Matches in Saeima for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 translatedText "Thank you So there is the proposal for a bill on the Amendment to the State-funded Pensions Law Commission Does Members have reservations? The bill tabled in the " Amendment to the Private Pensions Act " to the Budget and Finance (Tax) Commission stating that it is responsible by the commission is that MPs are opposed to the draft law the Bureau has referred to the committee's Bureau proposing the bill's draft legislation " Amendment " billthe statutory " corporation tax " to be transferred to the Budget and Financial (Tax) Commission, with the committee responsible that it is responsible to the committee as a case of objections? MPs are not opposed to the draft law the Bureau has referred to the Cabinet Office's proposal on the Corruption Prevention and Corruption Bill. The Office of the Anti-Fraud Office referred to the Defense, Home Affairs and Anti-Corruption Commission, stating that it is responsible by the commission Does MPs have reservations? The objection is not due to a draft law the Bureau has referred to the Cabinet Office proposing " Amendment to the buffer zone, "the Environmental and Regional Policy Commission, when determining that it is the responsible Commission, has reservations? The committee responsible for the House of Auditors, as the committee responsible, will vote in favour of the referral to the Committee on Legal Affairs on the referral of the bill to the committee responsible, stating that it is the responsible Commission, please voting the result! On - 66, V17 abstentions: no bill So: the draft bill has been referred to the Bureau by the Bureau of the Council, proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for Tobacco Products, the electronic smoking devices and their fluid law' transfer to the Social and Employment Commission stating thatthe committee responsible for the committee Does MPs have reservations? Members are not in a legislative proposal referred to by the Bureau of the Saeima committee, proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal be submitted to the law " For the police " to be transferred to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission, stating that it is responsiblethe Commission Does Members have reservations? There is no legislative proposal the commission has referred to the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose to the Cabinet Office's submission of the bill " Amendment in the custody of the Defence, Home and Anti-Corruption Commission, " in which it is responsible by the commission DoesMPs have reservations over the fact that MPs' objections to the draft law Commission has referred to the Bureau of Saeima's proposed bill's " Amendment to the Sodu Enforcement Code " to be transferred to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission, with the commission being responsible by the Commission / Was MPs. There are caveats? Members are not in a legislative proposal the commission has referred to the Bureau of the Cabinet to propose to the Cabinet Office's Bill of the holding of detained persons to surrender to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission, stating that it is a responsible commission for Was MPsthere are caveats? There is no anti-objection commission the commission has referred to the Bureau of Saeima's proposed " Amendment to the Education Bill " to transfer to the Education, Culture and Science Commission stating that it is the committee responsible for objections to the draft law? The Commission's Bureau is proposing to the House of Deputies, Liepus, Vilnius, Šica, Bees and Cleinberg's Bill and Cleinberg to transfer to the Human Rights and Public Affairs Commission, stating that it is the responsible Commission to speak to the Commission.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 mentions Q796010.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 mentions Q6031730.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 mentions Q211.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq7 mentions Q1021632.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 number "6".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 spokenText "Godātie kolēģi! Sakarā ar to, ka šis likumprojekts ir saistīts vienotā paketē ar iepriekšējiem un vēl nākamo likumprojektu, es aicinu mainīt atbildīgo komisiju un nodot šo likumprojektu tikai Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai kā atbildīgajai. Paldies.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 speaker Karlis_Sadurskis-1959.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq6 translatedText "Ladies and gentlemen, with regard to the fact that this bill is linked to a single package with the previous and future legislation, I call on the committee responsible to be changed to pass on the bill only to the Committee on Budgets and the Financial (Taxation) committee as the committee responsible".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 number "5".