Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_03_05_289-seq24> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 12 of
12
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 type Speech.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 number "24".
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 date "2015-03-05".
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 isPartOf 2015_03_05_289.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 spokenAs 92.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 spokenText "Ja matemātiķim kolēģim Šadurskim ne visai patīk cipari un skaitļi - es saprotu, ka darba apstākļu dēļ ne visai patīkami arī Saeimas procedūrās iedziļināties skaitļos -, es gribētu aprakstīt procesu, kas notika... un atgādināt par tiem solījumiem un sludinājumiem, kurus mēs dzirdējām 2008. un 2009.gadā: valsts pārdeva Parex akciju daļu ERAB, un tas ir ļoti izdevīgs darījums, tā ir privatizācija, katrā ziņā tas atbilst Latvijas ekonomikas un valsts pārvaldes... pārvaldīšanas filozofijai. Tagad mēs uzzinājām, ka tā nebija pārdošana, tas bija aizdevums. Nu, labi! Aizdevums arī ir tāds process, kurš var būt Latvijai izdevīgs. Bet atcerēsimies, ka bezmaksas aizdevumu nevar būt! Var būt, bet ļoti reti. Un arī par šo aizdevumu bija jāmaksā. Un kas par to maksāja? Maksāja mūsu nodokļu maksātāji! Vai kāds no Saeimas deputātiem zināja par to, ka bija jāmaksā par aizdevumu? Neviens nezināja. Par to es arī stāstīju. Un šī maksa ir vienāda ar 21 miljonu eiro. Vai tas ir maz vai daudz - lai to secina Valsts kontrole vai, es nezinu, kāda cita iestāde, kam ir tāda kompetence! Bet vismaz deputātiem un vēlētājiem par to ir gan jāzina. Bet vēlreiz saku, ka viss šis aizdevums kopā ar procentiem maksāja 114 miljonus eiro, un šī nauda katrā ziņā ir jāatdod. Pilnībā vai daļēji, bet jāatdod. Un par to arī ir jāatceras! Un tā nav manipulācija. Tas ir fakts. Es burtiski citēju to, ko mums ir sniedzis Privatizācijas aģentūras valdes priekšsēdētājs Vladimirs Loginova kungs. Paldies.".
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 language "lv".
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 speaker Igors_Pimenovs-1953.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 translatedText "If a fellow Member of the minister - a fellow minister - not like the digits and figures - I understand that because of working conditions it is not quite nice for the lawmakers to go into the numbers - I would like to describe the process that took place andto remind you of the promises and notices we have heard in 2008 and 2009: the country sold a share of Parex in the EBRD, and it is a very good deal, that is privatisation, in any case consistent with Latvia's economy andthe public administration philosophy of Now we learned that it was not a sale, it was a loan Well, well! The loan is also a process that can be profitable for Latvia, let us remember that free loans can't be a free loan! May there be, but very rarely And on this loan there was a bill and it was paid for it? Paid our taxpayers! Did any of the MPs knew about the loan that was paid for loans? NoneI did not know about this, I also told me this charge is equal to the 21 million Could it has little or no more - to conclude it in the National Audit Office or, I do not know, another authority withthere is such competence, but at least the Members and the voters have both to know Bet once again, to say that the whole of this loan, coupled with interest paid EUR 114 million, and that the money has, in any case, been returnedeither wholly or partially, it must be remembered! And it is not manipulation That is a fact I am literally quoting from the Board of Directors, Mr Vladimir Loginova".
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 mentions Q822919.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 mentions Q211.
- 2015_03_05_289-seq24 mentions Q2033921.