Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 translatedText "Fellow Members, I would like to thank you for three interrelated legislative and fundamental acts - whether the notaries should be allowed to register a marriage or not in the Legal Affairs Committee hearing all the arguments, we in the Ministry of Justice somewhat forget that the argument is conducted in a one-sided manner and witha little bit of a favour, even today, Mr Pasabler mentioned in his address a little, a little bit cheated at Redzat, Estonia has data that the number of marriages closed to notaries is between three and four per cent. We are suddenly already going up to five per cent even into marriagethe number of increases thanks to the statistics of the notaries, the increase in the number of marriages in the country may also be without notary involvement, I rather want to explain the motivation of the vote here, since, of course, we are all discussing this topical issue in the first placethe rounds in the UK currently operate on two reasonably well-organised hats away! Notary organization, meaning Latvian notifier college is well established and works well in certain shortcomings but generally works well in the Municipal Unit for working well, perform their functionsin a country without any problem, we now want to do a small shift in these two systems, which is to complete this area with another place of marriage, although we all know that the words' VA' in themselves already mean that it isthe place of registration of the state of registration of the state of residence, marriage, children, non-residence status, It means that family status is recorded in specific locations and has a self-operating function, established practices and traditions, and as ifthe discussion should no longer be the only one in the modern world that we are saying:' need to improve something', of course, one could say that, here, someone would like to play one extra charge in the service I'm not going to speculate with an honest idea. That, you see, the birth list is difficult to access, can be difficult and that if you look into the rules of regulation it is easier for people who do not want to be solemnthe ceremony in accordance with the law one month is, so to speak, a waiting period unless there are exceptional situations where there is an urgent need, and then can be rerecorded very quickly Jo is in exceptional circumstances as notaries say, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also have to wait one month, but will also haveif there is an emergency, it will be possible that there is no problem here earlier here that there are no sections of the Dzimtlist chapters that do not exist, of course, if they do not want a solemn ceremony; there is a need for a certain period of time) the second issue in the notordial of the notches may be cheaper from an initial point of time, which was the case ,that the fee would be the same, but the Legal Affairs Committee concluded, however, that, however, in the case of the notary, more than 100 euro list chapters - 14 euros - could be found for other objective reasons? You can see if there had been people being called andthey have said that the notary office would be the body in which they would like to have a marriage because, on the fold, they could also put their property issues into Widge not enough by the fact that the lawyer explains to them that it is possible for the estate to lose if the estate is badly damagedbehaving; they are being caught properly, so to speak, all in a frown on the shelves, I realise that in our society, I understand that the model of a market relationship, including its feelings, the feelings that are necessary for the sake of marriage, we wantto be subordinated to any contract for the sharing of a estate or purchase and sale; the notary could also help fold up all the times to put the whole thing into question but, in fact, there is no question about it One of the arguments was that people were not wanting to go to the chapters of the birth list ;they will have three or four per cent of couples who will want to be married to a notary who will not want to be married to the notary, who will not want to be married at all? Perhaps let us try one more comfortable form to invent, look for other options? (interjection:' Maximra!') Maybe put on these examples, I do not want to extend this opportunity toother options, Avance, barrister, explaining just some legal question, could say at the same time: " would you not want to be written? " (DEP I Zartins:' please come to us and see us in marriage, we've got two. Want to get married (interjection: " administrator! ") It is a very good idea that there could be a family notary - similar to that of a family lawyer, or a lawyer Yes, a good family notary Today he will register bridal, and will then be governed by an intimate relationship tomorrow .