Matches in Saeima for { ?s <http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/vocabulary/translatedText> ?o. }
- 2016_02_11_344-seq302 translatedText "Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Mr Zariis, I would like to draw attention to the fact that the law already provides for the provision of this safety margin to be made in the provisions of the Cabinet regulation, even saying that this proposal is rathercunning, because we have to take account of the fact that we have opened up the supply of markets, and the requirements contained in this proposal would be extended, for example, to suppliers supplying gas through the LMG. Terminal, all costs shall, in this case, be put to the final consumer as a result of which it was, and what, the commission of the commission was not consulted and it was not known and neither was the entry into force in the meaning of It ;as such an amendment enters into force immediately, it should be taken into account that this would require additional regulation in the Commission's sitting, we spoke about the matter, and the request is to stick with the Commission's opinion and not to support".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq300 translatedText "Fellow Members, such an amendment to the Energy Law is needed to remedy the situation that has now been created by approving the Energy Bill in a new version and by providing for these mechanisms of liberalisation, without providing for an appropriate mechanism to ensure that security of gas supply at present represents a realistic risk to the law ,that we will have a number of marketers, and that's very good - Latvian consumers will be able to choose the Taseer Act not making any commitment to these traders, and the conclusion of a contract with this trader, it will not be clear at all whether the trader is real ,will he be able to supply gas or will not be able to deliver on Why's situation this is so topical - be able to assess these risks? Because the UK's supply system is built, given that our biggest gas consumption is in the winter, Mr Tasei is in thatthe gas supply opportunities are very limited at the moment, if it does not have this savings, if the trader is not assembled, then it may come to a point that the gas will not be at all in this case, as regards the risks of gas supply should therefore be justified, therefore, that such athe mechanism provides for the second thing, why such amendments are necessary and why they should be supported, there is, from a competition point of view, a discriminatory situation coming up in such a way that every trader can do as he wants, and the law requires that ,if the trader does not meet, say a heat company suddenly in the winter, Teiksim, one heat company has concluded a contract with a trader who can supply gas cheaper than his current gas dealer And this heat for the company after this heat companythere is a need for a gas, the trader says: " well, the ship in the Middle East has failed to supply conflicts, well I cannot deliver anything " What is left of this heat company? Law provides a formal technical, legal solution that the system operator will have it ,what will deliver this gas issue of Bet - where the system operator will take this gas if he misses it in advance for winter, they may not be in for the gas it means to appear in these real risks of supply. One thing that comes up here is that, if we leave such a mechanism, such a situation creates such a situation where we do not want the risks of supply to happen, then the system operator must start to keep in parallel with this supposedly cheap gas in Inchaukalne andto make it pay for all other users, And here's the discrimination Someone can play in a single market, speculate and try to earn it in the Gadide, if we do not have to pay for it in the current Bill! Therefore, my proposal is to amend the situation and to predict that every trader who supplies gas to Latvian consumers requires some form of margin, which he, too, has even seen here - the Inčiukalne Kade was in the face of discussing this issue? I'll tell you straight away that I think they were absolutely incompetent and inadequate One of the counter-arguments was that the Energy Law provides for keeping emergency backup Colleagues, if there is an understanding of how security should be built, so you know - I will explain the Emergency Aid Reservethere is quite another backup to the reserve that Has has used in the state of emergency, As I understand, the proposal is that we have a market model and now let it work so that it leads the country to an emergency and then we areusing the emergency reserve This is complete nonsense! The other argument that was mentioned was that, in Europe, a new framework for Yes, indeed Europe's top new regulation, But this is only at the initial stage, at the stage of consultation, And when it will be adopted ,no one knows exactly what it is going to be, nor does anyone know Another more - the Ministry of Economy refers to this regulation, so the specific regulation that is already in place under this Regulation (if indeed invoked and called upon )Cuomo and follow-up tells us that every Member State has to take care of its energy security and identify these measures, which I also call for in the case of the opposite, we will be putting the market at serious risk and the distortion of competition".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq298 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, we are working with this bill, which has been granted the urgency and which we have already adopted at first reading in the Commission, there was a discussion on the two motions for proposals 1 -Ivara Zariit's proposal aims to ensure continuity of supplies of UK natural gas users and the safety of the Aaktivically issue is a matter of gas reserves, but the Commission proposal did not support this proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq297 translatedText "Honourable colleague, the Commission for the Economy, the agrarian, environmental and regional policy Commission is seeking to amend the agenda of the meeting of the meeting of MPs and the bill " Energy Law " (No 504 / Lp12) to consider the 11 issues (before the draft legislation on sexual and reproductive health") There are no objections to the members of the Agenda, the House has rejected the agenda as an amendment to the Agenda for the Energy Law, the Second Reading of the Economic and Regional Policy Commission - Edward Smiltani, Minister for the Environment and Regional Policy".