, pret - 49, atturas - 8. Likumprojekts komisijai nav nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina deputātu Liepiņa, Bites, Šica, Bondara, Viļuma iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Saeimas kārtības rullī” nodot Saeimas Juridiskajai komisijai un noteikt, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem ir iebildumi. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi Saeimas kārtības rullī” nodošanu Saeimas Juridiskajai komisijai kā atbildīgajai komisijai! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 28, pret - 47, atturas - 12. Likumprojekts komisijai nav nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina deputātu Parādnieka, Šnores, Vectirāna, Putras, Dzintara, Cilinska, Rasmaņa, Bērziņa, Dambes un Krēsliņa iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Imigrācijas likumā” nodot Aizsardzības, iekšlietu un korupcijas novēršanas komisijai un noteikt, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. “Par” ir pieteicies runāt deputāts Imants Parādnieks. Lūdzu.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 speaker Inese_Libina-Egnere-1977.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 translatedText "Thanks to the vote on the bill, we will vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Law on the Prevention of Conflict of Interest to Public Administration and Local Government' as the committee responsible, please please vote!: - 28, against: 49 abstentions- A draft legislative proposal has not been referred to the committee by the Bureau of Deputies, Mr Bite, Mr. Šica, Bondo, the Bill of the Saeima committee referred to the Saeima Committee on Legal Affairs and the committee responsible. Please vote in favour of the draft bill' Amendment of the Rules of Procedure', the referral to the Saeima Committee on Legal Affairs as the committee responsible, please the voting regime, please vote!: 28, against - 47, 12 abstentions: 12the debtor, Mr. Schnores, Vectiran, putras, Dinzara, CILINSKA, Rasumann, Berzina, Dambes and See the' Amendment of the Immigration Law' has been applied by the responsible Commission.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 mentions Q796010.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq7 mentions Q11711795.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 number "6".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 spokenText "Labrīt, kolēģi! Saistībā ar pirmo likumprojektu Aleksejs runāja par paviršību. Es arī varētu mazliet parunāt par paviršību un arī par iespējamu steigu likumprojekta sagatavošanā... Es runāšu par abiem likumprojektiem kopā, jo tie ir savstarpēji saistīti - šis un nākamais -, jo iespējams, ka šo jautājumu kaut kādā veidā var risināt, bet tas ir jādara juridiski korektā veidā. Un es jums citēšu Satversmes 63.pantu: “Ministriem, ja arī viņi nav Saeimas locekļi, un ministru pilnvarotām atbildīgām valsts amata personām ir tiesība piedalīties Saeimas un tās komisijas sēdēs un iesniegt papildinājumus un pārlabojumus pie likumprojektiem.” Ar to es gribu teikt - tas princips, ka Saeimas deputāts... ka ministrs vienlaikus var būt arī Saeimas deputāts, tas jau ir ierakstīts Satversmē. Līdz ar to, ja mēs vēlamies kaut ko mainīt, ir jāsāk no pareizā gala - Satversme un tālāk citi likumi. Es lasu tālāk. Jums ir piedāvāts izteikt 9.panta otro daļu šādā redakcijā: “Ja Saeimas deputāts amata pildīšanu savieno ar parlamentārā sekretāra amatu, viņam ir atļauts saņemt tikai vienam amatam paredzēto atalgojumu.” Es piecus gadus jau esmu strādājis parlamentārā sekretāra amatā un gribētu no jums uzzināt, kur ir rakstīts tas, ka parlamentārais sekretārs var saņemt otru algu? Nekur! Parlamentārais sekretārs var izvēlēties - saņemt algu Saeimā vai ministrijā (principā tā alga ir apmēram vienāda). Tas jau šobrīd likumā ir rakstīts. Tātad mēs ar šādu normu faktiski pārrakstītu to, kas šobrīd strādā. Līdz ar to, kolēģi, diemžēl man jāaicina jūs pagaidām neatbalstīt šā likumprojekta nodošanu komisijai.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 speaker Edvards_Smiltens-1984.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 translatedText "Good morning, colleagues, with regard to the first draft bill, Alekseer talked about the laxity I could also talk a little bit about the laxity and also of a possible rush to the bill I will be talking about both pieces of legislation together, as they are mutually reinforcingrelated - this and the next one - because it is likely that this issue can be tackled in some way, but it must be done in a legally correct way and I will quote you of the Constitution, Article 63: " ministers, if they are not members of the HouseMembers, and the ministers responsible for the ministerial capacity have the right to take part in the meetings of the members and its committees and to submit amendments and amendments to the draft legislation' With this I want to say this is the principle that the MPthat while the minister can also be an MP, it is already enshrined in the Constitution, so if we are to make a difference, we need to start from the right end - the Constitution and beyond the other laws I'm inyou have read the second part of the article in the wording:' if the MP is in office connecting with the office of parliamentary secretary, he is allowed to receive only one executive remuneration' in the EU for a period of five yearsI have already served as parliamentary secretary and would like to know from you where it is written that the Parliamentary Secretary can get a second salary? The salary is about equal) It is already written in the law So we are, with such a standard, to actually rewrite what is now working with it, colleagues, unfortunately I must call on you not to support the passing of this bill.