- It will be easy for everyone in the same company So to come and make all the difference to the times of course that we can think of how the official marriage ties we might even have to arrange for people who really do not go to register a Maybewe can put them before them as a document in which they sign up with an electronically committed signature? Finally, some legal arguments - purely legal action - to be a nuance that can create a problem for a fellow Member, two notarial acts .- when to sign up, and then, when recorded in marriage, It is a notarial act! Tell me - what will be decided if people want to divorce or be challenged by a notarial act? That it is a divorce But, if it is a notarial act, then only the notarial act will be the next item in the Public Administration System, So, when the VA refuses to register a marriage, this Decision may challenge the administrativein the case of a decision taken by the public administration, the notary is a judicial officer, and complaints about the misconduct of a notary in the Supreme Court of General jurisdiction - the District Court is a question: why the same national legal procedures differ in terms of legal procedures? In order not to delay your time I think that in Latvia, where the system traditionally operates well, there is no need to change and to create legal difficulties where everything is in order, where you do not need to be confused with so many people.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q211.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q191.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q13561029.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q8436.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q2167704.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq156 mentions Q1881222.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 number "155".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 spokenText "Paldies. Godātie kolēģi, pirms es dodu vārdu nākamajam debatētājam, vēlos jūs informēt, ka Saeimas Prezidijs ir saņēmis piecu deputātu - Smiltēna, Brigmaņa, Dzintara, Cilinska un Ražuka - priekšlikumu turpināt šo sēdi bez pārtraukuma, līdz tiek izskatīta visa darba kārtība. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputāti neiebilst. Līdz ar to mēs turpinām sēdi bez pārtraukuma. Nākamajam vārds debatēs deputātam Gunāram Kūtrim.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 speaker Gundars_Daudze-1965.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 translatedText "My thanks to my colleagues, before I give the floor to the next stepping stone, to inform you that the Bureau of Saeima has received five Members - SMILTĒNS, Brigue, infants, CILINSKA and Manuela - to continue thisthe sitting without question until the whole agenda is to be considered: may Members not object to any objections?".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq155 mentions Q16357338.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 number "154".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 spokenAs 100.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 spokenText "Labdien, cienītie deputāti! Uzreiz ķeroties pie lietas, jāuzsver, ka šis likums... visi trīs likumi, kas ir saistīti (es runāšu par visiem vienlaikus, lai nekavētu jūsu laiku)... Jāuzsver, ka šī iniciatīva paredz nevis nodot laulības reģistrēšanas funkciju no vienas iestādes citai, bet paplašināt cilvēkiem iespēju izvēlēties, kādā procedūrā laulību noslēgt. Kādām cilvēku grupām šī iniciatīva par laulībām pie notāra varētu būt interesanta? Pirmām kārtām tie ir cilvēki, kuri (viens vai abi laulātie) veic aktīvu saimniecisko darbību (Zālē ir pieaudzis troksnis. Sēdes vadītājs noklaudzina ar āmuru.) un kuriem paralēli laulības reģistrācijai ir nepieciešams noregulēt arī laulāto mantiskās attiecības, jo, kā komisijas sēdē atzina dzimtsarakstu nodaļu pārstāvji, dzimtsarakstu nodaļu amatpersonas neveic konsultācijas par laulības mantiskajiem aspektiem. Taču tieši šai cilvēku kategorijai, kuri veic saimniecisko darbību, tas ir ļoti aktuāli, jo mēs nereti varam dzirdēt par situācijām, ka viena laulātā biznesa neveiksmes dēļ visu mantu var pazaudēt arī otrs laulātais, kopīgo mantu, kas ir iegūta laulības laikā. Tādējādi cilvēki savas nezināšanas dēļ var nokļūt diezgan neapskaužamā situācijā, un saistībā ar šādiem gadījumiem notārs var vienlaikus ar laulības noslēgšanu sniegt kvalificētu konsultāciju par to, kā noregulēt šādas mantiskās attiecības. Otra cilvēku kategorija, kam tas varētu būt interesanti, ir cilvēki, kuriem tā nav pirmā laulība, vai cilvēki, kuri ir ilgstoši dzīvojuši kopdzīvē bez laulības noslēgšanas (iespējams, viņiem jau ir kopīgi bērni, ir kopīgi īpašumi vai atsevišķi īpašumi) un kuriem daudz svarīgāk ir savas attiecības noformēt juridiski un iegūt juridisko noregulējumu gan attiecībām ar bērniem, gan rīcībai ar īpašumiem, kā arī citiem jautājumiem. Tas nekādā ziņā neizslēdz laulības emocionālo nozīmi, taču ir cilvēku grupas, kuriem šī emocionālā nozīme jau ir, teiksim, pagātnē un kuriem tagad, slēdzot laulību kā juridisku aktu, ir svarīgi tieši saimnieciskie jautājumi. Arī Pārresoru koordinācijas centrs 2015.gadā veica pētījumu par iemesliem, kāpēc cilvēki nereģistrē laulību, jo, kā mēs zinām, šobrīd Latvijā ļoti daudz bērnu dzimst nereģistrētās attiecībās, ļoti daudzi cilvēki dzīvo šādās attiecībās. Un viens no secinājumiem šajā pētījumā ir tas, ka laulību pieejamību varētu veicināt iespēja laulību noslēgt arī pie notāra. Mūsu kaimiņvalstī Igaunijā šādu sistēmu ieviesa 2010.gadā, un kopš tā laika noslēgto laulību skaits ir palielinājies par 14 procentiem. Mēs, protams, varam spekulēt, vai tas ir šī jaunā regulējuma dēļ, taču šobrīd Igaunijā 4,5 līdz sešus procentus visu noslēgto laulību slēdz pie notāra. Ja runājam par institūcijām, kuras šobrīd veic laulības reģistrēšanu, tad jāteic, ka baznīcām nav iebildumu pret šo regulējumu, bet no dzimtsarakstu nodaļām ir izskanējušas bažas, ka varētu samazināties dzimtsarakstu nodaļu ienākumi, jo daļa cilvēku varētu iet pie notāriem, nevis uz dzimtsarakstu nodaļām. Taču, ņemot vērā Igaunijas pieredzi, jāteic, ka mēs runājam par aptuveni pieciem procentiem laulāties gribētāju, kuru primārā motivācija ir laulības noslēgt lietišķā veidā, bez ceremonijas. Un līdz ar to mēs varam runāt par šo valsts nodevu - 14 eiro; sareizinot tos ar dažiem simtiem laulību, redzam, ka tas nebūtu ļoti liels zaudējums arī pašvaldībām (pat tad, ja pieņemam, ka visi cilvēki, kuri laulāsies pie notāra, citādi to būtu izdarījuši dzimtsarakstu nodaļās). Jāuzsver arī tas, ka dzimtsarakstu nodaļās laulības ir un būs lētākas finansiāli, jo notārs papildus laulības reģistrēšanai var sniegt arī juridisko konsultāciju un noslēgt arī, piemēram, laulību līgumu par mantas šķirtību vai mantas kopību. (Dep. I.Lībiņa-Egnere: “Tas būs par velti?”) Nē. Protams, ne. (Dep. I.Lībiņa-Egnere: “Tu teici, ka būs lētāk.”) Es teicu, ka lētāk būs laulību noslēgt dzimtsarakstu nodaļās, savukārt notāra pakalpojumi ir dārgāki un būs dārgāki arī turpmāk. Līdz ar to tās bažas, ka cilvēki neies uz dzimtsarakstu nodaļām, manuprāt, nav īsti pamatotas. Tāpat arī Juridiskajā komisijā izskanēja bažas, ka šī jaunā iniciatīva varētu kādā veidā novest pie viendzimuma laulību reģistrācijas atzīšanas. Jāuzsver, ka uz visiem, kuri reģistrē laulību, attiecas Civillikumā noteiktie ierobežojumi: nevar slēgt laulību viena dzimuma personas, nevar slēgt laulību tuvi radinieki. Šīs prasības attiecas kā uz baznīcām, tā uz dzimtsarakstu nodaļām, tāpat tās attieksies arī uz notāriem. Ja dzimtsarakstu darbinieki nav pārkāpuši likumu, mums nav pamata domāt, pieņemt, ka notāri šajā ziņā pārkāps likumu, jo Civillikumā noteiktos ierobežojumus var grozīt tikai Saeima. Un arī Tieslietu ministrijā ir ļoti liels atbalsts Satversmes 110.pantā noteiktajam, ka laulība ir savienība starp sievieti un vīrieti. Katrā ziņā no Tieslietu ministrijas nenāks nekādas iniciatīvas, kas šo regulējumu varētu grozīt. Ir izskanējušas arī bažas, ka šī iniciatīva lobē notārus. Jāteic, ka šādu apgalvojumu nav iespējams argumentēti atspēkot, jo tas balstās uz ticību šādam apgalvojumam. (Dep. S.Āboltiņa: “Bet cilvēkiem taču jātic!”) Es vēlreiz gribu uzsvērt, ka šī funkcija netiek nodota no vienas iestādes citai. Vienkārši cilvēkiem tiek dotas papildu iespējas. Ja mums pieciem procentiem laulību (kas Latvijas gadījumā varētu būt līdz tūkstotim cilvēku gadā) ir iespēja atvieglot birokrātiskās procedūras, nedzenājot cilvēkus no vienas iestādes uz citu, bet dodot iespēju izdarīt to visu pie notāra, kāpēc mums to nedarīt? Paldies.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 speaker Janis_Iesalnieks.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 translatedText "Labor, honourable Members, once again, once again, I must stress that this law is all three of the laws that are relevant (I will be talking about everyone at the same time so as not to delay your time) It should be emphasised that this initiative is not to pass on the function of registration of a marriage. From one institution to another, but to extend the possibility for people to choose from a marriage procedure to conclude this initiative on a notary could be interesting? There has been an increase in noise of the sitting driver's hammer and which, alongside marriage registration, there is a need for a settlement of matrimonial property, as the committee's draft list of departments, department