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 spokenText "Paldies. Tātad viens deputāts ir runājis “pret”, otrs - “par”. Mums ir jābalso. Lūdzu zvanu! Balsosim par likumprojekta “Grozījumi likumā “Republikas pilsētas domes un novada domes vēlēšanu likums”” nodošanu Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija! Lūdzu balsošanas režīmu! Lūdzu rezultātu! Par - 46, pret - 35, atturas - 1. Likumprojekts komisijai nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Finanšu instrumentu tirgus likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisijai. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Ieguldījumu pārvaldes sabiedrību likumā” nodot Budžeta un finanšu (nodokļu) komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi Civilām vajadzībām paredzētu sprāgstvielu aprites likumā” nodot Aizsardzības, iekšlietu un korupcijas novēršanas komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi? Iebildumu nav. Likumprojekts komisijai nodots. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina Ministru kabineta iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījums Valsts fondēto pensiju likumā” nodot Sociālo un darba lietu komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. Ieslēdziet, lūdzu, mikrofonu deputātam Šadurskim!".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 translatedText "Thanks to So one MEP, I have to vote' yes' to Mr We vote in favour. We will vote in favour of the bill in the Law of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the State of Administration and Local Government, stating that it isthe responsible committee, please, the voting regime, please see the result! - 46, against - 35, the Commission's draft law has been passed to the Saeima Bureau proposing that the Committee on Financial Instruments should refer to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee, withthe fact that it is the committee responsible is that there is no objection to the Commission proposal, there is no legal draft committee referred to the Bureau of Saeima to propose to the Cabinet Office's proposal the " Amendment to the Trust Regulatory Companies Act " to the Budget and Financial (Taxation) committee, which is the committee responsibledo MPs have reservations? There is no legal draft law the commission referred to the Bureau of the House proposing that the Cabinet Office's proposal for " Amendment to Civil Use of Explosives " be transferred to the Defence, Home and Corruption Prevention Commission, with the committee responsible for Doesthere are objections to MPs? There is no draft Law Commission referred to the Bureau of Commons proposing that the Cabinet Office's submitted bill " Amendment to the State Government Occupational Pensions Act " to transfer to the Social and Employment Commission, with a request from the panel of the minister, please, microphone MEP!".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq5 mentions Q3154693.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 number "4".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 spokenAs 101.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 spokenText "Ļoti cienījamā priekšsēdētāja! Kolēģi! Labrīt! Vispirms gribu apsveikt visus jaunajā gadā. Novēlu to labiem darbiem bagātu! Demokrātija ir lieta, kas nevar pastāvēt bez aktīvas sabiedrības līdzdalības. Ja mēs skatāmies uz mūsu pašvaldību vēlēšanu dinamiku, tad redzam, ka pēdējos gados tā ir izteikti lejupejoša: 2001.gadā pašvaldību vēlēšanās piedalījās 62 procenti vēlētāju, turpretim 2013.gadā - vairs tikai 46 procenti. Un, pēc dažādu ekspertu viedokļa, brīdī, kad vēlētāju aktivitāte ir nokritusies zem 50 procentiem, ir jāzvana trauksmes zvans, jo, loģiski, rodas jautājums par ievēlētās varas leģitimitāti. Kāpēc tā notiek? Kāpēc krītas vēlētāju aktivitāte? Tam ir vairāki iemesli. Šobrīd vispār Eiropā ir vērojama tāda kā vēlētāju apātija, bet ir vērojams arī vesels bloks tādu lietu, kuras likumdevējs var ietekmēt, proti, atvieglot vēlētāja nokļūšanu uz vēlēšanu iecirkni. Kā rāda socioloģiskās aptaujas Latvijā, tie cilvēki, kas nepiedalās vēlēšanās, kā galveno iemeslu ir norādījuši to, ka viņu deklarētā dzīvesvieta un faktiskā dzīvesvieta atšķiras, proti, viņi vienkārši vēlēšanu dienā atrodas tālu no sava iecirkņa un vienkārši tāpēc neaiziet nobalsot. Kāpēc viņi nevarētu pārdeklarēties? Tāpēc, ka - atšķirībā no sākotnējā principa, ka deklarētā dzīvesvieta ir vienkārši punkts, kurā valsts var sastapt savu iedzīvotāju - šī situācija ir apaugusi ar dažnedažādām lietām, tādām kā tā dēvētās skolu rindas, bērnudārzu rindas; tāpat arī komunālos maksājumus aprēķina pēc deklarēto personu skaita. Un pat tāda lieta kā OCTA apdrošināšana... (Sēdes vadītāja noklaudzina ar āmuru.) Piemēram, rīdziniekiem OCTA apdrošināšana ir dārgāka, jo Rīgā ir intensīvāka satiksme un tātad lielāka iespēja iekļūt ceļu satiksmes negadījumā. Un visbeidzot jāuzsver arī tāda lieta, ka, izīrējot dzīvokli, īpašnieks bieži vien pat ieraksta īres līgumā, ka īrnieki nedrīkst tur deklarēties. Un tātad tā visa rezultātā ir cilvēki, kuri zūd mūsu demokrātijai. Tāpat ir vēl viena ļoti īpatnēja lieta, kuru pamanīju, pētot šo jautājumu, un Latvija ir vienīgā valsts, kurā man izdevās atrast šādu īpatnību. Proti, kandidēt pašvaldību vēlēšanās var trīs personu grupas: tie, kas ir deklarējušies, tie, kam ir īpašums, un tie, kas strādā konkrētā pašvaldībā. Bet balsot drīkst tikai divas kategorijas: tie, kas ir deklarējušies, vai tie, kam ir īpašums. Proti, tiesības balsot ir šaurākas nekā tiesības kandidēt, kas no vispārpieņemtās prakses