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq296 translatedText "Honourable Members, in connection with the fact that documents are still being prepared, there is a request for technical reasons to extend the break to 11 / 20 as Members have reservations?".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq294 translatedText "Dear colleagues, we are not registered at this time: the Ringolds dove, Andris boss (DEP A boss: " I'm! "), Raivis Dzintar, Artus Mezeckis and Sergei Potapkins are Thank you".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq292 translatedText "Dear colleague, the sitting of the economy, the agrarian, environmental and regional policy commission will take place after five minutes in the Chamber of the Commission to gather for the sitting.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq291 translatedText "Thank you to the MEP, Mr Romiane".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq290 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, at the end of last week, the Students' Association's annual awards show, and one of the winners of the Student Association's annual awards, came to the Saeima Awards. There was no reference to this measure, which is why I was mandated by the Chairman of the Association of Education, Culture and Science's Association of Students to announce that the " Year of the Year " of the Association of Student Students "an Intai MP has been given to MPs on suggestions made to the High School Law (applause) to make a happy tweak to Mr DĀLDERA, but he may have done so therefore".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq288 translatedText "Dear fellow Members, Members of the Group on oncological sufferers, please come here, even here in the yellow hall, to a short meeting, where we are signing the first work: a memorandum on the follow-up in the Annapolis".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq287 translatedText "Members of the Civil Liberties Committee want to see a break on the agenda for the 11 February session of the European Parliament. There is no objection? (interjection:' vote!') Members have reservations about the fact that, at Please call, the voting will take place before 11: 15! Please voting the result! Please see the result!: 58, against - 27,abstentions: not with a break to 11 o'clock before heading into the break, we must register the call of Members, please insert the presence of Members of the Chamber of Deputies!".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq285 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the bill in the third, final, reading, of the bill.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq284 translatedText "39 - It is also that the statue of the forensic peer confirmed by 31 August 2016 to 31 August 2016 has been addressed by colleagues, and I would ask that the draft law be upheld at third reading.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq282 translatedText "38 proposal is similar to the lack of support for the staff of the Commission for the examination of the staffing of forensic experts within the Commission.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq280 translatedText "And next, 37 are linked to a proposal from the Legal Affairs Commission that the Commission states that the staff staffing of this board is approved by the Commission by 31 August 2016 by 31 August 2016.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq278 translatedText "36 - The proposal by the Minister for Justice, the Minister of Justice, stating that the deadline for the establishment of a Judicial Council for approval is one month rejected by the Commission, since the Commission later set aside a different deadline for So So this proposal was not supported by this proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq276 translatedText "35 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which makes technical reference to the current Commission Justice Bill, is supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq274 translatedText "34 - The proposal by the Minister for Justice, the minister of the Ministry of Justice, which extends the deadline of two months for the issuing of the provisions of the Cabinet rules from May to July to the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq272 translatedText "33 - The proposal by the Minister of Justice, the minister of the Ministry of Justice, specifies the deadline for the establishment of forensic psychiatric tests in the Commission, supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq270 translatedText "32 - The proposal by the Minister of Justice, the minister of the Ministry of Justice, clarifies the reference and extend the deadline for the issuing of Cabinet rules to the Commission,".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq268 translatedText "31 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which technically clarifies the words from the multi-figure to a single figure, although in substance, this will also mean that the issue of the withdrawal of a medical certificate to the Commission is also supported by the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq266 translatedText "30 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which makes technical clarification of the forenames of forensic and forensic experts in the Commission, is supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq264 translatedText "29 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which complements the list of cases in which a forensic expert certificate may be terminated in Proti, it may also, in cases where the expert has established the patronage of the expert".