Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 translatedText "The honourable President of the Parliament, dear colleagues, I have asked for amendments to the Education Act not to be referred to the Commission because, by definition, they do not meet with the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, nor does it indicate that it is designed to address as far as possible the risks to the country andpublic interest, that is, to prevent an educational establishment working for its head or educator, which is disloyal to the Republic of Latvia and its disloyal disloyal whom? Constitution, for example, the Constitutional chapter on basic human rights? Which states that Latvia, as a democratic, legal, socially responsible and national country, is based on human dignity and freedom? Perhaps teachers will continue to be unloyal in the future and will not be based on universally human and Christian values? The amendments are based on the aim of strengthening the capacity of the Educational Quality National Service and, in fact, to pass on the service to police officers on average, dear colleagues, 10 applications for all Latvia and no more than two applications. May be linked to the content of Article 48 (5), fifth part of the Rules of Education, or Article 51, paragraph 2, of the Education and Science Ministry trying to influence teachers' resistance to teachers' freedom of expression against teachers' freedom of expression. And the diversity of opinion in order to silence any person who is in Latvia's school authorisation to be simply mistaken for the wrong ruling authority, the wrong Education and Science Ministry's view, must not education to be linked to some kind of exchange, by means of respect for people. People need to be taught to think critical of the punishment and the stops at the wrong, I repeat, the misinterpretations of the Department of Education and Science in defining it as an unloyal person - absolutely not in terms of the criteria recommended in the Constitution, nor the wording proposed in the Labour statute as a whole byeven to date, it is not clear what the implementing mechanism, such as the 101 or 115 application of the Labour Act, will be adopted, adopted in line with the specific amendments of the person - an educator with which an end to labour law is terminated, if he has not been loyal to the Republic of Latviaand the Constitution, or not, of its own pedagogh duties, will not be able to take office five years after the end of the legal relationship. I am sorry, but the sanction of the right to occupy certain positions in the Criminal Law is limited to certain articles, for examplefor exceeding the service mandate Well, for example, the politician exceeds the powers of his service related to the bombing - blow something (interjection:' horror!') Only then it is possible to ban the holding of a fixed office of up to five years, the politician takes a bribe (heckling )DEP L Čigane: " Elin! ") takes a bribe to squeezed a bribe, and only then the court may apply the decision that he should be barred from future work (DEP A boss: " but not if you are squeezed? " )there is no squeezing, then he can work on Thad he can work, in this case, the specific sanctions and impact restrictions on teacher work largely show only and only that we move towards a police law that is under the law of the Labour lawin substance, the restrictions under the Criminal Justice Act concerning the right to take up positions on the merits of this issue in the budget package do not contribute to the quality assessment of the Bill in These Amendments as a step in the police force, I call on colleagues not to support the transfer of the bill to the committees.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q3744607.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q16347646.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q751020.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq42 mentions Q957126.
- 92 type PoliticalFunction.
- 92 sameAs Q2167704.
- 92 title "deputāts | Saskaņa".
- 92 title "member of parliament | Social Democratic Party "Harmony"".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 number "41".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 spokenText "Paldies. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi elektroenerģijas tirgus likumā” nodošanu Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 54, pret - 35, atturas - nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Godātie kolēģi! Ir pienācis laiks pārtraukumam... Es atvainojos. Tātad turpinām darbu. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Izglītības likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Izglītības, kultūras un zinātnes komisijai. “Pret” pieteicies runāt deputāts Andrejs Elksniņš.