Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_06_09_370-seq81 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 number "80".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 spokenText "Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par 5. - Saeimas Juridiskā biroja iesniegto priekšlikumu! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 24, pret - 55, atturas - 4. Priekšlikums nav atbalstīts.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 translatedText "Please call, we will vote in favour of the proposal tabled by the Legal Office of the Legal Affairs Committee, please voting! Yes: 24, against - 55, 4 without support".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq80 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 number "79".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 spokenText "Paldies visiem debatētājiem. Katram bija savi argumenti. Bet manā skatījumā vislabākie argumenti ir Aizsardzības, iekšlietu un korupcijas novēršanas komisijai, kura 5.priekšlikumu nav atbalstījusi. Lūdzu balsot!".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 speaker Ainars_Latkovskis-1967.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq79 translatedText "Thanks to all the debate makers Each had their arguments But in my eyes, the best arguments are at the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission, whose 5 proposal has not supported Please's vote!".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 number "78".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 spokenText "Debates slēdzu. Vai ziņotājs komisijas vārdā ko piebildīs? (Dep. A.Bērziņš: “Nevajag vairāk neko! Balsojam!”)".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 translatedText "The debate on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission on behalf of the Commission? (DEP A boss: " you don't need more votes! ")".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq78 mentions Q3744607.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 number "77".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 spokenText "Cienījamie kolēģi! Grūti runāt, kad jau skaidri iezīmēta mūsu bipolārā pasaule. Profesionāli patrioti jau pateica, ka tie, kas nav profesionāli patrioti, ir valsts ienaidnieki. Es riskēšu tomēr runāt nevis par patriotismu, nevis par naudu, bet par ko citu. Tiešām, šie grozījumi vērtējami no ļoti daudziem skatu punktiem. Mēs varam runāt par naudu, mēs varam runāt par investīcijām, mēs varam runāt par situāciju Krievijā, mēs varam runāt par to, ka šādus grozījumus izstrādājis Juridiskais birojs. Vēršu jūsu uzmanību, tie, kas nepamanīja: Aizsardzības, iekšlietu un korupcijas novēršanas komisija šos Juridiskā biroja priekšlikumus nav atbalstījusi. Šnores kungs piedalījās komisijas sēdē un skaidri zina, ka gan 5., gan 6.priekšlikums ir izstrādāts juridiski korekti. Tie ir vienlīdz juridiski korekti. Mēs runājam tikai par politisko izšķiršanos - kuru variantu mēs atbalstām. Es piekrītu tiem, kas teica, ka tiesiskās paļāvības princips nav pārkāpts. Piekrītu arī tiem, kas teica, ka nav tiesisko šķēršļu. Taču es domāju, ka valsts dzīvi raksturo ne tikai tiesiskā reglamentācija, ne tikai tiesiskā paļāvība, ne tikai tiesisko šķēršļu esamība vai neesamība. Es uzskatu, ka situācija... Šo programmu, kas sākotnēji bija iecerēta kā investīciju programma, izmantoja ļoti daudz inteliģences pārstāvju no Maskavas, no Pēterburgas. Tie ir cilvēki, kas pārdevuši savu vienīgo dzīvokli un pārvākušies uz pastāvīgu dzīvesvietu Latvijā. Ja mēs tagad cilvēkiem, kuriem nav citas dzīvesvietas, sakām: “Jūs esat slazdā, tagad jums būs jāmaksā!” - tas nav pieļaujami. Tiesiskā paļāvība nav pārkāpta, bet ir pārkāpta morāle, ir pārkāpta ētiskā paļāvība. Protams, var salīdzināt ar īrniekiem, ar pasu saņēmējiem, bet atcerēsimies, ka īrniekam ir iespēja izvēlēties citu dzīvesvietu. Viņš var īrēt lētāku dzīvesvietu citur. Bet cilvēkam, kas jau iegādājies dzīvokli, nevar pārmest to, ka viņš dzīvo tieši tur. Es uzskatu, ka mūsu valsts politikai jābūt gan konsekventai, gan godīgai. Aicinu neatbalstīt 5.priekšlikumu un atbalstīt 6.priekšlikumu.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 speaker Aleksejs_Loskutovs-1962.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 translatedText "Dear colleagues, it is difficult to speak up once again when our bipolar world, professionally patriots, has already said that non-professional patriots are the enemies of a country I would risk, however, not to talk about patriotism and not about money but about money, but about whichthese amendments, from very many points of view, from very many points of view, we can talk about investment, we can talk about the situation in Russia, we can talk about the amendments that have been made to the Legal Office. Drawing your attention, those who did not see the proposals from Mr Schnores to the Committee on Defence, the Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption Commission have not supported Mr Schmidt's proposals and clearly knows that both the 5 and 6 proposals were legally correctthey are equally legally correct: we are talking only about a political choice - which we support, I agree with those who said that the principle of legal confidence has not been breached by the Flaat, including those who said there was no legal obstacle to TakingI think that public life is characterised not only by the legal regulation, not only of the legal certainty or the mere existence or absence of legal obstacles, I believe that the situation in this programme, which was originally intended as an investment programme, was usedan awful lot of intellectuals from Moscow, from Peter Tie, are people who have sold their only flat and overdescended to a permanent residence in Latvia If we now have people without another residence say' you are trapped, now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped, now you are going to be trapped, now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped; now you are going to be trapped, now youpay!': it cannot be accepted for the legal confidence not to be breached but the morals have been breached, there is a violation of the ethical confidence of the Protems, to compare tenants with passports, but let us remember that the tenant has the option of choosing another residence He can renta cheaper place of residence elsewhere, But someone who has already bought a flat is unable to reproach the fact that he is living right there, I believe that our public policy must be both consistent and fair: I do not support the 5 proposal and support the 6 proposals".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 mentions Q211.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 mentions Q649.