Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_05_21_301-seq80> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 14 of
14
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 type Speech.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 number "80".
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 date "2015-05-21".
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 isPartOf 2015_05_21_301.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 spokenAs 17.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 spokenText "Cienījamā Saeimas priekšsēdētāja! Godātie kolēģi! Noklausījies Elksniņa kunga uzstāšanos, gribu izteikt vienu secinājumu un divus precizējumus. Pirmais būs secinājums. Ja jau, kā apgalvoja Elksniņa kungs, Nacionālā apvienība lobē tos maksātnespējas procesa administratorus, kuri nav zvērināti advokāti, tad es varu izdarīt secinājumu, ka Elksniņa kungs lobē tos maksātnespējas procesa administratorus, kuri ir zvērināti advokāti. Un divas piebildes. Kā minēja Elksniņa kungs, Nacionālā apvienība uzstāj uz to, ka maksātnespējas procesa administratoriem jābūt valsts amatpersonām. Es atgādināšu, ka šo lēmumu pieņēma nevis Nacionālā apvienība vai Tieslietu ministrija, bet Saeimas vairākums, balsojot par attiecīgajiem grozījumiem Maksātnespējas likumā. Un visbeidzot par to, vai zvērināts advokāts var vai nevar apvienot šo amatu ar maksātnespējas procesa administratora amatu, kuram papildus nāktu klāt arī valsts amatpersonas statuss. Ļoti labi, ka Elksniņa kungs pauž savu viedokli, taču, manuprāt, Elksniņa kungs nav Latvijas Zvērinātu advokātu padomes pārstāvis, un, cik es zinu, Latvijas Zvērinātu advokātu padome nav pieņēmusi lēmumu par to, vai zvērināts advokāts var savienot vai varēs savienot šo amatu ar maksātnespējas procesa administratora amatu gadījumā, ja stāsies spēkā šī norma, kas noteiks valsts amatpersonas statusu. (No zāles dep. A.Elksniņa starpsaucieni.) Un, cik man zināms, arī padomē ir ļoti dažādi viedokļi par šo. Paldies.".
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 language "lv".
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 speaker Gaidis_Berzins-1970.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 translatedText "Honourable President-in-Office of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, having listened to Mr Elin's remarks, I would like to make one conclusion and two clarifications to the conclusion of the conclusion of what Mr Elin has already claimed, as stated by Mr Elin, by the clerks of the insolvency proceedings, who have not sworn lawyers, then I can do sothe conclusion that Mr Elenus has been lobbying those clerks of insolvency proceedings who have sworn lawyers And two remarks As mentioned by Mr Elin as mentioned by Mr Elin, the National Association insists on the fact that insolvency administrators should be reminded of this decision instead ofthe National Alliance or Department of Justice, while the majority of members vote for the corresponding amendments to the Insolvency Law And finally, whether the attorney may or may not combine this post with the office of an insolvency administrator, which would also include public officials. Status Very well that Mr Elin speaks his mind, but I think Mr Elin is not a member of the Zarkham Lawyers' Council, and as far as I know, the Zaferd's lawyer council has not made any decision as to whether a jury can connect or be ableto connect this office with the position of the insolvency administrator, if this provision enters into force, which will determine the status of national officials (heckling from DEP A Elin Un, as far as I know - the Council also has very different views on this Thank you".
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 mentions Q822919.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 mentions Q211.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 mentions Q9151087.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 mentions Q1771611.
- 2015_05_21_301-seq80 mentions Q1576026.