Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }
- 2015_02_12_285-seq277 translatedText "The Commission is seeking a deadline of 13 February of this year, the date of the submission of the proposals, 19 February this year".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq276 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill' Amendment of the Value Added Tax Law '. Abstentions: no draft legislative act adopted at first reading accepts the deadline for tabling proposals for second reading and the date of the second reading.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq274 translatedText "Yes, thanks to the First Rules, we should vote on the issue of the urgency of the draft bill, Please call! Law enforcement recognition: please voting regime, please see the result! - 81, against and not abstentions - no draft law deemed urgent".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq273 translatedText "(from the floor of the DEP S Abola: well able to talk! " - Thank you, Mr Many, dear colleagues, the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission has dealt with the draft law on the " Amendment of the Piesta Value Tax Law " with the aim of improving the regulation of the above-mentioned Law on the Law of the European Union. Fiscal Representative's proposals to improve the competitiveness of the transport and logistics sector by mitigating the adverse effects of Russia's economic sanctions by the Commission in the Commission had been considered by the Commission and asks for the urgent procedure to be adopted.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq271 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals - 6 March this year".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq270 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the Bill on the Civil Process Law, please vote! Yes - 67, against - there is no, 16 abstentions: 16 legislative proposals at second reading.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq269 translatedText "We have looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs to support the second reading of the Amendment to the Civil Process Act".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq267 translatedText "46 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which relates to the transitional provisions and entry into force There has been no support for the commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq265 translatedText "45 is the parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Justice, which introduces a new procedure for procedural enforcement, namely the adaptation of rights and obligations imposed by foreign courts in Latvia's implementation of Latvia's So'So cases in Latvia. The regulatory framework does not provide for the arrangements in question, while the foreign ruling in Latvia is feasible and, in these cases, it would be feasible for these rulings to be adapted to its implementation in Latvia So 45 a proposal has been given to the Commission.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq263 translatedText "And 44 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which is sponsored by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq261 translatedText "43 is parliamentary secretary of the Department of Justice, which is sponsored by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq259 translatedText "Also 42 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which is sponsored by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq257 translatedText "Also 41 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which the commission has sponsored".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq255 translatedText "Also 40 - Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Justice - Caucus has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq253 translatedText "Also 39 - The parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Justice - sponsored by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq251 translatedText "38 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq249 translatedText "Also 37 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which is sponsored by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq247 translatedText "36 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq245 translatedText "In contrast, the 35-year-old has been submitted to the Department of Justice's editorial proposal, which has not garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq243 translatedText "Also 34 - The Department of Justice's proposal - the Department of Justice - has gained support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq241 translatedText "Also 33 - The Department of Justice's proposal - Department of Justice - has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq239 translatedText "Also 32 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq237 translatedText "31 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq235 translatedText "30 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq233 translatedText "29 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq231 translatedText "28 is the Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal, which has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq229 translatedText "27 is a proposal by the Department of Justice, which seeks to extend the basis for non-acceptance of by-complaint cases and is supported by the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq227 translatedText "Also 26 - Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal - committee backed".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq225 translatedText "And also 25 - the Justice Secretary's proposal - supported by the commission -".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq223 translatedText "24 - The Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal - supported by the commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq221 translatedText "Also 23 - Parliamentary secretary of the Department of Justice - Commission backed".