officials, are not required to consult on the matrimonial property aspects of their marriageit is precisely this category of people who is doing an economic activity that is very pertinent, because we can often hear about situations where, because of the failure of one spouse, the entire estate can also lose a second spouse, the common estate obtained during the marriageas a result, people, because of their ignorance, can get into a rather enviable situation and, in such cases, the notary can, at the same time, be able to provide, at the same time as the conclusion of marriage, a qualified consultation on the way in which such a category of people with this kind of life can be adjusted ,there are people for whom it is not the first marriage, or people who have long lived in cohabitation without marriage (possibly, they already share children, have shared properties or separate properties) and which are more important than finding their own relationships legally andto obtain a legal settlement, both with children and for action with assets, and on other issues, It is by no means excluding the emotional nature of the marriage, but there are groups of people who already have this emotional importance, say, the past and who are now, by the time of the marriageas a legal act, it is important that an economic centre for the re-ordination of the re-ordination Centre in 2015 carried out a study of the reasons why people are not registering a marriage because, as we know, there are very many children living in the UK at the moment, very many people live in such ain the relationship And one of the findings in this study is that access to marriage could also contribute to the possibility of a marriage to a notary in Our neighbouring Estonia such a scheme was introduced in 2010, and the number of marriages has increased by 14 since thenwe can, of course, speculate as to whether this is because of this new regulation, but at the moment, in Estonia, 4.5 to six per cent of all marriages concluded shall be closed to the notary when it is now about institutions currently carrying out the registration of the marriage, then the churches are not. The objection to this regulation, while the section of the birth list has been raised by concerns that the population of the birth group might decline in chapter earnings, as some people could go to notaries rather than on the birth list of the Taseer, in the light of Estonia's experience, we have to say we are about to talk about somefive per cent of married spates whose primary motivation is for marriage to be applied without ceremonies And consequently we can talk about this national levy - 14 euros; by multiplying them with a few hundred marriages, see that it wouldn't be very muchthere is also a huge loss for local authorities (even if all the people who will spouse their spouse, otherwise - would have done so in the homemade-list chapters) and that, in addition to the registration of the marriage, there should be no marriage in addition to the registration of marriage. To also provide legal advice and conclude, for example, a marriage contract or a catalogue of articles (DEP I Lunza- Egnatere:' will it be for nothing?') Nothere will be a marriage to finish the birth list in the wards, while notary services are more expensive and will be more expensive to continue with the fact that people will not go to the birth list, I think the Legal Affairs Committee is also afraid that this newthe initiative could, in any way, lead to a recognition of same-sex marriage that should be passed on to anyone who registers marriage, subject to the restrictions on civil law: the fact that the marriage of the same person cannot be closed to the close relatives of this marriage requirement applies as churches ,the chapters on the birth list will also apply to notaries, if the staff of the notaries do not break the law, we have no reason to think that notaries in this respect act as a breach of the law, because the restrictions imposed by Civil Law can only be amended by the Ministry of Justice. The overwhelming support to the Constitution in Article 110 of the Constitution, that marriage is a union between a woman and a man in respect of the Ministry of Justice from the Ministry of Justice will not have any initiative which could amend this initiative in a period of concern that this initiative has been lobbied by notariessuch a statement cannot be reasoned because it is based on a belief in such a statement (DEP S Abola:' but people have to believe') I would like to emphasise once again that this function is not transferred from one institution to another to allow additional opportunities to be transferred from one institution to another. If we have a five per cent marriage (which in the UK case might be up to a thousand people per year) there is a chance to ease the bureaucratic procedures without driving people from one institution to another, but allowing it to do all of it, why should we not do so?".