Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_10_20_381-seq7 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq7 translatedText "Thank you for making a call, let us vote in favour of the bill " Amendment of the High School Law " to the Committee on Budgets and the Finance (Taxation) Commission stating that it is asked by the responsible Commission, as well as the Education, Culture and Science Commission, please vote! On - 81, against - 6;abstentions: there is no draft legislative proposal passed by the Bureau of Saeima to propose to the Cabinet Office the bill " Amendment to the Youth Law " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, as well as the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission Does Members haveobjections to the draft bill commissions? The objections to the draft law have not been passed to the Bureau of Deputies proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal tabled under the' Amendment to the Customs Law' should be handed over to the Budget and Finance Committee, stating that it is responsible by the committee if MPs are opposed to the bill's objections to the billthe transfer commission? Does not draft a draft law the commission has referred to the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose a bill of " Amendment to the Goods and Services Act " to be transferred to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, stating that it is responsible by the committee if MPs are opposed to the bill's objections to the billthe transfer commission? Does not draft a draft law the commission has referred to the Bureau of the Cabinet proposing the bill's " Amendment to the statutory corporate tax " " to be transferred to the Budget and Finance (Taxation) Commission, with the committee being responsible if the committee is opposedpassing the bill to the commission? There is no objection to the draft law the commission has referred to the committee's Bureau proposing a bill " Amendment to the Microenterprise Tax law " to be transferred to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee, with the committee responsible by the responsible commission " Pret Sudraba "".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq7 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq7 mentions Q4445523.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 number "6".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 spokenAs 41.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 spokenText "Ļoti cienījamā Saeimas priekšsēdētāja! Dāmas un kungi! Šis likumprojekts paredz izveidot studējošo un absolventu reģistru, un droši vien galvenais mērķis ir saprast, kurās darbavietās un cik daudz saņem absolventi pēc attiecīgās augstskolas beigšanas. Droši vien ministrija domā šo reģistru ņemt par pamatu, lai izvērtētu, kura augstskola strādā labāk, kura - sliktāk. Proti, ministrija domā to vērtēt, ņemot par kritēriju tikai šo - algas apjomu. Manuprāt, ja tā tas tiks darīts, tad... Protams, uzreiz nav skaidrs, kā tiks aprēķināts ieguvums no reģionālajām augstskolām, jo reģionos tās algas ir mazākas. Un, kopumā ņemot, šis likumprojekts, manuprāt, faktiski vairo birokrātiju, jo šie dati tik un tā tiks iegūti no Valsts ieņēmumu dienesta (par strādājošajiem studentiem un absolventiem) un no Nodarbinātības valsts aģentūras (par tiem absolventiem, kuri ir bezdarbnieki), bet augstskolas rektors būs, kā saka, atbildīgs par šo datu sniegšanu. Manuprāt, šis likumprojekts ir jānoraida. Aicinu balsot “pret”.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 speaker Juris_Vilums-1982.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 translatedText "Very honourable President-in-Office of the Council. - ladies and gentlemen, this bill is about setting up a register of students and graduates, and it is probably the ultimate goal of understanding where the jobs in the workplace and as well as graduates get secure after the graduation. This register should be based on an assessment of which university is working better, which - in the case of the Proti - is thought to be measured on the basis of the criterion of the salary cap, in my view ,it is not immediately clear how the gains will be calculated from regional universities, as the regions in its wages are lower and lower, in general, this bill, in my opinion, actually increases bureaucracy because the data will be derived from the State anywaythe Service (for workers and graduates) and from the Employment Agency (graduate) will be, but will be, as they say, responsible for providing this data in my opinion, that this bill should reject the' no' vote against:".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq6 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 number "5".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 spokenText "Paldies. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi likumā “Par Latvijas Republikas Uzņēmumu reģistru”” nodošanu Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 73, pret - 13, atturas - nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Energoefektivitātes likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Būvniecības likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par ietekmes uz vidi novērtējumu”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Azartspēļu un izložu likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijai? