Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2307 translatedText "On July 18, the House will also vote on a resolution on this topic.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2306 translatedText "18 July!".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2305 translatedText "18 June, July?".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2304 translatedText "Proposals await exactly a month later - 18 July".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2303 translatedText "Thank you for the first reading of the draft law on energy efficiency, please voting, please see the result!: 79, against and abstentions - the adoption of the proposal for a second reading by the Parliament is required.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2302 translatedText "Fellow Members, I would like to inform you, at the first reading of the draft law on energy efficiency, that the aim of this bill is to ensure efficiency in the production, distribution and final consumption of energy, to ensure the availability of energy audits and regular minimum energy audits in large enterprises and to promote energy efficiencywith the development of the services market and the creation of a national energy efficiency fund, this bill seeks to ensure the development and implementation of national energy efficiency action plans in the Commission, and I therefore call on you here to vote in favour of the draft legislation at first reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2301 translatedText "10 August Members agree legislative proposal on " Energy Efficiency Act " - Edward Smillan, MP for the Economic and Environmental Policy Commission, First Reading, Environment and Regional Policy Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2300 translatedText "10 August this year".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2299 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the draft law on the law on the expropriation of public persons' assets in second reading, please the result!: 77, against and abstentions - do not have the legislative proposal for a second reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2298 translatedText "All of the proposals on behalf of the Commission call for a second reading of the legislation".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2292 translatedText "7 - Legal office proposal Partly sponsored and included in 8 proposals".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2290 translatedText "6 - Mr. Reira's proposal: no support".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2288 translatedText "5 - The Minister for Economic Affairs, Danas Reiznieces-Ozolas, has not supported the problem identified in the Commission and outlined a number of solutions and then agreed that the MoD would consider the best solution to the third reading in the summer and then submitted to So".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2284 translatedText "3 - Reira's proposal for Finance Minister Partly sponsored, incorporated into 4 proposals".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2280 translatedText "Colleagues, the package consists of nine proposals 1: the proposal by the Reira finance minister, the Pardeur sponsored, included in 2 proposals".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2279 translatedText "10 August Members agree.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2278 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: 10 August this year".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2277 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the Amendment to the Act " Amendment of the Act of Cooperative Society, " please voting the result!: 80, against and abstentions - the legislative proposal for a second reading is available at third reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2274 translatedText "8 Proposal for this proposal is linked to proposals that have already been supported and provides for the adoption of a specific amendment of the relevant amendment of the law, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2272 translatedText "7 Proposal for a proposal by the Ministry of Justice to be partially supported and incorporated into the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2270 translatedText "6 Proposal - The proposal of the Ministry of Justice of the Ministry of Justice to clarify the rule as to which date the cooperative companies in the cooperative societies are required to amend in the Statutes - that is, by 1 July 2016 in the Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2268 translatedText "5 Proposal for a proposal by the Ministry of Justice to clarify to the Commission the information provided to the Commission in the minutes of the meeting of members of the cooperative society.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2266 translatedText "4 Proposal for a proposal by the Public Administration and Local Government Commission Parez to complement Article 37, with a new 2-1 share, stating that a cooperative society, other than the operator, may convene an authorised meeting, provided that the Statute provides for more thanthan 200 voting members, this rule is required in order to simplify the decision-making procedure in those cooperative societies with a high number of members and, therefore, the problem of quorum counters at the co-assembly meeting in Accra to support the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2264 translatedText "3 Proposal for a proposal of the Ministry of Justice to be part of the Department of Justice's proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2262 translatedText "2 Proposal for a proposal by the Public Administration and Local Government Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2260 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, we are working on the bill in the Law of Cooperative Society (document No 943), eight proposals for the second reading of the bill are presented at 1proposal for a proposal from the Public Administration and Local Government Commission to harmonise the provisions of 36 Article of Article 36 in the Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2258 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: 25 June".