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq219 translatedText "22 - The Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal - supported by the commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq217 translatedText "A similar character is 21 proposals from the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, and the Commission too did not support it".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq215 translatedText "20 is a proposal by the Ministry of Justice, which has not gained support in Here, so there was a discussion about the publication of information relating to the limitations of personal behaviour in the context of the currentno alternative proposal has been made, the majority in the House decided that the current arrangement would leave behind the publication of this information in the official edition of the Latvian Journal.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq213 translatedText "Thank-19 proposal by the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, which supports".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq212 translatedText "MEPs have no qualms about 17 and 18 proposals".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq211 translatedText "17 is a proposal from the Ministry of Justice, which is partly supported and incorporated into 18 proposals, which in turn is a proposal from the Legal Affairs Commission, which has gained support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq209 translatedText "Also 16 - Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal - has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq207 translatedText "15 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, which has garnered support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq205 translatedText "Also 14 - Parliamentary secretary of the Department of Justice, sponsored by the commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq203 translatedText "13 - The Department of Justice parliamentary secretary's proposal also provides that the non-signed application is deemed not to be submitted and referred back to the applicant in the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq201 translatedText "Technical is 12 - Department of Justice's parliamentary secretary's proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq199 translatedText "Also 11 - Former Ministry of Justice proposal supported by the Department of Justice".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq197 translatedText "10 - Parliamentary secretary of the Department of Justice's proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq195 translatedText "9 - Motion for a parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq193 translatedText "8 - The proposal by the parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Justice upholds the Commission's proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq191 translatedText "7 - The proposal by the Ministry of Justice Under the proposal of the Ministry of Justice that the application is not signed and referred back to the applicant, This is, in our view, a very important proposal, and the Commission supports it".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq189 translatedText "6 - The Department of Justice's proposal has not received any support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq187 translatedText "5 - The proposal by the Ministry of Justice to be responsible for showing contempt for the rights and responsibilities of the courts or of the right and duties of Celtic".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq185 translatedText "4 - Motion for parliamentary secretary at the Ministry of Justice, supported by".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq183 translatedText "3 - The proposal by the Ministry of Justice is linked to the transfer of cases by the Commission to another court, with a view to a more rapid examination of the case in question by the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq181 translatedText "2 - Proposal by the parliamentary secretary of the Ministry of Justice to support".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq179 translatedText "Colleague of the sitting, colleagues, working on the draft law on the Civil Process Act at second reading, the Commission has received 46 proposals, So 1 is the Justice of Justice. Secretary of the Department of Deputies of the Ministry of Deputies, who, under the law of the Civil Process, provides for a regulation laying down the Commission's support for the Commission proposal.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq178 translatedText "27 Feb@@. The next item is the next item on the next item: the Bill on Civil Process, Second Reading on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission - Member of the Legal Affairs Committee".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq177 translatedText "The deadline for tabling proposals is 27 February.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq176 translatedText "Thank you for asking the bill,' Amendment of the Law on the entry into force and the application of the Law on Criminal Justice '. The result! On - 87, against and abstentions - the adoption of the legislative proposal at first reading is not the deadline for submission of proposals for a second reading.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq175 translatedText "The Bill is a proposed bill in the Cabinet Bill, and is linked to the content of the content of the crime of the criminal offence and the content of thatthe substance is also linked as previously supported, as they are linked to the draft legislative resolution, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee, to support this bill at first reading".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq174 translatedText "27 Feb@@. On the next item: the next item on the next item: " amendments to the Law on the entry into force and application of the Law on Criminal Justice "".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq173 translatedText "The Commission is seeking a deadline of 27 February this year for the submission of proposals".