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq262 translatedText "28 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which makes technical adjustments to the format in the Commission, is supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq260 translatedText "27 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal states that the Minister of Justice of the Court of Justice does not appoint a Minister of Justice not for five years and for three years, andthe same person may serve as chairman of the Judiciary Board for a maximum of two consecutive time in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq258 translatedText "26 - Legal Affairs Committee proposal endorsed by the Legal Affairs Committee".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq256 translatedText "25 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides for the provision of documents to be stored instead of 15 years and 10 years in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq254 translatedText "24 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal that not only the head of the forensic body, but also the driver of the process, can commission a judicial expertise in the victim sex offence in support of the victim".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq252 translatedText "23 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which provides for two new cases in which the judicial expertise is carried out by a judicial expert panel, not a separate expert: in cases where expertise isin relation to the professional activities of medicinal products, and in cases where a person's health is to be considered by a number of experts in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq250 translatedText "22 - The Legal Office's proposal, which sets out the name of the article to be more precise, has the support of the Court of Justice for".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq248 translatedText "21 - The Legal Office proposal, which is technical clarification, transforms a third tranche in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq246 translatedText "20 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal to be linked to 18 proposals, but this regulation is not included in the introductory part and, in paragraph 10, the Commission supports".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq244 translatedText "19 - The proposal by the Minister for Justice, the minister of the Ministry of Justice, to add that the expert opinion contained in the expertise version of the method used in the Commission is supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq242 translatedText "18 - The Legal Office's proposal states that the provision of expertise that provides that the content of the opinion on the expert opinion could also be included in other statutory provisions, those laid down in this Lawthe provision of the content of the opinion of the Court of Justice for the opinion of the Court of Justice, where otherwise provided for in other laws, does not make this proposal partially supported and incorporated into the Commission proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq240 translatedText "17 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which excludes the words that the expert should participate only in court hearings on the expertise carried out by' expertise', the expert should participate in the hearing and answer all questions relating to the Commission in support of the".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq238 translatedText "16 - The Legal Affairs Commission's proposal to exclude the second paragraph of paragraph 3 of the article, namely that the expertise may only be used as a registered method, as this already exists in other articles of this law, supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq236 translatedText "15 - The Legal Office's proposal to exclude all other materials should be preserved, but will not be able to retain all material in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq234 translatedText "14 - Proposal by the Legal Office, which also technical details the name and commission of the expertise".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq232 translatedText "13 - The Legal Affairs Commission proposal specifies the name of the expert in the Commission.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq230 translatedText "12 - The proposal by the Minister for Justice, Dmitry Parez, that a private forensic expert can work not only as a trader but also on the basis of a job contract, supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq228 translatedText "11 - The Legal Office's proposal to exclude the regulation relating to the training of experts in the Commission on training and the payment of reserification in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq226 translatedText "10 - Legal Affairs Commission proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq224 translatedText "9 - A proposal by the Ministry of Justice to postpone the definition of the forensic body, as well as the definition of thisthe forensic body may also be a public body or a unit-based body of a capital-based entity, edited and included in the Commission proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq222 translatedText "8 - Proposal by the Legal Office to clarify the names of experts in the Commission with regard to the names of experts and psychiatric experts in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq220 translatedText "7 - The Legal Office's proposal to combine two parts of the article (one has been said on the Chairman of the Court of Justice, the Second on Vice-President of the Commission, second to the Vice-President of the Commission),".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq218 translatedText "6 - The Legal Affairs Commission's proposal to exclude from the words that a register of forensic methods of forensic methods is maintained by a Board of Experts, as this has in fact already been incorporated in the Commission.