skatpunkta tā nekur nenotiek. Kā piemērs - Saeimas vēlēšanas. Kandidēt var no 21 gada vecuma, bet balsot var jau no 18 gadu vecuma. Mums visiem zināmā Tatjana Ždanokas kundze drīkst balsot Saeimas vēlēšanās, bet kandidēt nedrīkst. Tātad šīs tiesības - tiesības kandidēt - ir šaurākas nekā tiesības balsot. Likumprojekts paredz novienādot šīs tiesības, proti, lai pašvaldību vēlēšanās var piedalīties arī cilvēki, kas šajā pašvaldībā strādā. Protams, tas neuzdzīs debesīs aktivitātes rādītājus, bet, nu, varbūt tas vismaz palīdzēs apturēt šo kritumu. Un, ja mēs palūkojamies uz citās valstīs pieņemto praksi, tad, piemēram, Polija pirms diviem gadiem veica tieši šādus grozījumus. Viņi pat gāja vēl tālāk: Polijā pašvaldību vēlēšanās var piedalīties jebkura persona, kurai ir kaut kāda sasaiste ar konkrēto pašvaldību. Kaut vai var aiznest īres rēķinu un pierādīt, ka tev ir šī sasaiste, vai, piemēram, tu mācies vai arī strādā. Bet vispār šobrīd kopēja tendence Eiropā ir atvieglot, noņemt dažnedažādus šķēršļus balsošanai. Tas, ko minēja Agešina kungs par nodokļu maksāšanu. Tad jau jūs savā ziņā piedāvājat atgriezties viduslaikos, kad, piemēram, Venēcijā varēja balsot tikai tirgotāji, baņķieri vai bagāto zemju īpašnieki. Pēc jūsu loģikas sanāk, ka arī pensionāriem vai bezdarbniekiem vajadzētu atņemt balsstiesības. Tāpat jūs minējāt par balsošanu dažādās vietās. Tīri tehniski šobrīd arī var balsot, ja tev pieder īpašums. Ja tev pieder īpašums visā Latvijā, tad kā šobrīd nodrošina...? Kaut kā jau šobrīd nodrošina to, ka tu nenobalso visās pašvaldībās. Tādēļ aicinu kolēģus atbalstīt likumprojektu. Tā izstrādes gaitā ir identificējušās vēl vairākas lietas, kuras mani kolēģi norādīja, tāpēc varētu izmantot šo likumprojektu par platformu, lai arī par tām diskutētu. Paldies.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 speaker Vilnis_Kirsis-1980.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 translatedText "Very dear Chair, colleague, good morning, first of all I would like to congratulate everyone in the new year, I wish to congratulate you on a thing that cannot exist without active public participation If we look at the dynamics of our local elections, see that in recent yearsit is distinctly top-down: in 2001, local voters participated in 62 per cent of voters, compared to just 46 per cent in 2013, according to a diverse range of experts, at a time when turnout has fallen below 50 per cent, a wake-up call ,the logical question arises as to the legitimacy of an elected power in Why this is happening?, why is falling turnout? There are a number of reasons that Little general in Europe is experiencing such apathy, but there has also been a whole block of things that the legislator can influence ,notably, to make it easier for a voter to get into the polling station As shown in the Sociological survey in Latvia, those who are not participating in the elections have indicated, as the main reason, that their declared residence and actual residence varies, meaning they are simply on an election dayfrom my station and simply therefore not to vote Why? Because - unlike the original principle - that the declared place of residence is simply a point in which the country can see its own population - this situation is sedentarycases such as the so-called school lines, nursery lines; and utility bills are calculated in the same way as the declared person and OCTA (the sitting driver noissed with a hammer), OCTA insurance ismore expensive, as there is more traffic in the capital and so more likely to get into a road traffic accident, one should also stress the kind of thing that, while renting a flat, the owner often even transcripts the lease that the tenants may not declare there? As a result of this, there are those who vanish in our democracy just another very peculiar thing to have noticed when researching the issue, and Latvia is the only country in which I managed to find the following three persons to stand in local electionsgroups: those who have been declared, those with property, and those who work in a particular municipality, But the vote may be limited to two categories: those who have declared property Proti, the right to vote is narrower than the right to vote is narrowerwhat does not happen from the generally accepted practice as an example: lawmakers may vote from the age of 21 from the age of 21, but the vote may be from the age of 18 for all of us, and all of the various Members of the European Parliament may vote on the subject. This right - the right to stand as a candidate - is a narrow right - the right to vote in the legislative project is to reconcile this right, namely that people who work in the municipality of this municipality can also participate in the sky; it will not cook in the performance of the sky, but not in the sky. Well, perhaps this will at least help to stop this fall and, if we look at practices adopted in other countries, Poland, for example, just went even further: Poland has even gone even further: in Poland, any local authority may participate. A person who has some sort of connection with a particular local while or else can bring the rent to the bill and prove you have this link or, for example, you learn or work But at all at the moment, a common trend in Europe is easing, removedthe myriad of obstacles to voting In What Mr Agashina referred to in charge of paying taxes, Then, you are in some ways offering to come back to the Middle Ages, when, for example, in Venice, it was only traders, bankers or rich landlords after your logic meet that they are also pensionersshould the right to the unemployed be taken away from the right to vote, it is also technically possible for you to vote when you have owned property in the whole of Latvia, as you already have the property right across the UK? At the moment, you are now ensuring that you do not vote in all communities to urge colleagues to support the bill in the course of the development of a bill that my colleagues have identified, so that this bill on the platform could be used to discuss them too.