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq172 translatedText "Thank you for asking the alternative bill' Amendment to the Criminal Justice Commission' (registration No 187 / Lp12) by the Legal Affairs Commission. Results!: - 84, against and abstentions: not a draft legislative act at first reading".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq171 translatedText "The Legal Commission proposes as an alternative to the newly rejected legislation on its bill " Amendment to the Criminal Justice " - where all of the articles of the Criminal Code needed to be amended include the Legal Affairs Committee's call for a legislative call - to support the bill".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq170 translatedText "And proceed to an alternative".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq168 translatedText "Thank you for the first reading of the Amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill (registration No 151 / Lp12), please voting, please see the result!: 2, against - 84, abstentions - 1 legislative date rejected".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq167 translatedText "Hello! Dear colleague, first of all your attention to the Bill of Criminal Justice, whose registration number is 151 / Lp12 and which the Cabinet of Cabinet has in charge of the Bill, and the Legal Affairs Committee, there was much discussion as the draft lawcontains, by nature, two major blocks of the One Block (and more than 20 articles) concern the qualification of the harmful effects of the offence, i.e., for a significant amount of content, and more generally, in the specific articlethe special parts of the item on the dispositions And about their great debate had not realized that it was possible to discuss a second and third reading of significant discussions on the other parts of this project, that is, on the fault lines in the resolutionit is a form of shared guilt - of intent and disregard: which at the moment is how to measure the common offence It is connected not only by this law, but also by other laws where certainpersons prevented from taking work under a deliberate offence, And this assessment, which actually commissions the theorists and scientists to the dispute, has led to the Legal Affairs Committee's failure to support the project. Generally, but to offer my own, alternative, bill " Amendment to the Criminal Justice, " and I will also call for it later, that the first is the Bill of Criminal Justice, whose registration number is 151 / Lp12, and the Legal Affairs Committee's decision was not to support this bill".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq166 translatedText "On 12 March, the Members of the European Parliament will not raise their views on the agenda for today's sitting, we have to decide to amend the agenda for today's sitting, to amend the agenda for today's sitting and to include the amendment of the Amendment to the Insolvency Law. MEPs call on the President of the European Parliament to refer the matter to the European Parliament for their votes on Thursday (click on the first reading of the sitting of Thursday, please see the first reading of the sitting of Thursday, please see the first reading of the amendment to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments to the amendments tothe result! On - 53, against: 26, abstentions: 6 Agenda amended by the Committee on Budgets is also asking for changes to the agenda of today's sitting and to include the " Amendment " of the bill on corporate tax "at the first reading stage, the House will also vote on a resolution on this topic. MEPs have reservations about the agenda changes, as MPs from the Economic and Regional Policy Committee have requested an amendment to the agenda of today's sitting and to include a draft amendment to the bill " Amendment of the Consumer Law Directive " Does Members have the right to vote at first reading. There are no objections to the vote! Concerning: 55, against - 24 abstentions: 7 Agenda amended by the Fair Collection: the next item on the next item on the next item: bill Criminal Justice, 1st reading Legal Affairs Committee - Member of the Legal Affairs Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq165 translatedText "For the third reading, proposals must be made by 12 March 2015".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq164 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the draft legislation on the draft legislation on the' Amendment of the Copymaking Law', please vote!: 58, against - 27 abstentions - 1 legislative proposal for a second reading.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq163 translatedText "Yes, so I call on the House to vote on the package at second reading.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq161 translatedText "However, the Commission also supported editorial clarifications and also supported all proposals, including the proposal made by Parliamentary Secretary for Transport (No medicine DEP V Agešins: " to vote! ")".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq160 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote on 8 - the proposal by the Member of Valeri Agashina and the Member's request for the vote! Please vote! For - 29, against - 46, abstentions - 3 proposals are not supported by the 3 proposals.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq159 translatedText "The Commission did not support this proposal, so I would urge it not to support it".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq157 translatedText "Fellow Members, another problem relates to Article 34 (1) of the bill, the wording adopted in the First reading provides that the way in which the occasional carriage of domestic passengers is carried out by the Government of the Government of the Government of the Ministry of Transport, by approving Transport Ministersthe arrangements for the arrangements for occasional services could create the possibility of this service being easily destroyed without the news of the members of the assembly, which I am familiar with now, with which I am familiar with me. Legitimate concerns about the re-establishment of a way to legally steal the business of a stolen business by the occasional passenger carrier But this runs counter to the interests of passengers, so I call on you to vote on 8 of the proposal and exclude Article 2 of the bill Thank you".