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq216 translatedText "5 - The Legal Office's proposal to exclude from the Legal Office methods a description of the method of expertise, as they might not have been supported in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq214 translatedText "4 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal, which states that a court expert register is maintained not by the administration of the Court of Justice, but by the Commission of the Commission of experts at the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq212 translatedText "3 - The Legal Office's proposal to remove the abbreviation of abbreviation " as the law contains several registers and full titles of registers in the Commission respectively are supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq210 translatedText "2 - The Legal Affairs Committee's proposal to exclude the words " and scope " in the title of Article 2, since this article actually does not speak up in favour of the Commission in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq208 translatedText "Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the draft bill before the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice contains 39 proposals for the Ministry of Justice ,the proposal by the author of the trial, which seeks to delete the definition of forensic body as it is included in the law of Article 11 of the Act, is supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq207 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the Pension Prevention and Anti-Corruption Law, " which was voted in the third, final, reading .- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq206 translatedText "Thank you to the Social and Labour Commission for not having received any proposal and has unanimously endorsed the amendment of the Pension Prevention and Prevention Office's pension law at third reading.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq205 translatedText "Thank you, let us vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the Bill of Law on the Regulation on the regulation of the regulated professions and professional qualifications. "- / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 PBR-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq204 translatedText "Labor, colleagues, are working on a bill called " Amendment of the Law on the regulated professions and professional qualifications, " " For the second reading, no proposal was made on behalf of the Commission asking you to support the draft law in the second, final, reading stage.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq203 translatedText "So the commission has asked for a deadline for the submission of proposals - for five minutes - Does Members have reservations?" Maybe not vote at all?! For whom we are here at all?! ") Thank you on the agenda: bill " Amendment to the Law on the regulated professions and recognition of professional qualifications, "".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq202 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, as the so-called basic law has already been adopted today in the third, final, reading, to not impose the deadline for proposals, simply to look at the two readings (interjection from the Chamber of Commerce'.)".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq201 translatedText "So the deadline for the submission of proposals is that you ask the (DEP politician':' he is not asking!') No, thank you Please, see the microphone to Edgari Putram, MEP!".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq200 translatedText "There is a thank you for submitting proposals, there is a need to see the bill we have to present to We just adopted Tikko! Yes, and".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq199 translatedText "So the proposal for a deadline for the submission of proposals So then the proposal does not (heckling):' we have a proposal!') Please, put on the microphone of MEP Zarneam!".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq198 translatedText "Colleagues, in order to be able to submit proposals, we should first see a draft bill on which we can submit them, because we have just adopted it and have decided on them in their final form. Not seen So first is a question for MPs in the Clerk and the Legal Office: when can we see this wording so we can access it and bring forward these proposals?".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq197 translatedText "Please see MEP Zarneam!".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq196 translatedText "Deadline for tabling proposals: five minutes to So - up to 10 01 And discussed - in this meeting of MPs (interjection: " for whom so much needs?! ")".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq195 translatedText "Please vote in favour of the adoption of the bill " Amendment of the Energy Law " (No 504 / Lp12) at first reading! Please voting regime! Please see the result! On - 62, against- 4, abstentions: not a draft legislative act at first reading: support for the deadline for tabling proposals for a second reading and the timing of the hearing".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq194 translatedText "On behalf of the Commission, I call for the draft legislation to be adopted at first reading".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq193 translatedText "Please call, vote in favour of the adoption of the bill " Amendment of the Energy Law " (No 504 / Lp12) as a matter of urgency; please voting, please vote! For - 63, against - 5, abstentions - the absence of a legislative proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq192 translatedText "Yes, colleagues, in the ministerial cabinet meeting of 9 February 2016, that is, most recently, the adoption of the Cabinet's provisions of the No 85 " Natural Gas Supply and Use Provisions " in paragraph 115 thereofin paragraph 34 of the Council of Ministers' provisions on the transitional provisions of the Energy Act of 16 December 2008 a reference to the adoption of the provisions of the draft law on the adoption of the law on the redundant workers to the Department of Energy of the European Unionin order to make appropriate changes to the transitional provision of the Energy Act 34, with a view to a maximum of 2 April 2017, the provisions of the Cabinet meeting of 9 February 2016 of 9 February 2016 shall apply ," natural gas supply and use conditions " With this can be said, this amendment is more technical It prioritizes the law so it correctly worked on behalf of the Commission to call for the bill to be declared urgent".