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q211.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q2660080.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q193089.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q36.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq4 mentions Q641.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 number "3".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 spokenText "“Par” pieteicies runāt deputāts Vilnis Ķirsis.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 translatedText "The Crown applicant to speak for Mr Wilder in Cologne".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 mentions Q661684.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq3 mentions Q13460949.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 number "2".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 spokenAs 92.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 spokenText "Labrīt, godātie kolēģi! Vietējā pašvaldība nepārprotami ir noteiktā teritorijā dzīvojošu pilsoņu vietējā vara, kas darbojas šajā teritorijā un strādā vietējo iedzīvotāju interesēs. Vietējā pašvaldība ir uzskatāma par demokrātiskas iekārtas pamatu. Tā ir vara, kuru savu interešu labā ievēlē vietējo iedzīvotāju kopums. Republikas pilsētas domes un novada domes vēlēšanu likums spēkā esošajā redakcijā nodrošina iespēju vēlēt attiecīgo domi tiem vēlētājiem, kuri ir saistīti ar attiecīgo pašvaldību, deklarējuši tajā savu dzīvesvietu vai kuriem tās teritorijā pieder nekustamais īpašums. Tātad šie vēlētāji maksā pašvaldībai gan iedzīvotāju ienākuma nodokli, gan nekustamā īpašuma nodokli, tādējādi piedaloties pašvaldības budžeta veidošanā un dodot iespēju pašvaldībai attīstīties. Tieši šiem vēlētājiem ir tiesības izvēlēties, kurš saimniekos pašvaldībā un izmantos viņu maksātos nodokļus. Piešķirot tiesības vēlēt domi cilvēkiem, kuri attiecīgās pašvaldības teritorijā nostrādājuši vismaz pēdējos četrus mēnešus, kā to vēlas likumprojekta autori, minētais princips tiktu sagrauts, jo domi vēlētu iedzīvotāji, kuri nepiedalās pašvaldības budžeta veidošanā. Vienlaikus jāatzīmē, ka likumprojekts neparedz risinājumu, kā nepieļaut, lai šādi vēlētāji nenobalsotu divas reizes, jo vēlēšanas tiek organizētas, balstoties uz vēlētāju reģistru, kas veidots atbilstoši vēlētāju deklarētajai dzīvesvietai. Aicinu balsot “pret” šo revolucionāro pagriezienu. Paldies.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 speaker Valerijs_Agesins-1972.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, the local authority of a local authority living on the territory and work in the local community for the benefit of the local people is clearly a democratic machine based on powerthe local population in the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic of the Republic, and the state Duma election law, provides for the possibility of voting in the relevant domain for those voters affiliated with the local authority, declared their place of residence or whothe territory belongs to the property So these voters are paying local authority both personal income tax and property taxes, thus contributing to the local government's shaping of the Budget and giving the local authority the opportunity to evolve to the right of these voters to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to choose from who are in the municipality to chooseand will use their tax pay to grant the right to vote in the City of the City of people who have been working in the territory of the concerned authorities at least over the past four months, as the authors of the bill want, and the principle of elected residents who do not participate in local authorities' budgetsit should be noted in advance that the bill does not provide a solution to prevent such voters from voting twice since elections are organised on the basis of a voter register declared in accordance with the electorates declared' No' to this revolutionary U-turn on Thank you".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq2 mentions Q3154693.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 type Speech.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 number "1".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 date "2016-01-14".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 isPartOf 2016_01_14_338.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 spokenAs 118.