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq6 mentions Q79820.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 number "5".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 spokenText "“Pret” pieteicies runāt deputāts Edvards Smiltēns. Lūdzu!".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 speaker Inese_Libina-Egnere-1977.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 translatedText "" I asked him to speak to Simon Smillime.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq5 mentions Q9250728.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 number "4".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 spokenAs 41.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 spokenText "Ļoti cienījamā sēdes vadītāja! Dāmas un kungi! Šis likumprojekts un arī nākamais likumprojekts, kas saistīts ar grozījumiem Saeimas kārtības rullī, ir savstarpēji saistīti, un abu šo likumprojektu būtība balstīta tajā, ko kādreiz skolā man mācīja, - ka valstī, lai demokrātija varētu darboties, ir jābūt četrām varām: pirmās trīs ir lēmējvara, izpildvara un tiesu vara, un ceturtā tātad ir plašsaziņas līdzekļu un preses vara. Un, lai šis demokrātijas process varētu patiešām labi norisināties, šiem visiem četriem, ja tā var izteikties, riteņiem ir jādarbojas, turklāt tiem jādarbojas neatkarīgi citam no cita. Iedomāsimies, kas notiktu, ja, piemēram, tiesnesis būtu arī Saeimas deputāts vai arī Ministru kabineta loceklis! Protams, tas nav pieļaujams, jo tiesnesim jābūt neatkarīgam un jāspēj darboties... Viņam jābūt patiešām neietekmējamam! Tāpat arī, kā zinām, pašvaldībās... Piemēram, izpilddirektors nevar būt pašvaldības deputāts. Arī pašvaldību kapitālsabiedrībās vairs nevar būt pašvaldību deputāti. Un jau toreiz, kad iepriekšējā Saeimā mēs debatējām par šo jautājumu, es atļāvos izteikt tādu domu, kura lielā mērā sakrīt ar šodien izskatāmo priekšlikumu, - ka ir grūti uz diviem krēsliem sēdēt, bet ir viegli uz diviem krēsliem gulēt. Domāju, ka mums patiešām ir jāļauj Ministru kabineta locekļiem strādāt neatkarīgi. Viņiem jāspēj pildīt savus pienākumus un jāspēj arī atskaitīties parlamentam par saviem padarītajiem darbiem un, protams, arī par nepadarītajiem. Mūsu frakcijas deputāti tikās ar Manabalss.lv pārstāvjiem... Bieži vien šīs iedzīvotāju iniciatīvas, kas nonāk Saeimā, tiek noraidītas, nesniedzot nekādu argumentāciju. Arī tad, kad mēs, Latvijas Reģionu apvienības frakcija, vai kāda cita opozīcijas frakcija iesniedzam savus priekšlikumus, bieži vien mēs nesaņemam argumentus, kāpēc mūsu priekšlikumi nav labi. Tāpēc es ceru, ka Smiltēna kungs tūlīt sniegs patiešām pamatīgu argumentāciju, kāpēc Saeimas loceklim, deputātam, ir jābūt iespējai būt vienlaikus arī Ministru kabineta loceklim. Un visbeidzot citēšu no mūsu pamatojuma gan šim, gan nākamajam likumprojektam: “Varas dalīšanas princips izpaužas valsts varas sadalījumā likumdošanas, izpildu un tiesu varā, ko realizē neatkarīgas un autonomas institūcijas. Likumdevējs kā augstākā valsts institūcija veic uzraudzību pār izpildvaru, un tādēļ rodas situācija, ka Saeimas loceklis reizē kā Ministru kabineta loceklis uzrauga pats savu darbu.” Aicinu atbalstīt gan likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par interešu konflikta novēr��anu valsts amatpersonu darbībā””, gan arī nākamo, kas saistīts ar grozījumiem Saeimas kārtības rullī. Paldies.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 speaker Juris_Vilums-1982.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 translatedText "Very dear Chair of the sitting, ladies and gentlemen, this bill, and also the next draft bill relating to amendments to the amendments to the rules of the House, are interconnected, and the nature of the legislation, based at one day at the school, taught me that :in a country so that democracy can work, there must be four sets of powers: the first three are decision-making powers, the executive and the judiciary, and the fourth is the media and the press, And that this democratic process can really perform well, all of themfour, if you may say that, the wheels must operate, and they must act independently of each other, whatever happens if, for example, the judge would also be an MP or a member of the Cabinet, of course, because the judge should beto be independent and be able to act must be truly insensitive, as well as, as we know, in the town of town halls, the executive director cannot be a councillor even in municipal capital companies anymore, as local authorities can no longer be members