Saeima Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in Saeima for { <http://dati.saeima.korpuss.lv/entity/speech/2015_01_29_282-seq4> ?p ?o. }

• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 type Speech.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 number "4".
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 date "2015-01-29".
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 isPartOf 2015_01_29_282.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 spokenAs 101.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 spokenText "Man ir sakāmas tikai trīs lietas. Sākšu ar senu latviešu tautas gudrību: “Sveša manta laimi nenes.” Numur viens. Terezīnas deklarācija, kas pieņemta 2009.gadā Čehijā. Tā ir par ebreju īpašumu restitūciju, un tā bija vajadzīga tāpēc, ka ir ļoti neordināra situācija, ka kopienas nevar pieprasīt savus īpašumus atpakaļ tāpēc, ka kopienas vairs nav. Nekad Eiropā nav bijis tā, ka pazūd veselas kopienas... gandrīz vai. Nu, varbūt varētu salīdzināt ar mēri viduslaikos, kad izzuda puse tautas vai divas trešdaļas tautas... Bet tā, kā ebrejiem bija, - ka 70, 80 vai 90 procenti - tā bija neparasta situācija. Nu, un tad tur tika pieņemtas dažādas vadlīnijas, kā to darīt, - dibināt fondus, veikt pētījumus un tā tālāk... Jo tā ir ļoti sarežģīta situācija, to neviens nenoliedz. Eiropā ir dažādi veidi, kā šo jautājumu risināt, un labā ziņa ir tā, ka Latvija jau agrāk sāka to darīt. Mēs atdevām atpakaļ trīs īpašumus - un nevienam gabals nenokrita! -, ieskaitot vienu slimnīcu, kas ir tā dēvētajā Maskavas forštatē un kas ir pieejama visiem Latvijas iedzīvotājiem. Sliktā ziņa ir tā, ka 2006.gadā viss beidzās ar fiasko, jo Saeima pat nerunāja, nediskutēja par to un vienkārši noraidīja. Nu, un otrais fiasko bija 2012.gadā, kad Valdis Dombrovskis dibināja darba grupu. Nu, un mēs zinām, kā tas beidzās: viens ministrs atkāpās, un viss! Ar to viss beidzās! Nezinu, kā to vērtēs nākamās paaudzes. Es tiešām nezinu. Bet ar to mums nav ko lepoties. Ir angļiem tāds ļoti labs vārds - closed, kas nozīmē “slēgts uz visiem laikiem, neatgriezeniski”. Un pagaidām ir tikai divas Centrāleiropas... Austrumeiropas valstis, kas to ir panākušas, un tās ir Igaunija un Lietuva. Otrā lieta, ko gribu pateikt, - par stereotipiem, kādus veidojušas mūsu apziņā abas okupācijas varas. Tās mūs gribēja iznīcināt, bet tām tas neizdevās, kā mēs labi zinām. Nu, runāsim par 1941.gada 14.jūnija deportācijām. Mēs trimdā zinājām, ka vislielākā... proporcionāli vislielākais skaits no tiem, kas 1941.gada 14.jūnijā tika deportēti, bija ebreji. Mēs to trimdā zinājām, bet Latvijā nezināja. Kāpēc nezināja Latvijā? Un arī par 1905.gada revolūciju... Kas vadīja 1905.gada revolūciju? Kas Rīgā (Starpsauciens no zāles.)... vadīja revolūciju Rīgā, ka pat cara armijai bija bail iziet ārā no kazarmām divus mēnešus?... Notika skolotāju konference... no visas Latvijas... pagastveču konference, kas lika pamatus neatkarīgas Latvijas dibināšanai dažus gadus vēlāk. Es jums ļaušu pašiem to atminēt. Jo tas, ko padomju laikā rakstīja vēstures grāmatās, un tas, ko mēs paši īstenībā zinājām, ir divas pilnīgi atšķirīgas lietas. Numur trīs. Trešais. Ir angļiem tāds vārds - statesmanship. Tā ir... latviski sakot, būtu: valstsvīra vai valstsievas cienīga rīcība par spīti sabiedriskajai domai, kas tanī laikā to neatbalsta. Un kā bija pirms gandrīz 100 gadiem? Nacionālais teātris tad nemaz nesaucās par Nacionālo teātri, un pēc Otrā pasaules kara arī tas nesaucās par Nacionālo teātri. Ja mūsu politiskā elite nebūtu proklamējusi Latviju, kas tad būtu noticis? Jo, ja “Sastrēgumstunda” būtu bijusi tanī laikā un ja cilvēki varētu piezvanīt un pateikt savus uzskatus, cik - kā jūs domājat? - lielu atbalstu rīdzinieki būtu devuši Ulmaņa pagaidu valdībai? Cik? (No zāles dep. K.Šadurskis: “Pieci procenti!”) Nu, varbūt 10! Bet kas notika gadu vēlāk, to jūs redzat filmā “Rīgas sargi”. Nu labi, stilizēta filma, bet pamatā pareiza! Redziet, es domāju, ka jūs, kas tagad spiedīsiet pogas šodien, padomājiet par to - par statesmanship! Atvainojiet, ka es beidzu ar angļu vārdu! (Frakcijas VIENOTĪBA aplausi.)".