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2257 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the bill " The estate of the Kaxe, " part of the Ledmanes Region, the Great Yarn county, the expropriation of an E22-Koknese reconstruction projectin the second reading, I asked the voting regime for a second reading of the result: 80, against and abstentions, for a second reading to determine the deadline for tabling proposals at third reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2256 translatedText "We have looked at all the proposals on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission to support the bill " The estate of the Kaxe " part of the Ledmanes Region, the Great Yarn county, the expropriation of a public road at E22 Riga -Koknese reconstruction project at second reading".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2254 translatedText "And also 8 - the last - is the proposal of the Legal Office, which is supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2252 translatedText "Also 7 - The Legal Office's proposal, which supports".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2250 translatedText "6 - The proposal by the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2248 translatedText "5 - The proposal by the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2246 translatedText "Similarly, 4 is supported by the proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2244 translatedText "3 - Proposal by the Legal Office, which is supported by editorial support".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2242 translatedText "2 - The proposal by the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2240 translatedText "Dear President, ladies and gentlemen, the aim of the bill is to ensure the needs of society: the E22-Koknese reconstruction project in the national road for the reconstruction of the country, This is an exceptional case of an exception from the fact that the owner of the estate does not appear to have arrived at the expense of onethe Commission's sitting, despite repeated calls, shows her disinterest in some sense on this issue by the College, so the Legal Affairs Committee has received eight proposals in favour of the Legal Office, which is supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2239 translatedText "14 August Thank you to the next item: the bill " The estate of the Kaxe " in the Ledmanes Region, the Middle East, the expropriation of the public on E22 Riga, 2nd reading on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee - Member of Gaidis".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2238 translatedText "14 August".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2237 translatedText "Thank you for the bill, we will vote in favour of the Bill for Parliamentary Inquiry in the Second Reading Law, please voting. Please see the result! For - 79, against and abstentions - the adoption of the deadline for tabling proposals at second reading".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2236 translatedText "Dear colleague, all the proposals on the amendments to the parliamentary inquiry commission are dealt with in the Bill in support of the draft law at second reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2235 translatedText "We will vote in favour of the proposal of the Legal Affairs Office, please voting, the result!, please vote!: 73, against - 3, without a proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2232 translatedText "I would, however, urge - also on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission - to support the specific proposal to Mr Loskutova, so to speak, in the history of two formal mistakes in the first place -the panel of parliamentary inquiries is not in the jury It is a sort of political jury at the trial of And jury, if one does not agree with the person convicted, then a human not.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2230 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleague, I think that there is no doubt in my mind that the commission's final report to the meeting of MPs As we see in the previous Commons parliamentary inquiry into the collapse of Krai bank was a dead end, effectively addressing the House of Deputieswith a fully cleared signatures, the members of the Some Commission, with the other reasons not signed by the Bureau of the final reports, actually recommended them to collect their signatures fully and then again to return to the meeting of the meeting to deal with this final reportthey certainly could not have been able to collect, and the final report did not come before the meeting of the meeting I think that the original position was also expressed by Mr Loskutova that the original position was that, in fact, allthere has to be a case of the referees and all you need to participate in the vote and also sign this final report - there is aborted last term when MPs were unable to fully collect these signatures I think the argument that eachit must be a conscientious MEP and, of course, it must be signed, there is no doubt that the argument that, if this situation speaks out, should be the mandate, the ethical and the application of the Commission, I think that the mandate, the ethics and thean application to the commission will neither someday handle the particular MPs who have chosen their own niche - mandate, ethics and application commission - nor will it be able to force colleagues to sign this final report, therefore I thinkthe absolute majority of votes that are required here at the moment to approve the final report are logical and consistent with the spirit of the Constitution, as the idea was for the final report to be presented to the Saeima Commons rather than to disappear on the corridors.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2229 translatedText "Thank you to Ringoldam Balodim, Member of the Member".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq19 translatedText "Thank you to Ringoldam Balodim, Member of the Member".