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 translatedText "Thank you for the referral of the bill' Amendment of the Electricity Market Law' to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission stating that it is the responsible Commission, as well as the Commission for Economic and Economic and Environmental Policy, the Committee on the Environment and Regional Policy, please votethe regime, I ask for a result! On - 54, against - 35, abstentions - is not a draft law in committee! It is time for my apologies to the Bureau of Ministers to move forward with the proposals from the Bureau. A cabinet bill tabled in the " Amendment to the Education Act " to be transferred to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission stating that it is responsible by the commission, as well as the Education, Culture and Science Commission, applied to speak to Mr Andrei Elin.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq41 mentions Q9151087.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 number "40".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 spokenText "Ļoti cienījamā priekšsēdētāja! Kolēģi! Stāsts jau nav tik daudz par elektrības cenām, cik par apstrādes rūpniecību un ražošanu: vai mēs vēlamies vai nevēlamies ražošanu Latvijā redzēt. Pamatoti tiek teikts, ka ražošana ir valsts ekonomikas mugurkauls. Īstenībā pēc datiem mēs par to varam ļoti labi pārliecināties, skatoties uz 2009., 2010.gadu, krīzes gadiem, kas notika, un redzam, ka, rodoties problēmām ekonomikā, pirmie pazūd pakalpojumi, tirdzniecība, dažādi komercpakalpojumi, savukārt ražošana ātri nekur nepazūd, tā paliek. Un faktiski, tikai pateicoties ražošanai, mēs šajos krīzes gados daudzmaz noturējāmies virs ūdens. Un tādēļ arī valdība Nacionālajā attīstības plānā izvirzīja mērķi, ka 2020.gadā ražošana sasniegs 20 procentus no mūsu valsts iekšzemes kopprodukta. Kas notiek šobrīd? Mēs redzam, ka nevis tuvojamies šim mērķim ar katru gadu, bet tieši otrādi - no šī mērķa attālināmies. Ja 2010.gadā apstrādes rūpniecība bija 13,5 procenti no iekšzemes kopprodukta, tad šobrīd jau, katru gadu vienmērīgi krītoties, tie ir vairs tikai 12 procenti. Kolēģi! Ja visa šī dinamika turpināsies, es nezinu, kur mēs nonāksim (Dep. I.Zariņš: “Sakiet paldies ministrijai!”), un galvenais iemesls, kāpēc šis kritums ir, ko min arī paši ražotāji, ir tieši enerģijas cenas, proti, elektrība. Un nevis nodokļi, kā mums visiem pēdējā laikā patīk publiskajā telpā runāt, vai dažādi slogi, bet tieši enerģijas cenas. Un arī investori, kad izvēlas, kur investēt - Latvijā vai kur citur -, skatās šo aspektu pirms visas nodokļu politikas un tā tālāk. Tāpat šajā plānošanas periodā ļoti būtisku daļu Eiropas fondu mēs esam novirzījuši Latvijas reģioniem tā saucamo industriālo teritoriju attīstībai. Ko mēs gaidām industriālajās teritorijās? Ražotājus! Bet vai viņi tur būs, ja mēs neko nemainīsim enerģijas cenu ziņā? Visdrīzāk, viņu tur arī vairs nebūs. Ja mēs skatāmies, kur Latvija šobrīd atrodas starp Eiropas Savienības valstīm pēc elektrības cenām ražotājam, tad mums ir ceturtās augstākās cenas. Mums ir augstākas elektrības cenas ražotājam nekā Lietuvā un Igaunijā, nemaz nerunājot par Skandināviju, un vairāki mūsu lielie uzņēmumi ir pateikuši, ka viņi savas nākamās ražotnes atvērs nevis Latvijā, bet Igaunijā vai Somijā. (Dep. A.Elksniņš: “Paldies jums!”) “Valmieras stikla šķiedra” jau ir atvērusi savu ražotni Amerikā. Tās ir darbavietas, kas mums iet garām (Dep. I.Zariņš: “Tas ir tas “veiksmes stāsts”!”), turklāt... tās ir darbavietas reģionos, jo ražošana Rīgā notiek ļoti maz. Ražošana notiek galvenokārt reģionos. Rīgā tie ir pakalpojumi. Tā kā, ja mēs neradīsim risinājumu, cietīs gan ražošana, gan pirmām kārtām reģioni. Tas, ko piedāvā Ekonomikas ministrija šajā likumprojektā, nav nekas jauns. Šāds veids, ka viena daļa no tā saucamās obligātā iepirkuma komponentes tiek maksāta fiksēti pēc pieslēguma jaudas un otra daļa ir mainīgā, nav nekas unikāls. Šāds mehānisms ir daudzās Eiropas valstīs. Mēs konkrēti esam ņēmuši par piemēru Austrijas modeli. Kolēģi, aicinu jūs šoreiz balsot nevis par elektrības modeļa maiņu, bet balsot par (Starpsaucieni: “Pret! Pret!”) apstrādes rūpniecību Latvijā vai, kā Bondara kungs teica, “pret”. Paldies.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 speaker Vilnis_Kirsis-1980.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 translatedText "Very dear President-in-Office, the story is not so much about electricity prices, as much as about manufacturing and production: whether we want or want production in Latvia to be rightly told that production is the backbone of the country's business. It is very good to see this very well when we look at the years of 2009, 2010, the years of crisis that have taken place and see that, when emerging into the economy, the first disappear in services, trade, various commercial services, while production will not disappear quickly, but production is not going anywhere, it is, in fact, only as a result offor production, during these years of crisis, we were more or less resilient over the crisis and the government in the National Development Plan set a target of 20 per cent of our country's gross domestic product at the