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq77 mentions Q159.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 number "76".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 spokenText "Vārds deputātam Ainaram Latkovskim. Vārds deputātam Ainaram Latkovskim... (Dep. A.Latkovskis: “Es komisijas vārdā!”) Vārds deputātam Aleksejam Loskutovam.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 translatedText "In the name of the MEP, Ainaram Latkovskim: " on behalf of the commission, MEP! "".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 mentions Q4267253.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq76 mentions Q9142842.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 number "75".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 spokenAs 92.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 spokenText "...maksātnespējas administratoru interesēs, lai viņiem būtu vairāk darba un nebūtu kāda investora, kas varētu to glābt... Jo, redziet, ja jūsu (Dep. R.Kols: “Bet kāds sakars?”) priekšlikums būtu tiešām ekonomiski pamatots, tad es... Es vēlētos cerēt, ka tiešām jūsu doma bija rūpēties par latviešu ģimenēm. Taču jums vajadzētu zināt, ka ir tāda Lafēra līkne - likumsakarība, kuru pētot, jūs varat saprast, ko jūs ar savu priekšlikumu panāksiet. Tā būtība ir tāda, ka, palielinot kaut kādu nodokļu nastu, jūsu ienākumi līdz kaut kādam brīdim... pieauguma stabiņi sāk samazināties. Un tas ir tieši tas, kas pašlaik ir noticis ar šo programmu. Tā līkne ir pārsniegusi maksimuma punktu un iet uz leju, un katra papildu slodze nevis palielinās, bet samazinās ienākumus šinī programmā. Ar šīm savām iniciatīvām jūs - tieši otrādi! - graujat, jūs darāt pretēji visam tam, ko jūs stāstāt. Jūs panākat tieši to, ko jūs jau esat panākuši: mājokļa programmai naudas vairs nav, jo tā tika finansēta no šīs uzturēšanās atļauju programmas. Un, pateicoties jūsu iniciatīvām, tagad Latvijas ģimenēm pašām būs jāmaksā par šo programmu. Un jūs gribat to turpināt! Man tomēr ir pamatotas aizdomas, ka jūs to darāt nevis to interešu dēļ, kuras jūs tagad cēli piesaucat, bet gan savu sponsoru - maksātnespējas administratoru - interesēs, lai būtu viņiem vairāk, lai šeit būtu vairāk maksātnespējīgu cilvēku, kuri nevarētu nopirkt šo īpašumu par dārgu naudu, bet to varētu kāds pa lēto pārņemt, lai pēc tam ar to varētu spekulēt. Diemžēl tā sanāk. Vai arī jūs esat labticīgi maldījušies? Ja esat maldījušies, mierīgi padomājiet par to, atzīstiet savas kļūdas un tiešām izdariet kaut ko jēdzīgu priekš Latvijas tautas. Paldies.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 speaker Ivars_Zarins-1969.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 translatedText "In the interests of insolvency administrators, in order for them to have more work and it would not be any investor who could save it Jo, you see if your (DEP R Kohl:' but what does?') would be really economically sound, I would like to seeto expect that really your idea was to care for the families of Tajs you should know that a graph - a graph - is a graph, which you can understand what you'll achieve with your proposal, the gist of that is that by stepping up anything you needa tax burden, your earnings up to any point in the rise of the stabsle that is starting to decline And that's exactly what has happened now with this program of the trajectory that has exceeded peak points and runs down and eachthe extra load does not increase but will reduce the income in this programme to these initiatives - on the contrary! - you are doing the opposite of what you have already achieved: the housing programme for money. Not any more because it was funded from this residence permit program And thanks to your initiatives, now UK families will pay for this programme and you want to continue it! I still have a reasonable suspicion you are doing it insteadbecause of the interests that you call now, it is in the interests of your sponsors - the insolvency administrators - to have more of an insolvent people here who could not buy this property for expensive money, but couldtake over the cheap to speculate afterwards, so might you speculate that it is coming as Are you are wrong? If you have been misled, just think about it, acknowledge your mistakes and really do something for the Latvian people.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 mentions Q20562562.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq75 mentions Q211.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 number "74".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 spokenText "Es aicinu debatēt par priekšlikumu.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq74 translatedText "I call for a debate on the proposal".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 number "73".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 spokenAs 92.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 spokenText "Es tieši par to arī runāju.".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 speaker Ivars_Zarins-1969.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq73 translatedText "I am talking about this too".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 number "72".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 spokenText "Par priekšlikumu, Zariņa kungs!".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq72 translatedText "On the proposal, Mr Zarresses!".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 type Speech.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 number "71".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 date "2016-06-09".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 isPartOf 2016_06_09_370.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 spokenAs 92.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 spokenText "(Starpsauciens.) Divās minūtēs anekdote nesanāks, tāpēc es runāšu par svarīgāko. Es labticīgi mēģināšu noticēt, ka Nacionālā apvienība vienkārši nesaprot, ko viņi dara, un ka viņi ir apmaldījušies labos nodomos, un ka tas netiek darīts viņu sponsoru interesēs... (Starpsauciens: “Par priekšlikumu!”; dep. J.Dombravas, dep. A.Kiršteina starpsaucieni.)".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 language "lv".
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 speaker Ivars_Zarins-1969.
- 2016_06_09_370-seq71 translatedText "(interjection) Two minutes of the hat will come, so I'm going to be the most important I will try to believe in good faith that the National Alliance simply does not understand what they are doing and that they aregood intentions have been lost and that it is not in the interests of their sponsorship (interjection:' on the proposal!'; DEP J Dombravas, DEP A heckling)".