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2228 translatedText "Fellow Members, the rule in force gives us that the final report of the parliamentary inquiry commission is signed by all the members of the parliamentary inquiry, This means that the consent of all the Members of this committee is necessary, and I think that the parliamentary inquiry is very harsh, but, in my view, of parliamentary investigationsthe Commission is very comparable to the jury, because if a jury has all the public leaders or representatives who decide on the question of the guilt of the person and if they see the guilt, the judge on that basis imposes a sentence on the Thad Parliamentarythe commission of inquiry, acting as a jury, namely all factions on an equal footing from each other faction, decides, in my view, to think that any conclusions would represent a view to representing all members of the commission, and all members of the committee of inquiry would agree with its conclusions. This means that, if there is disagreement, MEPs who object to To find the common denominator, where the same idea is to be met, in some case, have to stand up to those who remain at their own, and I call on it not to support it".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2227 translatedText "MEPs want to debate MEPs' credentials".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2225 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the proposal by Mr Elin, please voting, please vote!: 25, against: 34, 17 no abstentions - 17 proposals are not supported".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2224 translatedText "Nothing to be added on behalf of the Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2222 translatedText "Dear colleagues, I would very much like to say very briefly that the admission of a collegiate institution to a national secrecy does not allow the Commission to refuse a national secrecy but is given to the people who work there".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2221 translatedText "Thank you to Member of the Commission, Mr Gunar Kumthree, for a second time".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2220 translatedText "Honourable President, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to clarify a little more about what Mr Elin said about what the Law on State secrets of the Law of the Committees of Inquiry says in the Law of Inquiry:' access to national secrecy and rightsto use it to carry out its duties is the appointment of the parliamentary committees of inquiry appointed by the assembly, " Mr Speech is about the commission as a collegiate institution, but for each Member to operate in such a commission, there must be a person who meets the requirements of the countrythe tolerances pursuant to Article 9 (a), third subparagraph of that Law, Only for Members who do not have access to a national secrecy may be subject to a parliamentary inquiry and only when they have access to the state secret".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2218 translatedText "(from the floor of the DEP A boss: " we'll understand! ") Ciennish colleague, well, don't give it the chance to work with the state secrets, I know more than they do with their admission! (heckling from the floor) Not requiredto me, that is a clearance! The question is, so to speak, from a really legal point of view, the extent to which the provisions of the rules that have been adopted are clear, understandable, and so the Legal Affairs of the Legal Affairs Committee is all aware of this. Unfortunately, what Mr Judin told me today was that he, well, as such an agent stands guard of Nu by the national security authorities? You are working for them? You are working for them?".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2216 translatedText "Good afternoon, dear colleagues, this is indeed a piece of law, Mr Judas very rightly says that, in the first part of Article 12 of the Law on State secrets, it is true that MPs are entitled to see the state secrets of the state ifas long as they have received this access in the fourth section of the same article, the fourth part of the same article is the special provision which talks about the committees of inquiry of committees of inquiry, to which the commission and, in this case, thethere is special provision if the members of the commission have spoken that this clearance is not necessary, then it would not be possible for special provision to be excluded from what it would be like to duplicate it ,what already exists in the first part of the first subparagraph should not duplicate the rules in substance, and a quarter provides for specific regulations in the second part of the law where the law on the committees of inquiry does not require such a rule, I would be happy unless in practice notthe various interpretations of this norm are interpretations of the statutory' State secrets' of the Legal Office of the Legal Office saying that there are no two thoughts here! - it is clear that there is no contradiction in the rule, I would very much like to seethe leaders of our security authorities also interpreted the norm to Man as the commission manager at high risk of interpreting this standard, written into law, to allow the commission to familiarise themselves with the national secrets of the country and then on the basis of the Nationalthe Head of the Security Service's decision to lose access to national secrecy should, however, be reached here in the Commons, the precise wording of the law, so that interpretation is not ambiguous and that everyone knows what may or should not, I will support this proposal by Mr Elin.