of the local authorities at the time of the previouswe had a debate on this issue in the Commons that I would like to express an idea which, to a large extent, to coincide with today's proposal - that it is difficult to sit on two chairs, but it is easy for the Domari to sleep on two chairs. Indeed, we must allow the Cabinet Members to work independently and should also be able to account for Parliament for their work and, of course, also on the non-handling of Our Members meeting with representatives of the Manabalds. Often, these citizens' initiatives, which come into the Commons, are rejected without any reasoning even when we, the faction of the Latvian Union of Regions, or any other opposition faction, are presenting their proposals, often we do not get arguments ,why, therefore, our proposals are not good, I hope that Mr SMILTĒNS will now give a truly thorough reasoning on why an MP, a Member, should be able, at the same time, to be a member of the Cabinet Office and, finally, to quote from our justification boththis and the next set of reports: the principle of the separation of powers is reflected in the distribution of power by an independent, autonomous entity by independent and autonomous institutions, as the highest national body, in supervising executive powers, and therefore the situation thatas a member of the Cabinet meeting as a member of the Cabinet Office, I monitored his own work in the " Ashes Support Bill " legislation " Amendment to Conflict of Interest in Public Figures, " and dates linked to amendments to the amendments to the order of the political groups Thank you".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 mentions Q211.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq4 mentions Q18189957.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 number "3".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 spokenText "Paldies. “Par” neviens nav pieteicies runāt. Lēmums mums jāpieņem balsojot. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi likumā “Par Valsts ieņēmumu dienestu”” nodošanu Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 82, pret un atturas - nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Latvijas Administratīvo pārkāpumu kodeksā” nodot Juridiskajai komisijai kā atbildīgajai komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina deputātu Liepiņa, Bites, Šica, Bondara un Viļuma iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par interešu konflikta novēršanu valsts amatpersonu darbībā”” nodot Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisijai kā atbildīgajai komisijai. “Par” pieteicies runāt deputāts Juris Viļums. Lūdzu!".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 speaker Inese_Libina-Egnere-1977.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 translatedText "Thank you,' For' no one has asked for a decision by us to vote Please call, we will vote in favour of the Amendment of the Law on the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the Budget and Financial (Taxation). Please, the result! On - 82, against andabstentions: no draft legislative committee has referred to the Bureau of Saeima's suggestion that the Cabinet Office's submission to the Code of Administrative Offences referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs should be referred to MPs as objections? The Bureau proposed a " Amendment to the Law on the Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Public Figures to Public Administration and Local Government " as the committee responsible for the application of the Commission proposal as " requested by the Commission as the committee responsible. "".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 mentions Q796010.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 mentions Q211.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq3 mentions Q13585891.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 number "2".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 spokenText "Cienījamie kolēģi! Es saprotu, ka ierosinātie grozījumi likumā ir nepieciešami. Bet es gribu iebilst pret paviršību Saeimai iesniegto dokumentu sagatavošanā, jo šis dokuments sagatavots tiešām pavirši. Tas uzliek nesamērīgu un absolūti neloģisku slogu Valsts ieņēmumu dienesta amatpersonām. Aicinu jūs izlasīt mums piedāvāto tekstu – grozījums likumā paredz pilnvarot Valsts ieņēmumu dienesta ierēdņus izskatīt iesniegumus un atmaksāt valsts budžetā pārmaksāto vai nepareizi iemaksāto naudas soda summu. Es nesaprotu, kāpēc gan Valsts ieņēmumu dienesta amatpersonām būtu kaut kas jāatmaksā, izskatot iesniegumus? Līdz ar to es tiešām iebilstu pret šo tekstu. Aicinu to papildināt ar pazaudētajiem vārdiem “un pieņemt lēmumu atmaksāt”. Paldies.".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 speaker Aleksejs_Loskutovs-1962.