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq191 translatedText "Thank you, thank you, for your seat in the House, so that we can move on to the next item on the agenda. - / / EP / / DTD IM-PRESS 20050901 BRI-ITEM DOC XML V0 / / EN".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq190 translatedText "Fellow Member, Latvia joined the European Union in 2004, committing to becoming a full member of the European Union, which honours the idea and values of a united Europe and takes over European Union legislation, so that the so-called' energy' legislation is the so-called' European Union '. The third legislative package, aimed at strengthening consumers' interests in creating a single and free internal electricity and natural gas market, professionals in the Taseer sector know that the single internal market legislation was adopted in 1998, with a clear and unambiguous indication of Europeanin the Union, the monopoly on energy markets has no place in the market and consumer interests are best protected by the free-market and the playing field for all when a contract was drafted and concluded for the privatisation of the country's " Gasde "; the energy industry already knew ,the aim and content of Directive 98 / 30 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the internal market in natural gas This is also directly applicable to those operators who signed the agreement in 1997 on the purchase of shares of the Company's " Gasde. " In September 1998, the Energy Law of the Energy Act of 15 June 2015 was adopted, supplemented by the content of EU legislation on the development of the European Union's internal energy market under Article 42 of the Energy Act, thatall natural gas users are entitled to choose freely in the transitional rules of the natural gas trader Law, inter alia, that the entry into force of Article 42 of the law was determined by the entry into force of a separate article of the Energy Law of 30 June 2005the rule of order, which established that Article 42 enters into force on 1 January 2010, and the President of Winder Vent-Freiberg of 6 July 2005 was declared the date of 6 July 2005the will expressed by the Latvian legislator for the opening of the gas market in Latvia in 2010 for the gas supply operator was given a period of five years to prepare for the labour market conditions, however, the law of entry into force of the individual provisions of the Energy Law of 3 September 2009 in the framework of the Energy Law. The amendments replace the figures and the words " 1 January 2010 " with " 4 April 2014 " and the decision by MPs to provide gas to the gas supply operator for a further four years in preparation for the free gas market in Latvia under the only authorised gas supply operator in Latviaa total of nine years in preparation for the opening of the natural gas market, however, the company's " Gasde " just before the long ago planned opening of the gas market was actively targeted against the opening of the market in natural gas and continues its assets under the' Gason' assetsacting against market opening by citing so-called privatisation contracts, however, it is useful to take into account the fact that the company's privatisation of the company, at no point, has not obliged Latvian consumers to buy from the company's fixed volume of natural gas with thisthe widely-used " Latvian Gas " argument simply does not hold back the criticism of the closure of the amount of consumption or the so-called' consume or paying' contracts of a publicly traded company called Gasde, whose responsibility cannot be transferred to the entire natural gas users' shouldersanother very important nuance to the adoption of this bill was a serious and extensive legal analysis of the bill and the justification for the fact that the regulation of 3 April 2014, which had actually already opened up the gas market, had to be removed from the draft law, and insteadit has been created that the way it was passed to the Plats was an argument about the risks of the proceedings, but a realistic set of grounds for obtaining a failure to obtain a failure to comply with the draft legislation was extremely cumbersome and difficult, and it can be said that the Ministry of Economic Affairs was developedand the amendments adopted by the Commons are drawn and clumsy as possible, it would have been easier and more appropriate that the Energy Law should initially be amended in a completely new form, rather than being obscured by long-standing conflicts with the powerful lobby of powerful gas monopolies. The uncertainty caused in significant situations, however, must be the determination of the Ministry of Economic Affairs to bring this difficult process to a conclusion by developing the regulation for the distribution of Latvian Gas and the outermost processes in particular to highlight one of the major successes of this bill, including the commitment to the Latvian natural gas market. In other Member States of the European Union, market principles are already operating, with the entry into force immediately, with the entry into force of the law that Article 106 of the new law enters into force with the entry into force of the same law, which means that it should not be a problemfor companies like Latvenergo, the gas elsewhere is to be cheaper and that it can realistically be able to supply itself to the Bill, while conscious of how hard work awaits the next minister of economy, implementing the law in the way it has spelled out Thank you".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq189 translatedText "Thank you to the Member of the European Parliament to provide a report on voting motives in the name of the MEP, Eddie Smilker.