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2214 translatedText "Colleagues, I fully understand the pain of Mr Elin, and I have no doubt that he wants to address the substance of the problem, and this is exactly very positive and he has just cited a number of articles in a series of lawsand look very strongly, Well, I can continue and, in the same style, tell you, colleagues, that the law raised by Mr Elin, referred to in Article 12, third subparagraph, of the Law on State secretsindicated that access to state secrecy and the right to use it for the purposes of carrying out their functions are members of the assembly under the limit set out in the third paragraph of Article 9 of that Act One of the limits: the access to information isdenied to Members who have examined the facts that provide a basis for questioning the credibility and the ability to preserve State secrets in the light of So-tah, you are proposing the following: all Members have been elected, andthey don't have the right to work with the national secrets; now we will build - anyway, on an issue, the commission of inquiry, we will vote for the people and they will get the opportunity to work without a test Well, that doesn't work! Thank you".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2213 translatedText "Thank you to the House for a second time in the debate.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2212 translatedText "Yes, dear colleagues, having listened to Mr Judin's theses with regard to the proposal in question, it is very, very surprising that I, and I will not be perhaps as peculiar in their criticism of Mr. Schadurska, for those with regard to them and everything else, but to a large extent. To the extent that I have a question: at the hearing today, Mr Judin is in the chair of the committee, Mr Judin, who was at the Legal Affairs Committee hearing, because you are speaking with one another on the substance of the proposal, on the substance of the proposal, the moment, the honourable colleague, not in thisthe law, so neither the parliamentary commission of inquiry is legal, but the Law on State secrets " has identified cases in which the official is cleared of a test of state secrets to state secrets, if you want to hold any position, say a member of the commission ,the office of a cabinet member, Prime Minister or President and so on, but at the same time, at the same time, in the fourth and fifth parts of the Law on State secrets, there are cases in which the clearance work with the state secrets is not required by you. Imagine, in our country, there are people who work with state secrets in the case of state secrets too, if they do not have the right to work with the state secrets of the country, they are sworn lawyers in accordance with Article 12 of the Law on State secrets? In the UK there is no sworn solicitor who should have a clearance to work with state secrets, but if, for example, a government official steals the state's secrets, then the lawyer works with this country's secrets in this particular case, he is signing up to a separate commitment to writing that heit has been made aware that it is a state secret, which cannot be disclosed, that a liability for its disclosure of the Presence is still official? Is also the prosecution official as the process's promoter has apologized as the process's promoters And all of it is written by law-making law" on State secrets " - Mr Judas, read it in law! - in the fifth paragraph of Rule 12, what is written in the fourth paragraph of Article 12 of the Law on State secrets? To carry out his duties or decide today to conduct a parliamentary inquiry into alleged breaches of the national security service, in the action of the Special Services, then the clearance of these people to work with the state secrets is not required by Why? And the answer is very clear and reasonable. Logically, if the national security authorities now audit who the MPs - from you in the incumbent - will test their work Well, for example, they will not want to see Zarku there - Zarku won't be able to refuse Mr Shelmet. To see it in the commission of inquiry itself - there will also be no tolerance for him - Mr Judin himself - the same problem does Kur have created for a given moment? The problem has developed into the Constitutional Protection Bureau, which, as the Legal Committee, for example, has identifiedMr cake as former head of the Constitutional Court, and the committee's legal office did it and, and so does Mr Judin, by the way, he never saw any justification for the Constitutionthe Office for Protection does not apply the state secrets of the' For State secrets', in Article 12, the fourth subparagraph, he invented no way, however, that we should ask, in this case, within the parliamentary committee of inquiry, of this kindtolerances to the state secrets lining up are the purpose and substance of my particular proposal, which includes the same provision, which is foreseen in the fourth paragraph of Article 12 of the Law on State secrets, in order not to have any ambiguity, interpretations, somemore problematic for each other: the specific problem is confirmed by the position of the Legal Affairs Commission; it has sent a letter to the permanent working group of the Cabinet Office concerning amendments to the law of the national security authorities that this situation is not normal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2210 translatedText "Dear colleague, there is no doubt that my colleague, Elkin, for a good wish, submitted this proposal to the question whether the parliamentary inquiry committee is or does not have the right to work with the secrets of the country without doubt, and the lawalso provides that a Member, any Member, not only the one working for a parliamentary inquiry committee, can obtain the right to work with the national secrets Bet by colleague Elin ko? A special permit approach to national secrecy means What does it propose that if a person is elected to become a member of the parliamentary inquiry committee, he is automatically entitled to work with the country's secrets It isn't an issuethe law should be resolved if Mr Elin has such an opinion, it may be discussed, but there is a special " State secrets, " which determine the way in which people are able to work with the relevant documents, with relevant informationso, first of all, there is a legal error in the proposal that had to be presented in another draft bill, but we will see this special law, so we will see clearly that any Member has the right to work with sensitive documents Butthere are arrangements? If a Member has such a wish, check And if there are no problems, he can get the admission of Bet, if we do not check that there should be no examination, it could be a big, big problem for me tooI would like to work in the Commons, where the issue at all is not on the radar of people who may be elected by state secrets, but it is well-known that it is not, and that there are people in our Commons who cannotentrust state secrets to the test must, of course, also offer a solution - carry out an examination of all Members, but, as far as I know, some do not wish that they do not even want them to do so. To stand and to claim the posts, because they understand what they have problems with, this proposal cannot be upheld for two reasons: it has been put on the wrong end of the bill and offers a sloppy solution to him not to support him.