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 spokenText "Labrīt, godātie kolēģi! Aicinu ieņemt vietas Sēžu zālē. Sāksim Saeimas 14.janvāra sēdi. Pirms uzsākam izskatīt sēdes darba kārtību, ir izskatāmi priekšlikumi par grozījumiem tajā. Izglītības, kultūras un zinātnes komisija lūdz grozīt sēdes darba kārtību un tajā iekļaut lēmuma projektu “Par priekšlikumu iesniegšanas termiņa pagarināšanu likumprojekta “Nemateriālā kultūras mantojuma likums” (Nr.332/Lp12) otrajam lasījumam līdz 2016.gada 29.februārim”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret šo darba kārtības grozījumu? Iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Juridiskā komisija lūdz grozīt sēdes darba kārtību un tajā iekļaut lēmuma projektu “Par Vladislava Čerapa atbrīvošanu no Jēkabpils rajona tiesas tiesneša amata”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret šo darba kārtības grozījumu? Iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Deputāti Liepiņš, Viļums, Ruks, Šics, Bite un Kleinberga lūdz grozīt sēdes darba kārtību un tajā iekļaut likumprojektu “Grozījumi Patvēruma likumā”. Vai deputātiem ir iebildumi pret šo darba kārtības grozījumu? Iebildumu nav. Darba kārtība ir grozīta. Nākamā darba kārtības sadaļa - “Prezidija ziņojumi par iesniegtajiem likumprojektiem”. Saeimas Prezidijs ierosina deputātu Ķirša, Jansona, Viļuma, Šulca, Šadurska, Adamoviča, Čigānes, Kaimiņa, Boķa un Kūtra iesniegto likumprojektu “Grozījumi likumā “Republikas pilsētas domes un novada domes vēlēšanu likums”” nodot Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisijai, nosakot, ka tā ir atbildīgā komisija. “Pret” pieteicies runāt deputāts Valērijs Agešins.".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 language "lv".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 translatedText "Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, let us take the floor in the chamber in the House, before the opening of the agenda for the sitting, proposals for amending the sitting of the Education, Culture and Science Commission are pending. To include the draft Decision on extending the deadline for tabling proposals for the second reading of the bill " Intangible Cultural Heritage " (No 332 / Lp12) for the second reading until 29 February 2016 Does Members have any objections to this amendment to the agenda? No objection to the agenda has been amended by the Legal Affairs Committee asking for an amendment to the agenda of the agenda and include a draft decision on the release of Vladislava Čerapa from the judge of the District Court of JedkabCastle, " Does Members have any objection to thisthe agenda for an amendment to the agenda is not an agenda modified by Members Liepins, Vilnius, Ruks, Schics, Bite, and seeks to amend the agenda of the sitting, the " Amendment to the Asylum Law Does Members have reservations "against this agenda amendment, there is no agenda for changes to the agenda: " the Bureau's reports on the draft laws were amended by the Bureau of MPs, Janson, Vilnius, Adamović, Chiganic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Kathanic, Ka@@the Bok and peat Bill tabled the bill in the Law of the Republic of the Republic of the town council and the county council election law " to pass on to the Public Administration and Local Government Commission, " stating that it is responsible by the commission of " Pret " to speak out for Valery Ageshins".
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 mentions Q822919.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 mentions Q796010.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 mentions Q3736505.
- 2016_01_14_338-seq1 mentions Q3154693.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 type Speech.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 number "938".
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 date "2015-12-17".
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 isPartOf 2015_12_17_337.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 spokenAs 118.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 spokenText " Paldies deputātei Ingai Bitei. Līdz ar to šodien “Frakciju viedokļi” ir izskanējuši. Paldies, ka klausījāties. Lai jums jauka pēcpusdiena un svētku laiks! Uz sadzirdēšanos nākamgad! ".
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 language "lv".
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 speaker Inara_Murniece-1970.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 translatedText "Thank you to the Member for the Ingai Grand Prix today,' The views of the factions' have been raised to thank you for your lovely afternoon and holiday time! For a hearing next year!".
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 mentions Q796010.
- 2015_12_17_337-seq938 mentions Q6031730.
- 2015_12_17_337 type SessionDay.
- 2015_12_17_337 date "2015-12-17".
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq938.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq937.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq936.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq935.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq934.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq933.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq932.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq931.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq930.
- 2015_12_17_337 hasPart 2015_12_17_337-seq929.