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 mentions Q211.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 mentions Q191.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq154 mentions Q435407.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 number "153".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 spokenText "Paldies. Sākam debates. Vārds debatēs Tieslietu ministrijas parlamentārajam sekretāram Jānim Iesalniekam.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 speaker Gundars_Daudze-1965.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 translatedText "Thank you very much for starting the debate in the House of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, Janim Gear-Jiani.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq153 mentions Q11731912.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 number "152".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 spokenAs 17.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 spokenText "Cienījamais Prezidij! Godātie kolēģi! Gan šis likumprojekts, gan nākamie divi likumprojekti ir saistītie likumprojekti. Šie likumprojekti paredz laulības reģistrācijas lietu vešanu nodot arī zvērinātiem notāriem, lai veicinātu pamattiesības - stāties laulībā un dibināt ģimeni - realizāciju. Juridiskās komisijas sēdē mēs uzklausījām gan likumprojekta virzītājus - Tieslietu ministriju un zvērinātus notārus -, gan arī Latvijas Pašvaldību savienības pārstāvjus un Dzimtsarakstu nodaļu darbinieku asociācijas pārstāvjus. Komisijas sēdē izskanēja dažādi viedokļi. Tieslietu ministrija norādīja uz to, ka laulību reģistrācijas funkcijas nodošana arī zvērinātiem notāriem veicinās laulību noslēgšanu. Tas tika pamatots ar dažādām aptaujām un plašsaziņas līdzekļos izskanējušiem viedokļiem. Tieslietu ministrija un zvērināti notāri atsaucās uz to, ka līdzīgs regulējums kopš 2010.gada veiksmīgi darbojas Igaunijā. Tāpat Tieslietu ministrija un zvērināti notāri norādīja uz to, ka šīs funkcijas nodošana arī notāriem dos iespēju jau laulību noslēgšanas procesā saņemt konsultāciju par laulāto mantisko attiecību jautājumiem, kā arī nepieciešamības gadījumā laulāto mantiskās attiecības nokārtot vienlaikus ar laulības noslēgšanu, kas savukārt veicinātu tā saucamā ģimenes notāra idejas attīstību. Savukārt Latvijas Pašvaldību savienība norādīja uz to, ka jau šobrīd personas var noslēgt laulību jebkurā dzimtsarakstu nodaļā vai pie garīdznieka. Turklāt, ja personas vēlas juridiski sakārtot savas mantiskās attiecības, to var izdarīt tām pieņemamā laikā neatkarīgi no laulības reģistrācijas vietas. Latvijas Pašvaldību savienība norādīja arī to, ka pašvaldības ir ieguldījušas finanšu līdzekļus laulību reģistrācijas telpu veidošanā un darbinieku apmācībā. Savukārt Dzimtsarakstu nodaļu darbinieku asociācija norādīja, ka jau šobrīd laulību var noslēgt ar svinīgu ceremoniju vai bez ceremonijas. No tā ir atkarīga arī samaksa par šo procedūru. Dzimtsarakstu nodaļas norādīja, ka līdz šim ir tikušas galā ar šo funkciju un jau šobrīd personas, kuras vēlas reģistrēt laulību... ka dzimtsarakstu nodaļas nodrošina vienkāršu un lietišķu laulības reģistrēšanu un, viņuprāt, iesaistīt notārus šajā procesā nav nepieciešams. Tātad komisijā, kā mēs redzam, izskanēja dažādi viedokļi. Tomēr komisija balsojot nolēma atbalstīt likumprojektu “Grozījumi Notariāta likumā” pirmajā lasījumā. Līdz ar to komisijas vārdā es lūdzu atbalstīt minēto likumprojektu pirmajā lasījumā.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 speaker Gaidis_Berzins-1970.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 translatedText "For the honourable President, dear colleagues, both this draft bill and the next two draft amendments are related to the fact that, in order to promote fundamental rights - marry and start a family - we will be married in the Legal Affairs Committee at the Legal Affairs Commission. The Justice Department and representatives of the Latvian Department of Local Government and the Association of the Sex Workers Association have heard from the Ministry of Justice the fact that the transfer function of the bridal registration will also be used by the Ministry of Justice. The notifiers will facilitate the conclusion of marriage It was based on various opinions of the Department of Justice and sworn notaries who responded to the fact that a similar regulation has been successful in Estonia since 2010, with the Ministry of Justice and the sworn notaries who referred tothe fact that the transfer of this function will also enable notaries to obtain consultation on