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I understand that the proposed amendments to the law are necessary But I would like to object to the laxity of drafting documents submitted by Saeima, as this document is really careless. It places a disproportionate and totally unlogical burdenin the Official Journal of State Revenue Service officials, you read the text proposed to us by  Amendment to authorize officials of the State Office to look into the submissions and repay the public purse of amounts paid or wrongly paid in the EUI don't understand why both State officials would have something to repay when considering the submissions? So I really do oppose this text to complement this in the Ashes with the words lost " and make a decision to repay " Thank you".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq2 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 type Speech.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 number "1".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 date "2016-04-14".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 isPartOf 2016_04_14_358.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 spokenText "Labrīt, cienījamās kolēģes! Labrīt, godātie kolēģi! Lūdzu, ieņemiet savas vietas Sēžu zālē, un sāksim Saeimas 14.aprīļa sēdi. Paldies. Pirms izskatām darba kārtībā jau iekļautos jautājumus, ir izskatāmi priekšlikumi par grozījumiem sēdes darba kārtībā. Saeimas Prezidijs ir saņēmis trīs grozījumus šodienas darba kārtībā. Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisija lūdz izdarīt izmaiņas Saeimas 14.aprīļa sēdes darba kārtībā un iekļaut tajā Saeimas lēmuma projektu “Par priekšlikumu iesniegšanas termiņa pagarināšanu likumprojekta “Grozījumi Konkurences likumā” (Nr.269/Lp12) trešajam lasījumam līdz 2016.gada 15.aprīlim”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Sociālo un darba lietu komisija lūdz izdarīt izmaiņas Saeimas 14.aprīļa sēdes darba kārtībā un iekļaut tajā izskatīšanai pirmajā lasījumā likumprojektu “Grozījumi Darba likumā”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Saeimas Juridiskā komisija lūdz izdarīt izmaiņas Saeimas 14.aprīļa sēdes darba kārtībā un iekļaut tajā komisijas sagatavoto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Civilprocesa likumā”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Līdz ar to izskatīsim pirmo jau grozītās darba kārtības sadaļu “Prezidija ziņojumi par iesniegtajiem likumprojektiem”. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par Valsts ieņēmumu dienestu”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai un noteikt, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta... Tātad Loskutova kungs vēlas runāt... “par”? Vai “par”?".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 language "lv".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 speaker Inese_Libina-Egnere-1977.
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, good morning colleague, good morning, ladies and gentlemen, please take your seat in the Chamber and, on 14 April, I will start by tabling proposals for amendments to the agenda of the sitting by the Bureau. The amendments to today's agenda of the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture, the agrarian, environmental and regional policy members are requested to make a change to the agenda of the 14 April session of the sitting of 14 April, including a draft proposal for the extension of the deadline for the submission of proposals for the " Amendment of the Bill to the Competition Law " (No 269 / Lp12 )by 15 April 2016, " Does Members have reservations? Members are not in a position to have an agenda modified by the Social and Labour Commission asking for changes to the agenda of the 14 April sitting and to include at first reading the draft legislation Amendmentslabour Law Does MPs have reservations? MPs are not opposed to the agenda of the Legal Affairs Committee asking lawmakers to make changes to the April agenda of the 14 April session and include a bill titled " Amendment of the Civil Process " Does Members have reservations? No objections to the agenda have been amended to Members under the first amended draft agenda " Bureau reports on the proposed legislation " the Bureau of the Cabinet proposed to the Cabinet Office's " Amendment to the State of the State " to transfer the Budget andthe Finance (Tax) Commission and the determining committee that is responsible for the commission Does MPs have objections? MPs are not opposed to the draft law Commission has referred to the Bureau of Cabinet Office So Loskutova looking to speak " about "? Or " concerning "?".
- 2016_04_14_358-seq1 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 type Speech.
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 number "111".
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 date "2016-04-07".
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 isPartOf 2016_04_07_357.
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 spokenText " Paldies. Sēdi slēdzu. ".
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 language "lv".
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_04_07_357-seq111 translatedText "Thank you at the closing of the session.".
- 2016_04_07_357 type SessionDay.
- 2016_04_07_357 date "2016-04-07".
- 2016_04_07_357 hasPart 2016_04_07_357-seq111.
- 2016_04_07_357 hasPart 2016_04_07_357-seq110.
- 2016_04_07_357 hasPart 2016_04_07_357-seq109.