Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_02_12_285-seq357> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 13 of
13
with 100 items per page.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 type Speech.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 number "357".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 date "2015-02-12".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 isPartOf 2015_02_12_285.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 spokenAs 17.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 spokenText "(No zāles dep. J.Ādamsons: “Īsi un kodolīgi!”) Godājamais Prezidij, godājamie deputāti! Seržanta kungs jau noņēma pusi manu bažu ar savu uzstāšanos, līdz ar to es varu runāt mazāk. Man varbūt ir neliels tāds aizdomīgums, vai tomēr šis likums nav fikcija kā tāda. Kāpēc? It kā ir šīs divas iespējas, bet, kā saka, prātā ir tā, ka faktiski būs tikai viena iespēja. Kā jau es teicu, ja komercbankas noteiks tik milzīgi atšķirīgus pirmās iemaksas procentus, tad nevienam vairs nevajadzēs šo nolikto atslēgu principu. Un tad paliek jautājums, kuru, es ceru, komisijās arī izdiskutēs, jo šī ir Tautsaimniecības, agrārās, vides un reģionālās politikas komisija, nevis Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisija. Kāpēc komercbankas baidās no nolikto atslēgu principa - tas man nav skaidrs. Es ļoti uzmanīgi noklausījos vakardienas debatētājus... Saprotiet, mums ir īpašums kā konfekte, lielisks! Un te nu es gribu drusciņ oponēt Dombrovska kungam, Vjačeslavam Dombrovskim, jo atšķirība no lombarda tomēr ir. Tātad iedomājieties: ir skaists dzīvoklis kā konfekte, novērtētāji no bankas, lieliski zviedru speciālisti, novērtē to ar ātrās pārdošanas metodi. Banka paņem komisijas naudu, kur pirmā iemaksa ir 10 vai 20 procentu. Cilvēks maksā 5 gadus, nomaksājot, teiksim, kādus 20 procentus, tad viņš zaudē darbu un atdod šo dzīvokli kā konfekti bankai atpakaļ, uz kuru tā jau ir nopelnījusi 30 procentus. Bet banka saka: “Paldies! Nē, mums nevajag! Mēs nemaz negribam atpakaļ šo dzīvokli.” Un tad man radās nelabas aizdomas, vai tomēr bankas negrib nedaudz pelnīt uz bezatbildīgu cilvēku rēķina, kuri nespēj aprēķināt savas nākotnes saistības, kā to paredz Dombrovska kungs. Un atcerēsimies 2005.gadu, kas tad būtu noticis, ja tad būtu spēkā nolikto atslēgu princips! Es kā arhitekts jums varu pateikt: Ķengaraga dzīvokļi 20 tūkstošu dolāru vērtībā. Izcili zviedru speciālisti pēc tam, kad bija krīze - un viņi zināja, kas notiek, - tos novērtēja par 100 tūkstošiem eiro. Un, zināt, viņi nekautrējās par to, jo latvieši ir muļķi. Tātad viņi nozaga apmēram 70 procentus naudas, un daudzi cilvēki, vēl tagad nespēdami atdot, aizbrauca uz Angliju. Vai šeit nav drusciņ tā, ka daži... Es nesaku, ka visas... Es saprotu, ka mums lielākā daļa komercbanku guļ un ceļas ar domu, kā palīdzēt latviešu tautai ar dzīvojamo platību (Dep. A.Bērziņš aplaudē: “Tā ir taisnība!”), un ir gatavas pat piemaksāt, bet dažas bankas tomēr ir sliktas, tāpēc tās noteikti šo principu izmantos. Un tāpēc man ir nelielas bažas par visu to, bet es ceru, ka mēs komisijās un diskusijās to novērsīsim un ar lielu prieku otrajā balsojumā pieņemsim visizdevīgāko likumu. Paldies par uzmanību!".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 language "lv".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 speaker Aleksandrs_Kirsteins-1948.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 translatedText "(from the floor of the DEP J Addamsons: " brief and succinct! "), Honourable Members, honourable Members, the sergeant has already removed half of my concerns with my remarks, so I can speak less I may have some minor consideration, or, however, thisthe law is not fiction like the one in Why? As if there are these two options but, as they say in mind, there will only be one chance, as I have already said, if commercial banks set such huge percentages in the first contribution, thenno one will ever need this principle of warehouse principle and then there is a question which, I hope, commissions will also be debated, because this is a Commission for agrarian, agrarian, environmental and regional policy (taxes) Why commercial banks are afraid of the warehouse from the warehouse. Key principle - it's not clear to me I listened very attentively to yesterday's debates, we have the property as a prallar, brilliant! And here I would like to oppose Mr Dombrovska, Manuel Dombrovskim, because of the difference between Lombarda ,have a So imagine: a handsome flat as a Smarker, evaluators from the bank, great Swedish experts, appreciate it with the fast-selling method the Bank takes for money, where the first instalment is 10 or 20 per cent paying 5 years, settling, say ,what 20 per cent, then he loses the job and gives up this flat as a pinned bank back to which it has already earned 30 per cent But the bank says: " thank you, no, we don't want this flat back, " And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat back,' And we don't want this flat backI then got haunted by suspicion or, however, the banks do not want to pay a little at the expense of irresponsible people who are unable to calculate their future obligations, as Mr Dombrovska states back in 2005, which would have happened if it had been in forcewarehouse principle: I can tell you as an architect: the Cologne apartments valued 20 thousand dollars in excellent Swedish professionals after the crisis - and they knew what was going on - they appreciated 100 thousand. They shy about it, because Latvians are fools So they stole about 70 per cent of the money, and many people, even now wiring to give away, drove to England Was there is no suggestion here that some were not saying all thatI understand that we have the vast majority of commercial banks sleeping and rising with the idea of helping the nation with the residential area (DEP A boss applauding:' it's true!') and some banks are ready to even pay. Bad, that is why they certainly will use this principle and I have little concern for all of this, but I hope that we will turn away the most favourable laws in the second vote, and I will be very pleased to thank you for your attention in the second vote.".
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 mentions Q3744607.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 mentions Q1976817.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 mentions Q9368990.
- 2015_02_12_285-seq357 mentions Q16357519.