Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_02_19_286-seq71> ?p ?o. }

• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 type Speech.
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 number "71".
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 date "2015-02-19".
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 isPartOf 2015_02_19_286.
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 spokenAs 92.
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 spokenText "Kolēģi! Kāda ir priekšlikuma būtība? Priekšlikuma būtība... Mans priekšlikums bija - to likumu, kuru mēs bijām sagatavojuši savulaik un apstiprinājuši pirms vēlēšanām kā solījumu saviem vēlētājiem un kura spēkā stāšanos pēc tam tika piedāvāts pārcelt uz 1.martu... kuru tagad diemžēl esam grozījuši, kā es saprotu... Mans priekšlikums bija šo negrozīto redakciju piedāvāt, lai tā stājas spēkā nākošā gada sākumā. Kāpēc? Tāpēc, ka tā diskusija, kas publiski izskanēja... Un to pauda arī daudzi no jums, - ka patiesībā tas viss tiek darīts ar nosacījumu, ka bankām tiek dots laiks, lai tās varētu pierādīt, ka tās tik tiešām sāks kreditēt, tik tiešām nodrošinās tos savus solījumus, ka kredīti kļūs pieejamāki mājsaimniecībām, un ka bankas atjaunos savu darbību Latvijas reģionos. To jūs paudāt publiski, visas sabiedrības priekšā, - ka tikai tāpēc mēs taisām šos grozījumus un ka pēc tam, ja izrādīsies, ka bankas to nedara... ka pusgada laikā tas nenotiek, mēs atgriezīsimies atpakaļ un lemsim par to, vai tiešām šeit nevajag kaut ko grozīt. Nu, lūk! Lai nebūtu jānodarbojas ar šo grozīšanu vienā virzienā, pēc tam - grozīšanu otrā virzienā, vispareizāk būtu bijis vienkārši atlikt visu šo jezgu... atlikt līdz gada beigām, dodot skaidru ziņu bankām: lūk, jums ir laiks (konkrētajā gadījumā tie būtu mēneši deviņi), kurā jūs pierādiet to, ka jūs tik tiešām esat gatavas darīt to, ko jūs solāt, - tātad atsākt kreditēšanu mājsaimniecībām un atsākt savu darbību, izvērst savu darbību Latvijas reģionos! Un tanī gadījumā mēs vienkārši varētu šādus grozījumus varbūt arī neieviest. Dotajā gadījumā tas nav noticis. Un, redzot to, kāds ir bijis balsojums, ir skaidrs, ka šim manam priekšlikumam vairs nav jēgas. Tāpēc es to atsaucu. (No zāles: “Paldies!”)".
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 language "lv".
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 speaker Ivars_Zarins-1969.
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 translatedText "Colleagues, what is the substance of the proposal, the substance of the proposal, My proposal was - the law we had in the past and approved before the election as a promise to my constituents and the entry into force of which was subsequently proposedto move to 1 March now, unfortunately, we have unfortunately amended, as I understand My proposal, to propose this unamended version so that it will enter into force early next year, Why? Because of its discussion, whichit has been expressed in public that And it was echoed by many of you - that in fact all of this is done on the condition that banks are given time to prove that they actually start to lend themselves ,indeed, they will provide them with their promises that credit will become more accessible to households, and that banks will restore their activities to the Latvian regions To be publicly, before the public, and that, only therefore, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the other hand, we are making these amendments and that, on the otherif it turns out that the banks do not do this in half a year or so, we will come back and decide whether there really should be no amendment here, here is not to deal with thismodification in one direction, then modification in the second direction, it would have been more appropriate simply to postpone the whole course to the end of the year, giving a clear message to the banks: here you have time (in this case, they should bemonths nine), in which you prove that you are really ready to do what you promise, which is to resume lending to households and to resume their activities, to step up their activities in the Latvian regions! And in the case of that we areit might simply be possible to see such an amendment in the case that no such amendments have been made, and it is clear that my proposal no longer makes sense, therefore, I withdraw it (No floor: thank you')".
• 2015_02_19_286-seq71 mentions Q211.