moment? We can see that we are not getting closer to this one. For purpose every year, but on the contrary, from this target to a conversion, the manufacturing sector was 13.5 per cent of gross domestic product, then now, every year, evenly fall, they are only 12 per cent of the College! This dynamic will continue, I don't know where we will end up (DEP I Zartins: thank you to the Department!'), and the main reason for this drop is also raised by producers, namely electricity prices, and electricity prices, as all of us lastthere is a time in the public domain to speak up, or slogi, but direct energy prices and when you choose where to invest - in Latvia or elsewhere - watch this aspect before any tax policy and so on in this whole programming period and so on in this programming period. As a very important part of the European Fund, we have directed the Latvian regions to the development of so-called industrial sites, What are we waiting for in industrial areas? But will they be there if we do not change anything in terms of energy prices? If we are looking at where Ireland is currently running between the countries of the European Union after electricity prices, we have the fourth higher prices we have higher electricity prices for the manufacturer than in Lithuania and Estonia, not to mention Scandinavia and several of our ownthe companies have said that they will open their own plants instead of in Latvia, but in Estonia or Finland (DEP A Elin:' thank you!')' Valcustas glass fibre' has already opened its production in America Whose (DEP I'That is this' success story'!') and, moreover, there are jobs in the regions, as production in the capital is very low, mainly in the areas in which there is no solution, both production and, above all, the production of solutions. Regions That offered by the Ministry of Economy in this bill are nothing new to Should that one part of the so-called compulsory purchase components are paid fixed by connection capacity and the other part is variable, nothing unique to the facility. There are in many European countries, in particular, we have taken the example of the Austrian model to the College, I call on you, this time, not to vote for a change of electricity model, but to vote in favour (heckling:' against!'), or, as Mr Bondo said,' No' to Thank you".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q9151087.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q2660080.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q37.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q191.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q4102950.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q193089.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q13561029.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q40.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q458.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q21625222.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q25035930.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq40 mentions Q33.
- 101 type PoliticalFunction.
- 101 sameAs Q992046.
- 101 title "deputāts | Vienotība".
- 101 title "member of parliament | Unity".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 number "39".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 spokenText "“Par” pieteicies runāt deputāts Vilnis Ķirsis.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 translatedText "The Crown applicant to speak for Mr Wilder in Cologne".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 mentions Q661684.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq39 mentions Q13460949.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 number "38".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 spokenAs 62.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 spokenText "Cienījamie kolēģi! Arī mēs frakcijā “No sirds Latvijai” esam tikušies ar apstrādes rūpniecības pārstāvjiem un pilnībā saprotam to, ka mums ir jādara viss, lai atbalstītu savus uzņēmējus. Bet mēs esam tikušies arī ar mazā un vidējā biznesa pārstāvjiem, mēs arī saprotam katru mājsaimniecību Latvijā. Un jāsaka, ka šī likumprojektu pakete īpaši izceļas ar (Sēdes vadītāja noklaudzina ar āmuru.) Ekonomikas ministrijas nekvalitatīvi sagatavotu produktu. Un, ja jūs atkal... Kārtējo reizi jūs aicinu: atveriet šā likumprojekta anotāciju un izlasiet, cik daudz paskaidrojumu ir par šo tēmu. Jā, kādam ir jāmaksā par to, ko iepriekšējā desmitgadē politiķi ir sastrādājuši, jo obligātās iepirkuma komponentes cena šodien jau ir vairāk nekā 250 miljoni eiro gadā. Tātad kādam par to ir jāmaksā. Un būtu bijis tikai pilnīgi normāli, ja šo likumprojektu pavadītu pamatīga analīze, izskaidrojums, vērtējums, kādu mēs redzam tautsaimniecības attīstību nākotnē. Mēs saprotam, cik daudz elektroenerģija izmaksā mazajam un vidējam biznesam, cik daudz tā izmaksā lauksaimniekiem, cik - mājsaimniecībām. Ir izvirzīti kādi mērķi, sapratne, kā tālāk ekonomika attīstīsies, veidojot vienu vai otru politiku elektroenerģijas tirgū. Neko tādu mēs šajā likumprojektā neredzam! Mēs esam par to, lai būtu risinājumi, lai būtu skaidrība, lai šī skaidrība būtu katram un kārtējo reizi - lai šī skaidrība būtu ilgtermiņā. Un mums nav pieņemami risinājumi, ka viss deleģējums tiek atdots Ministru kabinetam - izlemt, kā tālāk elektroenerģijas tirgus strādās. Es vēlreiz aicinu jūs šo likumprojektu nenodot komisijām, bet prasīt kvalitatīvu darbu no Ministru kabineta un tad Saeimā lemt par likumprojekta tālāko virzību. Pateicos.