Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_05_28_302-seq560> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 14 of
14
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 type Speech.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 number "560".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 date "2015-05-28".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 isPartOf 2015_05_28_302.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 spokenAs 62.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 spokenText "Paldies, ministra kungs, par rakstveidā sniegto informāciju. Jautājums ir tāds. Jūs savā atbildē norādījāt, ka Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesa lietā “Ternovskis pret Latviju” nesaskatīja konvencijas 6.panta pārkāpumu. Un galvenais, protams, bija tas, ka Rīgas apgabaltiesa nav nodrošinājusi personai reālu tiesas procesu... bet ka ECT nav vērtējusi jautājumu par speciālo atļauju neizsniegšanas kārtību. Sakiet, lūdzu, vai Tieslietu ministrija, vērtējot konkrēto spriedumu un kārtību, ievēroja, ka ECT sprieduma 71.–73.punktā, kur ir vērtēts kopumā viss... kur ir norādīts, ka tiesa nevar konstatēt...? Tiesa secina, ka minētās pārrunas nerīkoja. Tiesa secina, ka iesniedzējs... nebija pilnībā nodrošināts sacīkstes princips pirms tam, kamēr apgabaltiesā lietu skatīja. Ja iepriekš būtu nodrošināts sacīkstes process, vai Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesa atzītu, ka ir pārkāpts sacīkstes process arī apgabaltiesā?".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 language "lv".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 speaker Gunars_Kutris.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 translatedText "Thank you, Minister, for the written information in writing, in my reply, in your reply, the European Court of Human Rights did not see a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and, of course, the fact thatthe District Court has not provided a realistic trial but that the ECtHR did not question the issue of a notification of special authorisation procedures, Sakiet, or the Ministry of Justice, when assessing the specific judgment and order, observedthat the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the European Union for the purposes of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice, is that the Court of Justice has concluded that the Court of Justice of the European Unionthe author was not fully assured of the principle of the race before, until the District Court brought the matter to a hearing, would the European Court of Human Rights recognise a breach of the race process in the District Court as well?".
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 mentions Q211.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 mentions Q2660080.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 mentions Q193089.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 mentions Q1771611.
- 2015_05_28_302-seq560 mentions Q122880.