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq188 translatedText "Latvia has been given time and opportunity to do the liberalisation of the gas market properly, responsibly and in line with the Latvian public interest, as has been the case with the existing monopoly of power, even the most important decisions were taken irresponsible and without the necessary powers, sincethere is a monopoly of power, the responsibility for its own decisions is not to be carried by any political responsibility, instead of having a thorough and timely preparation of market liberalisation and doing so in the public interest and within a reasonable timeframe, the liberalisation of the Latvian Gas Market is being liberalisedfollowing the sale of analogue schemes such as Citadele Bank, the bail-out of the carrier until the last moment, delaying the preparation of the necessary solution and then asjoyed at large amounts of uproar in order to prevent public attention and analysis from the essential elements, that is to say, how beneficialand sure there will be a solution to the proposed liberalisation for the Latvian consumer instead of being given a solution in order to create particularly favourable conditions for any specific financial investor to do all of this, of course, but also by failing to justify them to its purpose. Instead of a simple, fast and effective division of the " Latvian Gason " to the European Union's legislative provisions, namely separating infrastructure from trade, a complex, more expensive and long-ranging Latvian consumerthe " Gas Pipeline " model, which is not in the public interest and is the opposite of the publicly expressed desire to implement market liberalisation as soon as possible, but is necessary and very beneficial to a financial investor so that it is " filmed "? The bill needs to lay down specific conditions for this financial investor, thereby enabling it to control both strategic gas infrastructure and gas trading, contrary to European Union legislation Savufold, so as not to distort competition for this financial investor, the bill says. Preventing at all the possibility of a strategic investor, such as a US energy company, to purchase and manage Latvia as an essential gas infrastructure, It is illogical, and contrary to national security interests, the aim was to seek to incorporate the bill. The unmanageable commitment of the State to new Inčukalna owners? And, only thanks to the firm position of the Legal Office, DEP K Shadurska and DEP L Chigate's heckling of the hammer) was incorporated in the wording allowing for legala reasoned solution to the Inchukalna underground depths in Tvienu is to create a risk-based market model that does not guarantee the necessary safety of gas supplies to UK consumers, but it is not necessary for market speculators, who will not have to take responsibility for their gas supplies? The bill stipulates that the cost of a trader's irresponsible behaviour will have to be passed on to all other market participants, to each customer in Latvia, even if it is not the trader's client This is preposterous and discriminatory! Not only these! - Matters to the movers of the bill, it also failed to give a heartfelt reply to Savuthly members that their attempts to find out were openly presented as efforts to delay market liberalisation had been pushed, as if they were sacred Writers! To support it by relying on the blind faith and the promoter of the revolutionary conviction; did not give Members any reasoned justification or appropriate legal assessment, most of the amendments of the bill were tabled at all at the end of the term and only the members of the Commission became aware of them. In the sitting on which they were immediately asked to vote, This is a textbook example of the impunity of the power monopoly and of the irresponsibility of the public: yet another power monopoly is being carried out, perhaps also in the absence of a decision on which the Latvian public will have to pay dearly again ;just to find another success story again, Var will, of course, learn that energy is a complex area and is in need of years of experience in order to establish an adequate understanding of this, while the Ministry of Economics so often changes the leadership that it simply doesit does not gain this understanding, as is currently the case with' Latvian Gas', and the movers of the bill can be excited about this situation and the solution achieved through the monopoly of the monopoly's current competence and the expectations of it, andbenevolent action in the future - unlike the Ministry of Economy - where the existing monopoly (if not its existing manager) will certainly have the time and capacity to carry out a competent assessment of what has been undertaken, and, later, also for their own interests of the liberalisation of thethe lack of conformity and the followness of such market liberalisation deserve Latvia? - It is unacceptable for a revision of the market to participate in such an irresponsible liberalisation of the market in the gas market, which is why the vote on this bill does not take part in the vote on this bill (applause)".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq187 translatedText "Thank you to the Member of Ivar Zarneam, on behalf of Mr Zarneam, on behalf of the MEP - a report on the motives of the votes".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq186 translatedText "Honourable Members, honourable Members, we, the Members of the Movement for the Heart of Latvia, are in favour of the division of Latvian Gas, the establishment of the transmission and storage system operators, the opening of the gas market and liberalisation, but supports the liberalisation of the market, which is judicious, realistic and realisticand in the interests of the public interest, we are opposed to the waste of taxpayers' money, against the laws and decisions that have already been taken, that they will result in dozens or possibly even hundreds of legal proceedings leading to the country, not just this onedecision-makers, will come from the government budget, that is, from taxpayers' money, to pay to individuals in the Legislature damage to the Legislature, which is, to say the least, unweighted in the case of Citadele, a parliamentary inquiry. The Commission concluded that the bank sold for a substantially lower price by the Energy Law is like a time bomb And it can now be foreseen that it is set to drift - already we can one hundred per cent predicted that litigation with the