Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_05_28_306-seq20> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 type Speech.
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 number "20".
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 date "2015-05-28".
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 isPartOf 2015_05_28_306.
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 spokenAs 41.
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 spokenText "Godātais ministra kungs! Man ir jautājums sakarā ar to, ka pašreiz izveidojusies pielaižu piešķiršanas prakse, ka jautājums par to, vai cilvēkam nodrošināma pielaide valsts noslēpumam, tiek risināts tikai pēc tam, kad cilvēks stājies amatā. Un viņam pēc tam, stājoties amatā, ir divus vai trīs mēnešus ilgs pārbaudes laiks, un, ja tad saņem atteikumu, tiek zaudēts darbs. Un viņš jau ir aizgājis arī no iepriekšējā darba... Vai šī prakse, ka pārbaudi attiecībā uz iespēju saņemt pielaidi valsts noslēpuma objektiem neveic pirms personas stāšanās darbā vai pretendēšanas uz amatu, ir likumīga? Vai tomēr Tieslietu ministrija nedomā kaut ko šajā sakarībā darīt?".
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 language "lv".
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 speaker Martins_Sics.
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 translatedText "The honourable Minister, I have a question because of the fact that there is now a practice of granting of the exemption, that the issue of whether a person has a secret to a secret state is addressed only after the person took officeand then, upon taking office, there is a two or three month probation period, and if then the denial gets lost, work on Mr And he has already gone from the previous job as Hasthis practice that the verification of the possibility of admission to state secrecy facilities does not take place before the person has taken into account or to qualify for office is legal? Or does the Ministry of Justice not think anything about this?".
- 2015_05_28_306-seq20 mentions Q1771611.