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Augstskolu likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Izglītības, kultūras un zinātnes komisijai. Viļuma kungs, jūs runāsiet “par” vai “pret”? “Pret” pieteicies runāt deputāts Juris Viļums.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 translatedText "Thank you for the call! We will vote in favour of the Bill of Law of the Republic of Latvia concerning the' Transfer of business registers' and the Finance (Taxation) Commission stating that it is the responsible Commission, as well as the Committee on Legal Affairs, please voting the result! On - 73, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V, V- 13 abstentions: no draft legislative committee has referred to the Bureau of Deputies proposing that the Cabinet Office's submitted bill " Amendment Energy Efficiency Bill " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission stating that it is responsible by the Commission and the Tautfarm, agrarian, environmental and regionalthe Political Commission Was Members have reservations about the passing of the draft legislation on commissions? There is no reference to the draft law the Bureau has referred to the Bureau of Ministers proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for the " Amendment to the Construction Law " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee is responsible to the committee responsible ,as well as the Tautfarms, agrarian, Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, Does Members have reservations about the transfer of draft legislation to the committees? The Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, with the provision that it is a responsible panel, as well as the Tautfarms, the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, Does Members have reservations about the transfer of draft legislation to the committees? The Cabinet bill submitted by " Amendments to the Azarslot and the lottery law " to be transferred to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission, stating that it is responsible by the commission Does MPs have objections to the passing of the bill the Bureau is referred to by the Bureau of the Labour Bureau being referred to by the Bureau of Saeimaa cabinet bill tabled by " Amendment to the High School Law " to be transferred to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission, stating that it is responsible by the commission, as well as Education, Culture and Science Commission, you will speak " about " or " Yes to Juris "".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq5 mentions Q13585891.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 number "4".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 spokenAs 62.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 spokenText "Labdien, cienītā Saeimas priekšsēdētājas kundze! Godātie kolēģi! Tātad Valsts ieņēmumu dienests un Finanšu ministrija saka, ka blēži tiks izķerti pašā sākumā, un būtībā jāķeras problēmai saknē. Par ko ir runa šajā likumprojektā, kurš tiek virzīts steidzamā kārtā, divos lasījumos, un kuru es lūdzu izņemt ārā no budžeta likumprojektu paketes un skatīt normālā ceļā vai – vislabāk – atdot atpakaļ valdībai? Atslēgas teikums jeb diskutabli uzkonstruētā tiesību norma ir sekojoša: ja Uzņēmumu reģistrs saņem kompetentas iestādes atzinumu (pasvītroju – kompetentas iestādes atzinumu!) par tiesību subjekta izmaiņu reģistrēšanas riskiem, Uzņēmumu reģistra valsts notārs, izvērtējot kompetentās iestādes sniegto atzinumu, var pieņemt lēmumu – atteikumu reģistrēt. Tātad, ja kāds cilvēks būs tik drosmīgs, ka Latvijā vēlēsies uzsākt uzņēmējdarbību – tur patiešām ir jābūt drosmei, jo vieglāk jau doties uz Igauniju –, viņam var nākties vilties, ja viņš kādai kompetentai iestādei, kas var būt arī suņu audzētāju biedrība vai puķkopju biedrība, jo likums jau skaidri nepasaka... Protams, runa ir par Valsts izņēmumu dienestu, kas ir uzkonstruējis šo te brīnumu. Paraksts, kuru jūs redzēsiet uz šī likumprojekta, gan ir Dzintara Rasnača, un it kā sagatavotājs ir Uzņēmumu reģistrs. Tātad – kas notiks, ja jūs nobalsosiet par šo likumprojektu steidzamības kārtā, nevis pārdomāsiet šo normu? Kas notiks, ja mēs šo likumprojektu nevirzīsim parastā kārtībā? Es domāju, ka mēs varbūt paklausīsim Valsts prezidentam Raimondam Vējonim, kurš aicina pēdējā lasījumā neveikt fundamentālus grozījumus, un tos arī nevar būtībā kvalitatīvi veikt budžeta divos lasījumos. Piedāvātā redakcija ir tik diskutabla, ka tā prasa nopietnu revīziju un analīzi. Ministru kabineta sēdē 2.augustā Tieslietu ministrijai tika dots uzdevums – izstrādāt projektu. Ministru kabinets skatīja to jau 20.septembrī, bet būtībā netiek izvērtēts, kā esošie mehānismi strādā. Jūs varat palasīt šodienas “Dienas Biznesu”, kurā galvenā valsts notāre Guna Paidere skaidro, ka riskanto personu medības draud izgāzties. Turklāt, saprotiet, kolēģi, attiecībā uz šo projektu, kas būtībā atbaidīs uzņēmējus nodarboties ar uzņēmējdarbību, tiek paredzēta nauda 4 miljonu apmērā. Tātad, no