matrimonial property issues and, if necessary, settle the matrimonial property with marriage, which in turn would encourage so-called family notary ideasthe development of Savuthly's Local Government has pointed to the fact that, at this stage, individuals may enter a marriage in any section of the birth list or to the clerk in addition, if the person wishes to legally tidy up their own tic relationships, it can be done within reasonable time for them, irrespective of the marriage registrationthe site's Local Government Union also pointed to the fact that local authorities have invested in financial means for the creation of bridal registration facilities and staff training at the Savun Dzimtlist section of staff said the marriage can already be concluded with a celebratory ceremony or no ceremony at No. It also relies on the payment of the procedure in the section of the Association Agreement, indicated that it has so far coped with this function and already at the moment, persons wishing to register bridal chapters provide a simple and businesslike registration of the marriageand, they believe, to involve notaries in this process is not necessary for the So Commission, as we are seeing, there was a mixed bag of views the commission decided to support in the First Reading Bill Amendment to notariate Bill, with the Commission on behalf of the Commission.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 mentions Q211.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 mentions Q191.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq152 mentions Q8436.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 number "151".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 spokenText "Tātad priekšlikumu iesniegšanas termiņš - 17.maijs, un otrais lasījums - 19.maijā. Deputāti neiebilst. Paldies. Nākamais darba kārtības punkts - likumprojekts “Grozījumi Notariāta likumā”, pirmais lasījums. Juridiskās komisijas vārdā - deputāts Gaidis Bērziņš.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 speaker Gundars_Daudze-1965.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 translatedText "To conclude, the deadline for tabling proposals was 17 May, and the second reading, 19 May, will not raise your questions to the next item on the next item: draft bill on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission - Member of Gaidis Berzins".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq151 mentions Q1491211.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 number "150".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 spokenText "Priekšlikumi otrajam lasījumam tiek gaidīti līdz 17.maijam. Likumprojektu otrajā lasījumā paredzēts izskatīt Saeimas sēdē 19.maijā.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 speaker Ints_Dalderis-1971.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 translatedText "Proposals for a second reading under the second reading of the legislative draft on May 19 are scheduled for May 19.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq150 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 number "149".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 spokenAs 122.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 spokenText "Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi likumā “Par norēķinu galīgumu maksājumu un finanšu instrumentu norēķinu sistēmās”” pieņemšanu pirmajā lasījumā! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 81, pret un atturas - nav. Likumprojekts pirmajā lasījumā pieņemts. Lūdzu noteikt priekšlikumu iesniegšanas termiņu otrajam lasījumam, kā arī otrā lasījuma datumu.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 speaker Gundars_Daudze-1965.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq149 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the adoption of the bill " Amendment of the Law on settlement finality in payment and financial instruments in the settlement systems of payment and financial instruments " .- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 number "148".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 spokenText "Komisijas vārdā lūdzu atbalstīt likumprojektu pirmajā lasījumā.".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 language "lv".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 speaker Ints_Dalderis-1971.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq148 translatedText "On behalf of the Commission, I request a draft law at first reading".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq147 type Speech.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq147 number "147".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq147 date "2016-05-12".
- 2016_05_12_364-seq147 isPartOf 2016_05_12_364.
- 2016_05_12_364-seq147 spokenAs 122.