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2209 translatedText "MEPs to debate new EU-Russia summit".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2208 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, I am of course in favour of the fact that this final outcome can be approved by an absolute majority of the Commission, because its experience has been in the form of the 2 proposals I will be making.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2207 translatedText "Thank you very much for opening the debate to the Member of the European Parliament.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2206 translatedText "Dear colleagues, the draft law on the parliamentary committee on parliamentary inquiry law was drafted for second reading by Andrei Elin' s proposal to be added to Article 2 of the law".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2205 translatedText "20 August Thank you to the next item: draft legislation on the parliamentary commission of inquiry, Second reading by Mr Andrei Elin on behalf of the Legal Affairs Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2204 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: 20 August".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2203 translatedText "Thank you for the second reading of the' Asylum Law' Bill, please vote! Yes, 77, against and abstentions - there is no draft legislative proposal adopted at second reading.".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2200 translatedText "And 79 - The proposal for a Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2196 translatedText "77 - Presentation by the responsible Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2194 translatedText "76 - Proposal by the chairman of the committee, advocated".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2192 translatedText "75 - Presentation by the responsible Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2190 translatedText "74 - Proposal by the chairman of the committee, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq369 translatedText "74 - Proposal by the chairman of the committee, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2188 translatedText "73 - Chair of the Commission's proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2186 translatedText "72 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq365 translatedText "72 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2182 translatedText "70 - The Legal Office proposal has also been included in 71 - the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2180 translatedText "69 - Proposal for a resolution of the Legal Office, partially supported, included in 71 by the Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2178 translatedText "68 - Legal Office proposal".
- 2015_06_04_304-seq653 translatedText "68 - Legal Office proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2176 translatedText "67 - Presentation by the responsible Commission proposal, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2174 translatedText "66 - Proposal for a resolution of the Legal Office, partially sponsored by the Legal Office, included in the proposal of the responsible Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2170 translatedText "64 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office,".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2168 translatedText "63 - Motion for a resolution of the Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2166 translatedText "62 - Proposal for a regulation of the Legal Office, incorporated by the Legal Office, included in the proposal by the responsible Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2164 translatedText "61 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office,".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2162 translatedText "60 - Motion for a resolution by the chairman of the Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2160 translatedText "59 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq339 translatedText "59 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2158 translatedText "Yes 58 - Proposal by the chairman of the committee responsible,".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2157 translatedText "Withdrawn, yes".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2156 translatedText "57 proposal to be withdrawn".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2154 translatedText "56 - Commission's proposal is supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2152 translatedText "55 - Proposal by the Legal Office - Proposal for a".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2150 translatedText "54 - Presentation by the chairman of the committee, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq329 translatedText "54 - Presentation by the chairman of the committee, supported by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2148 translatedText "53 - Presentation by the responsible Commission proposal".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2146 translatedText "52 - Proposal for a proposal from the Legal Office,".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2144 translatedText "51 - Home Secretary's proposal by Secretary of State with responsibility".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2142 translatedText "50 - Legal office proposal sponsored by".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2140 translatedText "49 - Home Secretary's proposal by Secretary of State with responsibility".