vienas puses, ja mēs dosim valsts iestādēm tik lielu rīcības brīvību, komersantam var tikt radīti nopietni, būtiski zaudējumi. Ja pieteikums liksies aizdomīgs, izskatīšanas termiņš tiks pagarināts par 10 darba dienām. Tas, par ko uztraucas uzņēmējdarbību veicošie cilvēki, – viņi uztraucas par to, ka tas faktiski ir slazds visiem. Piemēram, “Dienas Biznesā” Kalvis Vītoliņš saka, ka būtībā pat godprātīgs uzņēmējs nevarēs šādā situācijā nomainīt valdes locekli, kurš rīkosies negodprātīgi vai pat prettiesiski, jo pieteikums par izmaiņām tiks apturēts riska filtrā. Pašreiz jau ir diezgan būtisks riska filtrs, ko mēs esam veidojuši divu gadu garumā. Tātad ir riska personu saraksts, kur ir iekļauti 12 tūkstoši personu. Ir riska adrešu saraksts – 146 adreses. Ir aizliegums nodarboties ar visu veidu... noteikta veida komercdarbību 600 personām. Aizliegts ieņemt amatus apmēram 6 tūkstošiem personu. Kompetentām iestādēm... Uzņēmumu reģistra reģistros var reģistrēt nodrošinājuma līdzekli. Šobrīd jau 23 tūkstoši ir reģistrēti – šādi nodrošinājuma līdzekļi. Var uzlikt pārreģistrācijas aizliegumu vai apturēt saimniecisko darbību. Šobrīd tas ir uzlikts aptuveni 27 tūkstošiem. Es domāju, ka, strādājot Uzņēmumu reģistrā ilgus gadus... Es jums nerekomendētu dot tik lielu varu Uzņēmumu reģistra notāriem, kas strādā par pārsimt eiro. Ja mēs runājam par to, kādas sekas var būt, tad jāteic, ka, bez šaubām, labākajā gadījumā cilvēki ies un pārsūdzēs. Sliktākajā gadījumā dosies prom uz citām valstīm veikt uzņēmējdarbību. Norma neatbilst administratīvo tiesību principiem. Tā indivīdam nedod pietiekamu skaidrību. Jau esošais regulējums, šis riska regulējums, netiek izanalizēts, neviens nav veicis vērtējumu. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests šobrīd ir bez vadītāja, ir kā paralizēts, – cenšas kaut ko darīt, lai pierādītu, ka tur vairs nestrādā blēži. Es domāju, ka pašreiz ir īstais brīdis, lai mēs, kolēģi, apdomātos un atdotu atpakaļ valdībai šo likumprojektu, lai tā pārstrādā šo brāķi. Tātad lūdzu nebalsot par šo likumprojektu.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 speaker Ringolds_Balodis.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 translatedText "Good afternoon, Madam President-in-Office of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, so the State Department and the Ministry of Finance say that crooks will be taken out right from the start and, in fact, we have to address the problem at root in this bill, which is directed as a matter of urgency in two readings ,and to whom I ask to be removed from the package of the budget bill and see in normal way or as a normal  to give back to the government? The key sentence, or the disconnect, is given by the competent authority of the competent authority (pastration Âan opinion of the competent authority, on the risks of the change of the rights of the entity, the national notary of the Companies Register, may decide, by assessing the opinion of the competent authority, to take the registration of the opinion of the competent authority, if one person is so brave that it will be willing to start a business  there. It really has to be mettle, as it is easier already to go to Estonia, so it may be frustrating for him to disappoint someone of the competent authority, which may also be the Association of breeders of dogs, or the Cinderella Association, because the law has already clearly not been made clear to the public. It is about the National Introduce Service, which has been engineered by this miracle Charter, which you will see on this bill, and is supposed to be the Dinstein Rasnake, and as the author of a Works Registry So  what will happen if you vote in favourthis bill should be adopted as a matter of urgency, not to thwart this provision? What will happen if we do not move this bill in the normal order? I think we may be obedooyn by President Raimonds Vejonis, who is calling for fundamental amendments at last reading and cannotin essence, the quality of making the budget in two readings is so controversial that it calls for a serious audit and analysis at the Cabinet meeting of 2 August, the Ministry of Justice was given a mandate to design a draft of the Cabinet meeting on 20 September as early as 20 September ,but basically overlooking the way existing mechanisms work you can read today's " day business, " in which the main country's notifier Guna Paidere explains that the risk of risk-averse hunts is in danger of ending, understood, colleagues, in relation to the project, which will, in fact, deter entrepreneurs. Business-to-business-to-business money is earmarked for 4 million So, on the one hand, if we give the public authorities so much room for manoeuvre, serious economic damage to economic operators, the timing of processing will be suspicious, the deadline for examination will be extended byfor 10 working days, what worries the business people is, â they are worried that it is, in fact, a trap for all of us:' the day in business' Kalvis says that, in fact, even a honest businessman will not be able to replace a board member in such a situation ,who will act in bad faith, or even unlawful, because the application for change will be