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq155 translatedText "Hence, 8 Proposal for a proposal by Mr Agashina and Mr Liepiya (Support to DEP J Urbanovic: support!), which was not supported by the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq154 translatedText "Moves forward to 8 proposals".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq153 translatedText "Alien machine (laughs DEP J Urbanovic: " occur! ")".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq152 translatedText "Thank you with 8 proposals".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq151 translatedText "No, accidentally pressed!".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq150 translatedText "Thank you, however, for the vote, however, that we will vote in favour of Mr Barroso's proposal! Please vote! Please vote!: 34, against - 46, abstentions- 5 Motion for no support for But, before we move on, I really do not understand what Will the Boome wants to debate?".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq149 translatedText "7 - Members of the Daily Liepus proposal Tur had a whole package This more applies to taxi services, but the commission believes that one proposal should be left to speak at second reading here. But the assessment of the commission concluded that we cannot do all of this on the third reading or debate, so it will be given three months, because the problems in the taxi transport are the commission members - all in principle! - recognised ,and in three months, therefore, the industry, together with ministries and interested organisations and members, will have separate proposals for taxis, but in this case the 7 proposal - the Daily Liepus proposal - decided not to support the Commission proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq147 translatedText "6 - Member's proposal: the Commission considered that this would in fact reduce their delegation, which is why it was not supported (No remedy:' no' vote!')".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq145 translatedText "5 proposal is made by the Parliamentary Secretary of State for Transport, Mr KORNAS, and has received support from the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq143 translatedText "May 4, yes? 4 is for passenger regular services To be submitted by Member State to the Liepins, but the Commission did not get it (No floor: no:' vote!')".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq142 translatedText "The Members have not already voted on this, but a simple session has to be reported on all the proposals in turn to proceed with 4 proposals!".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq141 translatedText "3 proposal we put together, yes, 3 proposals cannot, yes?".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq140 translatedText "3 proposal to skipper!".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq139 translatedText "Thus, 4 proposal, which was not sponsored by the Commission, was".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq138 translatedText "Yes, please voice call! Vote for the 2 - Secretary of State for Transport, Karinas KORNAS, asking for the vote! Please see the result!: 58, against - 29, without a proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq137 translatedText "Therefore, on behalf of the Commission, I would call for support for the proposal put forward by the Joint Committee on Transport and Legal Affairs, which is 2 and 3.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq135 translatedText "Dear colleagues, Mr Agashina's concerns are certainly the basis, but I would remind you that, by amending this law, we will be asking the Cabinet Office to draw up the provisions of the Cabinet Office which will then regulate the area of occasional services in practically thisthe only area that does not regulate certain of the Cabinet's rules These Cabinet rules are taps, and the Tautfarms, the agrarian, environment and regional policy commission are bound by these Cabinet rules or, rather, their black pattern going to the commissionbefore the deadline for tabling proposals, and Members, including Mr Ageshina, will have access to the intentions of the Ministry of Transport for the occasional regulation of the transport sector, and I would urge though to support this proposal from the Ministry of Transport and move on.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq133 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, with regard to the 2 proposal, I would like to point out that, if we support the proposal and the bill as a whole, there can be serious problems with the interpretation of this standard, Ag@@. It is incomprehensible that Article 1 (23) isis intended with the words' functionally serving the same passengers'; it is not clear how occasional carriers will find out whether they operate the same passengers in Domari, that it will not be possible, in theory, to establish whether occasional carriers are serving the samepassengers served by bus and coach parks on a regular basis within the meaning of this definition are so widely interpreted as allowing the default of a bus and / or coach park customer to be automatically considered by any person I believe is that " clients of regular carriers " can be limited toto those passengers waiting for bus and coach terminals or at the public transport stop I am convinced that Saeima should not lay dead the rules that I am calling on to reject in my opinion, in my view, that the actual purpose of this proposal isstrengthen the monopoly rights of regular transport operators, i.e. bus parks which receive public grants, even for cost-effective routes, and to drive from the occasional transport of passengers, for example, to passengers' groups, such as Latvian citiesover the years, Autoponan Law vs passengers' interests and the will of the majority of MPs may prove only one: the wish of individual bus and coach fleets to remove competitors - the occasional Ashes' vote against the 2 proposals".