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 speaker Inguna_Sudraba.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 translatedText "Dear colleagues, too, we have met with the representatives of the manufacturing industry and fully understand the fact that we must do everything we can to support our business operators, But we have met with small and medium-sized enterprises. Business representatives, we also understand every household in Latvia, And say that this package of legislation excels with (the sitting chair knocked out with a hammer) of the Economic Ministry's unquality product And if you are running again againone time you call for: open the symbols of this bill and read how much explanation is on this subject, someone has to pay for what the politicians of the last decade have worked for, as the compulsory purchase price for the component is already available today. There is more than €250 million a year So someone has to pay for this and it would have been only perfectly normal for this bill to be accompanied by a thorough analysis, explanation, assessment of what we are seeing in the future of the economy, We realise ,how much electricity costs a small and medium-sized business, how much it costs farmers as much as - households have some purpose, understanding how the economy will move further, creating one or the other to the electricity market anything we canin this bill, we are in favour of having solutions to be clear, so that this clarity should be clear for everyone and once again - so that this clarity should be clear for us in the long term and that we do not have a solution to the entire delegation. The Cabinet Office - deciding how to go further in the electricity market, will once again call on you not to pass on this bill to the committees but ask the Cabinet Office and then the Commons to decide on a bill for the future.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 mentions Q21625222.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq38 mentions Q16348038.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 number "37".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 spokenText "Paldies. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? (Starpsaucieni: “Nav! Nav!”; dep. M.Bondars: “Viņš bija pārliecinošs!”) Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Kontu reģistra likums” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijai? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Latvijas Administratīvo pārkāpumu kodeksā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Elektroenerģijas tirgus likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. “Pret” pieteikusies runāt deputāte Inguna Sudraba.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 translatedText "Thank you for the objections to the draft legislation? (heckling:' there is no!'; DEP M Bondars:' he was overwhelmingly!' the draft law passed by the Bureau of Ministers proposes that the draft law on' Kontu Record' will be introduced by the Bureau. The Budget and Financial (Tax) Commission, with its being responsible by the commission Will MPs have objections to the passing of a bill to the commission? The objection is not due to a draft law the Bureau has referred to the committee's Bureau proposing the bill's Administrative Billthe Code of Conduct for Conduct to the Budget and Finance (Taxation) Commission stating that it is responsible by the commission and the Committee on Legal Affairs Does MPs have objections to the passing of the bill in commissions? A draft bill tabled by the Cabinet Office entitled " Amendment to the Electricity Market Law " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission stating that it is responsible to the Commission, as well as the Tautfarms, the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission " Pret " to speak to Ms Inguna Sudraba".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 mentions Q4445523.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq37 mentions Q18342826.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 number "36".