stopped by the risk filtered at the very same time as there is a pretty substantial risk filter that we forged for two years in So there is a list of those who have 12 thousand. A list of persons with a risk address: â 146 addresses It is prohibited to engage in any type of commercial activity of 600 persons prohibited from taking up positions in the registers of some 6 000 individual competent authorities in the Works Record registersas a tool, Little already has 23,000 such collateral funds recorded in Var to impose a re-registration ban or stop an economic activity that Little has imposed on about 27 thousand I think, while working in the Companies House for years I'd have to tell yougive so much power to notaries in the Companies Register, working for a few years of the euro If we are talking about what the consequences might be, it must be said that, at best, people will go and appeal to Slikeauafor other countries to do business Norma does not comply with the principles of administrative law, it does not provide an individual with sufficient clarity for the existing regulation, this risk regulation, not analysed, no-one has undertaken an assessment by the State Revenue Service at the moment without any driver being paralysed, â triesdo something to prove that there are no more crooks I think now is the right moment for us, colleagues, to ponder and give back to the government this bill, so that it recycles this bill for the brothers, So please, not to vote for this bill".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q4294791.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q191.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q1771611.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q5319933.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq4 mentions Q2416022.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 number "3".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 spokenText "Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai kā līdzatbildīgajai komisijai? Iebildumu nav. Tātad likumprojekts nodots Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par izložu un azartspēļu nodevu un nodokli”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par akcīzes nodokli”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijai? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Bērnu tiesību aizsardzības likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Cilvēktiesību un sabiedrisko lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Valsts sociālo pabalstu likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par obligāto sociālo apdrošināšanu pret nelaimes gadījumiem darbā un arodslimībām”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par maternitātes un slimības apdrošināšanu”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par apdrošināšanu bezdarba gadījumam”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Iepakojuma likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Ūdens apsaimniekošanas likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Likumā par budžetu un finanšu vadību” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijai? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Bezdarbnieku un darba meklētāju atbalsta likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par valsts pensijām”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Par Latvijas Republikas Uzņēmumu reģistru”” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai. “Pret” pieteicies runāt deputāts Ringolds Balodis.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 translatedText "Do Members have any objections to the transfer of the bill, including the Commission for Agriculture, the Environment and Regional Policy, as the co-chairman of the Committee on the Environment, the Committee on the Environment ,and the Bureau of Regional Policy's Bureau is proposing that the Cabinet Office's submitted bill " Amendment of the Law on Ports and Gambling and Tax " to be sent to the Budget and Financial (Tax) Commission, stating that it is responsible for MPs to have objections? The draft bill has been referred to the Bureau by the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose a bill to the bill " Amendment to the Law on Exexcise " to the Budget and Financial (Tax) Commission, stating that it has reservations about the referral to the committee? The draft bill has been referred to the Bureau by the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose to the Cabinet Office's proposal for a " Amendment to Child Protection Law " to be transferred to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, with the committee responsible, as well as the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission, as MPs have reservationsopposing the passing of the draft legislation on commissions? The objections to the draft law have not been passed to the Bureau of MPs proposing that the Cabinet Office propose a bill " Amendment to the Public Social Benefits Law " to transfer to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee, which it is responsible for by the commission, as well as Social and Job. The Affairs Committee Does MPs have reservations about the