country is high. Both the minority shareholders and the landholders will be " Gasis " at a private company and such a large-scale sale and sale of a private company in Latvia will require, for the first time, nine months (fromat 3 April to 31 December 2017, it is indeed a short time that we have looked at any step that should be taken to ensure that this distribution is of a high quality and does not lead to additional expenditure on the public budget and the public without seeing this possibility underthe Latvian state's existing laws and principles of good governance have to be put into practice at short notice at this time with shareholders about the company and the share sharing, that is, the sale of shareholders' properties must be found in legally correct redesign documents of the Companythe assessment should also ensure the quality of the company in good time, and it should not be forgotten that a high level of land ownership will have to be addressed under the legal issues of the infrastructure, and we are aware that much can be achieved with revolutionary convictions. Not only the political but also the economic and legal aspects should be assessed, as we live in a state of law, so we believe that a number of the provisions contained in the bill are nationally irresponsible and call on project promoters and incandescent supporters in the public toothe room to take full responsibility for the possible legal consequences and additional costs that taxpayers can face in implementing this company's true beneficiaries of the transaction is likely to find out after years of repeating that we are on the lookout formarket liberalisation, but not in terms of deadlines and not with so many outstanding issues, we are opposed to another Citadele - this time in the energy field - and voting against the amendments to the Energy Law, Thank you (faction NSL applause)".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq185 translatedText "Thank you for calling. We will vote in favour of the " Amendment of the Energy Law " (No 396 / Lp12) in the third, final, reading .- 63, against - 5 abstentions - no Law has been adopted (applause) Visit to the Member of the Member, Mr Aivaram Matthews, on voting Voltaire".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq184 translatedText "We have therefore looked at all the proposals, and I call on my colleagues to vote in favour of this legislation at the third, final, reading".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq182 translatedText "And the last is the 84 proposal which the chairman of the committee responsible has supported in the Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq180 translatedText "83 - Presentation by the chairman of the committee, supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq178 translatedText "82 - Committee responsible, proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq176 translatedText "81 - Member of Ingmatar Member State Ingmatar is partially supported and included in 82 proposals".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq174 translatedText "80 - The chairman of the commission has given support to the".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq172 translatedText "79 - Parliamentary Providence Proposal Widow sponsored by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq170 translatedText "78 - Proposal by the responsible Commission".
- 2015_06_18_311-seq2198 translatedText "78 - Proposal by the responsible Commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq168 translatedText "77 - Member of Ingmar Member State Ingmatar proposal partially upheld and included in the 78 proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq166 translatedText "76 - The chairman of the panel's proposal has garnered support".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq164 translatedText "75 - deputy member of Ingmar's wallying proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq162 translatedText "74 - Member of Member for Latkowska's proposal There is no support for the commission".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq160 translatedText "73 - A member's proposal for the Commission has not received any support".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq158 translatedText "While 72 a proposal, which includes the previous one, is the committee's proposal and the Commission has given its support".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq156 translatedText "71 - Member of Ingmar's Anglary Foundation proposal was sponsored and included in 72 proposals".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq154 translatedText "70 - The chairman of the panel is sponsored by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq152 translatedText "69 - Member of Ingmar's Anglary Parglary proposal was approved and included in 70 proposals".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq150 translatedText "68 - Presentation by the Chair of the Commission's proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq148 translatedText "67 - Member of Ingmar Member State Ingmatar proposal partially upheld and included in 68 proposal".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq146 translatedText "66 - Request from the chairman of the panel, supported by".
- 2015_04_30_297-seq353 translatedText "66 - Request from the chairman of the panel, supported by".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq144 translatedText "65 - Proposal by the responsible Commission, which includes a previous proposal in the Commission,".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq143 translatedText "Thanks to the 64 proposals, MEPs agree with the proposal for a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council.".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq142 translatedText "64 - The proposal by the MP, Edward SMILTĒNS, partly advocated and incorporated into the proposal of 65, which provides for the possibility of agreement between large gas consumers and the' Gasi' on the transmission rules and for the supply of gas to the site".
- 2016_02_11_344-seq140 translatedText "63 - Request from the chairman of the panel, supported by".