Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_11_30_333-seq2118> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 9 of
9
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 type Speech.
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 number "2118".
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 date "2015-11-30".
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 isPartOf 2015_11_30_333.
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 spokenAs 92.
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 spokenText "Kolēģi, jūs pirms daudziem gadiem Augstskolu likumā iebalsojāt 78.pantu. Ļoti daudzi no jums zina, ka tas paredz ikgadēju finansējuma palielinājumu augstskolām par 0,25 procentiem no IKP. Tikpat daudzus gadus jūs to likumu neesat ievērojuši, taču jums ir ļoti smuka atruna: Augstskolu likumam ir zemāks spēks nekā likumam par valsts budžetu. Skan dīvaini. Katru gadu jūs to sakāt: “Nu, jā, bet iespēju nav! Mums ir citas nozares, kurām vajag naudu.” Īstenībā visām nozarēm vajag naudu. Bet, kolēģi, ja jūs iebalsojāt, nu, tad esiet konsekventi, vai nu pildiet to likumu, vai tad... Jo Ministru kabinets pat neiesniedza tādu grozījumu budžetā. Tas nebija paredzēts, tas bija jāiesniedz deputātiem. Tad - groziet likumu! Un izslēdziet no tā pārejas noteikumu 72.punktu, kurš paredz šā finansējuma ikgadējo pieaugumu, citādi sanāks ļoti dīvaina situācija - jūs iebalsojat, un jūs paši nepildāt. Aicinu atbalstīt.".
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 language "lv".
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 speaker Nikita_Nikiforovs-1983.
- 2015_11_30_333-seq2118 translatedText "Fellow Members, many years ago, you in the High School Law had voted in favour of Article 78, many of you know that it provides for an annual increase in funding for universities at 0.25 per cent of GDP, for many years you have not obested it in law, butyou have a very smuka excuse: the university law is lower in the law than the law of the country, Skan's odd year you say it: " well, yes, but the opportunity is not! We have other industry that needs money "in fact, all sectors need money But, colleagues, if you vote, well, then be consistent, either pass it into law, or then Jo's Cabinet even did not put an amendment in the Budget That wasn't supposed to be, it wasI had to submit a bill to Members of the House - amending the law! And exclude from the passage of the transitional arrangements, paragraph 72, which provides for the annual increase in this funding, will otherwise meet the very strange situation you are voting on, and you did not back up in the doorsteps".