handing over of the bill to the committees? The objections to the draft law have been referred to the Bureau of MPs proposing that the Cabinet Office propose " Amendment of the Law on compulsory social security against industrial accidents " and " transfer to the Budget and Finance. "( tax) commission stating that it is responsible by the commission, as well as to the Social and Employment Commission, Does Members have reservations about the transfer of the draft bill to the committees? Maternity and sickness insurance " transfer to the Budget and Finance (Taxation) Commission, " the committee responsible, as well as the Social and Employment Commission Does MPs have reservations about the transfer of draft laws to commissions? The Bureau is proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for an " Amendment to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) " to the Commission, as well as to the Committee on Social and Employment, Does Members have any objections to the passing of the billcommittees of inquiry: there is no draft law in committee, the Bureau is referred to by the Bureau of Ministers proposing a bill of " Amendment of the Packaging of Packaging " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, including the Commission and the Commission on Regional Policy, Economic and Regional Policy Commissiondo Members have any objections to the handing down of the draft legislation? The objection to the draft law commissions has been referred to the Bureau of Saeima's proposed bill " Amendment to the Water Management Law " to be sent to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee, as the committee responsible ,the Tautfarms, agrarian, Environmental and Regional Policy Commission Was MPs have reservations about the transfer of draft laws to commissions? The objections to the draft law have been referred to the Bureau of Saeima's Bill on Budget and Financial Management to the Budgetthe Finance (Taxation) Commission, with its committee responsible, Does MPs have reservations about the devolution of the bill to the commission? The objection is not due to a draft law the Bureau has referred to the Cabinet Office proposing amendments to the bill, " Amendment by Unemsman and job-seekers in support of the law "to transfer to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, as the committee responsible, as well as to the Social and Employment Commission, Does Members have reservations about the transfer of draft legislation to the committees? The bill tabled in the " Amendment of the Law on State Pensions " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, with the provision that it is responsible to the Commission, as well as the Social and Employment Commission Does MPs have reservations about the transfer of draft laws to commissions? A draft bill passed by the Bureau of the Latvian Parliament has been referred to the Bureau of Ministers' Amendment to the Law of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of Latvia to refer to the Commission and the Committee on Legal Affairs, as well as the Committee on Legal Affairs, the applicant to speak for the Ringolds dove".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 mentions Q211.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq3 mentions Q16350717.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 number "2".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 spokenAs 17.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 spokenText "Kolēģi! Lūgums šo likumprojektu nodot arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai kā līdzatbildīgajai komisijai.".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 speaker Romans_Naudins-1980.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq2 translatedText "Fellow Members, I would like to ask the Commission, as co-responsible Commission, to transfer this bill to the Commission for Economic and Monetary Affairs".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 number "1".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 isPartOf 2016_10_20_381.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 spokenText "Labrīt, godātie deputāti! Aicinu ieņemt vietas Saeimas Sēžu zālē, lai varam sākt Saeimas 20.oktobra ārkārtas sēdi. Darba kārtībā – likumprojekts “Par valsts budžetu 2017.gadam” un to pavadošie likumprojekti. Tātad – Saeimas Prezidija ziņojumi par iesniegtajiem likumprojektiem. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Pasta likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Elektronisko plašsaziņas līdzekļu likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Cilvēktiesību un sabiedrisko lietu komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Likumā par ostām” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Oficiālo publikāciju un tiesiskās informācijas likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Zemes ierīcības likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Ģeotelpiskās informācijas likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Deputātiem iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Nekustamā īpašuma valsts kadastra likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija, kā arī Juridiskajai komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret likumprojekta nodošanu komisijām? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijām ir nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Elektroenerģijas nodokļa likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Lūdzu, ieslēdziet mikrofonu deputātam Romānam Naudiņam!".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, honourable Members, let us take seats in the chamber so that we can start Parliament's extraordinary session of 20 October on the agenda of the " For Public Accounts Committee for 2017 " and draft reports from the Bureau of the Saeima Parliament on the draft packageproposes that the Cabinet Office's proposal for the " Amendment of the Postal Law " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, as well as the Tautfarms, the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, are opposed to handing over objections to the draft legislationa draft bill has been passed to the Bureau of MPs proposing that the Cabinet Office's submitted bill " Amendment to the Electronic Media Law " to be transferred to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, with the committee responsible, as well as the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission, as MPs have reservationsMEPs in the committee also call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all Member States comply with the legal requirements of the Commission, the Commission and the Member States. And the Commissioner for Regional Policy Does Members have reservations about the handing over of the bill to the members of the draft law, there is no draft law passed by the Bureau of MPs to propose to the Cabinet Office's proposed bill " Amendment of Official Publications and Financial Information " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee ,as the committee responsible, as well as the Committee on Legal Affairs, the objections to the draft bill have reservations raised to MPs' draft legislation has been referred to the Bureau of Ministers proposing that the Cabinet Office propose a bill on " Amendment of the Earth Code " to the Budget andthe Finance (Taxation) Commission, by stating that it is responsible by the Commission, the Tautfarms, the agrarian, Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, Does MPs have reservations about the transfer of draft laws to commissions?" Amendments to the Geographical Information Act " to be transferred to the Committee on Budgets and the Financial (Taxation) Commission, as well as to the Commission as well as the Tautfarm, the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, the objections to the draft bill have reservations on the draft legislationreferred to the Bureau of the Parliament, the Cabinet Office proposed a bill " Amendment to the State Tadastra State Tadastra Law " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission, as well as the Committee on Legal Affairs Does MPs have reservations about the transfer of draft laws to commissions? Not a draft legislative committee has been referred to the Bureau of Saeima to propose to the Cabinet Office a bill called " Amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) Commission stating that it is the committee responsible, and the Committee on Legal Affairs Does MPs have objections to the passing of bill commissions? There is no objection to the draft law the Bureau has referred to the Bureau of Deputies proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for a " Amendment to the Electricity Tax Law " to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission, with the committee responsible, Does MPs have reservations?".
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_10_20_381-seq1 mentions Q9322619.
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 type Speech.
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 number "359".
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 isPartOf 2016_10_20_380.
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 spokenText " Paldies. Sēdi slēdzu. ".
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 language "lv".
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_10_20_380-seq359 translatedText "Thank you at the closing of the session.".
- 2016_10_20_380 type SessionDay.
- 2016_10_20_380 date "2016-10-20".
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq359.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq358.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq357.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq356.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq355.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq354.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq353.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq352.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq351.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq350.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq349.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq348.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq347.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq346.
- 2016_10_20_380 hasPart 2016_10_20_380-seq345.