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 spokenText "Paldies. Ļoti cienījamā Saeimas priekšsēdētājas kundze! Kolēģi! Vai jūs zināt, kurš šobrīd ir Latvijas vērtīgākais uzņēmums? (Starpsaucieni: “Kurš?”; “Saeima?”) Nē, tas ir “Latvenergo”, kura pirmsākumi ir meklējami Ulmaņlaikā, kad uzbūvēja pirmo - Ķeguma - HES, un tam ir bijuši nepieciešami faktiski 80 gadi, lai tas sasniegtu savu apjomu, savu lielumu. Bet vai jūs zināt tādu uzņēmumu “MikroTik”? (Starpsaucieni: “Nē!”; “Zinām!”) Cik no jums zina tādu? Nu, kādi 10 procenti zina. Tas ir uzņēmums, kurš nesen ziedoja Bērnu klīniskās universitātes slimnīcai veselu vienu miljonu eiro bērnu ārstēšanai. (Dep. A.Kaimiņš: “Otro miljonu!”) Šim uzņēmumam bija faktiski nepieciešami tikai... Tas ražo pirmām kārtām rūterus, interneta... ar ļoti labu programmatūru. (Starpsauciens: “Nenodarbojies ar reklāmu!”) Un kas ir unikāls šajā stāstā? Faktiski dažu gadu laikā šis uzņēmums ir sasniedzis tādu pašu apjomu, pelna tikpat, cik “Latvenergo”, kuram bija vajadzīgi 80 gadi, lai līdz tam nonāktu. Mūsu ekonomikai ir svarīgi, lai pēc iespējas vairāk rastos tieši šādi uzņēmumi, jo tie rodas faktiski līdzenā vietā, balstās tikai uz savām prasmēm, uz savām zināšanām, nav jābetonē ciet Daugava vai jādara kas tamlīdzīgs. Kas ir svarīgi šiem uzņēmumiem? Tie faktiski savā ziņā ir izgudrotāji, un visvairāk ieguldījumu ir jāveic tieši šī produkta izstrādes gaitā, faktiski pirmajos gados, kad ienākumu nav nekādu, bet izdevumi ir ļoti lieli, jo, lai šos augsto tehnoloģiju produktus radītu, ir vajadzīgi inženieri, IT speciālisti, varbūt zinātnieki un tā tālāk, kuru algu līmenis ir... sāksim ar 2000 vai 3000 eiro un uz augšu. Un faktiski sanāk - lai tapinātu šo produktu, ļoti lielas summas ir jāpatērē tieši darbaspēka nodokļa nomaksai. Tādēļ Ekonomikas ministrija ir izstrādājusi atbalsta instrumentu tieši šāda tipa uzņēmumiem, lai pirmajos gados atvieglotu viņu darbību šo produktu radīšanā. Proti, par katru algoto darbinieku viņiem ir tiesības, ja darbinieks piekrīt, maksāt divas minimālās sociālās iemaksas; vai arī, ja darbinieks nepiekrīt, tad ir speciāla struktūrfondu programma, kura subsidē, grantē šo darbinieku algošanu un viņu nodokļu nomaksu. Protams, tas process, visi kritēriji, kuriem uzņēmumiem dot, kuriem nedot... Dot tikai tiem, kas ir piesaistījuši riska kapitālu. Tas ir tāds ļoti labs filtrs, jo, ja kāds ir gatavs ieguldīt savu naudu šī produkta attīstībā, tātad viņš ir noticējis. Tātad, kolēģi, aicinu jūs atbalstīt šo likumprojektu un faktiski šādā veidā atbalstīt mūsu ekonomikas transformāciju no tradicionālās uz pēc iespējas gudrāku un pelnītspējīgāku, kas nesīs mums visiem lielāku labklājību. Paldies.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 speaker Vilnis_Kirsis-1980.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 translatedText "Thank you, Madam President-in-Office of the House, if you know who the most valuable company is today? (heckling:' who?'; Saeima, whose roots lie in Ulniece - HES - which dates back to Italyin fact, it takes 80 years to reach its size, its size But do you know a company like " MicroTik "? (heckling:' no!'; know!) How many of you are aware of It is a company that recently donated to Children in Capitol Childrenthe University Hospital for a million children (DEP A Carote:' a second million!') This company was actually only needed for the production of first-hand rust, internet with very good software (" Outside advertising! " )what is unique in this story? The fact is that in a few years, the company has achieved the same amount, is earning the same as the' Latvenergo', which took 80 years to reach our economy as much as possible so as to make the most of thiscompanies, as they arise in fact, are based only on their skills, their knowledge, the lack of concrete explanation of Daugava, or something that is important to these companies? It is precisely in the course of the development of this product, in fact, in the first few years of absence of income, but the costs are very high, as they require engineers, IT experts, perhaps scientists and so on, whose salary levels arelet's start with 2,000 or 3,000 euros and upwards And actually meet - in order to produce this product, very large amounts have to be consumed directly into the labour tax deduction, which is why the Ministry of Economy has therefore developed a support instrument specifically for such companiesin the early years of their activity, they have the right to pay two minimum social contributions; or, if the employee does not agree, then there is a specific programme of Structural Funds subsidised by thethe hiring and payment of their taxes is, of course, process, all the criteria for which companies give to whom they withheld Dot only for those who have attracted venture capital This is a very good filter as if someone is willing to invest in their ownthe money for the development of this product, so he is believed by So, colleagues, would urge you to support this bill and in fact in this way to support the transformation of our economy from traditional to as intelligent and earning, which will give us all greater welfare Thank you".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q20562252.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q21625222.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q47182.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq36 mentions Q3736450.