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 language "lv".
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 speaker Atis_Lejins-1942.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 translatedText "I have just three things to start with, with the wisdom of an ancient English nation:' an alien's manta fortune will not be the number one' number one Tebarrazan declaration adopted in 2009 in the Czech Republic It is about the restitution of Jewish properties, and it was necessary because ofin a very unorthodox situation, that the communities cannot demand their properties back because the community no longer has Never in Europe has not been so, that whole swathes of the community almost or Well, perhaps, could be compared to mayors in the Middle Ages when half of the nation is disappearingor two-thirds of the people Bet the way Jews were - that 70, 80 or 90 per cent - it was an unusual situation, Well, and then there were various guidelines on how to do so - to set up the fundsand so on Jo it is a very difficult situation, no one is denying in Europe any different ways of dealing with this issue, and the good news is that Latvia has already started to do so in the past three possessions .- and no piece of the piece fell! - including one hospital, which is so-called the Moscow forvoys and which is accessible to all residents of Latvia, the fact that it all ended in 2006 with the fiasco, as the Saeima did not even speak, did not discuss the matterit and simply rejected Nu, and the second fiasco was in 2012, when Valdis Dombrovskis was founded by task force Well, and we know how it ended: one minister stepped down and everything! I don't know how it will be evaluated in the next generation. I really do not know But with this we have nothing to boast of the Anglars that have a very good word - closed down, which means' closed forever, irrevocably,' And so far there are only two Central European countries that have achieved it ,and it is Estonia and Lithuania's second case, which I want to say, about the stereotypes that have been shaped in our consciousness by both sides of the occupation of Who we wanted to destroy, but they did not succeed, as we well know Well, about 14the June deportations we knew of the highest proportion of those who were deported on 14 June 1941, were in the hands of Jews, and did not know if Latvia was unaware of Latvia? Who led the revolution of 1905?, which led to a revolution in the capital (interjection from the floor) that even the cara army was afraid to pass out of the barracks for two months?, a teacher conference took place from all over the place. The Conference of Latvia, which laid the foundations for the creation of an independent Latvian establishment some years later, I will allow you to read it for yourself Jo, what the boards wrote during the history books, and what we actually actually knew are two completely differentthe number three third cases of the Third Anglars word - a statesmanship It is lationsmanship - would be: statesman or national wife worthy of action despite the public opinion which, at the time, did not support And as was almost 100 years ago? The theatre would not be at the National Theatre, and after the Second World War, too, it did not happen in the National Theatres, where our political elite would not have been motherly, what would have happened then, because if the' Sastion Hour' had been a tangle, and if people wereone could call and say what you think - as you think? - a lot of support for the throws would have given the Ulm an interim government? How? (from the floor of DEP politician:' five!') Well, maybe 10! But what happened a year later, yousee the film's " guardians of Well, " a well-styled movie, but basically sound! You see, I think that you, who will now crisp on the buttons today, I am sorry that I am finishing with the English word! (faction of applause).".
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q822919.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q211.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q649.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q2660080.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q37.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q191.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q193089.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q11213537.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q25931626.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q57630.
• 2015_01_29_282-seq4 mentions Q213.