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq132 translatedText "Thank you very much for the first debate in the House for a debate on the Middle East.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq131 translatedText "I call on you not to support this proposal, the Commission voted against Mr Vectiran as the procedure to say to Mr Vectiran; you have a button! (heckling DEP J Urbanovic :" happen! ") Yes, I understand that there is nothing to say to Please call! We will vote in favour of Mr Agashina's proposal! Please voting, please vote!: 33, against - 29, abstentions -21 Proposal for a proposal by the Ministry of Transport for 2 and 3 is not supported by the proposal, and this would have supported the wording, which has also been supported by the Commission".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq129 translatedText "Dear colleagues, in the economic, agrarian, environmental and regional policy committees that raised this issue, the Legal Office received very detailed, very accurate and developed analyses of the existence or absence of a contradiction in the Regulation referred to by Mr Agashinathe legal office did not see any contradiction, and therefore I call for this proposal to be rejected, however, because I call for this rejection of Mr Agashina's proposal, because I see it as simply an utter contradiction in his written text. We are talking about occasional passenger traffic, we are talking about occasional services at the same time as the occasional transport of non-regular services, only because at least one day at a time the Man I School taught at some time at one timeif some activity is carried out at a certain time, there is a regular activity on Well as there may be occasional services being carried out on a regular basis? Then they are regular services, I think we will also respect English and reject the proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq128 translatedText "Thank you to Debaten, the Member of Ingioner Lizdabeu".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq127 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that, in view of the economic situation in the country, it is of paramount importance to support and develop business in accordance with fair competition in the field of road transport and passenger interests, I would therefore like to draw your attention to one particular problem with the definition of non-regular passenger transportin the context of Article 1, point 23 of the bill, the second sentence of the bill missing from the bill disappeared: " the transport of non-regular services does not lose any status simply because at a certain time of time " This rule isthe existing Road Transport Law and in full compliance with European Union legislation This sentence we cannot exclude from the bill, since this would, in my opinion, be contrary to Regulation No 1073 / 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning common rulesas regards access to the international road haulage market, the third sentence of Article 5 (3) of the Regulation clearly states that occasional services do not call for occasional non-regular services and only because they are carried out at a certain intervals, in accordance with the provisions of the RegulationAnnex 2 gives a Community authorisation for the authorisation of a Community authorisation, the general rules in point 9 of the General Regulation set out the definitions of the non-regular transport of non-regular services only because ofat certain time intervals, paragraph 2 states that the carrier meets the conditions laid down in Community rules on the authorisation to pursue the occupation of passengers in the national and international transport conditions, It means that the definitions of different types of road transport should bein the same way as those used in international transport, all these provisions are literally contained in the Community authorisation text and shall be issued to the commercial passenger by coach in all countries of the European Union, including in the Proti, this Regulation shall apply to both the internationalfor passenger transport and for the domestic commercial carriage of passengers, a Regulation which is applicable from 4 December 2011 to Latvia as a Member State of the European Union must be kept compulsory and I would literally like to recall that freedom to provide services is a fundamental principle of the European Union's common transport policy ,as well as ensuring that carriers have access to the transport market in addition to their rights, I believe that Saeima should defend the interests of passengers rather than bus and coach parks should therefore call for 1 Thank you as a proposal".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq126 translatedText "Thank you very much for starting the debate in Devil Agešinam".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq125 translatedText "The Commission has examined and prepared a second reading of the Bill Series Law (document No 448), with nine motions for uproar by the President of the Commission. To a large extent, there is a definition; one part of the proposal is a proposal of this nature, which was not supported by the Commission, Mr Agashina's proposal for occasional passenger transport, in principle".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq124 translatedText "Colleagues, please, take the seat! And please keep quiet!".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq123 translatedText "Dear Piedij, colleagues.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq122 translatedText "Dear colleague, the clock is 11 30! (interjection from the floor:' 31!') Not yet 31, after 4 seconds, so, colleagues, the clock is 11 and now 31, now 31. The House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".